Modern psychopharmacology is largely the story of chemical neurotransmission. To understand the actions of drugs on the brain, to grasp the impact of diseases upon the central nervous system, and to interpret the behavioral consequences of psychiatric medicines, one must be fluent in the language and principles of chemical neurotransmission. The importance of this fact cannot be overstated for the student of psychopharmacology. This chapter forms the foundation for the entire book, and the roadmap for one’s journey through one of the most exciting topics in science today, namely the neuroscience of how disorders and drugs act upon the central nervous system.
Anatomical versus Chemical Basis of Neurotransmission
What is neurotransmission? Neurotransmission can be described in many ways: anatomically, chemically, electrically. The anatomical basis of neurotransmission is neurons (Figures 1-1 to 1-3) and the connections between them, called synapses (Figure 1-4), sometimes also called the anatomically addressed nervous system, a complex of “hard-wired” synaptic connections between neurons, not unlike millions of telephone wires within thousands upon thousands of cables. The anatomically addressed brain is thus a complex wiring diagram, ferrying electrical impulses to wherever the “wire” is plugged in (i.e., at a synapse). Synapses can form on many parts of a neuron, not just from the axon of one neuron to the dendrite of another neuron as axodendritic synapses, but also from the axon of one neuron to the soma of another neuron as axosomatic synapses, and even from one neuron’s axon to another neuron’s axon, especially at the beginning and at the end of the receiving neuron’s axons (axoaxonic synapses) (Figure 1-2). Such synapses are said to be “asymmetric” since communication is structurally designed to be in one direction, i.e., anterograde from the axon of the first neuron to the dendrite, soma, or axon of the second neuron (Figures 1-2 and 1-3). This means that there are presynaptic elements that differ from postsynaptic elements (Figure 1-4). Specifically, a neurotransmitter is packaged in the presynaptic nerve terminal like ammunition in a loaded gun, and then fired at the postsynaptic neuron to target its receptors.
Neurons are the cells of chemical communication in the brain. Human brains are comprised of tens of billions of neurons, and each is linked to thousands of other neurons. Thus, the brain has trillions of specialized connections known as synapses. Neurons have many sizes, lengths, and shapes that determine their functions. Localization within the brain also determines function. When neurons malfunction, behavioral symptoms may occur. When drugs alter neuronal function, behavioral symptoms may be relieved, worsened, or produced.
General Structure of a Neuron
Although this textbook will often portray neurons with a generic structure (such as that shown in Figures 1-1 to 1-3), the truth is that many neurons have unique structures depending upon where in the brain they are located and what their function is. On the one hand, all neurons have a cell body known as the soma, and are set up structurally to receive information from other neurons through dendrites, sometimes via spines on the dendrites and often through an elaborately branching “tree” of dendrites (Figure 1-2). Neurons are also set up structurally to send information to other neurons via an axon that forms presynaptic terminals as the axon passes by (en passant, Figure 1-1) or as the axon ends (presynaptic axon terminals, Figures 1-1 through 1-4).
Neurotransmission has an anatomical infrastructure, but it is fundamentally a very elegant chemical operation. Complementary to the anatomically addressed nervous system is thus the chemically addressed nervous system, which forms the chemical basis of neurotransmission: namely, how chemical signals are coded, decoded, transduced, and sent along the way. Understanding the principles of chemical neurotransmission is a fundamental requirement for grasping how psychopharmacological agents work, because these agents target key molecules involved in neurotransmission. Drug targeting of specific chemical sites that influence neurotransmission is discussed in Chapters 2 and 3.
Understanding the chemically addressed nervous system is also a prerequisite for becoming a “neurobiologically informed” clinician: that is, being able to translate exciting new findings on brain circuitry, functional neuroimaging, and genetics into clinical practice, and potentially improving the manner in which psychiatric disorders and their symptoms are diagnosed and treated. The chemistry of neurotransmission in specific brain regions and how these principles are applied to various specific psychiatric disorders, treated with various specific psychotropic drugs, are discussed throughout the rest of the book.
Principles of Chemical Neurotransmission
Neurotransmitters
There are more than a dozen known or suspected neurotransmitters in the brain. For psychopharmacologists, it is particularly important to know the six key neurotransmitter systems targeted by psychotropic drugs:
Each is discussed in detail in the clinical chapters related to the specific drugs that target them.
Other neurotransmitters that are also important neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as histamine and various neuropeptides and hormones, are mentioned in brief throughout the relevant clinical chapters in this textbook.
Some neurotransmitters are very similar to drugs and have been called “God’s pharmacopeia.” For example, it is well known that the brain makes its own morphine (i.e., β-endorphin) and its own marijuana (i.e., endocannabinoids). The brain may even make its own Prozac, its own Xanax, and and its own hallucinogens! Drugs often mimic the brain’s natural neurotransmitters and some drugs have been discovered prior to the natural neurotransmitter. Thus, morphine was used in clinical practice before the discovery of β-endorphin; marijuana was smoked before the discovery of cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids; the benzodiazepines Valium (diazepam) and Xanax (alprazolam) were prescribed before the discovery of benzodiazepine receptors; and the antidepressants Elavil (amitriptyline) and Prozac (fluoxetine) entered clinical practice before molecular clarification of the serotonin transporter site. This underscores the point that the great majority of drugs that act in the central nervous system act upon the process of neurotransmission. Indeed, this apparently occurs at times in a manner that can mimic the actions of the brain itself, when the brain uses its own chemicals.
