Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:09:09.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Emma Moore
Emma Moore
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Socio-syntax
Exploring the Social Life of Grammar
 , pp. 233 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, Tahir. 2007. British South Asians and pathways into selective schooling: Social class, culture and ethnicity. British Educational Research Journal 33(1). 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920601104474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acton, Eric K. 2019. Pragmatics and the social life of the English definite article. Language 95(1). 37–65.Google Scholar
Acton, Eric K. 2021. Pragmatics and the third wave: The social meaning of definites. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 105–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acton, Eric K. & Potts, Christopher. 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(1). 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12062.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23(3–4). 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1989. Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12. 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, Farhana. 2015. “Glaswasian”? A Sociophonetic Analysis of Glasgow-Asian Accent and Identity. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1988. The Tag Question in British English: It’s Different, I’N’It? English World-Wide 9(2). 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.9.2.03alg.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were variation in non-standard British English today. English Today 22(1). 1–22.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetrics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2005. Negative concord in British English dialects. In Iyeiri, Yoko (ed.), Aspects of English Negation, 113–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Andrews, Jon, Robinson, David & Hutchinson, Jo. 2017. Closing the gap? Trends in educational attainment and disadvantage. London: Education Policy Institute. Available from: https://epi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Closing-the-Gap_EPI.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Andrews, Richard, Beverton, Sue, Locke, Terry, Low, Graham, Robinson, Alison, Togerson, Carole & Zhu, Die. 2004. The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. Review. University of London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Ash, Sharon. 2013. Social class. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, 350–367. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118335598.ch16 [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar
Avineri, N., Johnson, E., Brice-Heath, S., McCarty, T., Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T. & Alim, H. S.. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the “language gap.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(1). 66–86.Google Scholar
Bajona, Giulio. 2022. Mandative subjunctives in present-day British English. Leeds: University of Leeds PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Baker-Bell, April. 2020. Dismantling anti-black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language pedagogy. Theory Into Practice 59(1). 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415.Google Scholar
Ball, Stephen J. 1981. Beachside Comprehensive: A Case-Study of Secondary Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej & Turton, Danielle. 2020. TD-deletion in British English: New evidence for the long-lost morphological effect. Language Variation and Change 32. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie, Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Juhel, Jacques. 2013. Language evaluation and use during early childhood: Adhesion to social norms or integration of environmental regularities? Linguistics 51(2). 381–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0015.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne, Pandarova, Irina & Muderack, Karoline. 2015. Tag questions across Irish English and British English: A corpus analysis of form and function. Multilingua 34(4). 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Stephen, Bojesen Christensen, Rune Haubo, Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Scheipl, Fabian & Grothendieck, Gabor. 2019. Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4, R Package, Version 1.1–19. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 187–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. The phonology of English dialects in the north of England. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, 113–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2010. An Introduction to Regional Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Beaman, Karen V. 2021. Coherence in real- and apparent-time: A sociolinguistic variationist investigation of language change in Swabia. London: Queen Mary, University of London PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellinger, Charles K. 2020. Othering: The Original Sin of Humanity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea & Casasanto, Laura Staum. 2017. Totally tall sounds totally younger: Intensification at the socio-semantics interface. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(2). 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12230.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea & Casasanto, Laura Staum. 2021. The social meaning of semantic properties. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 80–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Emily M. 2001. Syntactic Variation and Linguistic Competence: The Case of AAVE Copula Absence. California, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joe. 2012. ‘And what comes out may be a kind of screeching’: The stylisation of chavspeak in contemporary Britain. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(1). 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00521.x.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, S., Leech, G. & Finegan, E.. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty. 1994. Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70. 233–259.Google Scholar
Blanchette, Frances. 2015. English negative concord, negative polarity, and double negation. New York, NY: City University of New York PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Blanchette, Frances, Nadeu, Marianna, Yeaton, Jeremy & Déprez, Viviane. 2018. English negative concord and double negation: The division of labor between syntax and pragmatics. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 3(53). 1–15.Google Scholar
