Book contents
- State-Owned Entities and Human Rights
- State-Owned Entities and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Statutes and Statutory Instruments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction to the Human Rights Dimension of State Corporate Ownership
- 2 State-Owned Entities as a Sui Generis ‘Participant’ in International Law
- 3 State-Owned Entities and Norm Development in International Law
- 4 Fundamental Change in International Law
- 5 The Continued Relevance of General International Law
- 6 Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - The Continued Relevance of General International Law
State Responsibility and State-Owned Entities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2021
- State-Owned Entities and Human Rights
- State-Owned Entities and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Statutes and Statutory Instruments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction to the Human Rights Dimension of State Corporate Ownership
- 2 State-Owned Entities as a Sui Generis ‘Participant’ in International Law
- 3 State-Owned Entities and Norm Development in International Law
- 4 Fundamental Change in International Law
- 5 The Continued Relevance of General International Law
- 6 Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Looked at through the topic of State responsibility, chapter five underlines the continued importance and relevance of the general rules of international law in addressing some of the challenges encountered when dealing with State corporate ownership and human rights. The first part of the chapter provides an introduction to the nature and scope of State responsibility in international law with particular emphasis being placed on the role and process of attribution. In this context, the rules of attribution found in Articles 4, 5 and 8 of the International Law Commission Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts are examined in detail. The second part of the chapter analyses how the concept of due diligence becomes relevant when certain acts and omissions cannot be attributed to the State because those acts are not perpetrated by State organs, by actors that exercise governmental authority, or by those that are not under the 'effective control' of the State. In such cases, States, can nevertheless, be held responsible for a failure to act diligently to take all the necessary measures to prevent or punish the occurrence of a specific act.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State-Owned Entities and Human RightsThe Role of International Law, pp. 202 - 264Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021