Book contents
- Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation
- Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theoretical Foundations
- Part I Where Is (Social) Meaning?
- Part II The Structure of Social Meaning
- Part III Meaning and Linguistic Change
- Index
- References
Part III - Meaning and Linguistic Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2021
Book contents
- Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation
- Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theoretical Foundations
- Part I Where Is (Social) Meaning?
- Part II The Structure of Social Meaning
- Part III Meaning and Linguistic Change
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Meaning and Linguistic VariationTheorizing the Third Wave, pp. 265 - 387Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
References
4rain. 2005. Response to Kuaile-cuojue 2005. Posted on September 16 at 23:57:34. http://tianya.cn/bbs/post-funinfo-90652-1.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1):38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah B. 2001. Sounding learned: The gendered use of /t/ in Orthodox Jewish English. In Sanchez, Tara, and Johnson, Daniel E. (eds.), Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 2000. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11, 84–100.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Xiaoxing. 2010. Cui Buzai ‘Gang-Tai Qiang’ (The Fault Is Not With ‘Hong Kong-Taiwan Accent’). Renmin Ribao Haiwai Ban (People’s Daily Overseas Edition). August 10, 3.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization and broadcast British media. In Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 67–96.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2016. Five Ms for sociolinguistic change. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433–54.Google Scholar
Deng, Xiaoping. 1994. Let the facts speak for themselves. Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume III (1982–1992). Translated by The Bureau for the Compilation and Translation of Works of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin Under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 169–71.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. 2001. Markets, culture, power: The making of a ‘Second Cultural Revolution’ in China. Asian Studies Review 25(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2016. Variation, meaning and social change. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2018. Meaning and linguistic variation: The third wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
fedent. 2009. Weimao Dianshiju li Daochu Doushi Jing Pianzi Mei Ren Shuo, Suowei Gang-Tai Qiang jiuyao bei Ren bs Ah? (Why Nobody Comments On TV Dramas Full of Beijing Vernacular, But So Called Hong Kong-Taiwan Accent Would Be Despised?). Posted on November 14 at 21:32:00. www.zzetyy.com/plains.php?p_funinfo_1_1696362Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wenzi, Guojia Yuyan. 1996. Guowuyuan Guanyu Tuiguang Putonghua de Zhishi (1956-02-06) (State Council Directives Concerning the Promotion of Putonghua (02-06-1956)). In Guojia Yuyan Wenzi Gongzuo Weiyuanhui Zhengce Fagui Shi (Office for Policies and Laws under the Committee on National Language and Script) (ed.), Guojia Yuyan Wenzi Zhengce Fagui Huibian (1949–1995) (Collection of National Policies and Laws on Language and Script). Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe (Philology Publishing House), 11–16.Google Scholar
Hen-jia-hen-hexie (Very-fake-very-harmonious). 2010. Beifangren jiu Gaoren Yideng? Nanfang Kouyin jiu Jiao Gang-Tai Qiang? (Northerners are Superior? Southern Accent Is Called Hong Kong-Taiwan Accent?). Posted on December 27 at 06:44. www.tianya200.com/90277_1.html.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2002. Gender, language, and modernity: Toward an effective history of Japanese women’s language. American Ethnologist 29(2), 392–422.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 2001. ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–43.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith, and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 35–84.Google Scholar
Ji, Fengyuan. 2004. Linguistic Engineering: Language and Politics in Mao’s China. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott Fabius. 1998. Men’s identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1), 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaobo. 2000. Xinling Aiyue Biancheng Routi Huange (The Sad Song of the Soul Becomes the Happy Song of the Flesh). Kaifang Zazhi (Open Magazine), December, No. 168. www.epochtimes.com/gb/1/1/2/n28824.htm. Accessed May 3, 2012.Google Scholar
Lu, Yunzhong. 1995. Putonghua De Qing She yu Erhua (Neutral Tone and Rhotacization in Putonghua). Beijing: Shangwu Chuban She (Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Nordenhake, Magnus, and Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1983. Duration of standard Chinese word tones in different sentence environments. Lund University Working papers in Linguistics 25, 105–11.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J., and Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2002. Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J., and Wong, Andrew (eds.), Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press, 175–89.Google Scholar
Pujolar, Joan. 1997. Masculinities in a multilingual setting. In Johnson, Sally, and Meinhof, Ulrike H. (eds.), Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 86–106.Google Scholar