Block, David. 2014. Social Class in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Block, David. 2018. Political Economy and Sociolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Brown, R. (ed.), Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change: Papers in the Sociology of Education, 71–112. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6). 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre & Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, second edition. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert. 2011. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. Revised edition. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.Google Scholar
Brechwald, Whitney A. & Prinstein, Mitchell J.. 2011. Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence 21(1). 116–179.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Asudeh, Ash, Toivonen, Ada & Wechsler, Stephen. 2016. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Second edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bright, William. Nd. What’s the difference between speech and writing? Resource Hub. Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1990. The development of discourse markers in English. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Linguistics and Philology, 45–76. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2002. Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1). 16–43.Google Scholar
Britain, David & Sudbury, Andrea. 2002. There’s sheep and there’s penguins: “Drift,” “slant” and singular verb forms following existentials in New Zealand and Falkland Island English. In Jones, M. & Esch, E. (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extralinguistic Factors, 209–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brook, Marisa, Jankowski, Bridget L., Konnelly, Lex & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. ‘I don’t come off as timid anymore’: Real-time change in early adulthood against the backdrop of the community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(4). 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12310.Google Scholar
Brownstein, Michael & Saul, Jennifer. 2016. Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 1996. Geek the girl: Language, femininity, and female nerds. In Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Chen, Melinda, Oliver, Monica, Warner, Natasha & Wertheim, Suzanne (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 119–132. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2002. Youth and cultural practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 31. 525–552.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2008. All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 401–431.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2004. The sociolinguistic constraints on the quotative system – British English and U.S. English compared. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2013. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Chichester, West Sussex and Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44(3). 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216639645.Google Scholar
Burnett, Heather, Koopman, Hilda & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. Structural explanations in syntactic variation: The evolution of English negative and polarity indefinites. Language Variation and Change 30(1). 83–107.Google Scholar
Buson, Laurence & Billiez, Jacqueline. 2013. Representations of stylistic variation in 9- to 11-year-olds: Cognitive processes and salience. Linguistics 51(2). 325–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona & O’Leary, Kathy. 1989. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, 74–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard & Schwenter, Scott. 2013. Pragmatics and variationist sociolinguistics. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, & Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 464–483. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22. 423–441.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald (ed.). 1991. Knowledge About Language and the Curriculum: The Linc Reader. Reprint edition. London: Hodder & Arnold.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 1994. Knowledge about language in the curriculum. In Brindley, Susan (ed.), Teaching English, 246–259. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16(2). 141–158.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1). 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charity, Hudley, Anne, H. & Mallinson, Christine. 2011. Understanding English Language Variation in U.S. Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1987. Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable, and sociolinguistic theory. Linguistics 25(2). 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Taming the vernacular: Some repercussions for the study of syntactic variation and spoken grammar. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 8. 59–80.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2005a. Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social class variation in the use of discourse-new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4). 479–508.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2005b. Syntactic variation and spoken language. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, Karen P. (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv & Whittle, Pamela. 1993. Non-standard English and dialect levelling. In Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 53–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Fox, Sue. 2009. New perspectives on was/were variation in London. Language Variation and Change 21(1). 1–38.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Trudgill, Peter. 1989. Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. In Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv, Munstermann, Henk & Weltens, Bert (eds.), Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, 94–110. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Foulkes, Paul. 2013. Introduction: Language acquisition and sociolinguistic variation. Linguistics 51(2). 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0010.Google Scholar
Childs, Claire. 2017. Variation and change in negation: A cross-dialectal perspective. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Newcastle, ms.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2017. The Galilean challenge: Architecture and evolution of language. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing 880. 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/880/1/012015.Google Scholar
Chun, Christian W. 2019. Language, discourse, and class: What’s next for sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics 23. 332–345.Google Scholar
