Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T17:42:09.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Forest inventory in Nepal – technical power or social empowerment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Jane Hull ,
Hemant Ojha  and
Krishna Prasad Paudel
Edited by
Anna Lawrence
Anna Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Community forestry in Nepal has long been considered a leading model of participatory forest management, whereby the state hands over national forest to be managed by local Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs). This development has been well documented (Hobley, 1996; Poffenberger, 2000; Ojha et al., 2006) with particularly keen attention to the social issues of organization, livelihoods impact and equity. However, the trend in Nepal follows a global tendency, as attention has shifted more recently to the technical details of forest management (Lawrence, 2007). Furthermore, as participatory approaches to natural resource management proliferate, initial enthusiasm has been tempered by the challenges of both scaling up participatory practice amongst the stakeholders who govern and use the resources (Sukwong, 1998) and developing the policy and institutional framework to support such approaches.

In this chapter we explore the negotiation of responses to both these shifts, through the process of developing and implementing the government-approved forest inventory guidelines for community forestry in Nepal (Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, 2000; Department of Forests, 2004). We focus on the process and how the results were experienced by different stakeholders – national and district staff from the Department of Forests, members of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) representing civil society, and CFUGs. We examine the knowledge, roles and involvement of these stakeholders in the development of the inventory guidelines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
 , pp. 165 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26(3), 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29(10), 1623–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amartya, D. B. (1999). Technical Aspects on Community Forestry Production Training Manual. Kathmandu, Nepal: Biodiversity Support Program, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Backstrand, K. (2004). Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: ecofeminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics 13(4), 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, S. and Smith, G. (1998). Beyond methodologies; coalition building for participatory technology development. World Development 6(2), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 168 pp.Google Scholar
Branney, P. and Yadav, K. P. (1998). Changes in Community Forest Condition and Management 1994–1998: Analysis of Information from the Forest Resource Assessment Study and Socio-economic Study in the Koshi Hills. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project (NUKCFP).Google Scholar
Branney, P., Malla, Y. B. and Neupane, H. R. (2000). Learning by doing: participatory research with forest user groups in Nepal. In Forestry, Forest Users And Research: New Ways Of Learning, ed. Lawrence, A.. Wageningen: ETFRN, 187 pp.Google Scholar
Britt, C. (2001). Mixed signals and government orders: the problem of on-again, off-again community forestry policy. Forest, Trees and People Newsletter 45, 29–33.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Malla, Y. M., Schreckenberg, K. and Springate-Baginski, O. (2002a). From supervising ‘subjects’ to supporting ‘citizens’: recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa. Natural Resources Perspectives Paper 75. London: Overseas Development Institute, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Shepherd, G., Schreckenberg, K. and Wells, A. (2002b). Forestry as an Entry Point for Governance Reform. Forestry Briefing Paper 1. London: Overseas Development Institute, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Bryden, J. (2002). Measuring Trees for Whom? The Role of Forest Inventory in Nepal's Community Forestry Programme. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Oxford, 102 pp.
Carter, J. (1996). Recent Approaches to Participatory Forest Resource Assessment. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 2. London: Overseas Development Institute, 322 pp.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In Participation – the New Tyranny?Cooke, B. and Kothari, U., eds. London: Zed Books, 207 pp.Google Scholar
,Community Forestry Division (CFD). (2006). Current Status of Community Forestry in Nepal, 50 pp. Available at: http://www.forestrynepal.org/current-status-of-community-forestry-in-nepal
Dhital, N., Paudel, K. and Ojha, H. (2003). Inventory related problems and opportunities in community forestry: findings of a survey. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 2(2), 62–66.Google Scholar
,Department of Forests (2004). Community Forest Resource Inventory Guidelines (in Nepali – English translation used). Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal, 63 pp.Google Scholar
Gautam, A. R., Shivakoti, G. P. and Webb, E. L. (2004). A review of forest policies, institutions, and changes in the resource condition in Nepal. International Forestry Review 6(2), 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobley, M. (1996). Participatory forestry: the process of change in India and Nepal. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3. London: Overseas Development Institute, 337 pp.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. and Chitraker, R. (1999). Literacy, Communication and Community Participation – Report of Baseline Study in 4 Forest User Group Areas, Dhankuta District, Nepal. Kathmandu: CLPN.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. and Ingles, A. (1998). Participatory Techniques for Community Forestry – A Field Manual. Australian Aid for International Development, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, WWF, 124 pp.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2002). Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity: a Summary of an Internet Discussion. Available at www.etfrn.org/etfrn/workshop/biodiversity/index.html
Lawrence, A. (2007). Beyond the second generation: towards adaptiveness in participatory forest management. CABI Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2(28), 1–15.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A., Paudel, K., Barnes, R. and Malla, Y. (2006). Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 33(4), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Livelihoods and Forestry Project (2004). Innovations for sustainable services – training local people in forestry techniques. Good Practice Papers, 24 pp. Livelihoods and Forestry Project, Kathmandu, Nepal. Available at http://www.lfp.org.np/publications.php?id=14
Mahapatra, R. (2001). Betrayed: Nepal's forest bureaucracy prepares for the funerals of the much hailed community forest management programme. Down to Earth 9, 20–24. Available at http://www.downtoearth.org.in/archive.asp?year=2001
