Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Editors' Introduction: Inference and Shoe Leather
- Part I Statistical Modeling: Foundations and Limitations
- Part II Studies in Political Science, Public Policy, and Epidemiology
- Part III New Developments: Progress or Regress?
- 12 On Regression Adjustments in Experiments with Several Treatments
- 13 Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression
- 14 The Grand Leap
- 15 On Specifying Graphical Models for Causation, and the Identification Problem
- 16 Weighting Regressions by Propensity Scores
- 17 On the So-Called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors”
- 18 Endogeneity in Probit Response Models
- 19 Diagnostics Cannot Have Much Power Against General Alternatives
- Part IV Shoe Leather Revisited
- References and Further Reading
- Index
17 - On the So-Called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Editors' Introduction: Inference and Shoe Leather
- Part I Statistical Modeling: Foundations and Limitations
- Part II Studies in Political Science, Public Policy, and Epidemiology
- Part III New Developments: Progress or Regress?
- 12 On Regression Adjustments in Experiments with Several Treatments
- 13 Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression
- 14 The Grand Leap
- 15 On Specifying Graphical Models for Causation, and the Identification Problem
- 16 Weighting Regressions by Propensity Scores
- 17 On the So-Called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors”
- 18 Endogeneity in Probit Response Models
- 19 Diagnostics Cannot Have Much Power Against General Alternatives
- Part IV Shoe Leather Revisited
- References and Further Reading
- Index
Summary
Abstract. The “Huber Sandwich Estimator” can be used to estimate the variance of the MLE when the underlying model is incorrect. If the model is nearly correct, so are the usual standard errors, and robustification is unlikely to help much. On the other hand, if the model is seriously in error, the sandwich may help on the variance side, but the parameters being estimated by the MLE are likely to be meaningless–except perhaps as descriptive statistics.
Introduction
This chapter gives an informal account of the so-called “Huber Sandwich Estimator,” for which Peter Huber is not to be blamed. We discuss the algorithm and mention some of the ways in which it is applied. Although the chapter is mainly expository, the theoretical framework outlined here may have some elements of novelty. In brief, under rather stringent conditions the algorithm can be used to estimate the variance of the MLE when the underlying model is incorrect. However, the algorithm ignores bias, which may be appreciable. Thus, results are liable to be misleading.
To begin the mathematical exposition, let i index observations whose values are yi. Let θ ∈ Rp be a p × 1 parameter vector. Let y → fi (y|θ) be a positive density. If yi takes only the values 0 or 1, which is the chief case of interest here, then fi (0|θ) > 0, fi (1|θ) > 0, and fi (0|θ) + fi (0|θ) + fi (1|θ) = 1. Some examples involve real- or vector-valued yi, and the notation is set up in terms of integrals rather than sums.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Statistical Models and Causal InferenceA Dialogue with the Social Sciences, pp. 295 - 304Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 1
- Cited by