Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:01:49.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - 3He transport and the solar neutrino problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2009

Chris Jordinson
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
Michael J. Thompson
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

3He transport in the solar core has been suggested as a solution to the solar neutrino problem. I investigate the consequences of imposing a flow on the solar core and show that it is unlikely that a flow could exist that would reproduce the best-fit astrophysical solution to the experimental neutrino fluxes from Homestake, SAGE, GALLEX and SuperKamiokande.

Introduction

Before the announcement of the results from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (Ahmad et al. 2001), the measurements of the fluxes of neutrinos coming from nuclear reactions in the core of the sun were inconsistent with solar models. It has been argued that a so-called standard solar model can never be consistent with the experimental fluxes, and this has been used as an argument for the necessity of flavour transitions. However, non-standard solar models where 3He is burnt out of equilibrium have been suggested as astrophysical solutions to the neutrino problem (e.g. Dilke & Gough, 1972 and Gough, 1991), and Cumming & Haxton (1996) showed how a solar model with a redistribution of 3He in the core could overcome the problems of a standard solar model.

It was argued (Bahcall et al., 1997), using simple one-dimensional models with a mixed core, that Cumming and Haxton's model was inconsistent with helioseismology. As helioseismology had measured only a horizontal average of quantities in the solar interior, and as the suggested mechanism is fundamentally at least two-dimensional, the mechanism cannot be ruled out until a more realistic, two-dimensional model has been produced.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×