Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T19:33:58.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: learning from experiences of participatory biodiversity assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Anna Lawrence
Edited by
Anna Lawrence
Anna Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A few years ago, curious to find out how individuals can bring about change in environmental policy, I arranged to meet volunteers who collect data about species distributions. My first interview was with a lively, successful group of volunteers in the south of England, who had developed a new approach for monitoring hedgerows. Ancient hedgerows are important for conservation in Britain, helping to maintain diversity of habitat, and connect up patches of otherwise isolated woodland. As a result of systematic surveys, some of them by volunteers, the British Government had changed the law and introduced incentives for farmers to replant them (in 1992), and regulations to protect them (in 1994).

Certainly the volunteers were enthusiastic about their successes and policy impact. But what they mostly wanted to talk about was the beauty of hedgerows, the pleasure they found in observing the variety in a line of trees, and the feeling that without the excuse of collecting data, they were being a little self-indulgent by spending time in nature. As one said, ‘It's nice, but as long as you do it with a purpose in mind and at the end of it you feel you've done something really quite good’.

Thousands of miles away, other people were collecting data about species, but these data had a more immediate effect on their lives. They were villagers in Karnataka, in southern India, who shared management of their forests with the state Forest Department.

Type
Chapter
Information
Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
 , pp. 1 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agarwal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26, 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badola, R. and Hussain, S. A. (2005). Valuing ecosystem functions: An empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. S. and Bowker, G. C. (2007). Information ecology: Open system environment for data, memories, and knowing. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 29, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Green, R. E. and Mace, G. M. (2005). The 2010 challenge: Data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10, 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, J., Aplet, G., Hartzell, C.et al. (2001). Community-based ecosystem monitoring. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 12, 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollig, M. and Schulte, A. (1999). Environmental change and pastoral perceptions: degradation and indigenous knowledge in two African pastoral communities. Human Ecology 27, 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, S. A. and Yan, N. D. (2004). Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based surveillance program for an aquatic invader bythotrephes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 91, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boylen, C.-W., Howe, E.-A., Bartkowski, J.-S. and Eichler, L.-W. (2004). Augmentation of a long-term monitoring program for Lake George, NY by citizen volunteers. Lake and Reservoir Management 20, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, A., Spyreas, G., Flores, B. Molano, Carroll, C. and Ellis, J. (2003). Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys?Natural Areas Journal 23, 254–262.Google Scholar
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. and Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education 27, 1099–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. (1998). The political ecology of biodiversity, conservation and development in Nepal's Terai: confused meanings, means and ends. Ecological Economics 24, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Magurran, A. E., Green, R. E. and Fewster, R. M. (2005). Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, J., Clark, J. and Harrison, C. M. (2000). Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics 35, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,CBD (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at http://www.biodiv.org/convention/.
Conrad, C. (2006). Towards meaningful community-based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: where are we versus where we would like to be. Environments 34, 25–36.Google Scholar
Conrad, C. T. and Daoust, T. (2008). Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environmental Management 41, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contandriopoulos, D. (2004). A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science and Medicine 58, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Convention on Biological Diversity (2005). Guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive Environmental 1 Impact Assessment (EIA) available at http://www.cbd.int/doc/reviews/impact/EIA-guidelines.pdf.
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (2005). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2507–2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Jensen, A. E., Alviola, P. A.et al. (2005). Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2633–2652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Mendoza, M. M., Tagtag, A.et al. (2007). Increasing conservation management action by involving local poeple in natural resource monitoring. Ambio 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. R. (2001). Hidden or hiding? Public perceptions of participation in the planning system. Town Planning Review 72, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,DETR (2000). Public Participation in Making Local Environmental Decisions: The Aarhus Convention Newcastle Workshop. Good Practice Handbook. London, UK: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1998). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrella, M., Blauert, J., Campilan, D.et al. (editors) (2000). Learning from Change: Issues and Experiences in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. Participation in Development. Intermediate Technology.CrossRef
Failing, L. and Gregory, R. (2003). Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faith, D. P. (2005). Global biodiversity assessment: integrating global and local values and human dimensions. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. and Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation 136, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. (2006). Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment. The cultural politics of discursive space. American Review of Public Administration 36, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, C. A. and Lescuyer, G. (2008). Monitoring, indicators and community based forest management in the tropics: pretexts or red herrings?Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 1303–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. (1996). Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. (1998). ‘Hired hands’ or ‘local voice’: understandings and experience of local participation in conservation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, L., Koppen, K., Groot, R. S. and Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkin, M. (2007). Mark of respect. Nature 448, 402–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphries, C. J., Williams, P. H. and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1995). Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 26, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, I. (2001). Toward participatory environmental management?Journal of Environmental Management 63, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karney, R. C. (2000). Poor water quality? Not in my backyard! The effectiveness of neighborhood pond associations in the protection and improvement of shellfish growing waters on Martha's Vineyard. Journal of Shellfish Research 19, 465–466.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2006). “No Personal Motive?” Volunteers, Biodiversity and the False Dichotomies of Participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2009). The first cuckoo in winter: phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Global Environmental Change 19, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A., Ambrose-Oji, B., Lysinge, R. and Tako, C. (2000). Exploring local values for forest biodiversity on Mount Cameroon. Mountain Research & Development 20, 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A. and Hawthorne, W. (2006). Plant Identification: User-friendly Field Guides for Biodiversity Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A., Paudel, K., Barnes, R. and Malla, Y. (2006). Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry. Environmental Conservation 33, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazdinis, M., Angelstam, P. and Lazdinis, I. (2007). Maintenance of forest biodiversity in a post-soviet governance model: Perceptions by local actors in Lithuania. Environmental Management 40, 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M. and Mearns, R. (editors) (1996). The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. Oxford: James Currey.
Maass, J. M., Balvanera, P., Castillo, A.et al. (2005). Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: Insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, G. M. and Baillie, J. E. M. (2007). The 2010 biodiversity indicators: Challenges for science and policy. Conservation Biology 21, 1406–1413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, P. (2006). Biodiversity – the appreciation of different thought styles and values helps to clarify the term. Restoration Ecology 14, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, R. E. (2005). Using citizen science in urban bird studies. Urban Habitats 3, 70–86 [online].Google Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2008). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: guide to the Millennium Assessment reports, accessed 2008 available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx.
Moffat, A. J.Davies, S. and Finer, L. (2008). Reporting the results of forest monitoring – an evaluation of the European forest monitoring programme. Forestry 81, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. (2006). Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: an analysis of UK agri-environment schemes. Geoforum 37, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Natural History Museum (2001). Biodiversity and worldmap: measuring biodiversity value. Accessed 2001: Natural History Museum available at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/projects/worldmap/diversity/index.html.
Newman, C., Buesching, C. D. and Macdonald, D. W. (2003). Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation – “Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?”Biological Conservation 113, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, A., Cuellar, E. and Cuellar, R. (2003). Hunter self-monitoring as a basis for biological research: data from the Bolivian Chaco. Mastozoologia Neotropical/Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 10, 49–67.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. R. (2006). De-centering environmental governance: a short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada. Policy Sciences 39, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, D. L. and Adelson, G. (1997). Biodiversity: Exploring Values and Priorities in Conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilz, D., Ballard, H. L. and Jones, E. T. (2006). Broadening Participation in Biological Monitoring: Handbook for Scientists and Managers available at http://www.ifcae.org/projects/ncssf3/IFCAE-ParticipatoryMonitoringGuidelines-2005.pdf.
Plummer, R. and Fitzgibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management 33, 876–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, R. M. and Whitelaw, G. S. (2005). Community-based monitoring in support of local sustainability. Local Environment 10, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, K. and Rees, G. (2000). Coastwatch UK: a public participation survey. Journal of Coastal Conservation 6(1), 61–66.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. (1979). Ecology, Meaning & Religion. North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Reitbergen-McCracken, J. and Narayan, D. (1997). A Resource Kit for Participation and Social Assessment. Washington DC:The World Bank.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. P. and Hull, R. B. (2003). Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environmental Science & Policy 6, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Royal Society (2003). Measuring biodiversity for conservation available at http://www.royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=6712.
Saris, F., Groot, H., Hagemeijer, W. and Van, D. A. (1996). Monitoring the Dutch agricultural bird community (a choice between a data-death because of the fear of inadequate data and a practical monitoring programme). Ekologia Bratislava 15, 87–96.Google Scholar
Scoones, I. (1999). New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement?Annual Review of Anthropology 28, 479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, A. and Conrad, C. (2006). Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113, 395–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheil, D. and Lawrence, A. (2004). Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 634–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slootwega, R. and Kolhoff, A. (2003). A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takacs, D. (1996). The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tangwa, G. B. (1999). Globalisation or westernisation? Ethical concerns in the whole big-business. Bioethics 13, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibault, M. and Blaney, S. (2001). Sustainable human resources in a protected area in southwestern Gabon. Conservation Biology 15, 591–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouvalis, J., Seymour, S. and Watkins, C. (2000). Exploring knowledge-cultures: precision farming, yield mapping, and the expert-farmer interface. Environment and Planning A 32, 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, P. J. (2000). Traditional ecological knoweldge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaarsveld, A. S., Biggs, R., Scholes, R. J.et al. (2005). Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeulen, S. and Koziell, I. (2002). Integrating Global and Local Values: a Review of Biodiversity Assessment. London: IIED.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. A. (2005). Participatory monitoring of changes in coastal and marine biodiversity. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 34, 136–146.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, E., Anderson, J. and Edmunds, D. (2001). Pluralism and the less powerful: accommodating multiple interests in local forest management. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 1, 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D. and Boutlinier, T. (2001). Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 446–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×