Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning Activity Contributions of Cultural-Historical Psychological Theory
Book contents
- Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning Activity
- Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning Activity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Transcription Excerpts
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Transcription Conventions
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cultural-Historical Psychological Theory
- Chapter 2 The Relational Habitus and Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 3 Practical-Moral Knowledge and Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 4 Identity and Competence Woven Together Through Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 5 Contextual Mood and Regulatory Processes
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2019
Book contents
- Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning Activity
- Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning Activity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Transcription Excerpts
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Transcription Conventions
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cultural-Historical Psychological Theory
- Chapter 2 The Relational Habitus and Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 3 Practical-Moral Knowledge and Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 4 Identity and Competence Woven Together Through Regulatory Processes
- Chapter 5 Contextual Mood and Regulatory Processes
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sociocultural Psychology and Regulatory Processes in Learning ActivityContributions of Cultural-Historical Psychological Theory, pp. 114 - 122Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 329–336.Google Scholar
Alter, C. (2018). The school shooting generation has had enough. Time, March 22. http://time.com/longform/never-again-movementGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (V. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boekaerts, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: Activated motivational beliefs, current concerns, and emotional arousal. In Volet, S. & Järvelä, S. (Eds.), Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications (pp. 17–32). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Logic of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The genesis of the concepts of habitus and field. Sociocriticism, 2, 11–24.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Children’s Crusade (n.d.). National Civil Rights Museum, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
Chizhik, A. W. (2001). Equity and status in group collaboration: Learning through explanations depends on task characteristics. Social Psychology of Education, 5(2), 179–200.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. L. (2008). “That’s not treating you as a professional”: Teachers constructing complex professional identities through talk. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 79–93.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. L. (2010). Getting recognized: Teachers negotiating professional identities as learners through talk. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26(3), 473–481.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1995). The supra-individual envelope of development: Activity and practice, situation and context. In Goodnow, J., Miller, P., & Kessel, F. (Eds.), Cultural Practices as Contexts for Development (pp. 105–118). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (2005). Cultural-historical activity theory in the family of socio-cultural approaches. International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development Newsletter, 29(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2015). Mediation: An expansion of the socio-cultural gaze. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 34–50.Google Scholar
de Bruin, A. B. H. & van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 245–252.Google Scholar
Dent, A. L. & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474.Google Scholar
Devos, T. & Banaji, M. B. (2003). Implicit self and identity. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 153–175). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dings, R. (2018). Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action: An exploration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 681–699.Google Scholar
Do, S. L. & Schallert, D. L. (2004). Emotions and classroom talk: Toward a model of the role of affect in students’ experiences of classroom discussions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 619–634.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: The Intersubjectivity of Interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10(1–2), 16–35.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomena. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of Competence Motivation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. D. & Stam, J. H. (2015). Crisis? What crisis? Cross-cultural psychology’s appropriation of cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 293–317.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2008). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting with Computers, 20(2), 256–259.Google Scholar
Fields, D. & Enyedy, N. (2013). Picking up the mantle of “expert”: Assigned roles, assertion of identity, and peer recognition. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 113–131.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2009). The psychology of self regulation: An introductory review. In Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (Eds.), Psychology of Self Regulation: Cognitive, Affective, and Motivational Processes (Vol. 11, pp. 1–17). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fuhs, M. W., Farran, D. C., & Nesbitt, K. T. (2013). Preschool classroom processes as predictors of children’s cognitive self-regulation skills development. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 347–359.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytical lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(1), 12–18.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gilmore, K. (2014). The Birmingham Children’s Crusade of 1963. February 14. www.biography.com/news/black-history-birmingham-childrens-crusade-1963-videoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). An Essay on the Organization of Experience: Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Göncü, A. (1993). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. (1990). The socialization of cognition: What’s involved? In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 259–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. & Lawrence, J. (2015). Children and cultural context. In Bornstein, M., Leventhal, T., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. Volume 4: Ecological Settings and Processes (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future: The zo-ped. In Rogoff, B. & Wertsch, J. (Eds.), New Directions for Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 45–63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Haag, M. (2018). Two workers at Arizona migrant children centers are charged with sexual abuse. New York Times, August 3. www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/us/sexual-abuse-arizona-migrant-children.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hadwin, A. & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially-shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (2004). Attaching self and others to social categories as an interactional and historical achievement. Human Development, 47, 354–360.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2016). The discrete emotions questionnaire: A new tool for measuring state self-report emotions. PLoS One, 11(8), 1–25.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change of state token and aspects of it sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. C. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, D. & Cole, M. (1995). Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(4), 475–490.Google Scholar
Holland, D. & Lachicotte, W. J. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In Daniels, H., Cole, M, & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holodynski, M. (2013). The internalization theory of emotion: A cultural-historical approach to the development of emotions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(1), 4–38.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasely, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.Google Scholar
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially-shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379–393.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janlert, L. & Stolterman, E. (1997). The character of things. Design Studies, 18, 297–314.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2004). Interactional practices and linguistic resources of stance taking in spoken English. In Östman, J. O. (Ed.), PIC Bulletin 7 (pp. 45–48). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kirschner, S. & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2010). The Sociocultural Turn in Psychology: The Contextual Emergence of Mind and Self. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. (2005). Thinking Through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (Eds.). (2008). Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2006). Residence in the world: Affordances, instruments, actions, roles, and identities. Semiotica, 162, 19–71.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2012). Agent, Person, Subject, Self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohfeldt, D., Bowen, A. R., & Langhout, R. D. (2016). “They think kids are stupid”: yPAR and confrontations with institutionalized power as context for children’s identity work. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 27(2), 276–291.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1986). Vygotsky in Context. In Vygotsky, L. S. (Ed.), Thought and Language (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Langhout, R. D. & Thomas, E. (2010). Imagining participatory action research in collaboration with children: An introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 60–66.Google Scholar
LCHC (Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition). (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory. In Peterson, P., Tierney, R., Baker, E., & McGaw, B (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Vol. 6, pp. 360–366). Kidlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leander, K. M. (2002). Polycontextual construction zones: Mapping the expansion of schooled space and identity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(3), 211–237.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lodewyk, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2009). Implications of task structure on self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35(4), 493–506.Google Scholar
Martinek, D., Hofmann, F., & Kipman, U. (2016). Academic self-regulation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support and differentiation in school. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 729–748.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934/1962). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. & Turner, J. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotions and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377–390.Google Scholar
Miller, P. & Goodnow, J. (1995). Cultural practices: Toward an integration of culture and development. In Goodnow, J., Miller, P., & Kessel, F. (Eds.), New Directions for Child Development (Vol. 67, pp. 5–16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In Stigler, J. & Schweder, R. A. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 287–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–28.Google Scholar
Panadero, E. & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Precht, K. (2003). Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. Text, 23(2), 239–257.Google Scholar
Rief, S. (2007). Strategies to improve self-regulation. In Goldstein, S. (Ed.), Understanding and Managing Children’s Classroom Behavior: Creating Sustainable, Resilient Classrooms (pp. 322–360). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1979). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In Rommetveit, R. & Blakar, R. M. (Eds.), Studies of Language, Thought, and Verbal Communication (pp. 93–108). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1984). The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. In Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 331–359). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. A. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 693–735.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2000). Psychological models of emotion. In Borod, J. (Ed.), The Neuropsychology of Emotions (pp. 137–162). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1996). Creating evidence. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 435–460). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (1993). Vygotsky: The social negotiation of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 11(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2014). Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 305–325.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2016). Speaking Actually: Towards a New ‘Fluid’ Common-Sense Understanding of Relational Becomings. Farnhill, UK: Everything Is Connected Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking Through Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 16, 70–75.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D. (1996). The social construction of mathematical knowledge: Presented problems in mathematics classrooms. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 119–133.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D. & Gutierrez, K. D. (2007). Problem articulation and the processes of assistance: An activity theoretic view of mediation in game play. International Journal of Education Research, 46(1–2), 43–56.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D. & Hart, T. (2002). Identities of competency and literacy learning. Research article. Child Development. California State University.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D. & Hart, T. (2007). Semiotic mediation in literacy practices: Private speech in context. Language in Action: Vygotsky and Leontevian Legacy Today (pp. 280–305).Google Scholar
Stone, L. D., Kerrick, M., & Stoeckl, R. (2013). Practical-moral knowledge: The social organization of regulatory processes in academic settings. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(4), 372–392.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D. & Thompson, G. A. (2014). Classroom mood and the dance of stance: The role of affective and epistemic stancetaking in the development of a classroom mood. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 3(4), 309–322.Google Scholar
Stone, L. D., Underwood, C., & Hotchkiss, J. (2012). The relational habitus: Intersubjective processes in learning settings. Human Development, 55(2), 65–91.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2016). Temporality, stance ownership, and the constitution of subjectivity. Language and Communication, 46, 30–41.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. & Dori-Hacohen, G. (2012). Framing selves in interactional practice. Electronic Journal of Communication, 22(3/4), 1–26.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). Culture and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(2), 37–40.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44(2), 84–97.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1935). The problem of the environment. In van Der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36(3), 415–434.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and Speech: The Collected Works of Lev Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Genesis of the higher mental functions. In Luria, A. R. & Smirnoff, A. (Eds.), Psychological Research in the USSR (Vol. 1). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Conclusion. Further research: Development of personality and world view in the child (M. Hall, Trans.). In Rieber, R. W (Ed.), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 4: The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions (241–251). Springer Science+Business Media, New York.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 2 (J. Know & C. Stevens, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, D. & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2008). “Just don’t”: The suppression and invitation of dialogue in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 143–157.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meanings, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985a). The semiotic mediation of mental life: L.S. Vygotsky and M.M. Bakhtin. In Mertz, E. & Parmentier, R. J. (Eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 49–71). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985b). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whipple, M. (2005). The Dewey-Lippmann debate today: Communication distortions, reflective agency, and participatory democracy. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 156–178.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar
Wootson, C. R. (2018). Laura Ingraham mocked Parkland survivor David Hogg over college rejections. Now he’s headed to Harvard. Washington Post, December 22. www.washingtonpost.com/education/2018/12/22/laura-ingraham-taunted-david-hogg-over-collecge-rejections-he-just-said-he-got-into-harvard/?utm_term=.38658fbe92cGoogle Scholar
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202.Google Scholar