Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:16:43.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Singapore's Dilemma: Coping with the Paradoxes of Success

from SINGAPORE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Diane K. Mauzy
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access

Summary

Since 1959, when the People's Action Party (PAP) came to power, Singapore has been among the world's most successful countries “by any measure” at improving its citizens’ welfare. The result is that after thirty-seven years, Singaporeans expect — almost by “right” — clean, efficient and effective government and a continually growing economy and increasing prosperity. However, over time the people have become a little less willing to make the political trade-offs and sacrifices (for example, partially constrained political freedoms) that have helped make the dominant party, the PAP, so adept at “delivering the goods” while not catering to popular demands. The paradox that hits a dominant party, if history is a guide, is that over time growing numbers of people simply want a change, regardless of the performance of a government. The PAP's dilemma has been to overcome this burden of history, and to reverse the slow decline since 1980 in its percentage of the popular vote in general elections.

Politics: Preparing for the General Election

This was the year (1996) the general election was expected — virtually all year — but was not called until late in December. Nomination day was December 23, and polling day set for nine days later, the legal minimum for the campaign, on 2 January 1997. The prolonged preparation for this election monopolized the political agenda. This was a year when the PAP applied itself, with all its considerable energy and creativity, to meticulously and systematically planning and laying the groundwork for the election.

The issues, actions, strategies that emerged, and the constitutional changes that were enacted, offer a glimpse of the kind of society that is emerging in Singapore as it heads into the new millennium. The groundwork consisted of three facets: (1) publicly addressing many of the difficult issues directly in the hope of defusing them; (2) party recruitment, election strategies and constitutional electoral changes;

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×