Cipriani, Enrico. 2019. Semantics in generative grammar: A critical survey. Lingvisticae Investigationes 42(2). 134–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00033.cip.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Filio & Lucy, Chambers. 2020. Non-standard English in UK students’ writing over time. Language and Education 34(1). 22–35.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2010. The authentic speaker and the speech community. In Llamas, Carmen & Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and Identities, 99–112. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crosnoe, Robert & Johnson, Monica Kirkpatrick. 2011. Research on adolescence in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology 27. 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, Salina. 2019. Can women “sound gay”? A sociophonetic study of /s/ and pitch of gay and straight British-English speaking women. York, UK: University of York PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 2016. Shut up! Geezer who runs Essex school is like ‘pupils must stop speaking as if they were in TOWIE.’ The Mail Online. Available from: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3565133/Shut-Geezer-runs-Essex-school-like-pupils-stop-speaking-Towie.html [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Cushing, Ian. 2019a. Resources not rulebooks. Metaphor and the Social World 9(2). 155–176.Google Scholar
Cushing, Ian. 2019b. Grammar policy and pedagogy from primary to secondary school. Literacy 53(3). 170–179.Google Scholar
Cushing, Ian. 2020. The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society 49(3). 425–450.Google Scholar
Cushing, Ian & Julia, Snell. 2022. The (white) ears of Ofsted: A raciolinguistic perspective on the listening practices of the schools inspectorate. Language in Society 52(3). 1–24.Google Scholar
Dann, Holly Rebeka. 2019. Productions and perceptions of BATH and TRAP vowels in cornish English. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2). 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12115.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette & Eckert, Penelope. 2021. Affect and iconicity in phonological variation. Language in Society 50(1). 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000871.Google Scholar
Department of Education. 2014. English programmes of study: Key Stages 1 and 2: National curriculum in England. London, ms.Google Scholar
Department of Education. 2017. Unlocking talent, fulfilling potential: A plan for improving social mobility through education. London: Department of Education. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667690/Social_Mobility_Action_Plan_-_for_printing.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R. 1980. Variation in discourse - “and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9(1). 13–31.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie, Guthrie, Kate Hardeman, Schutz, Rachel & Chik, Ivan. 2021. Perceptions of style: A focus on fundamental frequency and perceived social characteristics. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Variation and Linguistic Meaning: Theorizing the Third Wave, 176–202. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2011. Glottal variation in /t/ in non-native English speech: Patterns of acquisition. English World-Wide 32(3). 280–308. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.3.02dru.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2018a. Maybe it’s a grime [t]ing: th-stopping among urban British youth. Language in Society 47(02). 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000999.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2018b. Researching Urban Youth Language and Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2002. Stance and consequence. Conference paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–177. Amsterdam, NL & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Durham, Mercedes. 2011. Right dislocation in Northern England: Frequency and use – perception meets reality. English World-Wide 32(3). 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.3.01dur.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1988. Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17(2). 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012756.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1998. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, Jennifer (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 64–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2003. Language and adolescent peer groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(1). 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02250063.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2006. Communities of practice. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, second edition, 683–685. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86(1). 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277528.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2014. Language and gender in adolescence. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds.), The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 529–545. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch27.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2017. Comment: The most perfect of signs: Iconicity in variation. Linguistics 55(5). 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0025.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2018. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2019a. The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority. Language 95(4). 751–776. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2019b. The individual in the semiotic landscape. Glossa 4(1). 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.640.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21. 461–490.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Wenger, Etienne. 1993. Seven Principles of Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John. 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Labov, William. 2017. Phonetic, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(4). 467–496.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv, Trudgill, Peter & Weltens, Bert. 1984. The Grammar of English Dialect. London: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv & Weltens, Bert. 1985. Research on non-standard dialects of British English: Progress and prospects. In Viereck, W. (ed.), Focus on: England and Wales, 97–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eisikovits, Edina. 1991. Variation in subject-verb agreement in Inner Sydney English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 235–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elley, W. 1994. Grammar teaching and language skill. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 1468–1471. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1869. On Early English Pronunciation. 5 volumes. London: Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H. 2000. T-glottalling between stigma and prestige: a sociolinguistic study of modern RP. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D. M., John Horwood, L. & Boden, Joseph M. 2008. The transmission of social inequality: Examination of the linkages between family socioeconomic status in childhood and educational achievement in young adulthood. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26(3). 277–295.Google Scholar
