Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Genealogical interpretations
- 2 The human Son of Man
- 3 The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man
- 4 The question of reference
- 5 The question of authenticity
- 6 Miscellaneous sons of men
- 7 Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man?
- 8 The idiomatic/nontitular son of man
- 9 Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts
- 10 Conclusions
- Appendix Surveys of research on “the Son of Man”
- List of references
- Index of passages
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
Appendix - Surveys of research on “the Son of Man”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Genealogical interpretations
- 2 The human Son of Man
- 3 The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man
- 4 The question of reference
- 5 The question of authenticity
- 6 Miscellaneous sons of men
- 7 Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man?
- 8 The idiomatic/nontitular son of man
- 9 Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts
- 10 Conclusions
- Appendix Surveys of research on “the Son of Man”
- List of references
- Index of passages
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
Summary
(in chronological order)
Wolf [1725] 1739: 1.159; Köcher 1766: 191–93; Scholten 1809: 141–209; H. Holtzmann 1865; Appel 1896: 1–27; Lietzmann 1896: 1–29; Baldensperger 1900; Schmiedel 1901; Croskery 1901/1902; Driver 1902; Mouren 1903: 11–32; N. Schmidt 1903; Schweitzer [1906] 1968: 267–69, 277–86; Tillmann 1907a: 9–60; H. Holtzmann [1897] 1911: 1.313–35; Foakes Jackson and Lake 1920: 1.368–84; Roslaniec 1920: 4–33; Dupont 1924: 1–6; Peake 1924; Rawlinson 1926: 242–50; N. Schmidt 1926; Kraeling 1927: 6–16; Riesenfeld 1947: 307–13; McCown 1948; Preiss 1951: 11–14; Higgins 1959; Fuller 1962: 37–43; Black 1963; Perrin 1963: 90–129; Higgins 1964: 20–25; Marshall 1965/66; Haufe 1966; Hindley 1966; Marlow 1966; Jüngel 1967: 215–34; Vermes 1967: 311–15; Higgins 1969; Birdsall 1970; Marshall 1970; Van Cangh 1970; Maddox 1971; Boers 1972; Weist 1972; Coppens 1973; Legasse 1977; Black 1978; Vermes 1978a; 1978b; Coppens 1980; Higgins 1980: 1–53; Kümmel 1980; Colpe 1981; Tuckett 1981; Neirynck 1982: 69–72; Vögtle 1982; Walker 1983; M. Müller 1984a; Don Jackson 1985/86; Caragounis 1986: 9–33; Donahue 1986; P. Casey 1991b; Borsch 1992; Aufrecht 1993; Tuckett 1993; Burkett 1994.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Son of Man DebateA History and Evaluation, pp. 125Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000