Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:48:01.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2011

Richard A. Richards
Richard A. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Species Problem
A Philosophical Analysis
 , pp. 221 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agapow, Paul-Michael, Bininda-Edmunds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., Gittleman, J. L., Mace, G. M., Marshall, J. C., and Purvis, A. (2004) “The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 79, no. 2, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amundson, Ron, (1998) “Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology,” Biology and Philosophy, 13: 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle Vols. I and II, Barnes, J., ed., Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (2003) “Language and Logic,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, McGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 73–96.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. (1987a) “Aristotle's Biology was not Essentialistic,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 291–312.Google Scholar
(1987b) “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 69–89.CrossRef
(1987c) “The Place of Biology in Aristotle's Philosophy,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 9–20.CrossRef
Barker, Matthew J. (2007) “The Empirical Inadequacy of Species Cohesion by Gene Flow,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 654–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan (1995) “Life and Work,” The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1992) “Speaking of Species: Darwin's Strategy,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 227–245.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2000) Thomas Kuhn, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander, and Tobin, Emma (2008) “Natural Kinds,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn.), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/natural-kinds/
Blackburn, Simon (2002) “Metaphysics,” The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Bunnin, N and Tsui-James, E. P., eds., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 61–89.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Henry J. (1990) “Neoplatonic Elements in the de Anima Commentaries,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 305–324.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Henry J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of De AnimaIthaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boler, John F. (1963) “Abailard and the Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 :104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Robert (1987) “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 120–166.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard (1999) “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 141–185.Google Scholar
Brigandt, Ingo (2003) “Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism,” Philosophy of Science, 70: 1305–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar (1983) “Homo Sapiens: Linnaeus's Classification of Man,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, Frängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 156–194.Google Scholar
Brogaard, Berit (2004) “Species as Individuals,” Biology and Philosophy, 19: 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stephen F. (1999) “Realism versus Nominalism,” The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, New York:Columbia University Press 271–278.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1985) “On Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene,” Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science,” Depew, D. J. and Weber, B. H., eds., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 21–42.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Frederick and Smith, Sydney, eds. (1987) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. II. Cambridge University Press.
Burkhardt, Frederick and Smith, Sydney, (1990) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. VI. Cambridge University Press.
Cain, A. J. (1993) Animal Species and Their Evolution, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1966) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Gardner, M., ed., New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A. and Wilson, M. R. (1997) “Practical Approaches to Species Concepts for Living Organisms,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 1–15.Google Scholar
Cracraft, Joel (1992) “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 93–120.Google Scholar
Cracraft, Joel (1997) “Species Concepts in Systematics and Conservation Biology – an Ornithological Viewpoint,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 325–339.Google Scholar
Cracraft, Joel (2000) “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Quentin, Q. D. Wheeler and Meier, R. eds., New York:Columbia University Press, 3–14.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1851) The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online, University of Cambridge, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F339.1&keywords=cirripedia&pageseq=1.
Darwin, Charles (1964) On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin (1999) “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 49–89.Google Scholar
Queiroz, Kevin (2005) “Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. CII, suppl. 1, 6600–6607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Hugo (1905) Species and Varieties, Their Origin and Mutation, Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea, New York:Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2008) “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 75, no. 3, 344–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (1993) The Disorder of Things: Philosophical Foundations for the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (1999) “On the Impossibility of a Monistic Account of Species,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 3–19.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Stan (1990a) “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 373–391.Google Scholar
Ebbeson, Stan (1990b) “Philoponus, Alexander and the Origins of Medieval Logic,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 445–461.Google Scholar
Ebbeson, Stan (1990c) “Porphyry's Legacy to Logic: A Reconstruction,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 141–179.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles (1995) “Species, Selection, and Paterson's Concept of the Specific-Mate Recognition System,” Speciation and the Recognition Concept, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 464–477.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles, and Cracraft, Joel (1980) Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary ProcessNew York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc (1992) “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 381–398.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc (2001) The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of biological Taxonomy, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Gunnar (1983) “Linnaeus the Botanist,” Linnaeus the Man and His WorkFrängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 63–109.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea (2005) “Commentators on Aristotle,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005 edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/aristotle-commentators/.
Frängsmyr, Tore, ed. (1983) Linnaeus, the Man and His WorkBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Frede, Dorothea (2009) “Alexander of Aphrodisias,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/alexander-aphrodisias/.