Flores, Nelson & Rosa, Jonathan. 2015. Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review 85(2). 149–171.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerald. J. & Watt, Dominic. 1999. Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation in 2- to 4-year-olds. ICPhS-14, 1625–1628.Google Scholar
Fox, S. 2015. The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318251.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne & Toda, Martine. 2010. Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Zygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent Sounds, 281–302. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fyne, John. 2005. The dialect of New Mills: Linguistic change in a north-west Derbyshire community. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2013. Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropological Theory 13(1–2). 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613483396.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.. 2019. Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209.Google Scholar
Gates, Shivonne. 2019. Language variation and ethnicity in a multicultural East London secondary school. PhD dissertation. Queen Mary, University of London, ms.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversations. In Nuyts, Jan & de Schutter, George (eds.), Getting One’s Words into Line: On word Order and Functional Grammar, 119–130. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ghimenton, Anna, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Billiez, Jacqueline. 2013. Language choice adjustments in child production during dyadic and multiparty interactions: A quantitative approach to multilingual interactions. Linguistics 51(2). 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0016.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, Marcello & Clayton, Dan (eds.). 2016. Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719818.Google Scholar
Givon, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 149–158. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glass, Lelia. 2015. Strong necessity modals: Four socio-pragmatic corpus studies. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2). 77–88.Google Scholar
Godley, Amanda J., Carpenter, Brian D. & Werner, Cynthia A.. 2007. “I’ll speak in proper slang”: Language ideologies in a daily editing activity. Reading Research Quarterly 42(1). 100–131.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2012. Current conceptions of stance. In Hyland, Ken & Guinda, Carmen Sancho (eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, 15–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_2.Google Scholar
Gross, Miriam. 2010. So Why Can’t They Read? London: Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1988. Advanced Varbrul analysis. In Linguistic Change and Contact: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 124–136. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.). 2021. Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David H. 1967. Social Relations in a Secondary School. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Daniel, Schreier. 2004. Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject–verb agreement with be in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 16(3). 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394504163047Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy M., Miller, Michelle & Beazley, Jo Anne. 1995. Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14(1–2). 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X95141004.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison. 2016. Acquiring language from variable input: Subject-verb agreement and negative concord in Belfast English. Linguistic Variation 16(1). 131–150.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, Paul. 2002. Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture. Bloomsbury. Available from: www.bloomsbury.com/uk/goth-9781859736050/ [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar
Hoff, E. 2013. Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology 49(1). 4–14.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo 27. 47–62.Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Levon, Erez. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Linguistics 55(5). 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0020.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1986. Presupposition, theme and variations. In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistic Society, 168–192. University of Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2004. Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, Geoffrey. K.. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1975. The meaning of questions. Language 51. 1–31.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 2001. Grammar teaching and writing skills: The research evidence. Syntax in the Schools 17. 1–6.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 2016. The impact of policy on language teaching in UK schools. In Giovanelli, Marco & Clayton, Dan (eds.), Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom, 25–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2020. Comment on ‘The policy and policing of language in schools’ by Ian Cushing. Language in Society 49(3). 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000366.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur, Trudgill, Peter & Watt, Dominic. 2005. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles, fourth edition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoffrey. 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ilbury, Christian. 2019. “Beyond the offline”: Social media and the social meaning of variation in East London. London: Queen Mary, University of London PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of Language, 35–83. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Ella. 2019. Preschool children’s categorization of speakers by regional accent. Language Variation and Change 31(3). 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000176.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. Place, globalization and linguistic variation. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, 65–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(11). 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12210.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2017. Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety. In Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.), Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region, 283–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.015.Google Scholar
Kearsley, Greg P. 1976. Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5. 355–375.Google Scholar
Kefalas, Maria. 2003. Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community, and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood. California, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29. 65–115.Google Scholar