Qian, Nairong. 1995. Modern Chinese Linguistics. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, S. Robert. 1987. The Languages of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rong-yan-lao-si-ji. 2007. Response to Xiwang Dalu Beifang Tongbao Buyao Zai Shuo Shenme Beifang Qiang, Gang-Tai Qiang de Wenti!! (Hope Mainland Northern Compatriots Don’t Discuss the Issue of Northern Accent and Hong Kong-Taiwan Accent Anymore!!). Posted by Jiu-fen-bei-qing-cheng-shi on January 16 at 22:06:00. www.tianya.cn/publicforum/content/funinfo/1/289461.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Shen, Susan Xiaonan. 1990. The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4), 193–229.Google Scholar
Wang, Shuo, and Lao, Xia. 2000. Meiren Zeng Wo Menghan Yao (A Beauty Presents Me with Knockout Drops). Wuhan, China: Changjiang Wenyi Chubanshe (Changjiang Literature and Art Publishing House).Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., and Kroskrity, Paul (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2010. Tonal effects on perceived vowel duration. Laboratory Phonology 10, 151–68.Google Scholar
Yu, Jie. 2010. ‘Gang-Tai Qiang’ yu ‘Beijing Qiang’ (‘“Hong Kong-Taiwan Accent” and “Beijing Accent”’). In Xianggang Chenmo (Hong Kong Sinking). http://blog.boxun.com/hero/200801/yujie/76_1.shtml. Accessed April 20, 2012.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2001. Changing Economy, Changing Markets: A sociolinguistic study of Chinese yuppies. California: Stanford University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34(3), 431–66.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2007. Cosmopolitanism and linguistic capital in china: Language, gender and the transition to a globalized market economy in Beijing. In McElhinny, Bonnie S. (ed.), Words, Worlds, and Material Girls: Language, Gender, Globalization. Berlin: de Gruyter, 403–22.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2008. Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing Smooth Operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2), 201–22.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2018. Language and Social Change in China: Undoing Commonness through Cosmopolitan Mandarin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhuang, Liwei. 2005. Gang-Tai Hua Yeshi Zhongguo Hua (Hong Kong-Taiwan Speech Is Also Chinese). Posted on September 15. http://zhuangliwei.blogchina.com/89362.html. Accessed April 24, 2012.Google Scholar
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bijvoet, Ellen, and Fraurud, K. 2010. ‘Rinkeby Swedish’ in the mind of the beholder: Studying listener perceptions of language variation in multilingual Stockholm. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 170–88.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bóden, Petra. 2004. A new variety of Swedish? Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Sydney, AU: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association, 475–80.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2010. Language and space: The variationist approach. In Auer, Peter, Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Lameli, Alfred (eds.), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 1: Theories and Methods. Berlin: De Gruyter, 142–63.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1), 84–100.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue, and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2), 151–96.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14, 83–9.Google Scholar
Duncan, Simon. 1989. What is locality? In Peet, R. and Thrift, N. J. (eds.), New Models in Geography, Vol. 2. London, UK: Unwin Hyman, 221–54.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2004. Variation and a sense of place. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. Oxford, UK, and New York: Oxford University Press, 107–18.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Susan. 2015. The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freiesleben, Mikaela. 2016. Segregation, Ghettoization and Social Cohesion: The Parallel Society in Danish Discourse 1968–2013 – From Utopia to Dystopia. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen, DK: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Cornips, Leonie, Ganuza, Natalia, Nistov, Ingvild, and Opsahl, Toril. 2015. Beyond verb second – A matter of novel information-structural effects? Evidence from Norwegian, Swedish, German and Dutch. In Nortier, Jacomine and Svendsen, Bente A. (eds.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices Across Urban Spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 73–92.Google Scholar
Ganuza, Natalia. 2008. Syntactic variation in the Swedish of adolescents in multilingual urban settings: Subject-verb order in declaratives, questions and subordinate clauses. PhD dissertation. Ph.D. dissertation. Stockholm, SE: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N. 2005. Fonetik og Fonologi. Almen og Dansk. Copenhagen, DK: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2003. Mixed language varieties of migrant adolescents and the discourse of hybridity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(1–2), 12–41.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Rivke. 2012. Talkin’ ‘bout the ghetto: Popular culture and urban imaginaries of immobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(4), 674–88.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen. 2008. Problematizing ethnolects: Naming linguistic practices in an Antwerp secondary school. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 85–103.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, and Kiesling, Scott. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1), 5–33.Google Scholar