Input to any neuron can involve many different neurotransmitters coming from many different neuronal circuits. Understanding these inputs to neurons within functioning circuits can provide a rational basis for selecting and combining therapeutic agents. This theme is discussed extensively in each chapter on the various psychiatric disorders. The idea is that for the modern psychopharmacologist to influence abnormal neurotransmission in patients with psychiatric disorders, it may be necessary to target neurons in specific circuits. Since these networks of neurons send and receive information via a variety of neurotransmitters, it may therefore be not only rational but necessary to use multiple drugs with multiple neurotransmitter actions for patients with psychiatric disorders, especially if single agents with single neurotransmitter mechanisms are not effective in relieving symptoms.
Neurotransmission: Classic, Retrograde, and Volume
Classic neurotransmission begins with an electrical process by which neurons send electrical impulses from one part of the cell to another part of the same cell via their axons (see neuron A of Figure 1-3). However, these electrical impulses do not jump directly to other neurons. Classic neurotransmission between neurons involves one neuron hurling a chemical messenger, or neurotransmitter, at the receptors of a second neuron (see the synapse between neuron A and neuron B in Figure 1-3). This happens frequently but not exclusively at the sites of synaptic connections. In the human brain, a hundred billion neurons each make thousands of synapses with other neurons for an estimated trillion chemically neurotransmitting synapses.
Communication between all these neurons at synapses is chemical, not electrical. That is, an electrical impulse in the first neuron is converted to a chemical signal at the synapse between it and a second neuron, in a process known as excitation–secretion coupling, the first stage of chemical neurotransmission. This occurs predominantly but not exclusively in one direction, from the presynaptic axon terminal to a second postsynaptic neuron (Figures 1-2 and 1-3). Finally, neurotransmission continues in the second neuron either by converting the chemical information from the first neuron back into an electrical impulse in the second neuron, or, perhaps more elegantly, by the chemical information from the first neuron triggering a cascade of further chemical messages within the second neuron to change that neuron’s molecular and genetic functioning (Figure 1-3).
An interesting twist to chemical neurotransmission is the discovery that postsynaptic neurons can also “talk back” to their presynaptic neurons. They can do this via retrograde neurotransmission from the second neuron to the first at the synapse between them (Figure 1-5, right panel). Chemicals produced specifically as retrograde neurotransmitters at some synapses include the endocannabinoids (EC, also known as “endogenous marijuana”), which are synthesized in the postsynaptic neuron. They are then released and diffuse to presynaptic cannabinoid receptors such as the CB1 or cannabinoid 1 receptor (Figure 1-5, right panel). Another retrograde neurotransmitter is the gaseous neurotransmitter nitric oxide (NO), which is synthesized postsynaptically and then diffuses out of the postsynaptic membrane and into the presynaptic membrane to interact with cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-sensitive targets there (Figure 1-5, right panel). A third type of retrograde neurotransmitter are neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), which is released from postsynaptic sites, and then diffuses to the presynaptic neuron, where it is taken up into vesicles, and transported all the way back to the cell nucleus via retrograde transport systems to interact with the genome there (Figure 1-5, right panel). What these retrograde neurotransmitters have to say to the presynaptic neuron and how this modifies or regulates the communication between pre and postsynaptic neuron are subjects of intense active investigation.
In addition to “reverse” or retrograde neurotransmission at synapses, some neurotransmission does not need a synapse at all! Neurotransmission without a synapse is called volume neurotransmission, or nonsynaptic diffusion neurotransmission (examples are shown in Figures 1-6 through 1-8). Chemical messengers sent by one neuron to another can spill over to sites distant to the synapse by diffusion (Figure 1-6). Thus, neurotransmission can occur at any compatible receptor within the diffusion radius of the neurotransmitter, not unlike modern communication with cellular telephones, which function within the transmitting radius of a given cell tower (Figure 1-6). This concept is part of the chemically addressed nervous system, and here neurotransmission occurs in chemical “puffs” (Figures 1–6 through 1–8). The brain is thus not only a collection of wires, but also a sophisticated “chemical soup.” The chemically addressed nervous system is particularly important in mediating the actions of drugs that act at various neurotransmitter receptors, since such drugs will act wherever there are relevant receptors, and not just where such receptors are innervated with synapses by the anatomically addressed nervous system. Modifying volume neurotransmission may indeed be a major way in which several psychotropic drugs work in the brain.
A good example of volume neurotransmission is dopamine action in the prefrontal cortex. Here there are very few dopamine reuptake transport pumps (dopamine transporters or DATs) to terminate the action of dopamine released in the prefrontal cortex during neurotransmission. This is much different from other brain areas, such as the striatum, where dopamine reuptake pumps are present in abundance. Thus, when dopamine neurotransmission occurs at a synapse in the prefrontal cortex, dopamine is free to spill over from that synapse and diffuse to neighboring dopamine receptors and stimulate them, even though there is no synapse at these “spillover” sites (Figure 1-7).
Another important example of volume neurotransmission is at the sites of autoreceptors on monoamine neurons (Figure 1-8). At the somatodendritic end of the neuron (top of the neurons in Figure 1-8) are autoreceptors that inhibit the release of neurotransmitter from the axonal end of the neuron (bottom of the neurons in Figure 1-8). Although some recurrent axon collaterals and other monoamine neurons may directly innervate somatodendritic receptors, these so-called somatodendritic autoreceptors also apparently receive neurotransmitter from dendritic release (Figure 1-8, middle and right panels). There is no synapse here, no synaptic vesicles, just neurotransmitter apparently “leaked” from the neuron’s dendrites upon its own receptors in a mechanism that is still being clarified. The nature of a neuron’s regulation by its somatodendritic autoreceptors is a subject of intense interest, and is theoretically linked to the mechanism of action of many antidepressants, as will be explained later in Chapter 7. The take-home point here is that not all chemical neurotransmission occurs at synapses.