Khan, Arfaan. 2006. A sociolinguistic study of Birmingham English: Language variation and change in a multi-ethnic British community. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University Unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Khattab, Ghada. 2013. Phonetic convergence and divergence strategies in English-Arabic bilingual children. Linguistics 51(2). 439–472.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2004. Dude. American Speech 79(3). 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. Style as stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kimps, Ditte. 2007. Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning, and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 270–291.Google Scholar
Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin & Cornillie, Bert. 2014. A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66. 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013.Google Scholar
Kirkham, Sam. 2013. Ethnicity, social practice and phonetic variation in a Sheffield secondary school. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kirkham, Sam & Moore, Emma. 2016. Constructing social meaning in political discourse: Phonetic variation and verb processes in Ed Miliband’s speeches. Language in Society 45(1). 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000755.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.), The Structure of Language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kloe, Donald R. 1977. A Dictionary of Onomatopoeic Sounds, Tones, and Noises in English and Spanish, Including Those of Animals, Man, Nature, Machinery and Musical Instruments, Together with Some That Are Not Imitative or Echoic. S Leonard, OK: B. Ethridge.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1964. Stages in the acquisition of Standard English. In Shuy, Roger, Davis, Alva & Hogan, Robert (eds.), Social Dialects and Language Learning, 77–103. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972a. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48(4). 773–818. https://doi.org/10.2307/411989.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972b. The logic of nonstandard English. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular, 201–240. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop: A response to Beatriz R. Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 44. 1–16.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1982. Objectivity and commitment in Linguistic Science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11. 165–201.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1984. Intensity. In Schriffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Georgetown Roundtable in Linguistics, 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1993. The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at the 22nd New Ways in Analyzing Variation conference, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. II: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2013. The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej & Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463.Google Scholar
Lacey, Colin. 1970. Hightown Grammar: The School as a Social System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1992. Expressing negation. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 40. 237–260.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on ‘this’ and ‘that.’ Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 10. 345–356.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7(2). 171–182.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean & Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law, James, McBean, Kirsty & Rush, Robert. 2011. Communication skills in a population of primary school-aged children raised in an area of pronounced social disadvantage. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 46(6). 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00036.x.Google Scholar
Lawson, Robert. 2009. Sociolinguistic constructions of identity in a Glasgow high school. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Glasgow, ms.Google Scholar
Lefstein, Adam & Snell, Julia. 2013. Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leith, Dick. 1995. Tense variation as a performance feature in a Scottish folktale. Language in Society 24(1). 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500018406.Google Scholar
Levey, Stephen. 2007. The next generation: Aspects of grammatical variation in the speech of some London preadolescents. Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. Conceptual problems in the study of regional and cultural style. In Dittmar, Norbert & Schlobinski, Peter (eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Urban Vernaculars, 161–190. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez & Fox, Sue. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3). 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214531487.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 27(3). 319–348.Google Scholar
Levey, Stephen. 2012. Understanding children’s non-standard spoken English: A perspective from variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Education 26(5). 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.651144.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark C. 2018. A critique of the principle of error correction as a theory of social change. Language in Society 47. 325–346.Google Scholar
Lucas, Samuel. 1999. Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 2005. Talk That Counts: Age, Gender, and Social Class Differences in Discourse. Illustrated edition. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Katie. 2022. Is Style Control a Potential Factor in Working-Class Educational Underachievement? Paper presented at NWAV 50, Stanford University, October 2022.Google Scholar
Maybin, J. 2006. Children’s Voices: Talk, Knowledge and Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511958.Google Scholar
McRobbie, Angela. 2000. Feminism and Youth Culture, second edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Medhurst, A. 2000. If anywhere: Class identifications and cultural studies academics. In Munt, S. (ed.), Cultural Studies and the Working Class: Subject to Change, 19–35. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Meecham, Marjory & Foley, Michele. 1994. On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation – There’s bridges. Language Variation and Change 6. 63–85.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic Hitchhiker’s Guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21. 261–280.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Walker, James A.. 2007. The persistence of variation in individual grammars: Copula absence in ‘urban sojourners’ and their stay-at-home peers, Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines)1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(3). 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00327.x.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Walker, James. 2013. An existential problem: The sociolinguistic monitor and variation in existential constructions on Bequia (St. Vincent and the Grenadines). Language in Society 42(4). 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000456.Google Scholar