Malla, Y. B. (2001). Changing policies and the persistence of patron–client relations in Nepal: stakeholders' responses to changes in forest policies. Environmental History 6(2), 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (2000). Guidelines for Inventory of Community Forests. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, 13 pp.Google Scholar
,Nepal Australia Community Resource Management Project (NACRMP). (2002). Module 5 Participatory Forest Resource Assessment and Analysis. In Training of Trainers Manual. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Australia Community Resource Management Project, 84 pp.Google Scholar
,Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project (2001). Participatory Inventory Guidelines for Non-Timber Forest Product. Kathmandu: SDC, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (2005). “The Experts Taught Us All We Know”: professionalism and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry. Antipode 37(3), 581–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, H. R (2002). A Critical Assessment of Scientific and Political Dimensions of the Issue of Community Forests Inventory in Nepal: A Policy Discussion Note. Kathmandu, Nepal: Forest Action, 6 pp. Available at http://www.forestaction.org/publications/6_Discussion%20Papers/6_6.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ojha, H. (2006). Techno-bureaucratic doxa and challenges for deliberative governance: the case of community forestry policy and practice in Nepal. Policy and Society 25(2), 151–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, H. R and Bhattarai, B. (2001). Understanding community perspectives of silvicultural practices in the middle hills of Nepal. Forest Trees and People Newsletter 44, 55–61.Google Scholar
Ojha, H., Timsina, N., Khanel, D. and Cameron, J. (2006) Deliberation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Forest Policy Making in Nepal. School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 21 pp. Available at http://www.forestaction.org/pdf/forestpo.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ojha, H., Paudel, K. P., Timsina, N. P. and Chhetri, R. B. (2007). Deliberative knowledge interface: lessons and policy implications. In Ohja, H. R., Timsina, N. P., Chhetri, R. B. and Paudel, K. P., eds, Knowledge Systems Interface in Natural Resource Governance – Case Studies from Nepal. Forest Action, Kathmandu, Nepal, 160 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paudel, K. P. and Kattel, B. (2006). Caught in the crossfire: forest-dependent poor people in Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 5(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
Paudel, K. P. and Ohja, H. (2007). Contested knowledge and reconciliation in Nepal's community forestry – a case of forest inventory policy. In Ohja, H. R., Timsina, N. P., Chhetri, R. B. and Paudel, K. P., eds., Knowledge Systems Interface in Natural Resource Governance – Case Studies from Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Forest Action, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Philip, M. S. (1994). Measuring Trees and Forests, 2nd edn. Wallingford: CAB International, 310 pp.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (2006). Which knowledge? Whose reality? An overview of knowledge used in the development sector. Development in Practice 16(6), 518–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poffenberger, M., ed. (2000). Communities and Forest Management in South Asia – A Regional Profile of the Working Group on Community Involvement in Forest Management. Switzerland: IUCN, 162 pp.
Pokharel, B. and Nurse, N. (2004). Forests and people's livelihood: benefiting the poor in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 4(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
Pokharel, B., Paudel, D., Branney, P., Khatri, D. B. and Nurse, N. (2006). Reconstructing the concept of forest based enterprise development in Nepal: towards a pro-poor approach. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 5(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
Rai, C. B., aus der Beek, R. and Dangal, S. P. (2000a). Simple Participatory Forest Inventory and Data Analysis. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Rai, C., aus der Beek, R. and Dangal, S. (2000b). Participatory Forest Resource Assessment – a Guideline for Forest Management Operational Plan. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal-Swiss Community Forestry Project.Google Scholar
Samoff, J. and Stromquist, N. P. (2001). Managing knowledge and storing wisdom? New forms of foreign aid?Development and Change, 32, 631–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheil, D. and Lawrence, A. (2004). Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, pp. 634–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrestha, K. and Amatya, D. (2000). Protection verses Active Management of Community Forests. Issue Paper 1 in Community Forestry in Nepal: Proceedings of the Workshop on Community based Forest Resource Management. Joint Technical Review Committee Kathmandu, Nepal, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Shrestha, N. K. (2001). The backlash – recent policy changes undermine user control of community forests in Nepal. Forest Trees and People Newsletter 44, 62–65.Google Scholar
Singh, V. P. (2000). Comment on Inventory Guidelines to Community Forest. Unpublished paper. Kathmandu, Nepal, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Stockdale, M. C. and Corbett, J. M. S. (1999). Participatory inventory – a field manual written with special reference to Indonesia. Oxford Forestry Institute Tropical Forestry Papers 38, 383 pp.Google Scholar
Sukwong, S. (1998). Foreword in Victor, M., Lang, C. and Bornmeier, J. Community Forestry at a Crossroads: Reflections and Future Directions in the Development of Community Forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand 17th–19th July 1997. RECOFTC Report No 16. Bangkok, Thailand, 324 pp.Google Scholar
Talbott, K and Khadka, S. (1994). Handing it over – an analysis of the legal and policy framework of community forestry. In Nepal WRI Cases in Development. Washington D.C.: World Resources Institute, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Timsina, N, Ohja, H. and Paudel, K. P. (2004). Deliberative Governance and Public Sphere: A reflection on Nepal's Community Forestry 1997–2004. Fourth National Workshop on Community Forestry. Kathmandu, Nepal: Department of Forestry, Nepal.Google Scholar
Tucker, G., Bubb, P., Heer, M.et al. (2005). Guidelines for Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring for Protected Areas. Kathmandu, Nepal: KMTNC, 132 pp. Available at http://www.unepwcmc.org/collaborations/BCBMAN/PDF/PA_Guidelines_BMA.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vickers, B. (2006). Community Forestry: An Opportunity for Participatory Biodiversity Monitoring, 10 pp. Available at http://www.recoftc.org/site/index.php?id=324

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×