Excitation—Secretion Coupling
An electrical impulse in the first – or presynaptic – neuron is converted into a chemical signal at the synapse by a process known as excitation–secretion coupling. Once an electrical impulse invades the presynaptic axon terminal, it causes the release of chemical neurotransmitter stored there (Figures 1-3 and 1-4). Electrical impulses open ion channels – both voltage-sensitive sodium channels (VSSCs) and voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs) – by changing the ionic charge across neuronal membranes. As sodium flows into the presynaptic nerve through sodium channels in the axon membrane, the electrical charge of the action potential moves along the axon until it reaches the presynaptic nerve terminal where it also opens calcium channels. As calcium flows into the presynaptic nerve terminal, it causes synaptic vesicles anchored to the inner membrane to spill their chemical contents into the synapse. The way is paved for chemical communication by previous synthesis of neurotransmitter and storage of neurotransmitter in the first neuron’s presynaptic axon terminal.
Excitation–secretion coupling is thus the way that the neuron transduces an electrical stimulus into a chemical event. This happens very quickly once the electrical impulse enters the presynaptic neuron. It is also possible for the neuron to transduce a chemical message from a presynaptic neuron back into an electrical chemical message in the postsynaptic neuron by opening ion channels linked to neurotransmitters there. This also happens very quickly when chemical neurotransmitters open ion channels that change the flow of charge into the neuron, and ultimately, action potentials in the postsynaptic neuron. Thus, the process of neurotransmission is constantly transducing chemical signals into electrical signals, and electrical signals back into chemical signals.
Signal Transduction Cascades
Overview
Neurotransmission can be seen as part of a much larger process than just the communication of a presynaptic axon with a postsynaptic neuron at the synapse between them. That is, neurotransmission can also be seen as communication from the genome of the presynaptic neuron (neuron A of Figure 1-3) to the genome of the postsynaptic neuron (neuron B of Figure 1-3), and then back from the genome of the postsynaptic neuron to the genome of the presynaptic neuron via retrograde neurotransmission (right panel of Figure 1-5). Such a process involves long strings of chemical messages within both presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, called signal transduction cascades.
Signal transduction cascades triggered by chemical neurotransmission thus involve numerous molecules, starting with neurotransmitter first messenger, and proceeding to second, third, fourth, and more messengers (Figures 1-9 through 1-30). The initial events occur in less than a second, but the long-term consequences are mediated by downstream messengers that take hours to days to activate, yet can last for many days or even for the lifetime of a synapse or neuron (Figure 1-10). Signal transduction cascades are somewhat akin to a molecular “pony express” with specialized molecules acting as a sequence of riders, handing off the message to the next specialized molecule, until the message has reached a functional destination, such as gene expression or activation of otherwise “sleeping” and inactive molecules (see for example, Figures 1-9 through 1-19).
An overview of such a molecular “pony express,” from first-messenger neurotransmitter through several “molecular riders” to the production of diverse biological responses, is shown in Figure 1-9. Specifically, a first-messenger neurotransmitter on the left activates the production of a chemical second messenger that in turn activates a third messenger, namely an enzyme known as a kinase that adds phosphate groups to fourth-messenger proteins to create phosphoproteins (Figure 1-9, left). Another signal transduction cascade is shown on the right with a first-messenger neurotransmitter opening an ion channel that allows calcium to enter the neuron and act as the second messenger for this cascade system (Figure 1-9, right). Calcium then activates a different third messenger on the right, namely an enzyme known as a phosphatase that removes phosphate groups from fourth-messenger phosphoproteins and thus reverses the actions of the third messenger on the left. The balance between kinase and phosphatase activity, signaled by the balance between the two neurotransmitters that activate each of them, determines the degree of downstream chemical activity that gets translated into active fourth messengers able to trigger diverse biological responses, such as gene expression and synaptogenesis (Figure 1-9). Each molecular site within the cascade of transduction of chemical and electrical messages is a potential location for a malfunction associated with a mental illness; it is also a potential target for a psychotropic drug. Thus, the various elements of multiple signal transduction cascades play very important roles in psychopharmacology.
Four of the most important signal transduction cascades in the brain are shown in Figure 1-11. These include G-protein-linked systems, ion-channel-linked systems, hormone-linked systems, and neurotrophin-linked systems. There are many chemical messengers for each of these four critical signal transduction cascades; the G-protein-linked and the ion-channel-linked cascades are triggered by neurotransmitters (Figure 1-11). Many of the psychotropic drugs used in clinical practice today target one of these two signal transduction cascades. Drugs that target the G-protein-linked system are discussed in Chapter 2; drugs that target the ion channel-linked system are discussed in Chapter 3.
Forming a Second Messenger
Each of the four signal transduction cascades (Figure 1-11) passes its message from an extracellular first messenger to an intracellular second messenger. In the case of G-protein-linked systems, the second messenger is a chemical, but in the case of an ion-channel-linked system, the second messenger can be an ion such as calcium (Figure 1-11). For some hormone-linked systems, a second messenger is formed when the hormone finds its receptor in the cytoplasm and binds to it to form a hormone–nuclear receptor complex (Figure 1-11). For neurotrophins, a complex set of various second messengers exist (Figure 1-11), including proteins that are kinase enzymes with an alphabet soup of complicated names.