Milroy, James, Milroy, Lesley, Hartley, Sue & Walshaw, David. 1994. Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6. 327–357.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.). 2017. Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma. 2010. The interaction between social category and social practice: Explaining was/were variation. Language Variation and Change 22. 347–371.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert P.. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38. 447–485.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma & Snell, Julia. 2011. “Oh, they’re top, them”: Right dislocated tags and interactional stance. In Gregersen, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey K. & Quist, Pia (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives III, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma & Spencer, Sarah. 2021. “It just sounds proper common”: Exploring the social meanings expressed by nonstandard grammar. Linguistics and Education 63. 2–14.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, Ryherd, Kayleigh & Kemper, Sara. 2017. Implicit and explicit gender priming in English lingual sibilant fricative perception. Linguistics 55(5). 1073–1107. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0021.Google Scholar
Mycock, Louise. 2019. Right-dislocated pronouns in British English: The form and functions of ProTag constructions. English Language & Linguistics. 23(2). 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000399.Google Scholar
Myhill, Debra A. 2018. Grammar as a meaning-making resource for improving writing. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 18. 1–21.Google Scholar
Myhill, Debra. 2021. Grammar re-imagined: Foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education 55(3). 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1885975.Google Scholar
Myhill, Debra A., Jones, Susan M., Lines, Helen & Watson, Annabel. 2012. Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education 27(2). 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640.Google Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Barbu, Stéphanie. 2014. Sociolinguistic convergence and social interactions within a group of preschoolers: A longitudinal study. Language Variation and Change 26(3). 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000131.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Negative concord as an English “vernacular universal”: Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3). 257–278.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Language as Interactive Phenomenon, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. 1980. Classification of Occupations and Coding Index. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna & Ohala, John (eds.), Sound Symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pabst, Katharina. 2022. Putting ‘the other Maine’ on the map: Language variation, local affiliation, and co-occurrence in Aroostook County English. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Palacios, Ignacio M. 2017. Negative concord in the language of British adults and teenagers. English World-Wide 38(2). 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.2.02pal.Google Scholar
Pea, Roy D. 1980. The development of negation in early child language. In Olson, David R. (ed.), The Social Foundations of Language and Thought, 597–626. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1895. Of reasoning in general. In Houser, N., A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, A. C. Lewis, C. L. Clark, & Davis, D. Bront (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913), 11–26. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. & Welby-Gregory, Victoria. 1977. In C. S. Hardwick & J. Cook (eds.), Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce Edition Project, Peirce Edition. 1998. The Essential Peirce, Volume 2: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai & Maegaard, Marie. 2017. On the influence of coronal sibilants and stops on the perception of social meanings in Copenhagen Danish. Linguistics 55(5). 1141–1167. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0023.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler & Kristiansen, Tore. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1). 1–31.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert P. 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 51. 134–143.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2021. The role of the body in language change. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 363–381. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa. 2018. Affective Sociolinguistic Style: An Ethnography of Embodied Linguistic Variation in an Arts High School. California, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2021. Multiethnolect and dialect in and across communities. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 292–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2010. Social class and sociolinguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 1. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222654.1.Google Scholar
Rathje, Marianne. 2009. Quotation and quotatives in the speech of three Danish generations. Paper presented at ICLAVE 5, University of Copenhagen. 25–27 June, 2009.Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2003. Stance accretion. Conference paper presented at the Language, Interaction, and Social Organization Research Focus Group, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Reay, Diane. 2004. ‘Mostly roughs and toughs’: Social class, race and representation in inner city schooling. Sociology 38(5). 1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504047183.Google Scholar
Reay, Diane. 2007. ‘Unruly places’ : Inner-city comprehensives, middle-class imaginaries and working-class children. Urban Studies 44(7). 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701302965.Google Scholar
Reay, Diane. 2017. Miseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Reitemeier, Bob. 2018. The key to social mobility lies in language. Times Education Supplement. 11 July 2018.Google Scholar