Frege, Gottlob (1990) “On Sense and Nominatum,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, Martinich, A.P., ed., Oxford University Press, 190–202.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael, T. (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1989) “Individuality, History and the Laws of Nature in Biology,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull, Ruse, M., ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1997) Metaphysics and the Origin of Species, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison, and Meltzoff, Andrew N. (1997) Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan (1987) “First Principles in Aristotle's Parts of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, and Depew, David (2004) The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic HistoryCambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul (1999) “Squaring the Circle, Natural Kinds with Historical Essences,” Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 209–228.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1990) “The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle According to Porphyry,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 125–140.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1994) “Galen and the Logic of Relations,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Schrenk, L., ed., Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 57–75.Google Scholar
Hennig, Willi (1977) Phylogenetic Systematics, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hey, Jody (2001) Genes, Categories and Species: the Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1983) Darwin and His Critics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1988) Science as Process: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. (1989) The Metaphysics of Evolution, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1992a) “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of SpeciesEreshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 199–225.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1992b) “A Matter of Individuality,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 293–316.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1997). “The Ideal Species Concept – and Why We Can't Get It,” in Species: the Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 357–380.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1999) “On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line,” Species: New Interdisciplinary EssaysWilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 23–48.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (2001) Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian (1940) The New Systematics, LondonOxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur and Walsh, James J. (1983) Philosophy in the Middle Ages, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jones, W. T. (1969) The Medieval MindSan Diego, CA.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1978) “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change,” Philosophical Review, 87: 519–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984) “Against the Monism of the Moment,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 4. (December 8), 616–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1992) “Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of SpeciesEreshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 317–341.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1998) “Explanatory Unification,” Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of ScienceKlemke, E. D., Hollinger, R., Rudge, D. W., eds., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 278–301.Google Scholar
Kitts, David R. and Kitts, David J. (1979) “Biological Species as Natural Kinds,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 46, no. 4, 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula (2003) “Natures: The Problem of Universals,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, McGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 196–207.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1972) Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1977) The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ednThe University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, Joseph, (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, James L. (1968) “The Species Concept of Linnaeus,” Isis, vol. 59, no. 3, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, James L. (1971) Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von LinneBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lauden, Larry (1984) Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, James (1980) “Aristotle on Genera, Species and the More and the Less,” Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, James (1987a) “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 90–119.Google Scholar
(1987b) “Kinds, Forms of Kinds and the More and Less in Aristotle's Biology,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, and Lennox, , eds., Cambridge University Press, 339–359.CrossRef
(2006) “Aristotle's Biology,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/aristotle-biology/.
Lewis, David (1983), “Extrinsic Properties,” Philosophical Studies, 44: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroth, Sten (1983) “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, Frängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1–62.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, Carolus (1964) Systema Naturae, Facsimile of the First EditionEngel-Ledeboer, M. J. S. and Engel, H., eds., Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: B. De Graaf. Publ.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1968) “Buffon and the Problem of Species,” Forerunners of Darwin, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 84–113.Google Scholar
Lyell, Charles (1997) Principles of Geology, LondonPenguin Books.Google Scholar
MacLaurin, James and Sterelny, Kim (2008) What is Biodiversity?, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, Arthur S. J. (1994) “Alexander on Aristotle's Species and Genera as Principles,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Schrenk, L., ed., Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 76–91.Google Scholar
Magnello, M. Eileen (1996) “Karl Pearson's Gresham Lectures: W. F. R. Weldon, Speciation and the Origin of Pearsonian Statistics,” British Journal for the History of Science vol. 29, no. 1 (March), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, James (1995) “A Species Definition for the Modern Synthesis,”Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 7, 294–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John (2005) “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/boethius/.
Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen (2006) “Concepts,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/concepts/.
Marrone, Steven P. (2003) “Medieval Philosophy in Context,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval PhilosophyMcGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 10–50.Google Scholar
Mayden, Richard L. (1997) “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 381–424.Google Scholar
Mayden, Richard L. (1999) “Consilience and a Hierarchy of Species Concepts: Advances Toward Closure on the Species Puzzle,” Journal of Nematology, vol. 31, no. 2, 95–116.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1957a) “Difficulties and Importance of the Biological Species,” The Species Problem, Mayr, , ed. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 371–388.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1957b) “Species Concepts and Definitions,” The Species ProblemMayr, , ed. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1–22.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1992) “Species Concepts and Their Application,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 15–25.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (2000) “The Biological Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 17–29.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst and Ashlock, Peter D. (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (1977) “Natural Kinds,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 28, no. 4, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. H. and Oliver, Alex (1997) Properties, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, Brent D. and Brandon, Robert (1987) “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, Brent D. and Donoghue, Michael (1992) “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 121–137.Google Scholar
Mishler, Brent D., and Theriot, Edward C. (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, Apomorphy and the Phylogenetic Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic TheoryWheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 44–54.Google Scholar
Mueller, Ian “Aristotle's Doctrine of Abstraction in the Commentators,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 463–480.