The transduction of an extracellular first neurotransmitter from the presynaptic neuron into an intracellular second messenger in the postsynaptic neuron is known in detail for some second-messenger systems, such as for those that are linked to G proteins (Figures 1-12 through 1-15). There are four key elements to this second-messenger system:the first-messenger neurotransmitter
a receptor for the neurotransmitter that belongs to the receptor superfamily in which all have the structure of seven transmembrane regions (designated by the number 7 on the receptor in Figures 1-12 to 1-15)
a G protein capable of binding both to certain conformations of the neurotransmitter receptor (7) and to an enzyme system (E) that can synthesize the second messenger
and finally the enzyme system itself for the second messenger (Figures 1-12 through 1-15)
The first step is the neurotransmitter binding to its receptor (Figure 1-13). This changes the conformation of the receptor so it can now fit with the G protein, as indicated by the receptor (7) turning green and its shape changing at the bottom. Next comes the binding of the G protein to this new conformation of the receptor–neurotransmitter complex (Figure 1-14). The two receptors cooperate with each other: namely, the neurotransmitter receptor itself, and the G protein, which can be thought of as another type of receptor associated with the inner membrane of the cell. This cooperation is indicated in Figure 1-14 by the G protein turning green and its conformation changing on the right so it is now capable of binding to an enzyme (E) that synthesizes the second messenger. Finally, the enzyme, in this case adenylate cyclase, binds to the G protein and synthesizes cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate), which serves as second messenger (Figure 1-15). This is indicated in Figure 1-15 by the enzyme turning green and generating cAMP (the icon with number 2 on it).
Beyond the Second Messenger to Phosphoprotein Messengers
Recent research has begun to clarify the complex molecular links between the second messenger and its ultimate effects upon cellular functions. These links are specifically the third, fourth, and subsequent chemical messengers in the signal transduction cascades shown in Figures 1-9, 1-11, 1-16 through 1-30). Each of the four classes of signal transduction cascades shown in Figure 1-11 not only begins with a different first messenger binding to a unique receptor, but this also leads to activation of very different downstream second, third, and subsequent chemical messengers. Having many different signal transduction cascades allows neurons to respond in amazingly diverse biological ways to a whole array of chemical messaging systems.
What is the ultimate target of signal transduction? There are two major targets of signal transduction: phosphoproteins and genes. Many of the intermediate targets along the way to the gene are phosphoproteins, such as the fourth-messenger phosphoproteins shown in Figures 1-18 and 1-19 that lie dormant in the neuron until signal transduction wakes them up and they can spring into action.
The actions shown in Figure 1-9 on fourth-messenger phosphoproteins as targets of signal transduction can be seen in more detail in Figures 1-16 through 1–19. Thus, one signal transduction pathway can activate a third-messenger kinase through the second-messenger cAMP (Figure 1-16), whereas another signal transduction pathway can activate a third-messenger phosphatase through the second-messenger calcium (Figure 1-17). In the case of kinase activation, two copies of the second messenger target each regulatory unit of dormant or “sleeping” protein kinase (Figure 1-16). When some protein kinases are inactive, they exist in dimers (two copies of the enzyme) while binding to a regulatory unit, thus rendering them in a conformation that is not active. In this example, when two copies of cAMP bind to each regulatory unit, the regulatory unit dissociates from the enzyme, and the dimer dissociates into two copies of the enzyme, and the protein kinase is now activated, shown with a bow and arrow ready to shoot phosphate groups into unsuspecting fourth-messenger phosphoproteins (Figure 1-16).
Meanwhile, the nemesis of protein kinase is also forming in Figure 1-17, namely a protein phosphatase. Another first messenger is opening an ion channel here, allowing the second-messenger calcium to enter, which activates the phosphatase enzyme calcineurin. In the presence of calcium, calcineurin becomes activated, shown with scissors ready to rip phosphate groups off fourth-messenger phosphoproteins (Figure 1-17).
The clash between kinase and phosphatase can be seen by comparing what happens in Figures 1-18 and 1-19. In Figure 1-18, the third-messenger kinase is putting phosphates onto various fourth-messenger phosphoproteins such as ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, and enzymes. In Figure 1-19, the third-messenger phosphatase is taking those phosphates off. Sometimes phosphorylation activates a dormant phosphoprotein; for other phosphoproteins, dephosphorylation can be activating. Activation of fourth-messenger phosphoproteins can change the synthesis of neurotransmitters, alter neurotransmitter release, change the conductance of ions, and generally maintain the chemical neurotransmission apparatus in either a state of readiness or dormancy. The balance between phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of fourth-messenger kinases and phosphatases plays a vital role in regulating many molecules critical to the chemical neurotransmission process.
Beyond the Second Messenger to a Phosphoprotein Cascade Triggering Gene Expression
The ultimate cellular function that neurotransmission often seeks to modify is gene expression, either turning a gene on or turning a gene off. All four signal transduction cascades shown in Figure 1-11 end with the last molecule influencing gene transcription. Both cascades triggered by neurotransmitters are shown acting upon the CREB system, which is responsive to phosphorylation of its regulatory units (Figure 1-11, left). CREB is cAMP response element-binding protein, a transcription factor in the cell nucleus capable of activating expression of genes, especially a type of gene known as immediate genes or immediate early genes. When G-protein-linked receptors activate protein kinase A, this activated enzyme can translocate or move into the cell nucleus and stick a phosphate group on CREB, thus activating this transcription factor and causing the nearby gene to become activated. This leads to gene expression, first as RNA and then as the protein coded by the gene.
Interestingly, it is also possible for ion-channel-linked receptors that enhance intracellular second-messenger calcium levels to activate CREB by phosphorylating it. A protein known as calmodulin, which interacts with calcium, can lead to activation of certain kinases called calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (Figure 1-11). This is an entirely different enzyme than the phosphatase shown in Figures 1-9, 1-17, and 1-19. Here, a kinase and not a phosphatase is activated. When activated, this kinase can translocate into the cell nucleus and, just like the kinase activated by the G-protein system, add a phosphate group to CREB and activate this transcription factor so that gene expression is triggered.