Resnick, Lauren, Asterhan, Christa, & Clarke, Sherice (eds.). 2015. Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Rickford, , John, Thomas Wasow, Arnold Zwicky, , & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2007. Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new. American Speech 82. 3–31.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. 1997. The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation: A study of (-t, d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24. 351–372.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mary. 2021. Negative concord as a window into the social perception of (morpho-) syntactic variables. Research talk presented at the Linguistics Seminar Series, University of Newcastle. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FjEPd2535VZtAakn7PRsqKy_K1SxheiA/view [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1984. On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18(3–4). 409–438.Google Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan & Flores, Nelson. 2017. Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5). 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael. 2021. Dear Gavin Williamson, could you tell parents what a fronted adverbial is? The Guardian, sec. Education. Available from: www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jan/23/dear-gavin-williamson-could-you-tell-parents-what-a-fronted-adverbial-is [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, 325–349. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Wolfram, Walt. 1994. Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: _Were/weren’t_ levelling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change 6. 273–302.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik. 2013. Glottal replacement of /t/ in two British capitals: Effects of word frequency and morphological compositionality. Language Variation and Change 25. 201–223.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2018. Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me.’ Language in Society 47(1). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000835.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2021. Biographical indexicality. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 243–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2022. False oppositions in the study of coherence. In Beaman, Karen V. & Guy, Gregory R. (eds.), The Coherence of Linguistic Communities: Orderly Heterogeneity and Social Meaning. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheppard, J. 2012. Hiya pupils, please avoid slang, ta. The Guardian. Available from: www.theguardian.com/education/2012/feb/14/hiya-pupils-avoid-slang-sheffield [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Shin, Naomi & Miller, Karen. 2021. Children’s acquisition of morphosyntactic variation. Language Learning and Development 18(2). 1–26.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1980. A grammar of the dialect of Farnworth and district (Greater Manchester County, formerly Lancashire). Sheffield: Thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1982. Relative pronouns and relative clauses in the dialect of Farnworth and district (Greater Manchester County, formerly Lancashire). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49(3). 334–343.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1998. A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area: Introduction, phonology. Amsterdam: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1999. A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area: Morphology and syntax. Amsterdam: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith & Selby, H. A. (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology, 11–56. Albuquerque, NM: University of Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In Mertz, Elizabeth & Parmentier, Richard J. (eds.), Semiotic Mediation, 219–259. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.Google Scholar
Skeggs, Beverley. 1997. Formations of Class & Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2001. Negative concord in the Old and New World: Evidence from Scotland. Language Variation and Change 13(2). 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394501132011.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Fortune, Liane. 2007. “Mam, my trousers is fa’in doon!”: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 63–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394507070044.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Fortune, Liane. 2009. Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21. 69–95.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Richards, Hazel. 2013. The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic norms: Caregivers, children, and variation. Linguistics 51(2). 285–324.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer & Durham, Mercedes. 2019. Sociolinguistic Variation in Children’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779248.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer & Holmes-Elliott, Sophie. 2022. Mapping syntax and the sociolinguistic monitor. In Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Jensen, Torben Juel (eds.), Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, 58–89. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2008. Pronouns, dialect and discourse: A socio-pragmatic account of children’s language in Teeside. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Leeds, ms.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2010. From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5). 630–656.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2013. Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education 27(2). 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.760584.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2014. Social class and language. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: 2014 Installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available from: https://benjamins.com/catalog/hop.18.soc6/details [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Language in Society 47(5). 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000970.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2019. Evidence submitted to the Oracy APPG “Speak for Change” Inquiry. Available from: www.snell.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/JSnell_Speaking_for_Change.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. Forthcoming. Social class and educational inequalities. In Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.), The Handbook of British Englishes. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia & Andrews, Richard. 2017. To what extent does a regional dialect and accent impact on the development of reading and writing skills? Cambridge Journal of Education 47(3). 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1159660.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia & Cushing, Ian. 2022. “A lot of them write how they speak”: Policy, pedagogy and the policing of ‘nonstandard’ English. Literacy 56(3). 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12298.Google Scholar
Spencer, Sarah. 2017. Research as working-class resistance: Lessons learned from getting by. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25(3). 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1173962.Google Scholar