Murphy, Gregory L., and Medin, Douglas L. (1985) “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence,” Psychological Review, vol. 92, no. 3 (July 1985), 289–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Research Council Committee on Scientific Issues in the Endangered Species Act (1995) Science and the Endangered Species ActWashington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1994) The Rationality of Science, London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Niklas, Karl J. (1997) The Evolutionary Biology of Plants, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Brian W. (2006) The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchen, Alec L. (1992) Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Hugh (1992) “The Recognition Concepts of Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 139–158.Google Scholar
Paterson, Hugh (1993) Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species, Collected Writings of H. E. H. Paterson, McEvey, S. F., ed., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher (1992) A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre (1987) “Logical Difference and Biological Difference: The Unity of Aristotle's Thought,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 313–338.Google Scholar
Peters, F. E. (1967) Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Purvis, O. W. (1997) “The Species Concept in Lichens,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 109–134.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1990) “Meaning and Reference,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language 2nd edn, Martinich, A., ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 308–315.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1990) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn, Martinich, A., ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 26–39.Google Scholar
Ray, John (1735) The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation 10th edn, London: William Innys and Richard Manby.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydon, Thomas A. C. (2003) “Discussion: Species Are Individuals – Or Are They?”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Janet Radcliffe (2000) Human Nature after Darwin, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2002) “Kuhnian Values and Cladistic Parsimony,” Perspectives on Science, vol. 10, no. 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2003) “Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference,” Philosophy of Science, 70, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2005) “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory,” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social, vol. 1, no. 2, 270–294.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2007a) “Solving the Species Problem: Kitcher and Hull on Sets and Individuals,” Philosophy of Biology, Michael Ruse. ed., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2007b) “The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis,” The Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Richards, Richard A. (2008) “Species and Taxonomy,” Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1987) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals or What?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, no. 2, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1992) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?”, The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 343–361.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1999) The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1998) Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (1990) “The School of Alexander?” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 83–111.Google Scholar
Shiel, James (1990) “Boethius' Commentaries on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 349–372.Google Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord (1951) “The Species Concept,” Evolution, vol. 5, no. 4, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord (1961) Principles of Animal TaxonomyNew York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip R. (1976) “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy,” Isis, vol. 67, no. 3, 356–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, Philip R. (1979), “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species,” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 12, no. 2, 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Philip R. (1985) “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals,” Histoire du Concept d'Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip R. (2003) “Reflections on the Species Problem,” The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, Auxier, R. and Hahn, L. E., eds., Chicago, IL.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C. N. (1976) Concepts of SpeciesStroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, Robert R. (1973) Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott (2005) Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 47, no. 3, 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1984) “Sets, Species and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's ‘Species’,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 2, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1992) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 247–278.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (2000) Philosophy of Biology, 2nd ednBoulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (1990) “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–30.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (2008) “William of Ockham,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ockham/.
Stafleu, Frans A. (1971) Linnaeus and the Linnaeans, Utrecht, Netherlands: A. Oosthooek's Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Stamos, David, (2003) The Species Problem, Lanhan, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Stamos, David, (2007) Darwin and the Nature of Species, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Robert C. (1975) Charles Darwin's Natural Selection, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stott, Rebecca (2003) Darwin and the BarnacleNew York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Templeton, Alan (1992) “The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 159–183.Google Scholar
Thompson, Augustine (1995) “The Debate on Universals Before Peter Abelard,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valen, Leigh (1992) “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 69–77.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Quentin D. and Platnick, Norman I. (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick),” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R. eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 55–69.Google Scholar
Whewell, William (1984) Selected Writings on the History of Science, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, William (1989) Theory of Scientific MethodButts, R. E., ed., Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O. (1981) Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., and Mayden, Richard L. (2000) “The Evolutionary Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 70–89.Google Scholar
Williams, Mary B. (1989) “Evolvers are Individuals: Extension of the Species as Individuals Claim,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays dedicated to David Hull, Ruse, M., ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 301–308.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. (2000) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Leonard G. (1970) Sir Charles Lyell's Scientific Journals on the Species Question, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. (1999) “Realism, Essence, and Kind: Resuscitating Species Essentialism?” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 187–207.Google Scholar
Winsor, Mary (2003) “Non-essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy,” Biology and Philosophy, 18: 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, Mary (2006a) “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28, 149–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Winsor, Mary (2006b) “Linnaeus's Biology was not Essentialist,” Annuals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93: 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1968) Philosophical Investigations, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Carl (2008) “What Is a Species,” Scientific American (June), 72–79.CrossRef
Zirkle, Conway (1959) “Species Before Dawin,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 103, no. 5, 636–644.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: The Species Problem
  • Online publication: 04 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762222.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: The Species Problem
  • Online publication: 04 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762222.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: The Species Problem
  • Online publication: 04 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762222.009
Available formats
×