It is important to bear in mind that calcium is thus able to activate both kinases and phosphatases. There is a very rich and sometimes confusing array of kinases and phosphatases, and the net result of calcium action is dependent upon what substrates are activated, because different phosphatases and kinases target very different substrates. Thus, it is important to keep in mind the specific signal transduction cascade under discussion and the specific phosphoproteins acting as messengers in the cascade in order to understand the net effect of various signal transduction cascades. In the case illustrated in Figure 1-11, the G-protein system and the ion-channel system are working together to produce more activated kinases and thus more activation of CREB. However, in Figures 1-9 and 1-16 through 1-19, they are working in opposition.
Genes are also the ultimate target of the hormone signal transduction cascade in Figure 1-11. Some hormones, such as estrogen, thyroid, and cortisol, act at cytoplasmic receptors, bind them, and produce a hormone–nuclear receptor complex that translocates to the cell nucleus, finds elements in the gene that it can influence (called hormone-response elements, or HREs), and then acts as a transcription factor to trigger activation of nearby genes (Figure 1-11).
Finally, a very complicated signal transduction system with terrible sounding names for their downstream signal cascade messengers is activated by neurotrophins and related molecules. Activating this system by first-messenger neurotrophins leads to activation of enzymes that are mostly kinases, one kinase activating another until finally one of them phosphorylates a transcription factor in the cell nucleus and starts transcribing genes (Figure 1-11). Ras is a G protein that activates a cascade of kinases with confusing names. For those who are good sports with an interest in the specifics, this cascade starts with Ras activating Raf, which phosphorylates and activates MEK (MAPK kinase/ERK kinase or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal regulated kinase kinase), which activates ERK kinase (extracellular signal-regulated kinase itself), RSK (ribosomal S6 kinase), MAPK (MAP kinase itself), or GSK-3 (glycogen synthase kinase), leading ultimately to changes in gene expression. Confused? It is actually not important to know the names, but to remember the take-away point that neurotrophins trigger an important signal transduction pathway that activates kinase enzyme after kinase enzyme, ultimately changing gene expression. This is worth knowing because this signal transduction pathway may be responsible for the expression of genes that regulate many critical functions of the neuron, such as synaptogenesis and cell survival, as well as the plastic changes that are necessary for learning, memory, and even disease expression in various brain circuits. Both drugs and the environment target gene expression in ways that are just beginning to be understood, including how such actions contribute to the cause of mental illnesses and to the mechanism of action of effective treatments for mental illnesses.
In the meantime, it is mostly important to realize that a very wide variety of genes are targeted by all four of these signal transduction pathways. These range from the genes that make synthetic enzymes for neurotransmitters, to growth factors, cytoskeleton proteins, cellular adhesion proteins, ion channels, receptors, and the intracellular signaling proteins themselves, among many others. When genes are expressed by any of the signal transduction pathways shown in Figure 1-11, this can lead to making more or fewer copies of any of these proteins. Synthesis of such proteins is obviously a critical aspect of the neuron performing its many and varied functions. Numerous diverse biological actions are effected within neurons that alter behaviors in individuals due to gene expression that is triggered by the four major signal transduction cascades. These range widely from neuronal responses such as synaptogenesis, strengthening of a synapse, neurogenesis, apoptosis, increasing or decreasing the efficiency of information processing in cortical circuits to behavioral responses such as learning, memory, antidepressant responses to antidepressant administration, symptom reduction by psychotherapy, and possibly even the production of a mental illness.
How Neurotransmission Triggers Gene Expression
How does the gene express the protein it codes? The discussion above has shown how the molecular “pony express” of signal transduction has a message encoded with chemical information from the neurotransmitter–receptor complex that is passed along from molecular rider to molecular rider until the message is delivered to the appropriate phosphoprotein mailbox (Figures 1-9 and 1-16 through 1-19) or DNA mailbox in the postsynaptic neuron’s genome (Figures 1-11 and 1-20 through 1-30). Since the most powerful way for a neuron to alter its function is to change which genes are being turned on or off, it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms by which neurotransmission regulates gene expression.
How many potential genes can neurotransmission target? It is estimated that the human genome contains approximately 20,000 genes located within 3 million base pairs of DNA on 23 chromosomes. Incredibly, however, genes only occupy a few percent of this DNA. The other 96% used to be called “junk” DNA since it does not code proteins, but it is now known that these sections of DNA are critical for structure and for regulating whether or not a gene is expressed or is silent. It is not just the number of genes we have, it is whether and when and how often and under which circumstances they are expressed that seems to be the important factor in regulating neuronal function. These same factors of gene expression are now thought to also underlie the actions of psychopharmacological drugs and the mechanisms of psychiatric disorders within the central nervous system.
Molecular Mechanism of Gene Expression
Chemical neurotransmission converts receptor occupancy by a neurotransmitter into the creation of third, fourth, and subsequent messengers that eventually activate transcription factors that turn on genes (Figures 1-20 through 1-30). Most genes have two regions, a coding region and a regulatory region with enhancers and promoters of gene transcription (i.e., DNA being transcribed into RNA) (Figure 1-20). The coding region of DNA is the direct template for making its corresponding RNA. This DNA is “transcribed” into its RNA with the help of an enzyme called RNA polymerase. However, RNA polymerase must be activated, or it won’t work.