Spencer, Sarah, Judy, Clegg, Joy, Stackhouse & Robert, Rush. 2017. Contribution of spoken language and socio-economic background to adolescents’ educational achievement at age 16 years. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 52(2). 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12264.Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2013. It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2). 200–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12025.Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2014. Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject–verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42(2). 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214526057.Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2016. Processing grammatical differences: Perceiving v. noticing. In Babel, Anna M. (ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research, 80–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L. 2021. Changing language, changing character types. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 315–337. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Ellen. 1990. I’m sitting there: Another new quotative? American Speech 65. 303.Google Scholar
Straw, Michelle & Patrick, Peter L.. 2007. Dialect acquisition of glottal variation in /t/: Barbadians in Ipswich. Language Sciences 29. 385–407.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Timmins, Claire & Tweedie, Fiona. 2007. ‘Talkin’ Jockney’? Variation and change in Glaswegian accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2). 221–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00319.x.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1984. Applied discourse analysis and educational linguistics. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Applied Sociolinguistics, 203–244. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 1998. Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10. 153–191.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2011. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Temple, Rosalind. 2005. New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17. 281–302.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Roeder, Rebecca V.. 2009. Variation in the English definite article: Socio-historical linguistics in t’speech community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(4). 435–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00418.x.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender Play. Buckingham, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2009. “Tails” of linguistic survival. Applied Linguistics 31(3). 325–345.Google Scholar
Toma, Bethany E. 2018. The semantics and pragmatics of right dislocation: Odd thing, that. Undergraduate Research Thesis. Ohio State University, ms.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell. 1986. Basic Word Order: Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206294369.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1975. Accent, Dialect and the School. London: Edward Arnold & Co.Google Scholar
Vincent, Carol, Ball, Stephen, Rollock, Nicola & Gillborn, David. 2013. Three generations of racism: Black middle-class children and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education 34(5/6). 929–946.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Birner, Betty. 1996. On the discourse function of rightward movement in English. In Goldberg, Adele (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 463–479. Stanford University, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Watt, Paul. 2006. Respectability, roughness and ‘race’: Neighbourhood place images and the making of working-class social distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(4). 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00688.x.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–53.Google Scholar
Wells, John Christopher. 1982. Accents of English: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. & Hardman, F.. 1997. Those terrible marks of the beast: Nonstandard dialect in children’s writing. Language and Education 23. 157–168.Google Scholar
Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Brianna. 2022. The social meaning of unbound reflexives. Paper presented at NWAV 50, University of Stanford, October 2022.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1984. The linguistic variable and syntactic variation in creole continua. Lingua 62. 267–288.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2013. Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499 [cs].Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Sellers, Jason. 1999. Ethnolinguistic marking of past be in Lumbee vernacular English. Journal of English Linguistics 27. 94–114.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2003. Parallel development and alternative restructuring: The case of weren’t regularization. In Britain, David & Cheshire, Jenny (eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1979. The conversational historic present alternation. Language 55. 168–182.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: Frowde.Google Scholar
Wyse, Dominic. 2001. Grammar for writing? A critical review of empirical evidence. British Journal of Educational Studies 49. 411–427.Google Scholar
Yakin, Halina Sendera Mohd, & Totu, Andreas. 2014. The semiotic perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A brief comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155. 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247.Google Scholar
Young, Vershawn Ashanti. 2009. “Nah, we straight”: An argument against code switching. Journal of Advanced Composition 29(1/2). 49–76.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam, ms.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2008. Rhotacization and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2). 201–222.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2021. Emergence of social meaning in sociolinguistic change. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 265–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal. 2017. Variability in /s/ among transgender speakers: Evidence for a socially grounded account of gender and sibilants. Linguistics 55(5). 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0018.Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 1994. Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 22(6). 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90033-7.Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael & Grosz, Barbara. 1994. Right dislocation and attentional state. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse, 184–199. The Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Emma Moore, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Socio-syntax
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921299.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Emma Moore, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Socio-syntax
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921299.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Emma Moore, University of Sheffield
  • Book: Socio-syntax
  • Online publication: 19 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921299.009
Available formats
×