Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:07:15.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2010

Höskuldur Thráinsson
Höskuldur Thráinsson
Affiliation:
University of Iceland, Reykjavik
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Syntax of Icelandic , pp. 505 - 529
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Åfarli, Tor A. 1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A., and Eide, Kristin M.. 2003. Norsk generativ syntaks. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Robin, Holmes, Philip and Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom. 1995. Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In Bresnan, Joan (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson
Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2001. Skandinavísk orðaröð í íslenskum aukasetningum. Íslenskt mál 23: 95–122.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.
Barnes, Michael P. 1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In Louis-Jensen, Jonna and Poulsen, Jóhan Hendrik W. (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 2001. Faroese Language Studies. Studia Nordica 5. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In Johansen, Anfinnur, Hansen, Zakaris Svabo, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon and Marnersdóttir, Malan (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Barss, Andrew, and Lasnik, Howard. 1986. A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 219–51.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.). 1997. Atomism and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn, see Sveinn Bergsveinsson.
Bernódusson, Helgi, see Helgi Bernódusson.
Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 536–61. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur, see Haraldur Bessason.
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania, pp. 47–131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam [First distributed in manuscript form in 1977.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir. 1990. North American Icelandic: The Linguistic and Social Context of Vowel Mergers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. [Available from University of Michigan Dissertation Services since 1995.]
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna. 1997. The Life Cycle of a Language. Canadian Ethnic Studies 29: 31–42.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarPubMed
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1994. What Does Adjacency Do? In Phillips, Colin and Harley, Heidi (eds.): The Morphology-Syntax Connection, pp. 1–32. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.2000. Adjacency and Autonomy: Holmberg's Generalization Revisited. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 10, pp. 51–59. Institute of Linguistics, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does not Drive Syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Subject Positions and the Role of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two Heads aren't always Better than One. Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. Quirky Agreement. Studia Linguistica 54: 354–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2001. PF Merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift. WPSS 68: 75–115.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the Locality of the Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Francke Verlag, Tübingen. [2nd revised edition 1999.]Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. A Note on Icelandic Coordination. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 355–65. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Burton, Strang, and Grimshaw, Jane. 1992. Coordination and VP-Internal Subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–13.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Revised edition published as Italian Syntax by Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.]
Burzio, Luigi. 1991. The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, Robert (ed.): Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417–54. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.): The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2003. On the Synchronic and Diachronic Status of the Negative Adverbial ikke/not. WPSS 72: 1–53.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj.2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1983. The Categorial Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In Papers from the 7th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 9–20. Department of Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch.1986. Norwegian ingen: A Case of Post-syntactic Lexicalization. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax: Papers from a Workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 21–35. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991a. AGR, Adjunction, and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991b. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i GB-teoretisk perspektiv. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 9: 21–49.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen. 1989. Expletive Chain Formation and Past Participle Agreement in Scandinavian Dialects. In Benincà, Paola (ed.): Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, pp. 53–83. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1995. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections. GLOW Newsletter 34: 14–15.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clausing, Stephen. 1986. English Influence on American German and American Icelandic. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.). 2001. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris, and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1990. Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2004. On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993a. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993b. On Attributive Adjectives in Scandinavian and Other Languages. Studia Linguistica 47: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1995. Prepositionsstrandning och kasus i äldre svenska. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 110: 141–78.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.1998. Possession in Germanic. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Wilder, Chris (eds.): Possessor, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, pp. 87–108. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2001. Stylistic Fronting: Evidence from Old Scandinavian. WPSS 68: 147–68.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003a. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 11–64. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003b. Preposition Stranding and Case. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 75–84. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Positions and the Nature of Chains. Move α to the Specifier of Functional Projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk grammatik. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul. 1964. Essentials of Danish Grammar. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1990. Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish. NLLT 8: 41–79.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly.1996. Semantic Variables and Object Shift. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 66–84. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic. NLLT 15: 369–427.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1993. The Syntax and Semantics of Object Shift. WPSS 51.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1995. Distributing Arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerland, Verner. 2003. Impersonal Pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. WPSS 71: 75–102.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán, see Stefán Einarsson.
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson. 1982a: Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1982b. We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 557–61. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 349–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1983. Sagnliðurinn í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 5: 7–28.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1984a. Rightward displacements of NPs in Icelandic. In Ringgaard, Kristian and Sørensen, Viggo (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 5, pp. 362–8. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984b. Icelandic Word Order and það-Insertion. WPSS 8.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984c. Af lýsingarorðsviðurlögum. Íslenskt mál 6: 57–80.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1986. Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 89–102. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1987a. Enda. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 10: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1987b. OV Order in Icelandic. In Allen, R. D. S. and Barnes, Michael (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Languages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 33–49. Department of Scandinavian, University College, London.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1990a. Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [The author's 1982 MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1990b. Null objects in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 367–79. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1991. Quirky Subjects in Old Icelandic. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 369–378. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1992. Nema. Íslenskt mál 14: 35–61.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1995. Old Icelandic: A Non-Configurational Language? NOWELE 26: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1996a. Word Order Variation in the VP in Old Icelandic. WPSS 58: 55–86.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur 1996b. Mikið er það sorglegt að refir skuli ekki geta klifrað í trjám. Höskollu gefið, pp. 14–16. A festschrift for Höskuldur Thráinsson. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1997. Frumlag og fall að fornu. Íslenskt mál 18: 37–69.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2000. Setningarstaða boðháttarsagna í fornu máli. Íslenskt mál 22: 63–90.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2002. Það í fornu máli og síðar. Íslenskt mál 24: 7–30.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.2005. Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 602–35. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic Word Order Once More. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 3–40. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kiss, É. Katalin. 2002a. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin.2002b. The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 107–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The Choice between bli-Passive and -s-Passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Ms., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.1991. Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax? In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 277–305. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.2001. Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors. In Megerdoomian, Karine and Bar-el, L. A. (eds.): West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20: 178–91. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, see Thórhallur Eythórsson.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Transformational Syntax in Dialectology: Scandinavian Word Order Varieties. In Fretheim, Torstein and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium, pp. 65–83. University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Mouton, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein and Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia. 1990. On Double Object Constructions. WPSS 46: 53–100.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia.1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and Object Case Checking. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 97–111. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (eds.): Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Some Problems for Case Grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 245–65. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann, and Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. On Stylistic Fronting: Germanic vs. Romance. WPSS 68: 117–45.Google Scholar
Fiva, Toril. 1987. Possessor Chains in Norwegian. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G., see Jón G. Friðjónsson.
Magnússon, Friðrik. 1984. Um innri gerð nafnliða í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 6: 81–111.Google Scholar
Friðrik Magnússon.1990. Kjarnafærsla og það-innskot í aukasetningum í íslensku. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík. [The author's 1989 Master's thesis.]
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic Can you be if you Speak Icelandic B? In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 115–22. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 1984. Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra.1991. Prepositions, Binding and θ-Marking. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 185–208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi, see Helgi Guðmundsson.
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2001. An Optimality Theory Analysis of Agreement in Icelandic DAT-NOM Constructions. WPSS 68: 15–47.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2003. On Stylistic Fronting Once More. WPSS 72: 153–205.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2004a. Stylistic Fronting. Studia Linguistica 58: 88–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.2004b. Oblique Subjects and Stylistic Fronting in the History of Scandinavian and English: The Role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus.
Gylfi Hafsteinsson. 1998. Um hömlur á röð íslenskra lýsingarorða – og samanburður við önnur tungumál. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hafsteinsson, Gylfi, see Gylfi Hafsteinsson.
Haider, Hubert. 1997. Extraposition. In Beerman, Dorothee, Leblanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Rightward Movement, pp. 115–51. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2001. How to Stay Accusative in Insular Germanic. WPSS 68: 1–14.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, I, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.). 1986. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark. 2006. Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Um méranir. Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. Íslenskt mál 4: 159–89.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1981. Fleiryrtar aukatengingar? Íslenskt mál 3: 59–76.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1983. Um frásagnarumröðun og grundvallarorðaröð í forníslensku. Master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1985. Subordinate V1 in Icelandic: How to Explain a Root Phenomenon. WPSS 18.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1986. Verb Post-Second in a V2 Language. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 138–49. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1988. From OV to VO: Evidence from Old Icelandic. WPSS 34.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland 1992.]