Jones, Martin, and Woods, Michael. 2013. New localities. Regional Studies 47(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Anja. 2010. The sense of belonging in new urban zones of transition. Current Sociology 58(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1988. Immigrant children’s Swedish – A new variety? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9(1–2), 129–40.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. The macro-level social meaning of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41(1), 167–92.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore, Pharao, Nicolai, and Maegaard, Marie. 2013. Controlled manipulation of intonational difference: An experimental study of intonation patterns as the basis for language-ideological constructs of geographical provenance and linguistic standardness in young Danes. In Kristiansen, T. and Grondelaers, S. (eds.), Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo, NO: Novus, 355–74.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai. 2015. Fighters, Girls and Other Identities: Sociolinguistics in a Martial Arts Club. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie. 2005. Language attitudes, norms and gender. A presentation of the method and results from a language attitude study. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37(1) 55–80.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie. 2007. Udtalevariation og -forandring i københavnsk: En etnografisk undersøgelse af sprogbrug, sociale kategorier og social praksis blandt unge på en københavnsk folkeskole. Copenhagen, DK: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. 2010. What’s in a name? Language ideology and social differentiation in a Swedish print-mediated debate. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(1), 116–42.Google Scholar
Møller, Janus Spindler. 2009. Stereotyping categorisations of speech styles among linguistic minority Danes in Køge. In Maegaard, M., Gregersen, F., Quist, P., and Jørgensen, J. N. (eds.), Language Attitudes, Standardization and Language Change. Oslo, NO: Novus, 231–54.Google Scholar
Opsahl, Toril. 2009a. ‘Egentlig alle kan bidra!’ – en samling sosiolingvistiske studier av strukturelle trekk ved norsk i multietniske ungdomsmiljøer i Oslo. [Actually Everbody may Contribute. A Collection of Sociolinguistic Studies of Structural Features Associated with Norwegian as Spoken among Adolescents in Multiethnic Areas in Oslo.] Ph.D. dissertation. Oslo, NO: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Opsahl, Toril. 2009b. Wolla I swear this is typical for the conversational style of adolescents in multiethnic areas in Oslo. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32(2), 221–44.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise. 1985. Dialektudtynding på Fyn. Et forsøg med implikations analyse. Danske Folkemål 27, 83–102.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise. 2003. Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159, 9–28.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, and Hansen, Gert Foget. 2005. Prosodic aspects of the Copenhagen multiethnolect. In Bruce, Gösta and Horne, Merle (eds.), Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of the IXth Conference. Lund, SE: Peter Lang, 87–96.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, and Hansen, Gert Foget. 2010. Prosody in the Copenhagen multiethnolect. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 79–95.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, and Maegaard, Marie. 2017. On the influence of coronal sibilants and stops on the perception of social meanings in Copenhagen Danish. Linguistics 55(5), 1141–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1987. Linguistic Utopias. In Fabb, Nigel et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 48–66.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2000. New Copenhagen ‘Multi-ethnolect’: Language use among adolescents in linguistic and culturally heterogeneous settings. Danske Talesprog, 143–212.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2005. Stilistiske praksisser i storbyens heterogene skole. En etnografisk og sociolingvistisk undersøgelse af sproglig variation. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen, DK: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2008. Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 43–61.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2010. Untying the language, body and place connection: Linguistic variation and social style in a Copenhagen community of practice. In Auer, Peter, Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Lameli, Alfred (eds.), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 1: Theories and Methods. Berlin: De Gruyter, 632–48.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2012. Stilistisk Praksis [Stylistic Practice]. Copenhagen, DK: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2017. Sprog-krop-sted: Dialektsamfundets meningsskabende orden. Nordica Helsingiensia 48, 57–71.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia, and Skovse, Astrid Ravn. 2020. Regional dialect and multiethnolect youth style in a Danish social housing project. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1725527Google Scholar