Luckily, the regulatory region of the gene can make this happen. It has an enhancer element and a promotor element (Figure 1-20), which can initiate gene expression with the help of transcription factors (Figure 1-21). Transcription factors themselves can be activated when they are phosphorylated, which allows them to bind to the regulatory region of the gene (Figure 1-21). This in turn activates RNA polymerase and off we go with the coding part of the gene transcribing itself into its messenger RNA (mRNA) (Figure 1-22). Once transcribed, of course, this messenger RNA goes on to translate itself into the corresponding protein (Figure 1-22). However, there is a great deal of RNA that never gets translated into proteins and instead exerts regulatory functions as explained below.
Some genes are known as immediate early genes (Figure 1-23). They have weird names such as cJun and cFos (Figures 1-24 and 1-25) and belong to a family called “leucine zippers” (Figure 1-25). These immediate early genes function as rapid responders to the neurotransmitter’s input, like the special ops troops sent into combat quickly and ahead of the full army. Such rapid deployment forces of immediate early genes are thus the first to respond to the neurotransmission signal by making the proteins they encode. In this example, it is Jun and Fos proteins coming from cJun and cFos genes (Figure 1-24). These are nuclear proteins; that is, they live and work in the nucleus. They get started within 15 minutes of receiving a neurotransmission, but only last for a half hour to an hour (Figure 1-10).
When Jun and Fos team up, they form a leucine zipper type of transcription factor (Figure 1-25), which in turn activates many kinds of later-onset genes (Figures 1-26, 1-27, 1-29). Thus, Fos and Jun serve to wake up the much larger army of inactive genes. Which individual “late” soldier genes are so drafted to active gene duty depends upon a number of factors, not the least of which is which neurotransmitter is sending the message, how frequently it is sending the message, and whether it is working in concert or in opposition with other neurotransmitters talking to other parts of the same neuron at the same time. When Fos and Jun partner together to form a leucine zipper type of transcription factor, this can lead to the activation of genes to make anything you can think of, from enzymes to receptors to structural proteins (see Figure 1-27).
In summary, one can trace the events from the neurotransmitting first messenger, through gene transcription (Figures 1-9, 1-11, 1-28, and 1-29). Once the second-messenger cAMP is formed from its first-messenger neurotransmitter (Figure 1-28), it can interact with a protein kinase third messenger. cAMP binds to the inactive or sleeping version of this enzyme, wakes it up, and thereby activates protein kinase. Once awakened, the protein kinase third messenger’s job is to activate transcription factors by phosphorylating them (Figure 1-28). It does this by traveling straight to the cell nucleus and finding a sleeping transcription factor. By sticking a phosphate onto the transcription factor, protein kinase is able to “wake up” that transcription factor and form a fourth messenger (Figure 1-28). Once a transcription factor is aroused, it will bind to genes and cause protein synthesis, in this case, the product of an immediate early gene, and this functions as a fifth messenger. Two such gene products bind together to form yet another activated transcription factor, and this is the sixth messenger (Figure 1-29). Finally, the sixth messenger causes the expression of a late gene product, which could be thought of as a seventh-messenger protein product of the activated gene. This late gene product then mediates some biological response important to the functioning of the neuron.
Of course, neurotransmitter-induced molecular cascades into the cell nucleus lead to changes not only in the synthesis of its own receptors, but also in that of many other important postsynaptic proteins, including enzymes and receptors for other neurotransmitters. If such changes in genetic expression lead to changes in connections and in the functions that these connections perform, it is easy to understand how genes can modify behavior. The details of nerve functioning – and thus the behavior derived from this nerve functioning – are controlled by genes and the products they produce. Since mental processes and the behaviors they cause come from the connections between neurons in the brain, genes therefore exert significant control over behavior. But can behavior modify genes? Learning as well as experiences from the environment can indeed alter which genes are expressed and thus can give rise to changes in neuronal connections. In this way, human experiences, education, and even psychotherapy may change the expression of genes that alter the distribution and “strength” of specific synaptic connections. This in turn may produce long-term changes in behavior caused by the original experience and mediated by the genetic changes triggered by that original experience. Thus, genes modify behavior and behavior modifies genes. Genes do not directly regulate neuronal functioning. Rather, they directly regulate the proteins which create neuronal functioning. Changes in function have to wait until the changes in protein synthesis occur, and the events which they cause start to happen.
Epigenetics
Genetics is the DNA code for what a cell can transcribe into specific types of RNA or translate into specific proteins. However, just because there are about 20,000 genes in the human genome, it does not mean that every gene is expressed, even in the brain. Epigenetics is a parallel system that determines whether any given gene is actually made into its specific RNA and protein, or if it is instead ignored or silenced. If the genome is a lexicon of all protein “words,” then the epigenome is a “story” resulting from arranging the “words” into a coherent tale. The genomic lexicon of all potential proteins is the same in every one of the 100+ billion neurons in the brain, and indeed is the same in all of the 200+ types of cells in the body. So, the plot of how a normal neuron becomes a malfunctioning neuron in a psychiatric disorder, as well as how a neuron becomes a neuron instead of a liver cell, is the selection of which specific genes are expressed or silenced. In addition, malfunctioning neurons are impacted by inherited genes that have abnormal nucleotide sequences, which if expressed contribute to mental disorders. Thus, the story of the brain depends not only upon which genes are inherited but also whether any abnormal genes are expressed or even whether normal genes are expressed when they should be silent or silenced when they should be expressed. Neurotransmission, genes themselves, drugs, and the environment all regulate which genes are expressed or silenced, and thus all affect whether the story of the brain is a compelling narrative such as learning and memory, a regrettable tragedy such as drug abuse, stress reactions, and psychiatric disorders, or therapeutic improvement of a psychiatric disorder by medications or psychotherapy.
What Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Epigenetics?
Epigenetic mechanisms turn genes on and off by modifying the structure of chromatin in the cell nucleus (Figure 1-30). The character of a cell is fundamentally determined by its chromatin, a substance composed of nucleosomes (Figure 1-30). Nucleosomes are an octet of proteins called histones around which DNA is wrapped (Figure 1-30). Epigenetic control over whether a gene is read (i.e., expressed) or is not read (i.e., silenced), is done by modifying the structure of chromatin. Chemical modifications that can do this include not only methylation, but also acetylation, phosphorylation, and others, and these processes are regulated by neurotransmission, drugs, and the environment (Figure 1-30). For example, when DNA or histones are methylated, this compacts the chromatin and acts to close off access of molecular transcription factors to the promoter regions of DNA, with the consequence that the gene in this region is silenced, and not expressed, so no RNA or protein is manufactured (Figure 1-30). Silenced DNA means molecular features that are not part of a given cell’s personality.
Histones are methylated by enzymes called histone methyltransferases, and this is reversed by enzymes called histone demethylases (Figure 1-30). Methylation of histones can silence genes whereas demethylation of histones can thus activate genes. DNA can also be methylated and this, too, silences genes. Demethylation of DNA reverses this. Methylation of DNA is regulated by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzymes, and demethylation of DNA by DNA demethylase enzymes (Figure 1-30). There are many forms of methyltransferase enzymes, and they all tag their substrates with methyl groups donated from L-methylfolate via S-adenosyl-methionine (SAMe) (Figure 1-30). When neurotransmission, drugs, or the environment impact methylation, for example, this regulates whether genes are epigenetically silenced or expressed.
Methylation of DNA can eventually lead to deacetylation of histones as well, by activating enzymes called histone deacetylases (HDACs). Deacetylation of histones also has a silencing action on gene expression (Figure 1-30). Methylation and deacetylation compress chromatin, as though a molecular gate has been closed, and thus transcription factors that activate genes cannot get access to their promoter regions, and thus the genes are silenced and not transcribed into RNA or translated into proteins (Figure 1-30). On the other hand, demethylation and acetylation do just the opposite: they decompress chromatin as though a molecular gate has been opened, and thus transcription factors can get to the promoter regions of genes, and do activate them (Figure 1-30). Activated genes thus become part of the molecular personality of a given cell.
How Epigenetics Maintains or Changes the Status Quo
Some enzymes try to maintain the status quo of a cell, enzymes such as DNMT1 (DNA methyltransferase 1), which maintain the methylation of specific areas of DNA and keep various genes quiet for a lifetime. For example, this process keeps a neuron always a neuron, and a liver cell always a liver cell, including when a cell divides into another one. Presumably methylation is maintained at genes that one cell does not need, even though another cell type might.
It used to be thought that, once a cell differentiated, the epigenetic pattern of gene activation and gene silencing remained stable for the lifetime of that cell. Now, however, it is known that there are various circumstances in which epigenetics may change in mature, differentiated neurons. Although the initial epigenetic pattern of a neuron is indeed set during neurodevelopment to give each neuron its own lifelong “personality,” it now appears that the storyline of some neurons is that they respond to their narrative experiences throughout life with a changing character arc, thus causing de novo alterations in their epigenome. Depending upon what happens to a neuron (such as experiencing child abuse, adult stress, dietary deficiencies, productive new encounters, psychotherapy, drugs of abuse, or psychotropic therapeutic medications), it now seems that previously silenced genes can become activated and/or previously active genes can become silenced (Figure 1-30). When this happens, both favorable and unfavorable developments can occur in the character of neurons. Favorable epigenetic mechanisms may be triggered in order for one to learn (e.g., spatial memory formation) or to experience the therapeutic actions of psychopharmacological agents. On the other hand, unfavorable epigenetic mechanisms may be triggered in order for one to become addicted to drugs of abuse, or to experience various forms of “abnormal learning,” such as when one develops fear conditioning, an anxiety disorder, or a chronic pain condition.
How these epigenetic mechanisms arrive at the scene of the crime remains a compelling neurobiological and psychiatric mystery. Nevertheless, a legion of scientific detectives is working these cases and is beginning to show how epigenetic mechanisms are mediators of psychiatric disorders. There is also the possibility that epigenetic mechanisms can be harnessed to treat addictions, extinguish fear, prevent the development of chronic pain states, and maybe even prevent disease progression of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia by identifying high-risk individuals before the “plot thickens” and the disorder is irreversibly established and relentlessly marches on to an unwanted destiny.
One of the mechanisms for changing the status quo of epigenomic patterns in a mature cell is via de novo DNA methylation by a type of DNMT enzyme known as DNMT2 or DNMT3 (Figure 1-30). These enzymes target neuronal genes for silencing that were previously active in a mature neuron. Of course, deacetylation of histones near previously active genes would do the same thing, namely silence them, and this is mediated by HDACs. In reverse, demethylation or acetylation of genes both activate genes that were previously silent. The real question is how does a neuron know which genes among its thousands to silence or activate in response to the environment, including stress, drugs, and diet? How might this go wrong when a psychiatric disorder develops? This part of the story remains a twisted mystery but some very interesting detective work has already been done by various investigators who hope to understand how some neuronal stories evolve into psychiatric tragedies. These investigations may set the stage for rewriting the narrative of various psychiatric disorders by therapeutically altering the epigenetics of key neuronal characters so that the story has a happy ending.