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990a. V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 41–69. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990b. Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–46. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990c. Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical A-positions. WPSS 45: 35–82.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 31–77.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. NLLT 9: 327–63.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992a. Um beygingarsamræmi og málkunnáttu. Íslenskt mál 14: 63–87.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992b. The Case of Quirky Subjects. WPSS 49: 1–26.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993a. The Structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47: 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993b. Agreement as Head Visible Feature Government. Studia Linguistica 47: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993c. Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua 89: 247–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1994. Morphological Case, Abstract Case and Licensing. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics – Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 145–59. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1996. Icelandic Finite Verb Agreement. WPSS 57: 1–46.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1997. Öðruvísi frumlög. In Agnarsdóttir, Anna, Pétursson, Pétur and Tulinius, Torfi (eds.): Milli himins og jarðar, pp. 299–306. Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2000. The Locus of Case and Agreement. WPSS 65: 65–108.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2001. Inflectional Features and Clausal Structure. In Niemi, Jussi and Heikkinen, Janni (eds.): Nordic and Baltic Morphology, pp. 99–111. Studies in Languages 36, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002a. Agree and Agreement. WPSS 70: 101–56.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002b. To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. NLLT 20: 691–724.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2003. Case: Abstract vs. Morphological. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 223–68. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004a. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 59–99. Akademieverlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004b. Agree in Syntax, Agreement in Signs. WPSS 74: 1–42.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004c. The Syntax of Person, Tense and Speech Features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–51.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004d. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 61–103. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson2004e. Icelandic Non-Nominative Subjects: Facts and Implications. In Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.): Non-Nominative Subjects 2, pp. 137–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005a. Accusative and the Nom/Acc Alternation in Germanic. WPSS 76: 93–133.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005b. Meaningful Silence, Meaningless Sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006a. The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 2: 389–408.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006b. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: Central Traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór, see Halldór Halldórsson.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Mikkelsen, Line Hove. 2002. A Morphological Analysis of Definite Nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge, and Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 1999. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Ms., Roskilde and Copenhagen.
Bessason, Haraldur. 1967. A Few Specimens of North American Icelandic. Scandinavian Studies 39: 115–46.Google Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur. 1971. Isländskan i Nordamerika. Språk i Norden 1971, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian Language Structures: A Comparative Historical Survey. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Heinat, Fredrik. 2005. A Note on Long Object Shift. WPSS 76: 135–42.Google Scholar
Helgi Bernódusson. 1982. Ópersónulegar setningar. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli. 1991. Nýstárleg þolmynd í barnamáli. Skíma 14: 18–22.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Binding. WPSS 5.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986a. The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In Muysken, Pieter and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Features and Projections, pp. 89–122. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986b. On Anaphora and Predication in Norwegian. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 103–24. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991a. The Phrasal Nature of Double Object Clusters. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 67–92. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991b. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian: An Overview. WPSS 56: 47–69.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Jeffrei. 1991. Navnháttur ella lýsingarháttur í føroyskum. Málting 3: 25–29.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Jeffrei. 2000. Orðalagslæra. Sprotin, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1984. Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding. In Sørensen, Finn and Heltoft, Lars (eds.): Topics in Danish Syntax, pp. 34–71. Nydanske studier og almen kommunikationsteori 14. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hestvik, Arild. 1992. LF Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 557–94.Google Scholar
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk, see Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir.
Holmberg, Anders. 1984. On Certain Clitic-Like Elements in Swedish. WPSS 13: 1–31.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders.1991a. The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Clitics and their Hosts, pp. 155–74. Eurotyp Working Papers, Theme Group 8: Clitics. Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1991b. On the Scandinavian Double Object Construction. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 141–55. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1993. Two Subject Positions in IP in Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 52: 29–41.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1994. The Pros and Cons of Agreement in Scandinavian Impersonals. In Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi and Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.): Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 217–36. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1997. The True Nature of Holmberg's Generalization. NELS 27: 203–17.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders (ed.). 1992. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Institute of Linguistics, University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1988. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. WPSS 42: 25–42.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack.1991. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 93–118. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2003. Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions. Lingua 113: 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Philip, and Hinchliffe, Ian. 1994. Swedish. A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [Published 1996 by Garland, New York.]
Hornstein, Norbert. 1989. Verb Raising in Icelandic Infinitives. NELS 20: 215–29.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1991. Expletives: A Comparative Study of English and Icelandic. WPSS 47: 1–88.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1976. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. NELS 6: 225–39.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1980. Tilvísunarfornöfn?Íslenskt mál 2: 53–96.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1984. Different Types of Infinitival Complements in Icelandic. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 247–55. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986a. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.): Verb-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, pp. 169–94. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986b. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VP in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 235–65. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1990. A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego. [A slightly revised version of Höskuldur Thráinsson 1976.]Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1991. Long Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 49–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1992. A Note on Underspecification and Binding. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 73–90. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3, pp. 181–213. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994a. Icelandic. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 142–89. Routledge, London.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994b. Comments on the Paper by Vikner. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 149–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1996. On the Non-Universality of Functional Categories. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 253–81. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1997. The Chapters by Kiparsky, Roberts and Weerman: An Epilogue. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 495–508. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In Askedal, John Ole (ed.): Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax: Akten des internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, pp. 335–63. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1999. Review of Anders Holmberg and Christer Platzack: The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 35: 418–30.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001a. Object Shift and Scrambling. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 148–202. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001b. Syntactic Theory for Faroese and Faroese for Syntactic Theory. In Braunmüller, Kurt and Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon (eds.): Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, pp. 89–124. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2003. Syntactic Variation, Historical Development, and Minimalism. In Hendrick, Randall (ed.): Minimalist Syntax, pp. 152–91. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2005. Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. [Editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, co-authors Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal.] Íslensk tunga 3. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter. 1996. Introduction. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. vii–xxxix. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen and Zakaris S. Hansen. 2004. Faroese: A Handbook and Reference Grammar. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn, and Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson and Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-Drop, Topic Drop …: Where do Old and Modern Icelandic Fit in? In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 150–61. Papers from a workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Vikner, Sten. 1995. Modals and Double Modals in the Scandinavian Languages. WPSS 55: 51–88.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, see Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg, see Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 263–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora. A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1992. So-called ‘Double Objects’ and Grammatical Relations. Language 68: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 1990. The Development of ‘Long-Distance Anaphora’: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison with Special Reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, and Kroch, Anthony. 1992. The Licensing of CP-recursion and its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. WPSS 50: 1–24.Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald. 1918. Syntaksen i Tromsø Bymaal. Bymaals-Lagets Forlag, Oslo [Kristiania].Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. Íslenzk setningafræði. Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar, Reykjavík. [Reprinted by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík, 1987.]
Jóhanna Barðdal. 1993. Accusative and Dative Case of Objects of Some Transitive Verbs in Icelandic and the Semantic Distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, pp. 1–13. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999a. Case in Icelandic – A Construction Grammar Approach. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 20: 65–100.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999b. The Dual Nature of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 79–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000a. The Subject is Nominative! On Obsolete Axioms and their Deeprootedness. Papers from the 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 93–117. Institute of Language and Communication, University of Odense, Odense.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000b. Oblique Subjects in Old Scandinavian. NOWELE 37: 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000c. Case Assignment of Nonce Verbs in Icelandic. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 7–28.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001a. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna Barðdal.2001b. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2002. ‘Oblique subjects’ in Icelandic and German. WPSS 70: 61–99.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. Construction-Specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna, Barðdal and Molnár, Valéria. 2000. Passive in Icelandic – Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–46.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003a. The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subject. Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003b. Icelandic vs. German: Oblique Subjects, Agreement and Expletives. Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Case and Control Constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic: Or How to Evaluate Marginally Acceptable Data?WPSS 75: 1–36.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson. 1990. The Pronoun maður in Icelandic. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1991. Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. WPSS 48: 1–43.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1992. The Two Perfects of Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 14: 129–45.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.1996. Clausal Achitecture and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1997–1998. Sagnir með aukafallsfrumlagi. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 11–43.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000a. Definites in Icelandic existentials. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 125–34. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000b. Case and Double Objects in Icelandic. In Nelson, Diane and Foulkes, Paul (eds.): Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, pp. 71–94. University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2002. S-Adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2003. Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives in Case Theory, pp. 127–63. CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005a. Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 350–409. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005b. Merkingarflokkar nafnliða og setningagerð. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 435–58. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003. Breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 25: 7–40.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M., see Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir.