Quist, Pia, and Svendsen, Bente Ailin (eds.). 2010. Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia, and Svendsen, Bente Ailin. 2020. Urban speech styles of Germanic languages. In Putnam, M. T. and Page, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2015. Contemporary urban vernaculars. In Nortier, J. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices Across Urban Spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skovse, Astrid Ravn. 2018. Udgangspunkter og orienteringspunkter. Om stedsidentitet, hverdagsmobilitet og sproglig praksis blandt unge to steder i Danmark. [Departures and Destinations. On Place Identity, Everyday Mobility, and Linguistic Practice Among Adolescents in Two Danish Settings.] Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen, DK: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Stroud, Christopher. 2004. Rinkeby Swedish and semilingualism in language ideology debates: A Bourdieuan perspective. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2), 196–214.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin, and Røyneland, Unn. 2008. Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 63–83.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin, and Quist, Pia. 2010. New linguistic practices in multilingual urban Scandinavia: An introduction. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind Nessa, and Szakay, Anita. 2012. An investigation of speech rhythm in London English. Lingua (New Horizons in Sociophonetic Variation and Change) 122(7), 822–40.Google Scholar
Vollsmose Statistics. 2012. Statistisk oversigt over Vollsmose. Odense Kommune, Økonomi og Organisationsudvikling.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1996. Red belt, black belt: Racial division, class inequality and the state in the french urban periphery and the American ghetto. In Mingione, E. (ed.), Urban Poverty and the Underclass. Oxford, UK, and New York: Blackwell Publishers, 234–74.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 2008. Urban Outcasts. A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2009. Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua 119, 782–806.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2011. The role of information structure in linguistic variation: Evidence from a German multiethnolect. In Gregersen, F., Parrott, J. and Quist, P. (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives III. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 83–95.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2012. Kiezdeutsch: Ein Neuer Dialekt Entsteht. Munich, DE: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
References
Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23, 231–73.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15, 38–59.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ali, Nurul. 2012. Magnum Temptation event. May 21, 2012. http://blog.omy.sg/casio-sheen/2012/05/21/magnum-temptation-event/. Accessed August 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna. 2010. English in Singapore: Culture, capital, and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes 29(3), 336–48.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41(2), 237–67.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2009. Enregisterment, commodification and historical context: ‘Geordie’ versus ‘Sheffieldish’. American Speech 84(2),138–56.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. 2014. The social motivations of reversal: Raised bought in New York City English. Language in Society 43(4), 395–420.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.13. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. Accessed January 31, 2016.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. ‘Why be normal?’ Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2), 203–23.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2010. White Kids: Language and White Youth Identities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chng, Huang Hoon. 2008. Beyond linguistic instrumentalism: The place of Singlish in Singapore. In Rubdy, R. and Tan, P. (eds.), Language as a Commodity: Global Structures, Local Marketplaces. London, UK: Bloomsbury, 57–69.Google Scholar
Chong, Terence. 2011. Manufacturing authenticity: The cultural production of national identities in Singapore. Modern Asian Studies 45(4), 877–97.Google Scholar
CIA. 2017. The World Factbook: Singapore. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sn.html. Accessed August 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Clammer, John R. 1979. The Ambiguity of Identity: Ethnicity Maintenance and Change among the Straits Chinese Community of Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Stylistic Variation in Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 185–210.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. The vowels of the different ethnic groups in Singapore. In Prescott, D., Kirkpatrick, A., Martin, I., and Hashim, A. (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Literacies, literatures, and Varieties. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2–29.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461–90.Google Scholar
Goh, Chok Tong. 1999. Prime Minister’s National Day Rally speech: First-world economy, world-class home. www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/view-html?filename=1999082202.htm. Accessed August 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Goh, Daniel. 2015. Facebook post, August 27, 2015. www.facebook.com/danpsgoh/photos/a.573814819347932.1073741827.460369130692502/964848156911261/. Accessed August 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Bruno, Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, Ramasco, José J., and Sánchez, David. 2017. The fall of the empire: The Americanization of English. arXiv:1707.00781.Google Scholar