A Brief Word about RNA
Alternative Splicing
As mentioned above, the RNA that encodes our 20,000 genes is called messenger RNA (mRNA) and serves as an intermediate between DNA and protein. Although it might seem as if our 20,000 genes would make only 20,000 proteins, that is not so. It turns out that developing mRNA into protein is a similar process as when an old-fashioned movie producer makes cinema. That is, mRNA records the action from DNA just as the movie studio faithfully develops the film exactly as initially recorded. In the case of DNA transcription, this “first draft” is called the primary transcript (Figure 1-31). However, just as the raw footage from a movie shoot is not “translated” directly into a motion picture, in many cases, the “raw” mRNA is also not immediately translated into a protein. Now comes the interesting part: editing. It turns out that mRNA can be “spliced,” much like a movie producer edits and splices movie film once the live shoot is over, organizing the splices into different sequences and leaving some on the cutting-room floor. For spliced mRNA, these sections won’t be translated into protein (Figure 1-31). This “alternative splicing” means that one gene can give rise to many proteins (Figure 1-31), just like a movie can have different endings or be edited into a short trailer. Thus, thanks in part to RNA editing, the true molecular diversity of the brain is notably greater than our 20,000 genes.
RNA Interference
There are forms of RNA other than mRNA that are now known to exist and that do not code for protein synthesis; instead they have direct regulatory functions. These include ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and small nuclear RNA (snRNA), along with a large number of other noncoding RNAs (e.g., small hairpin RNAs because they are shaped like a hairpin, sometimes also called microRNA [miRNA]; interference RNA [iRNA]; and small interfering RNA [siRNA]. When miRNAs are transcribed from DNA, they do not go on to be translated into proteins. Instead, they form hairpin loops and are then exported to the cytoplasm by the enzyme exportin, where they are chopped into pieces by an enzyme called “dicer” (Figure 1-32). Small pieces of iRNA then bind to a protein complex called RISC, which binds in turn to mRNA to inhibit protein synthesis (Figure 1-32). So, forms of RNA can lead both to protein synthesis and to blocking protein synthesis. Future therapeutics may be able to utilize iRNAs to inhibit protein synthesis in genetic disorders, such as Huntington’s disease.
Summary
The reader should now appreciate that chemical neurotransmission is the foundation of psychopharmacology. There are many neurotransmitters, and all neurons receive input from a multitude of neurotransmitters in classic presynaptic to postsynaptic asymmetrical neurotransmission. Presynaptic to postsynaptic neurotransmissions at the brain’s trillion synapses are key to chemical neurotransmission, but some neurotransmission is retrograde from postsynaptic neuron to presynaptic neuron, and other types of neurotransmission, such as volume neurotransmission, do not require a synapse at all.
The reader should also have an appreciation for elegant if complex molecular cascades precipitated by a neurotransmitter, with molecule-by-molecule transfer of that transmitted message inside the neuron receiving that message, eventually altering the biochemical machinery of that cell in order to carry out the message that was sent to it. Thus, the function of chemical neurotransmission is not so much to have a presynaptic neurotransmitter communicate with its postsynaptic receptors, but to have a presynaptic genome converse with a postsynaptic genome: DNA to DNA, presynaptic “command center” to postsynaptic “command center” and back.
The message of chemical neurotransmission is transferred via three sequential “molecular pony express” routes: (1) a presynaptic neurotransmitter synthesis route from presynaptic genome to the synthesis and packaging of neurotransmitter and supporting enzymes and receptors; (2) a postsynaptic route from receptor occupancy through second messengers all the way to the genome, which turns on postsynaptic genes; and (3) another postsynaptic route starting from the newly expressed postsynaptic genes transferring information as a molecular cascade of biochemical consequences throughout the postsynaptic neuron.
It should now be clear that neurotransmission does not end when a neurotransmitter binds to a receptor or even when ion flows have been altered or second messengers have been created. Events such as these all start and end within milliseconds to seconds following release of presynaptic neurotransmitter. The ultimate goal of neurotransmission is to alter the biochemical activities of the postsynaptic target neuron in a profound and enduring manner. Since the postsynaptic DNA has to wait until molecular pony express messengers make their way from the postsynaptic receptors, often located on dendrites, to phosphoproteins within the neuron, or to transcription factors and genes in the postsynaptic neuron’s cell nucleus, it can take a while for neurotransmission to begin influencing the postsynaptic target neuron’s biochemical processes. The time it takes from receptor occupancy by neurotransmitter to gene expression is usually hours. Furthermore, since the last messenger triggered by neurotransmission – called a transcription factor – only initiates the very beginning of gene action, it takes even longer for the gene activation to be fully implemented via the series of biochemical events it triggers. These biochemical events can begin many hours to days after the neurotransmission occurred, and can last days or weeks once they are put in motion.
Thus, a brief puff of chemical neurotransmission from a presynaptic neuron can trigger a profound postsynaptic reaction that takes hours to days to develop and that can last days to weeks or even a lifetime. Every conceivable component of this entire process of chemical neurotransmission is a candidate for modification by drugs. Most psychotropic drugs act upon the processes that control chemical neurotransmission at the level of the neurotransmitters themselves or their enzymes and especially their receptors. Future psychotropic drugs will undoubtedly act directly upon the biochemical cascades, particularly upon those elements that control the expression of pre- and postsynaptic genes. Also, mental and neurological illnesses are known or suspected to affect these same aspects of chemical neurotransmission. The neuron is dynamically modifying its synaptic connections throughout its life, in response to learning, life experiences, genetic programming, epigenetic changes, drugs, and diseases, with chemical neurotransmission being the key aspect underlying the regulation of all these important processes.