Vietnam's One-Party Rule and Socialist Democracy?
from VIETNAM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
Summary
Nineteen-ninety seven was an eventful year for Vietnam. Leadership changes took place in the National Assembly, the government, and the Politburo of the Vietnamese Communist Party (VCP). In July the people went to the polls to elect their representatives to the law-making body, but throughout the year Vietnamese farmers staged a series of protests, the largest so far, in reaction to rampant corruption and abuse of power by local party and state officials. Signs of an economic slow-down that had emerged in 1996 persisted into 1997, and the political leadership's hope for a higher growth rate was further frustrated by the financial crisis throughout Southeast Asia.
The debates in 1997 among party leaders over the rebuilding of a postcentral planning political and economic order unfolded within the context of mounting domestic social and economic problems. The Third Plenum of the Central Committee in June focused on the reform of the administrative state and the promotion of socialist democracy. The Fourth Plenum of the Central Committee in December concentrated on socio-economic issues including capital mobilization, rural industrialization and co-operativization, the balance between export-oriented growth and import-substitution strategies, and socioeconomic stratification.
Confirming a trend that emerged in the 1990s, the VCP leaders in 1997 continued to emphasize the strengthening of state organizations under the leadership of the party. In addition to the general call for the development of a clean administrative system, emphasis was given to the management of the state-controlled mass media. To counter corruption and the abuse of administrative power, the party leadership revived a “mass line” strategy in the form of both “direct” and “representative” democracy. Economically, different sectors of the leadership had voiced their agreement to expedite the “corporatization” of the state sector as a means of mobilizing domestic investment capital. Rural development and rural stability became prominent issues, and the year saw campaigns to revive the co-operative structure to cope with rural problems.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Southeast Asian Affairs 1998 , pp. 309 - 327Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 1998