Hong, Xinyi. 2013. Singapore’s millennials are nostalgic, and it’s fueling trends in art and retail. South China Morning Post. July 5, 2013. www.scmp.com/magazines/style/article/1269357/good-old-days. Accessed August 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Janice, . 2010. Nestum Cereal goodness. April 15, 2010. http://jan-projectoflove.blogspot.jp/2010/04/nestum-cereal-goodness.html. Accessed August 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Jerilyn, M. 2013. Review of Hua Ting Restaurant. April 10, 2013. www.yelp.com.sg/biz/hua-ting-restaurant-singapore. Accessed August 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistic Compass 3(1), 359–83.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. Pittsburghese shirts: Commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect. American Speech 84(2), 157–75.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety. In Montgomery, C. and Moore, E. (eds.), Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 283–300.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 2006. The English language in the outer circle. In Bolton, K. and Kacru, B. B. (eds.), World Englishes. New York, NY: Routledge, 241–55.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin, DE: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob. 2012. Singapore English: An indexical approach. World Englishes 31(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2004a. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2004b. Sounding Singaporean. In Lim, L. (ed.), Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 19–56.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Niedzielski, Nancy. 2003. The globalization of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4), 534–55.Google Scholar
Modiano, Marko. 1996. The Americanization of Euro‐English. World Englishes 15(2), 207–15.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma, and Podesva, Robert J.. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4), 447–85.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin, DE: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pakir, Anne. 1991. The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes 10(2), 167–79.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Wee, Lionel. 2009. The three circles redux: A market-theoretic perspective on World Englishes. Applied Linguistics 30(3), 389–406.Google Scholar
Phang, Sock-Yong, and Helble, Matthias. 2016. Housing policies in Singapore. ADBI Working Paper 559. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
Platt, John, and Weber, Heidi. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, Features, Functions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. The California vowel shift and gay identity. American Speech 86(1), 32–51.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria. 2000. The media as a model and source of innovation in the development of Singapore Standard English. In Brown, Adam, Deterding, David, and Ee Ling, Low (eds.), The English Language in Singapore: Research on Pronunciation. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, 112–20.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter. 2004. British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34(2), 239–45.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singapore Department of Statistics. 2015. General Household Survey 2015. www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/GHS/ghs2015. Accessed August 14, 2017.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca Lurie. 2016. English variation and standard language ideology on a Singaporean game show. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation Asia-Pacific 4. National Chung Cheng University: Chiayi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca Lurie. 2017. Cross-dialectal awareness and use of the BATH-TRAP distinction in Singapore: Investigating the effects of overseas travel and media consumption. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca, and Wang, Tianxiao. 2018. Singapore, Singapura, Xinjiapo: Trilingual lifespan change in the National Day messages of Lee Kuan Yew. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca, Wong, Kevin Martens, Ibrahim, Nurul Afiqah Bte, Theng, Andre Joseph, Mei Yin, Alicia Chua, and Tong Jing Yi, Natalie. 2016. Flip-flops, slippers, thongs and jandals: Cross-dialectal lexical awareness among children in Singapore. Paper presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tan, Chor Hiang, and Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1992. Post-vocalic /r/ in Singapore English. York Papers in Linguistics 16, 139–52.Google Scholar
Tan, Kenneth Paul. 2007. Renaissance Singapore? Economy, Culture, and Politics. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Yingying. 2012. To r or not to r: Social correlates of /ɹ/ in Singapore English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 218, 1–24.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R., and Kendall, Tyler. 2007. Vowels: Vowel Manipulation, Normalization, and Plotting in R. R package, version 1.1. Software Resource: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2003. Linguistic changes in pan-world English. In Tschichold, C. (ed.), English Core Linguistics: Essays in Honour of David Allerton. Berne, CH: Peter Lang, 55–68.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2014. Diffusion, drift, and the irrelevance of media influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2), 214–22.Google Scholar
Yeoh, Brenda, and Lin, Weiqiang. 2012. Rapid Growth in Singapore’s Immigrant Population Brings Policy Challenges. Migration Information Source. www.migrationpolicy.org/article/rapid-growth-singapores-immigrant-population-brings-policy-challenges. Accessed August 8, 2017.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2002. Lor in colloquial Singapore English. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6), 711–25.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2008. Singapore English: Phonology. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), Varieties of English, Volume 4. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 259–77.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English I: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Peidong. 2014. ‘Authenticity’ and ‘foreign talent’ in Singapore: The relative and negative logic of national identity. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 29(2), 408–37.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34(3), 431–66.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. 2008. Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing Smooth Operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2), 201–22.Google Scholar
