Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:00:08.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Reflection and Impulse as Determinants of Conscious and Unconscious Motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Fritz Strack
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wörzburg, Germany
Roland Deutsch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wörzburg, Germany
Joseph P. Forgas
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Kipling D. Williams
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Simon M. Laham
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Social behavior may be determined by both conscious and unconscious forces. Indeed, a first look at the dominant theories of motivation (Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000) suggests that this distinction lends itself to a meaningful classification of motivational mechanisms. Conscious accounts are based on the assumption that humans (and to some degree other primates) are endowed with reason and insight. What they do can therefore be construed as deliberate action, the mental precursor of which is a decision or a choice. As Ajzen (1996, p. 298) has put it, acting “involves a choice even if the alternative is no action.” It is therefore useful to study people's reflective judgments as precursors to their choices. Specifically, decisions are based on the perceived value of the outcomes of an action and the subjective probability that they can be achieved. This expectancy-value perspective has influenced many theoretical approaches (for a review, see Feather, 1982). Most prominently, perhaps, Fishbein and Ajzen's theories of reasoned action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) and of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) have invoked this model to specify the influence of attitudinal judgments on human behavior. Also, Bandura's (1977) theory of social learning has adopted central elements of the expectancy-value paradigm.

Another variant of the conscious approach to motivation invokes people's intentions in the context of goal pursuit (see also Aarts & Hassin, this volume). Specifically, actors are assumed to intentionally control and regulate their behavior in order to reach a specific end state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Motivation
Conscious and Unconscious Processes
, pp. 91 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Vries, P. (2001). On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 631–642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ach, N. (1905). Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht
Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle und Mayer
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1996). The social psychology of decision making. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 297–325). New York: Guilford Press
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660Google ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, D. J. (1967). An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 73, 185–200Google Scholar
Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (Eds.). (2000). The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: W. W. Norton
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carver, C. S., Ganellen, R. J., Froming, W. J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 403–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (2002). Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences. In A. Tesser, D. A. Stapel, & J. V. Wood (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 13–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford Press
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1872/1965). The expression of emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (submitted for publication). “Not good” may feel quite positive! Affective and behavioral consequences of processing negated information. Manuscript
Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2002). Evaluative learning with delayed gratification. Impulsive and reflective processes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Würzburg, Germany
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 449–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (1999). Just going along: Nonconscious priming and conformity to social pressure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 578–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectations and actions. Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1996). The influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 421–430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1997). Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motor congruence effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 1419–1427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1998). Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: II. Boundary conditions for motor congruence effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1423–1426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York: Guilford Press
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press
Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press
Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds). (2000). Motivational science. Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt
Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735–739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. K., & Hirst, W. (1991). MEM: Memory subsystems as processes. In A. Collins, S. Gathercole, M. Conway, & P. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 241–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Kawakami, K., Young, H., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Automatic stereotyping: Category, trait, and behavioral activations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laird, J. D. (1974). Self-attribution of emotion: The effects of expressive behavior on the quality of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 475–486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe – studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50(5), 372–385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377–395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press
Lewin, K. (1926). Untersuchungen zur Handlungs-und Affektpsychologie. II.: Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 330–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain, 106, 623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C., & Atkinson, J. W. (1948). The projective expression of needs: I. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on perception. Journal of Psychology, 25, 205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, W. (1996). From good intentions to willpower. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. R. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 197–218). New York: Guilford Press
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 135–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R., & Hess, M. (2001). The latency of facial action differentiates the valence of processed information: Evidence that facial action is activated by evaluative processing. Unpublished manuscript, University of Würzburg
Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). “Approach and avoidance”: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 79, 39–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, M., Decety, J., Raybaudi, M., Massarelli, R., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., Morand, S., Gemignani, A., Decorps, M., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuro Report, 7, 1280–1284Google ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (in press). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of automaticity?European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 101–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wispe, L. G., & Drambarean, N. C. (1953). Physiological need, word frequency, and visual duration thresholds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 25–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×