Book contents
- Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History
- Human Rights in History
- Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Not ‘Second-Generation Rights’
- Part I Religion, Markets, States
- Part II Race, Gender, Class
- 8 The Soviet Social
- 9 The Japanese ‘Welfare Society’: Social Rights in Action and the Seeds of the Precariat?
- 10 Liberation Theology, Social Rights and Indigenous Rights in Mexico (c.1965–2000)
- 11 The Unhappy Marriage of Gender and Socio-economic Rights in France
- Part III Social Rights in the Age of Internationalism
- Index
8 - The Soviet Social
Rights and Welfare Reimagined
from Part II - Race, Gender, Class
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2022
- Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History
- Human Rights in History
- Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Not ‘Second-Generation Rights’
- Part I Religion, Markets, States
- Part II Race, Gender, Class
- 8 The Soviet Social
- 9 The Japanese ‘Welfare Society’: Social Rights in Action and the Seeds of the Precariat?
- 10 Liberation Theology, Social Rights and Indigenous Rights in Mexico (c.1965–2000)
- 11 The Unhappy Marriage of Gender and Socio-economic Rights in France
- Part III Social Rights in the Age of Internationalism
- Index
Summary
This chapter considers the Soviet conception and implementation of a highly distinctive scheme of social rights from its foundation in the 1920s through the 1960s to the 1980s. The state which ostensibly took those rights to their highest degree of realisation in the twentieth century presents a particularly instructive history, but one that destabilises and confounds received categories and trajectories. As heirs to the emancipatory ambitions of eighteenth-century Jacobins and nineteenth-century labour movements, the Bolsheviks pursued a highly distinctive mode of conceptualising and implementing social and economic protection. Fraught and contradictory, it encompassed sweeping labour protection and ruthless labour repression. Its unmatched scope and depth of social provision was marred by problematic enforcement, backstopping and justiciability, the state conceiving itself as having transcended both the market and social classes. The Soviet Constitution eschewed ‘class-abatement’ (which T. H. Marshall espoused) as the objective of social welfare, while also rejecting the notion that social rights should be actionable (contra the Weimar jurists’ ‘social rule of law’).
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History , pp. 141 - 163Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022