References
Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel, and van Hout, Roeland. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5), 3099–107.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. 2014. The social motivations of reversal: Raised BOUGHT in New York City English. Language in Society 43(4), 395–420.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, and New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavioral Research Methods 41(4), 977–90.Google Scholar
Conn, Jeff. 2005. Of ‘moice’ and men: The evolution of male-led sound change. Ph.D. dissertation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 119–26.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2003. The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum 47: Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society – Austin, 41–53.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2010. Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2), Article 9.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. The phonological influence on phonetic change. Ph.D. dissertation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52, 63–71.Google Scholar
Hubbell, Allan Forbes. 1950. The Pronunciation of English in New York City. New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler. 2009. Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the sociolinguistic archive and analysis project. Ph.D. dissertation. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001a. The anatomy of style-shifting. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 85–108.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001b. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2006 [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid, and Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1), 30–65.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 51: Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society – Austin 15, 134–43.Google Scholar
Prichard, Hilary, and Tamminga, Meredith. 2012. The impact of higher education on local phonology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2), Article 11.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., and McNair-Knox, Faye. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 235–76.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Josef, Evanini, Keelan, and Yuan, Jiahong. 2011. FAVE Program Suite [Forced alignment and vowel extraction].Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani, and Rampton, Ben. 2011. Lectal focusing in interaction: A new methodology for the study of superdiverse speech. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Morgan, Bane, Max, and Graff, Peter. 2017. The medium-term dynamics of accents on reality television. Language 93(3), 598–640.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith, Ahern, Christopher, and Ecay, Aaron. 2016a. Generalized additive mixed models for intraspeaker variation. Linguistics Vanguard, 2(s1).Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith, MacKenzie, Laurel, and Embick, David. 2016b. The dynamics of variation in individuals. Linguistic Variation 16(2), 300–36.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2017. The systematicity of style: Investigating the full range of variation in everyday speech. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2008. Linguistic change and stabilization in the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Ph.D. dissertation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1976. Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5(2), 189–209.Google Scholar
Wood, Simon N. 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Simon N. 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 73(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
References
Barthel, Helen, and Quené, Hugo. 2015. Acoustic-phonetic properties of smiling revised: Measurements on a natural video corpus. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2016. A brief history of style, and its contribution to 21st-century sociolinguistic theory. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5, 341–5.Google Scholar
Boyd, Zac, Elliott, Zuzana, Fruehwald, Josef, Hall-Lew, Lauren, and Lawrence, Daniel. 2015. An evaluation of sociolinguistic elicitation methods. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow: paper 800.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory Phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155–80.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Hall, Kira. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, Nick (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–97.Google Scholar
Calder, Jeremy. 2017. Handsome women: A semiotics of non-normative gender in SoMa, San Francisco. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette, Pratt, Teresa, and Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2019. Compression in the California Vowel Shift: Tracking generational sound change in California’s Central Valley. Language Variation and Change 31, 193–217.Google Scholar