Johnson, Kyle. 1985. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 102–37.Google Scholar
Kyle, Johnson. 1991. Object positions. NLLT 9: 577–636.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle, and Vikner, Sten. 1994. Verb Movement in Scandinavian Infinitives. WPSS 53: 61–84.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1994. The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 33–59. Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996a. Clause Structures, Expletives and Verb Movement. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 167–88. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Jonas, Dianne.2002. Residual V-to-I. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 251–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne, and Bobaljik, Jonathan D.. 1993. Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 59–98.Google Scholar
Jón G. Friðjónsson. 1986. Um notkun forsetninga í íslensku. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1989. Samsettar myndir sagna. Málvisindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi með samsettu frumlagi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 79–103.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, see Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1992. Object Shift and Weak Pronominals in Swedish. WPSS 49: 59–94.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.1994. Scandinavian Pronouns and Object Shift. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position, pp. 91–122. Eurotyp Working Papers 6. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.2003. Four Myths about Object Shift in Swedish. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 199–207. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Julien, Marit. 2002a. Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2002b. Determiners and Word Order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56: 264–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 460–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl (eds.): Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–73. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É., see É. Kiss, Katalin.
Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-Middle Constructions and Verb Raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1986. Mörk orðmyndunar og beygingar: Miðmynd í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál 8: 63–119.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1988. A Feature Based Approach to Thematic Roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2: 135–50.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991a. Icelandic Double Objects as Small Clauses. WPSS 48: 77–97.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991b. Psych-Verbs and Binding in Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 335–44. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1993. Double-Object Small Clauses and Reanalysis in Icelandic Passives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XI, pp. 371–87. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson.1994. Comments on the Paper by Santorini. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 107–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjartan Ottosson. 2003. Subject Positions, Adverbials and Functional Projections in Modern Icelandic. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 249–56. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli, see Helgi Skúli Kjartansson.
Kosmeijer, Wim. 1991. The Distribution of það: An Argument against a Generalized Comp Analysis. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 182–93. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kossuth, Karen C. 1981. Unmarked Definite NPs and Referential Cohesion in Old Icelandic Narrative. Íslenskt mál 3: 85–100.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan, and Reuland, Eric (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1975. Zum Verhältnis syntaktischer Strukturen zu Strukturen der objektiven Realität, dargestellt am Beispiel des Isländischen. In Dahlstedt, Karl-Hampus (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, II, pp. 539–45. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1982. Isländische Grammatik. VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir. 1996. Á sögnum verður sjaldnast skortur: Afleiðslusagnir og innlimunarsagnir í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M.. 2005. Temporal Adverbs in Icelandic: Adverbs of Quantification vs. Frequency Adverbs. WPSS 76: 31–72.Google Scholar
Árnason, Kristján. 1981. Um merkingu viðtengingarháttar í íslensku. In Afmæliskveðja til Halldórs Halldórssonar, pp. 154–72. Íslenska málfræðifélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil. 1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislandsk – ei samanliking. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–67.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1975. Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, pp. 276–336. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William, and David Dowty. 1987. Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles. In Wilkins, Wendy (ed.): On the Nature of Thematic Roles. Syntax and Semantics 21. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.Google Scholar
Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna: Ordböjning och syntax. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Levin, Lori S., and Simpson, Jane. 1981. Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 185–96. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David, and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.). 1994. Verb Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lødrup, Helge. 2006. Anaphors without Visible Binders: Evidence from Norwegian. Ms., University of Oslo.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 562–603. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis. 2003. Complex Dependencies: The Person-Number Restriction in Icelandic. WPSS 72: 55–90.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Friðrik, see Friðrik Magnússon.
Maling, Joan. 1976. Notes on Quantifier-Postposing. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 708–18.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–93. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 71–91. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan.1986. Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 53–63. Reidel, Dordrecht. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 277–87. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1987. Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic: Reference to Thematic Roles. WPSS 28.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1988. Variations on a Theme: Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Germanic Syntax, pp. 168–91. Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions and Thematic Roles. Lingua 111: 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002a. Icelandic Verbs with Dative Objects. WPSS 70: 1–60.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002b. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105. [A revised version of Maling 2002a.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1995. On Nominative Objects in Icelandic and the Feature [+ human]. WPSS 56: 71–9.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 2002. The ‘New Impersonal’ Construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 97–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 167–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1978. The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 475–497. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 383–407. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1985. Preposition-Stranding and Passive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 197–209. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 153–64. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3: 413–44.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 1992. On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein. 1997. Adverbs and A-Shift. WPSS 59: 1–31.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein.1998. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. MA thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Orešnik, Janez. 1972. Morphophonemic Notes on the Modern Icelandic Imperative Singular. In Firchow, Evelyn S., Grimstad, Karen, Hasselmo, Nils and O'Neil, Wayne A. (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 450–9. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orešnik, Janez.1980. On the Modern Icelandic Clipped Imperative. In Hovdhaugen, Even (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 305–14. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan, see Kjartan Ottosson.
Ottósson, Kjartan G., see Kjartan G. Ottósson.
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David (ed.). 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 1999. Kloyvdir setningar. Málting 26: 15–24.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 2000. IP or TP in Modern Faroese. WPSS 66: 75–83.Google Scholar
Petersen, Inge Lise. 1996. ‘Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det.’ Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger. In Nielsen, Bent Jul and Pedersen, Inge Lise (eds.): Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt: Til Inger Eskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, pp. 242–51. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1984. On the Distinction between Argumental and Non-Argumental Anaphors. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 185–94. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. NELS 17: 483–99.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre.1991. Antecedent Government and Binding: The Case of Long-Distance Reflexivization. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 119–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspekt and Aktionsarten: A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic and Swedish. In Karlsson, Fred (ed.): Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Hanasaari, Finland, December 17–19, 1982, pp. 80–100. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1985a. Narrative Inversion in Old Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 7: 127–44.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1985b. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986a. Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Order. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 185–234. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986b. The Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 123–37. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1987a. The Case of Narrative Inversion in Swedish and Icelandic. WPSS 31: 9–14.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1987b. The Scandinavian Languages and the Null Subject Parameter. NLLT 5: 377–401.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1988a. The Emergence of a Word Order Difference in Scandinavian Subordinate Clauses. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 215–38. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1988b. Den centralskandinaviska bisatsordföljdens framväxt. In Studier i svensk språkhistoria, pp. 241–55. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 41. Lund University Press, Lund.
Platzack, Christer.1989. The Swedish Supine: An Active Verb Form or the Non-Agreeing Form of the Past Participle? In Jaspers, Danny, Klooster, Wim, Putseys, Yvan and Seuren, Pieter (eds.): Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest, pp. 305–19. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1996. Small Pro, Weak Agr and Syntactic Differences in Scandinavian. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 180–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1999. The Subject of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 103–15.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.2005. Cross-Germanic Promotion to Subject in Ditransitive Passives – A Feature-Driven Account. In Vulchanova, Mila and Åfarli, Tor A. (eds.): Grammar and Beyond: Essays on Honour of Lars Hellan, pp. 135–61. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer, and Holmberg, Anders. 1989. The Role of AGR and Finiteness. WPSS 43: 51–76.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer, and Rosengren, Inger. 1997. On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist Account of the Imperative Clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey. 1992. The Case Filter and Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 19–31. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey.1996. Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwar, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas, pp. 199–216. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items. In Sag, Ivan and Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.): Lexical Matters, pp. 111–30. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1988. Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Citation Etiquette beyond Thunderdome. Topic … Comment. NLLT 6: 579–88.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian, and Svenonius, Peter. 2002. The Lexical Syntax and Lexical Semantics of the Verb-Particle Construction. In West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 21: 387–400. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 283–321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1989. V-2 in Mainland Scandinavian: Finite Verb Movement to Agr. WPSS 44: 101–17.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Jan Koster. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1997. Long Distance ‘Binding’ in Icelandic: Syntax or Discourse? In Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.): Atomism and Binding, pp. 323–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar, pp. 289–330. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head Movement. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 113–47. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, see Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.
Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-Drop. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [A revised version of the author's 1994 dissertation The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Infinite Syntax by Arlex Publications, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.]
Safir, Kenneth J. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 1976. Laust samansette verb i vestnordisk. Ein samanliknande leddstillingsanalyse for islandsk, færøysk og romsdalsmål. MA thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Sandøy, Helge. 1986. ‘Han er åt og kjem seg.’ Om ein vestnordisk aspektkonstruksjon. Nordisk institutt, Bergen.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 1991. Attraksjon av supinum i færøsk og norsk. Danske folkemål 33: 251–62. [Papers from the 4th conference of Scandinavian dialectologists, Askov, Denmark, 12–16 August 1990.]Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1988. Variable Rules vs. Variable Grammars in the History of Yiddish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 29: 63–73.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1989. The Generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Santorini, Beatrice.1994. Some Similarities and Differences between Icelandic and Yiddish. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 87–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2003. Syncretism and Double Agreement with Icelandic Nominative Objects. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 295–303. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–81.Google Scholar
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1989. The Structure of Icelandic Infinitival Clauses and the Status of the Infinitival Marker að. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.1992. Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Hyams, Nina. 1992. Reflexivization and Logophoricity: Evidence from the Acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2: 359–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Maling, Joan. 2001. Það var hrint mér á leiðinni í skólann: Þolmynd eða ekki þolmynd?Íslenskt mál 23: 123–80.Google Scholar
Sigríður Valfells. 1970. Middle Voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 551–71. Vísindafélag Íslendinga, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, see Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður, see Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.
Smith, Henry. 1994. Dative Sickness in Germanic. NLLT 12: 675–736.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry. 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Revised version of the author's 1992 Stanford University dissertation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–50.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton.
Einarsson, Stefán. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar. Texts. Glossary. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across Categories. The Linguistic Review 2: 285–312.Google Scholar
Strahan, Tania E. 2003. Long-Distance Reflexives in Norwegian: A Quantitative Study. Lincom Europa, Munich.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2002. Object Shift and Holmberg's Generalization in the History of Norwegian. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 326–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, see Ásta Svavarsdóttir.
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn. 1969. Die Stellung des Adverbs im Isländischen. Folia linguistica 3: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 1996a. The Optionality of Particle Shift. WPSS 57: 47–75.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.1996b. The Verb-Particle Alternation in the Scandinavian Languages. Ms., University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter.2000. Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): The Derivation of VO and OV, pp. 255–92. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002a. Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 202–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002b. Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002c. Introduction. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 3–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2003. Swedish Particles and Directional Prepositions. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 343–51. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, Expletives and the EPP. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the that-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian. WPSS9.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1986. Som and the Binding Theory. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 149–84. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1994. Reflexives, Pronouns and Subject/Verb Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. WPSS 54: 43–58.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1995. On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 307–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999a. Svenska Akademiens grammatik II. Ord. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik III. Fraser. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999c. Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir. 2004. Verlaufsformen. Isländisch, Rheinisches Deutsch, Englisch. MA thesis, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk. 1993. Getið í eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. [The author's 1987 master's thesis.]Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2000. Fall á fallanda fæti? Um breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 22: 185–204.Google Scholar
Thórhallur Eythórsson.2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 196–212. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2003. Oblique Subjects: A Germanic Inheritance!WPSS 71:145–202.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. The Case of Subject in Faroese. WPSS 72: 207–31.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, see Höskuldur Thráinsson.
Torfadóttir, Theódóra Anna, see Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir.
Torp, Arne. 1992. Der sogenannte ‘Garpegenitiv’: Ursprung, Alter und Verbreitung im heutingen Norwegisch. In Elmevik, Lars and Schöndorf, Kurt Erich (eds.): Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien III. Papers from the 3rd Symposium ‘Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien’, Sigtuna August 17–20, 1989, pp. 151–66. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne. 1998. Nordiske språk i nordisk og germansk perspektiv. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Trosterud, Trond. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and the New Mainland Scandinavian Word Order: A Possible Counterexample from a Norwegian Dialect. In Papers from the 11th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics I, pp. 87–100. University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne. 1985. Icelandic Case without Primitive Grammatical Functions. WPSS24.Google Scholar
Valfells, Sigríður, see Sigríður Valfells.
Valin, Robert. 1991. Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations. NLLT 9: 145–94.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1995. Referentiality and Argument Positions in Icelandic. WPSS 55: 89–109.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2000. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i minimalistisk perspektiv. In Andersen, Øivin, Fløttum, Kjersti and Kinn, Torodd (eds.), Menneske, språk og fellesskap: Festskrift til Kirsti Koch Christensen på 60–årsdagen 1. desember 2000. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2001. On Noun Phrase Architecture, Referentiality and Article Systems. Studia Linguistica 55: 249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002a. Icelandic Expletive Constructions and the Distribution of Subject Types. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 43–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002b. A Verb's Gotta Do What a Verb's Gotta Do! On Scandinavian Infinitivals and the AGR Parameter. In Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter and Abraham, Werner (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 203–17. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2003. ‘Identifikasjon’ og morfologiens rolle i den nordiske nominalfrasen. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 111–94. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø, Tromsø. [A paper presented at GLOW, Thessaloniki, 2004.]
VangsnesØystein, , Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.). 2003. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1985. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. WPSS23.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1989. Object Shift and Double Objects in Danish. WPSS 44: 141–55.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1991. Relative der and other Co-elements in Danish. Lingua 84: 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 117–47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995b. Vo-to-Io Movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses. WPSS 55: 1–27. [Also published in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 1997: The New Comparative Syntax, pp. 189–213. Longman, London.]Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997. The Interpretation of Object Shift, Optimality Theory and Minimalism. WPSS 60: 1–24.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997–1998. Vo-til-Io flytning og personfleksion i alle tempora. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 85–132.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.2003. Null Objects under Coordination in Yiddish and Scandinavian. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 365–75. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Bonnie Schwartz. 1995. The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses. In Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, pp. 11–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Sprouse, Rex. 1988. Have/Be Selection as a Chain Membership Requirement. WPSS 38: 1–48.Google Scholar
Vikør, Lars S. 1995. The Nordic Languages: Their Status and Interrelations. 2nd edn. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vinka, Mikael. 1998. Two Disinct Verb Particle Constructions in Swedish. In Cambier-Langeveld, T., Liptak, A. and Redford, M. (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole VI, pp. 269–281. HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Birner, Betty. 1995. Definiteness and the English Existential. Language 71: 722–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 427–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Maria Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.): Parameter Setting, pp. 41–76. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – A Preliminary Investigation. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Wide, Camilla. 2002. Perfect in Dialogue. Form and Functional Potential of the vera búinn að + inf. Construction in Contemporary Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–38.Google Scholar
Willson, Kendra. 2000. Grammaticalization, Borrowing and Verb Post-Second Sentences in Icelandic. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 253–64. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1997. Four Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative. NLLT 15: 181–227.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen.2003. Burzio's Generalization, Markedness and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 301–29. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan and Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Case in Tiers. Language 63: 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1980. Extraction Rules in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York, 1985.
Zaenen, Annie. 1983. On Syntactic Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 469–504.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, and Maling, Joan. 1984. Unaccusative, Passive and Quirky Case. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–29. Stanford University. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 137–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. NLLT 3: 441–83. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 95–136. Academic Press, San Diego, and in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) 2006: Lexical Semantics in LFG, pp. 163–207. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.]Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential Negation. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 511–35. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. A-type Binding and Narrative Point of View. Language 65: 695–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't. Language 59: 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Åfarli, Tor A. 1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A., and Eide, Kristin M.. 2003. Norsk generativ syntaks. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Robin, Holmes, Philip and Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom. 1995. Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In Bresnan, Joan (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson
Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2001. Skandinavísk orðaröð í íslenskum aukasetningum. Íslenskt mál 23: 95–122.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.
Barnes, Michael P. 1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In Louis-Jensen, Jonna and Poulsen, Jóhan Hendrik W. (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 2001. Faroese Language Studies. Studia Nordica 5. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In Johansen, Anfinnur, Hansen, Zakaris Svabo, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon and Marnersdóttir, Malan (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Barss, Andrew, and Lasnik, Howard. 1986. A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 219–51.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.). 1997. Atomism and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn, see Sveinn Bergsveinsson.
Bernódusson, Helgi, see Helgi Bernódusson.
Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 536–61. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur, see Haraldur Bessason.
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania, pp. 47–131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam [First distributed in manuscript form in 1977.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir. 1990. North American Icelandic: The Linguistic and Social Context of Vowel Mergers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. [Available from University of Michigan Dissertation Services since 1995.]
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna. 1997. The Life Cycle of a Language. Canadian Ethnic Studies 29: 31–42.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarPubMed
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1994. What Does Adjacency Do? In Phillips, Colin and Harley, Heidi (eds.): The Morphology-Syntax Connection, pp. 1–32. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.2000. Adjacency and Autonomy: Holmberg's Generalization Revisited. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 10, pp. 51–59. Institute of Linguistics, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does not Drive Syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Subject Positions and the Role of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two Heads aren't always Better than One. Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. Quirky Agreement. Studia Linguistica 54: 354–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2001. PF Merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift. WPSS 68: 75–115.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the Locality of the Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Francke Verlag, Tübingen. [2nd revised edition 1999.]Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. A Note on Icelandic Coordination. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 355–65. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Burton, Strang, and Grimshaw, Jane. 1992. Coordination and VP-Internal Subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–13.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Revised edition published as Italian Syntax by Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.]
Burzio, Luigi. 1991. The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, Robert (ed.): Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417–54. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.): The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2003. On the Synchronic and Diachronic Status of the Negative Adverbial ikke/not. WPSS 72: 1–53.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj.2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1983. The Categorial Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In Papers from the 7th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 9–20. Department of Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch.1986. Norwegian ingen: A Case of Post-syntactic Lexicalization. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax: Papers from a Workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 21–35. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991a. AGR, Adjunction, and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991b. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i GB-teoretisk perspektiv. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 9: 21–49.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen. 1989. Expletive Chain Formation and Past Participle Agreement in Scandinavian Dialects. In Benincà, Paola (ed.): Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, pp. 53–83. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1995. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections. GLOW Newsletter 34: 14–15.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clausing, Stephen. 1986. English Influence on American German and American Icelandic. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.). 2001. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris, and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1990. Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2004. On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993a. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993b. On Attributive Adjectives in Scandinavian and Other Languages. Studia Linguistica 47: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1995. Prepositionsstrandning och kasus i äldre svenska. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 110: 141–78.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.1998. Possession in Germanic. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Wilder, Chris (eds.): Possessor, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, pp. 87–108. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2001. Stylistic Fronting: Evidence from Old Scandinavian. WPSS 68: 147–68.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003a. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 11–64. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003b. Preposition Stranding and Case. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 75–84. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Positions and the Nature of Chains. Move α to the Specifier of Functional Projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk grammatik. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul. 1964. Essentials of Danish Grammar. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1990. Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish. NLLT 8: 41–79.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly.1996. Semantic Variables and Object Shift. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 66–84. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic. NLLT 15: 369–427.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1993. The Syntax and Semantics of Object Shift. WPSS 51.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1995. Distributing Arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerland, Verner. 2003. Impersonal Pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. WPSS 71: 75–102.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán, see Stefán Einarsson.
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson. 1982a: Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1982b. We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 557–61. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 349–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1983. Sagnliðurinn í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 5: 7–28.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1984a. Rightward displacements of NPs in Icelandic. In Ringgaard, Kristian and Sørensen, Viggo (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 5, pp. 362–8. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984b. Icelandic Word Order and það-Insertion. WPSS 8.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984c. Af lýsingarorðsviðurlögum. Íslenskt mál 6: 57–80.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1986. Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 89–102. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1987a. Enda. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 10: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1987b. OV Order in Icelandic. In Allen, R. D. S. and Barnes, Michael (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Languages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 33–49. Department of Scandinavian, University College, London.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1990a. Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [The author's 1982 MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1990b. Null objects in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 367–79. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1991. Quirky Subjects in Old Icelandic. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 369–378. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1992. Nema. Íslenskt mál 14: 35–61.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1995. Old Icelandic: A Non-Configurational Language? NOWELE 26: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1996a. Word Order Variation in the VP in Old Icelandic. WPSS 58: 55–86.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur 1996b. Mikið er það sorglegt að refir skuli ekki geta klifrað í trjám. Höskollu gefið, pp. 14–16. A festschrift for Höskuldur Thráinsson. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1997. Frumlag og fall að fornu. Íslenskt mál 18: 37–69.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2000. Setningarstaða boðháttarsagna í fornu máli. Íslenskt mál 22: 63–90.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2002. Það í fornu máli og síðar. Íslenskt mál 24: 7–30.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.2005. Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 602–35. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic Word Order Once More. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 3–40. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kiss, É. Katalin. 2002a. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin.2002b. The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 107–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The Choice between bli-Passive and -s-Passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Ms., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.1991. Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax? In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 277–305. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.2001. Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors. In Megerdoomian, Karine and Bar-el, L. A. (eds.): West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20: 178–91. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, see Thórhallur Eythórsson.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Transformational Syntax in Dialectology: Scandinavian Word Order Varieties. In Fretheim, Torstein and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium, pp. 65–83. University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Mouton, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein and Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia. 1990. On Double Object Constructions. WPSS 46: 53–100.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia.1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and Object Case Checking. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 97–111. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (eds.): Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Some Problems for Case Grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 245–65. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann, and Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. On Stylistic Fronting: Germanic vs. Romance. WPSS 68: 117–45.Google Scholar
Fiva, Toril. 1987. Possessor Chains in Norwegian. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G., see Jón G. Friðjónsson.
Magnússon, Friðrik. 1984. Um innri gerð nafnliða í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 6: 81–111.Google Scholar
Friðrik Magnússon.1990. Kjarnafærsla og það-innskot í aukasetningum í íslensku. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík. [The author's 1989 Master's thesis.]
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic Can you be if you Speak Icelandic B? In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 115–22. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 1984. Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra.1991. Prepositions, Binding and θ-Marking. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 185–208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi, see Helgi Guðmundsson.
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2001. An Optimality Theory Analysis of Agreement in Icelandic DAT-NOM Constructions. WPSS 68: 15–47.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2003. On Stylistic Fronting Once More. WPSS 72: 153–205.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2004a. Stylistic Fronting. Studia Linguistica 58: 88–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.2004b. Oblique Subjects and Stylistic Fronting in the History of Scandinavian and English: The Role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus.
Gylfi Hafsteinsson. 1998. Um hömlur á röð íslenskra lýsingarorða – og samanburður við önnur tungumál. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hafsteinsson, Gylfi, see Gylfi Hafsteinsson.
Haider, Hubert. 1997. Extraposition. In Beerman, Dorothee, Leblanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Rightward Movement, pp. 115–51. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2001. How to Stay Accusative in Insular Germanic. WPSS 68: 1–14.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, I, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.). 1986. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark. 2006. Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Um méranir. Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. Íslenskt mál 4: 159–89.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1981. Fleiryrtar aukatengingar? Íslenskt mál 3: 59–76.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1983. Um frásagnarumröðun og grundvallarorðaröð í forníslensku. Master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1985. Subordinate V1 in Icelandic: How to Explain a Root Phenomenon. WPSS 18.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1986. Verb Post-Second in a V2 Language. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 138–49. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1988. From OV to VO: Evidence from Old Icelandic. WPSS 34.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland 1992.]
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990a. V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 41–69. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990b. Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–46. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990c. Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical A-positions. WPSS 45: 35–82.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 31–77.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. NLLT 9: 327–63.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992a. Um beygingarsamræmi og málkunnáttu. Íslenskt mál 14: 63–87.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992b. The Case of Quirky Subjects. WPSS 49: 1–26.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993a. The Structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47: 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993b. Agreement as Head Visible Feature Government. Studia Linguistica 47: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993c. Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua 89: 247–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1994. Morphological Case, Abstract Case and Licensing. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics – Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 145–59. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1996. Icelandic Finite Verb Agreement. WPSS 57: 1–46.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1997. Öðruvísi frumlög. In Agnarsdóttir, Anna, Pétursson, Pétur and Tulinius, Torfi (eds.): Milli himins og jarðar, pp. 299–306. Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2000. The Locus of Case and Agreement. WPSS 65: 65–108.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2001. Inflectional Features and Clausal Structure. In Niemi, Jussi and Heikkinen, Janni (eds.): Nordic and Baltic Morphology, pp. 99–111. Studies in Languages 36, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002a. Agree and Agreement. WPSS 70: 101–56.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002b. To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. NLLT 20: 691–724.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2003. Case: Abstract vs. Morphological. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 223–68. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004a. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 59–99. Akademieverlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004b. Agree in Syntax, Agreement in Signs. WPSS 74: 1–42.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004c. The Syntax of Person, Tense and Speech Features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–51.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004d. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 61–103. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson2004e. Icelandic Non-Nominative Subjects: Facts and Implications. In Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.): Non-Nominative Subjects 2, pp. 137–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005a. Accusative and the Nom/Acc Alternation in Germanic. WPSS 76: 93–133.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005b. Meaningful Silence, Meaningless Sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006a. The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 2: 389–408.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006b. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: Central Traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór, see Halldór Halldórsson.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Mikkelsen, Line Hove. 2002. A Morphological Analysis of Definite Nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge, and Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 1999. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Ms., Roskilde and Copenhagen.
Bessason, Haraldur. 1967. A Few Specimens of North American Icelandic. Scandinavian Studies 39: 115–46.Google Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur. 1971. Isländskan i Nordamerika. Språk i Norden 1971, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian Language Structures: A Comparative Historical Survey. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Heinat, Fredrik. 2005. A Note on Long Object Shift. WPSS 76: 135–42.Google Scholar
Helgi Bernódusson. 1982. Ópersónulegar setningar. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli. 1991. Nýstárleg þolmynd í barnamáli. Skíma 14: 18–22.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Binding. WPSS 5.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986a. The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In Muysken, Pieter and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Features and Projections, pp. 89–122. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986b. On Anaphora and Predication in Norwegian. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 103–24. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991a. The Phrasal Nature of Double Object Clusters. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 67–92. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991b. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian: An Overview. WPSS 56: 47–69.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Jeffrei. 1991. Navnháttur ella lýsingarháttur í føroyskum. Málting 3: 25–29.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Jeffrei. 2000. Orðalagslæra. Sprotin, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1984. Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding. In Sørensen, Finn and Heltoft, Lars (eds.): Topics in Danish Syntax, pp. 34–71. Nydanske studier og almen kommunikationsteori 14. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hestvik, Arild. 1992. LF Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 557–94.Google Scholar
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk, see Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir.
Holmberg, Anders. 1984. On Certain Clitic-Like Elements in Swedish. WPSS 13: 1–31.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders.1991a. The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Clitics and their Hosts, pp. 155–74. Eurotyp Working Papers, Theme Group 8: Clitics. Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1991b. On the Scandinavian Double Object Construction. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 141–55. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1993. Two Subject Positions in IP in Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 52: 29–41.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1994. The Pros and Cons of Agreement in Scandinavian Impersonals. In Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi and Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.): Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 217–36. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1997. The True Nature of Holmberg's Generalization. NELS 27: 203–17.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders (ed.). 1992. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Institute of Linguistics, University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1988. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. WPSS 42: 25–42.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack.1991. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 93–118. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2003. Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions. Lingua 113: 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Philip, and Hinchliffe, Ian. 1994. Swedish. A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [Published 1996 by Garland, New York.]
Hornstein, Norbert. 1989. Verb Raising in Icelandic Infinitives. NELS 20: 215–29.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1991. Expletives: A Comparative Study of English and Icelandic. WPSS 47: 1–88.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1976. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. NELS 6: 225–39.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1980. Tilvísunarfornöfn?Íslenskt mál 2: 53–96.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1984. Different Types of Infinitival Complements in Icelandic. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 247–55. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986a. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.): Verb-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, pp. 169–94. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986b. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VP in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 235–65. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1990. A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego. [A slightly revised version of Höskuldur Thráinsson 1976.]Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1991. Long Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 49–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1992. A Note on Underspecification and Binding. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 73–90. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3, pp. 181–213. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994a. Icelandic. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 142–89. Routledge, London.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994b. Comments on the Paper by Vikner. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 149–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1996. On the Non-Universality of Functional Categories. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 253–81. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1997. The Chapters by Kiparsky, Roberts and Weerman: An Epilogue. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 495–508. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In Askedal, John Ole (ed.): Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax: Akten des internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, pp. 335–63. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1999. Review of Anders Holmberg and Christer Platzack: The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 35: 418–30.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001a. Object Shift and Scrambling. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 148–202. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001b. Syntactic Theory for Faroese and Faroese for Syntactic Theory. In Braunmüller, Kurt and Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon (eds.): Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, pp. 89–124. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2003. Syntactic Variation, Historical Development, and Minimalism. In Hendrick, Randall (ed.): Minimalist Syntax, pp. 152–91. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2005. Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. [Editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, co-authors Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal.] Íslensk tunga 3. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter. 1996. Introduction. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. vii–xxxix. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen and Zakaris S. Hansen. 2004. Faroese: A Handbook and Reference Grammar. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn, and Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson and Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-Drop, Topic Drop …: Where do Old and Modern Icelandic Fit in? In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 150–61. Papers from a workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Vikner, Sten. 1995. Modals and Double Modals in the Scandinavian Languages. WPSS 55: 51–88.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, see Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg, see Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 263–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora. A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1992. So-called ‘Double Objects’ and Grammatical Relations. Language 68: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 1990. The Development of ‘Long-Distance Anaphora’: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison with Special Reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, and Kroch, Anthony. 1992. The Licensing of CP-recursion and its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. WPSS 50: 1–24.Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald. 1918. Syntaksen i Tromsø Bymaal. Bymaals-Lagets Forlag, Oslo [Kristiania].Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. Íslenzk setningafræði. Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar, Reykjavík. [Reprinted by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík, 1987.]
Jóhanna Barðdal. 1993. Accusative and Dative Case of Objects of Some Transitive Verbs in Icelandic and the Semantic Distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, pp. 1–13. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999a. Case in Icelandic – A Construction Grammar Approach. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 20: 65–100.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999b. The Dual Nature of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 79–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000a. The Subject is Nominative! On Obsolete Axioms and their Deeprootedness. Papers from the 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 93–117. Institute of Language and Communication, University of Odense, Odense.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000b. Oblique Subjects in Old Scandinavian. NOWELE 37: 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000c. Case Assignment of Nonce Verbs in Icelandic. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 7–28.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001a. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna Barðdal.2001b. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2002. ‘Oblique subjects’ in Icelandic and German. WPSS 70: 61–99.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. Construction-Specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna, Barðdal and Molnár, Valéria. 2000. Passive in Icelandic – Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–46.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003a. The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subject. Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003b. Icelandic vs. German: Oblique Subjects, Agreement and Expletives. Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Case and Control Constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic: Or How to Evaluate Marginally Acceptable Data?WPSS 75: 1–36.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson. 1990. The Pronoun maður in Icelandic. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1991. Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. WPSS 48: 1–43.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1992. The Two Perfects of Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 14: 129–45.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.1996. Clausal Achitecture and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1997–1998. Sagnir með aukafallsfrumlagi. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 11–43.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000a. Definites in Icelandic existentials. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 125–34. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000b. Case and Double Objects in Icelandic. In Nelson, Diane and Foulkes, Paul (eds.): Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, pp. 71–94. University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2002. S-Adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2003. Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives in Case Theory, pp. 127–63. CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005a. Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 350–409. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005b. Merkingarflokkar nafnliða og setningagerð. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 435–58. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003. Breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 25: 7–40.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M., see Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir.
Johnson, Kyle. 1985. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 102–37.Google Scholar
Kyle, Johnson. 1991. Object positions. NLLT 9: 577–636.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle, and Vikner, Sten. 1994. Verb Movement in Scandinavian Infinitives. WPSS 53: 61–84.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1994. The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 33–59. Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996a. Clause Structures, Expletives and Verb Movement. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 167–88. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Jonas, Dianne.2002. Residual V-to-I. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 251–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne, and Bobaljik, Jonathan D.. 1993. Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 59–98.Google Scholar
Jón G. Friðjónsson. 1986. Um notkun forsetninga í íslensku. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1989. Samsettar myndir sagna. Málvisindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi með samsettu frumlagi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 79–103.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, see Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1992. Object Shift and Weak Pronominals in Swedish. WPSS 49: 59–94.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.1994. Scandinavian Pronouns and Object Shift. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position, pp. 91–122. Eurotyp Working Papers 6. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.2003. Four Myths about Object Shift in Swedish. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 199–207. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Julien, Marit. 2002a. Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2002b. Determiners and Word Order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56: 264–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 460–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl (eds.): Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–73. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É., see É. Kiss, Katalin.
Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-Middle Constructions and Verb Raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1986. Mörk orðmyndunar og beygingar: Miðmynd í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál 8: 63–119.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1988. A Feature Based Approach to Thematic Roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2: 135–50.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991a. Icelandic Double Objects as Small Clauses. WPSS 48: 77–97.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991b. Psych-Verbs and Binding in Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 335–44. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1993. Double-Object Small Clauses and Reanalysis in Icelandic Passives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XI, pp. 371–87. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson.1994. Comments on the Paper by Santorini. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 107–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjartan Ottosson. 2003. Subject Positions, Adverbials and Functional Projections in Modern Icelandic. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 249–56. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli, see Helgi Skúli Kjartansson.
Kosmeijer, Wim. 1991. The Distribution of það: An Argument against a Generalized Comp Analysis. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 182–93. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kossuth, Karen C. 1981. Unmarked Definite NPs and Referential Cohesion in Old Icelandic Narrative. Íslenskt mál 3: 85–100.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan, and Reuland, Eric (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1975. Zum Verhältnis syntaktischer Strukturen zu Strukturen der objektiven Realität, dargestellt am Beispiel des Isländischen. In Dahlstedt, Karl-Hampus (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, II, pp. 539–45. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1982. Isländische Grammatik. VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir. 1996. Á sögnum verður sjaldnast skortur: Afleiðslusagnir og innlimunarsagnir í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M.. 2005. Temporal Adverbs in Icelandic: Adverbs of Quantification vs. Frequency Adverbs. WPSS 76: 31–72.Google Scholar
Árnason, Kristján. 1981. Um merkingu viðtengingarháttar í íslensku. In Afmæliskveðja til Halldórs Halldórssonar, pp. 154–72. Íslenska málfræðifélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil. 1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislandsk – ei samanliking. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–67.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1975. Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, pp. 276–336. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William, and David Dowty. 1987. Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles. In Wilkins, Wendy (ed.): On the Nature of Thematic Roles. Syntax and Semantics 21. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.Google Scholar
Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna: Ordböjning och syntax. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Levin, Lori S., and Simpson, Jane. 1981. Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 185–96. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David, and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.). 1994. Verb Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lødrup, Helge. 2006. Anaphors without Visible Binders: Evidence from Norwegian. Ms., University of Oslo.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 562–603. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis. 2003. Complex Dependencies: The Person-Number Restriction in Icelandic. WPSS 72: 55–90.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Friðrik, see Friðrik Magnússon.
Maling, Joan. 1976. Notes on Quantifier-Postposing. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 708–18.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–93. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 71–91. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan.1986. Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 53–63. Reidel, Dordrecht. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 277–87. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1987. Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic: Reference to Thematic Roles. WPSS 28.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1988. Variations on a Theme: Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Germanic Syntax, pp. 168–91. Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions and Thematic Roles. Lingua 111: 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002a. Icelandic Verbs with Dative Objects. WPSS 70: 1–60.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002b. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105. [A revised version of Maling 2002a.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1995. On Nominative Objects in Icelandic and the Feature [+ human]. WPSS 56: 71–9.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 2002. The ‘New Impersonal’ Construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 97–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 167–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1978. The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 475–497. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 383–407. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1985. Preposition-Stranding and Passive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 197–209. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 153–64. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3: 413–44.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 1992. On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein. 1997. Adverbs and A-Shift. WPSS 59: 1–31.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein.1998. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. MA thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Orešnik, Janez. 1972. Morphophonemic Notes on the Modern Icelandic Imperative Singular. In Firchow, Evelyn S., Grimstad, Karen, Hasselmo, Nils and O'Neil, Wayne A. (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 450–9. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orešnik, Janez.1980. On the Modern Icelandic Clipped Imperative. In Hovdhaugen, Even (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 305–14. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan, see Kjartan Ottosson.
Ottósson, Kjartan G., see Kjartan G. Ottósson.
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David (ed.). 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 1999. Kloyvdir setningar. Málting 26: 15–24.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 2000. IP or TP in Modern Faroese. WPSS 66: 75–83.Google Scholar
Petersen, Inge Lise. 1996. ‘Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det.’ Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger. In Nielsen, Bent Jul and Pedersen, Inge Lise (eds.): Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt: Til Inger Eskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, pp. 242–51. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1984. On the Distinction between Argumental and Non-Argumental Anaphors. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 185–94. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. NELS 17: 483–99.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre.1991. Antecedent Government and Binding: The Case of Long-Distance Reflexivization. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 119–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspekt and Aktionsarten: A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic and Swedish. In Karlsson, Fred (ed.): Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Hanasaari, Finland, December 17–19, 1982, pp. 80–100. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1985a. Narrative Inversion in Old Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 7: 127–44.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1985b. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986a. Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Order. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 185–234. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986b. The Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 123–37. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1987a. The Case of Narrative Inversion in Swedish and Icelandic. WPSS 31: 9–14.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1987b. The Scandinavian Languages and the Null Subject Parameter. NLLT 5: 377–401.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1988a. The Emergence of a Word Order Difference in Scandinavian Subordinate Clauses. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 215–38. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1988b. Den centralskandinaviska bisatsordföljdens framväxt. In Studier i svensk språkhistoria, pp. 241–55. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 41. Lund University Press, Lund.
Platzack, Christer.1989. The Swedish Supine: An Active Verb Form or the Non-Agreeing Form of the Past Participle? In Jaspers, Danny, Klooster, Wim, Putseys, Yvan and Seuren, Pieter (eds.): Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest, pp. 305–19. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1996. Small Pro, Weak Agr and Syntactic Differences in Scandinavian. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 180–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1999. The Subject of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 103–15.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.2005. Cross-Germanic Promotion to Subject in Ditransitive Passives – A Feature-Driven Account. In Vulchanova, Mila and Åfarli, Tor A. (eds.): Grammar and Beyond: Essays on Honour of Lars Hellan, pp. 135–61. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer, and Holmberg, Anders. 1989. The Role of AGR and Finiteness. WPSS 43: 51–76.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer, and Rosengren, Inger. 1997. On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist Account of the Imperative Clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey. 1992. The Case Filter and Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 19–31. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey.1996. Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwar, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas, pp. 199–216. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items. In Sag, Ivan and Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.): Lexical Matters, pp. 111–30. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1988. Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Citation Etiquette beyond Thunderdome. Topic … Comment. NLLT 6: 579–88.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian, and Svenonius, Peter. 2002. The Lexical Syntax and Lexical Semantics of the Verb-Particle Construction. In West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 21: 387–400. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 283–321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1989. V-2 in Mainland Scandinavian: Finite Verb Movement to Agr. WPSS 44: 101–17.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Jan Koster. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1997. Long Distance ‘Binding’ in Icelandic: Syntax or Discourse? In Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.): Atomism and Binding, pp. 323–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar, pp. 289–330. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head Movement. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 113–47. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, see Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.
Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-Drop. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [A revised version of the author's 1994 dissertation The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Infinite Syntax by Arlex Publications, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.]
Safir, Kenneth J. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 1976. Laust samansette verb i vestnordisk. Ein samanliknande leddstillingsanalyse for islandsk, færøysk og romsdalsmål. MA thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Sandøy, Helge. 1986. ‘Han er åt og kjem seg.’ Om ein vestnordisk aspektkonstruksjon. Nordisk institutt, Bergen.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 1991. Attraksjon av supinum i færøsk og norsk. Danske folkemål 33: 251–62. [Papers from the 4th conference of Scandinavian dialectologists, Askov, Denmark, 12–16 August 1990.]Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1988. Variable Rules vs. Variable Grammars in the History of Yiddish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 29: 63–73.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1989. The Generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Santorini, Beatrice.1994. Some Similarities and Differences between Icelandic and Yiddish. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 87–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2003. Syncretism and Double Agreement with Icelandic Nominative Objects. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 295–303. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–81.Google Scholar
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1989. The Structure of Icelandic Infinitival Clauses and the Status of the Infinitival Marker að. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.1992. Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Hyams, Nina. 1992. Reflexivization and Logophoricity: Evidence from the Acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2: 359–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Maling, Joan. 2001. Það var hrint mér á leiðinni í skólann: Þolmynd eða ekki þolmynd?Íslenskt mál 23: 123–80.Google Scholar
Sigríður Valfells. 1970. Middle Voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 551–71. Vísindafélag Íslendinga, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, see Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður, see Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.
Smith, Henry. 1994. Dative Sickness in Germanic. NLLT 12: 675–736.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry. 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Revised version of the author's 1992 Stanford University dissertation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–50.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton.
Einarsson, Stefán. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar. Texts. Glossary. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across Categories. The Linguistic Review 2: 285–312.Google Scholar
Strahan, Tania E. 2003. Long-Distance Reflexives in Norwegian: A Quantitative Study. Lincom Europa, Munich.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2002. Object Shift and Holmberg's Generalization in the History of Norwegian. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 326–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, see Ásta Svavarsdóttir.
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn. 1969. Die Stellung des Adverbs im Isländischen. Folia linguistica 3: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 1996a. The Optionality of Particle Shift. WPSS 57: 47–75.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.1996b. The Verb-Particle Alternation in the Scandinavian Languages. Ms., University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter.2000. Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): The Derivation of VO and OV, pp. 255–92. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002a. Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 202–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002b. Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002c. Introduction. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 3–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2003. Swedish Particles and Directional Prepositions. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 343–51. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, Expletives and the EPP. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the that-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian. WPSS9.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1986. Som and the Binding Theory. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 149–84. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1994. Reflexives, Pronouns and Subject/Verb Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. WPSS 54: 43–58.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1995. On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 307–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999a. Svenska Akademiens grammatik II. Ord. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik III. Fraser. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999c. Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir. 2004. Verlaufsformen. Isländisch, Rheinisches Deutsch, Englisch. MA thesis, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk. 1993. Getið í eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. [The author's 1987 master's thesis.]Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2000. Fall á fallanda fæti? Um breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 22: 185–204.Google Scholar
Thórhallur Eythórsson.2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 196–212. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2003. Oblique Subjects: A Germanic Inheritance!WPSS 71:145–202.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. The Case of Subject in Faroese. WPSS 72: 207–31.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, see Höskuldur Thráinsson.
Torfadóttir, Theódóra Anna, see Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir.
Torp, Arne. 1992. Der sogenannte ‘Garpegenitiv’: Ursprung, Alter und Verbreitung im heutingen Norwegisch. In Elmevik, Lars and Schöndorf, Kurt Erich (eds.): Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien III. Papers from the 3rd Symposium ‘Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien’, Sigtuna August 17–20, 1989, pp. 151–66. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne. 1998. Nordiske språk i nordisk og germansk perspektiv. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Trosterud, Trond. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and the New Mainland Scandinavian Word Order: A Possible Counterexample from a Norwegian Dialect. In Papers from the 11th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics I, pp. 87–100. University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne. 1985. Icelandic Case without Primitive Grammatical Functions. WPSS24.Google Scholar
Valfells, Sigríður, see Sigríður Valfells.
Valin, Robert. 1991. Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations. NLLT 9: 145–94.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1995. Referentiality and Argument Positions in Icelandic. WPSS 55: 89–109.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2000. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i minimalistisk perspektiv. In Andersen, Øivin, Fløttum, Kjersti and Kinn, Torodd (eds.), Menneske, språk og fellesskap: Festskrift til Kirsti Koch Christensen på 60–årsdagen 1. desember 2000. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2001. On Noun Phrase Architecture, Referentiality and Article Systems. Studia Linguistica 55: 249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002a. Icelandic Expletive Constructions and the Distribution of Subject Types. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 43–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002b. A Verb's Gotta Do What a Verb's Gotta Do! On Scandinavian Infinitivals and the AGR Parameter. In Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter and Abraham, Werner (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 203–17. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2003. ‘Identifikasjon’ og morfologiens rolle i den nordiske nominalfrasen. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 111–94. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø, Tromsø. [A paper presented at GLOW, Thessaloniki, 2004.]
VangsnesØystein, , Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.). 2003. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1985. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. WPSS23.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1989. Object Shift and Double Objects in Danish. WPSS 44: 141–55.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1991. Relative der and other Co-elements in Danish. Lingua 84: 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 117–47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995b. Vo-to-Io Movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses. WPSS 55: 1–27. [Also published in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 1997: The New Comparative Syntax, pp. 189–213. Longman, London.]Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997. The Interpretation of Object Shift, Optimality Theory and Minimalism. WPSS 60: 1–24.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997–1998. Vo-til-Io flytning og personfleksion i alle tempora. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 85–132.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.2003. Null Objects under Coordination in Yiddish and Scandinavian. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 365–75. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Bonnie Schwartz. 1995. The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses. In Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, pp. 11–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Sprouse, Rex. 1988. Have/Be Selection as a Chain Membership Requirement. WPSS 38: 1–48.Google Scholar
Vikør, Lars S. 1995. The Nordic Languages: Their Status and Interrelations. 2nd edn. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vinka, Mikael. 1998. Two Disinct Verb Particle Constructions in Swedish. In Cambier-Langeveld, T., Liptak, A. and Redford, M. (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole VI, pp. 269–281. HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Birner, Betty. 1995. Definiteness and the English Existential. Language 71: 722–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 427–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Maria Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.): Parameter Setting, pp. 41–76. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – A Preliminary Investigation. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Wide, Camilla. 2002. Perfect in Dialogue. Form and Functional Potential of the vera búinn að + inf. Construction in Contemporary Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–38.Google Scholar
Willson, Kendra. 2000. Grammaticalization, Borrowing and Verb Post-Second Sentences in Icelandic. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 253–64. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1997. Four Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative. NLLT 15: 181–227.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen.2003. Burzio's Generalization, Markedness and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 301–29. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan and Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Case in Tiers. Language 63: 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1980. Extraction Rules in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York, 1985.
Zaenen, Annie. 1983. On Syntactic Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 469–504.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, and Maling, Joan. 1984. Unaccusative, Passive and Quirky Case. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–29. Stanford University. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 137–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. NLLT 3: 441–83. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 95–136. Academic Press, San Diego, and in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) 2006: Lexical Semantics in LFG, pp. 163–207. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.]Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential Negation. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 511–35. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. A-type Binding and Narrative Point of View. Language 65: 695–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't. Language 59: 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Höskuldur Thráinsson, University of Iceland, Reykjavik
  • Book: The Syntax of Icelandic
  • Online publication: 28 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619441.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Höskuldur Thráinsson, University of Iceland, Reykjavik
  • Book: The Syntax of Icelandic
  • Online publication: 28 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619441.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Höskuldur Thráinsson, University of Iceland, Reykjavik
  • Book: The Syntax of Icelandic
  • Online publication: 28 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619441.011
Available formats
×