Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:19:38.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - From macro to micro: the French experience on credit risk stress-testing

from Part II - Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Mario Quagliariello
Affiliation:
European Banking Authority, London
Get access

Summary

Main features and objectives of the French stress-testing framework

The stress-testing approach adopted by the Commission Bancaire – Banque de France is based on a reduced form credit risk model, where the capacity of a borrowing agent to repay his debt is determined by the difference between the value of his assets and the nominal value of his debt. Hence, the link with stress-testing exercises can be easily made through two complementary steps. First, the asset is modelled as a variable that adjusts over time under the realisation of random shocks, which can either be idiosyncratic (agent-specific) or systemic (macroeconomic) in nature. In that context, our stress test will implicitly consist of quantifying the impact of these shocks – or risk factors – to the asset value of the borrower. Second, according to Merton (1974), the comparison of the asset value to the nominal debt value determines the default of the borrower. The default occurs when the value of the debt exceeds the value of the assets. Therefore, the measure of credit risk, over a one-year horizon, is the probability of default (PD). The Basel 2 regulatory framework – namely the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach for credit risk – provides us with an appropriate structure for stress-testing. Compliant with Vasicek (2002), our stress-testing exercises will aim at assessing how systemic and/or idiosyncratic risk factors may affect the dynamic of PDs in banks' loan portfolios.

Type
Chapter
Information
Stress-testing the Banking System
Methodologies and Applications
, pp. 238 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avesani, R., García Pascual, A. and Li, J. (2006), ‘A New Risk Indicator and Stress Testing Tool: a Multifactor Nth-to-Default CDS Basket’, IMF Working Paper, 105.Google Scholar
Baghli, M., Brunhes-Lesage, V., Bandt, O., Fraisse, H. and Villetel, J. P. (2004), ‘Modèle d'Analyse et de Prevision de la COnjoncture TrimesTriellE – Mascotte’, Banque de France Working Paper, 5.Google Scholar
Bardos, M. (2006), ‘Banque de France Scores: Developments, Applications and Maintenances’, Banque de France Monthly Bulletin Digest, 151.Google Scholar
Bandt, O. and Oung, V. (2004), ‘Assessment of Stress-tests Conducted on the French Banking System’, Banque de France Financial Stability Review, 5.Google Scholar
Fabi, F., Laviola, S. and Reedtz, P. Marullo (2004), ‘The Treatment of SMEs Loans in the New Basel Capital Accord: Some Evaluations’, BNL Quarterly Review, 228, March.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. A. E., Sunirand, P. and Tsomocos, D. P. (2004), ‘A Model to Analyse Financial Fragility: Applications’, Journal of Financial Stability, 1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H. and Manz, M. (2006), ‘The Exposure of Swiss Banks to Macroeconomic Shocks: an Empirical Investigation’, Swiss National Banks Working Papers, 4.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C. (1974), ‘On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: the Risk Structure of Interest Rates’, Journal of Finance, 29 (2), 449–70.Google Scholar
Rouabah, A. (2006), ‘La Sensibilité de l'Activité Bancaire aux chocs Macroéconomiques: une Analyse en Panel sur des Données des Banques Luxembourgeoises’, Banque Centrale du Luxembourg Cahier d'études, 21.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O. (2002), ‘Loan Portfolio Value’, Risk, December, 160–2.Google Scholar
Virolainen, K. (2004), ‘Macro Stress Testing with a Macroeconomic Credit Risk Model for Finland’, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, 18.Google Scholar
Wei, J. Z. (2003), ‘A Multi-factor Credit Migration Model for Sovereign and Corporate Debts’, Journal of International Money and Finance, 22, 709–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. C. (1997a), ‘Portfolio Credit Risk I’, Risk, 10 (9), 111–17.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. C.(1997b), ‘Portfolio Credit Risk 2’, Risk, 10 (10), 56–61.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×