Drahota, Amy, Costall, Alan, and Reddy, Vasuvedi. 2008. The vocal communication of different kinds of smile. Speech Communication 50, 278–87.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2006 [1996]. Vowels and nailpolish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Cameron, Deborah and Kulick, Don (eds.), The Language and Sexuality Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 189–95.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12, 25–42.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2010. Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. The University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2), 70–80.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86, 85–97.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, Friesman, Wallace V., and Ancoli, Sonia. 1980. Facial signs of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1125–34.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, and Hinskens, Frans. 2016. Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities. Lingua 172–3, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2005. One shift, two groups: When fronting alone is not enough. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10(2).Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2009. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue et al. 1987. It’s not just the valley girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 117–28.Google Scholar
Johnson, Steve. 2006. Shift happens: Effects of personality on the Northern Cities Shift. Colloquium presented in the Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert, and Grama, James. 2012. Chain shifting and centralization in California vowels: An acoustic analysis. American Speech 87, 39–56.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H., and Sloetjes, H.. 2009. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods 41, 841–9.Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 606–8.Google Scholar
Luthin, Herbert. 1987. The story of California /ow/: The coming-of-age of English in California. In Denning, K. et al. (eds.), Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, 312–24.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. The California Vowel Shift and gay identity. American Speech 86, 32–51.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2016. Affect structures variation in vowel quality: The influence of smiling on the front lax vowels in California. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., D’Onofrio, Annette, Van Hofwegen, Janneke, and Kim, Seung Kyung. 2015. Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift. Language Variation and Change 27, 157–86.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Callier, Patrick, Voigt, Rob, and Jurafsky, Dan. 2015. The connection between smiling and GOAT fronting: Embodied affect in sociophonetic variation. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa. 2016. The use of embodied creak by young men at an arts high school. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa. 2017. LOT-raising and toughness in a California high school. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa, and D’Onofrio, Annette. 2017. Jaw setting and the California vowel shift in parodic performance. Language in Society 30, 1–30.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Joe, Evanini, Keelan, and Yuan, Jiahong. 2011. FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) program suite.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2017. The systematicity of style: Investigating the full range of variation in everyday speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy. 2014. GOOSE-fronting among Chinese Americans in New York City. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2), 209–18.Google Scholar
References
Babel, Anna M. (ed.). 2016. Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, Jeremy. 2019. The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 48, 31–64.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette, and Eckert, Penelope. 2021 Affect and iconicity in phonological variation. Language in Society 50, 1–23.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2010. Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. The University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2), 70–80.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 1999. A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(1), 5–23.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52, 63–71.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, and Hinskens, Frans. 2016. Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities. Lingua 172(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Politics, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, 35–83.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2012. A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Sharese. 2016. On the negotiation of racial and regional identities: Vocalic variation in African Americans from Bakersfield. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1), 100–10.Google Scholar
King, Sharese. 2020. From African American Vernacular English to African American Language: Rethinking the study of race and language in African Americans’ speech. Annual Review of Linguistics 6, 285–300.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. The linguistic consequences of being a lame. In Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 255–92.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez, Maegaard, Marie & Pharao, Nicolai. 2017. Introduction: Tracing the origin of /s/ variation. Linguistics 55(5), 979–92.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language & Communication 6(3), 215–21.Google Scholar
Smith, Edward E., and Kosslyn, Stephen M.. 2007. Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar