Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:20:30.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Interpreting the Ingroup's Negative Actions Toward Another Group

Emotional Reactions to Appraised Harm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Nyla R. Branscombe
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Anca M. Miron
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Larissa Z. Tiedens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Colin Wayne Leach
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

Social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) claims that how people interpret group-relevant events depends on their own group membership and the structural relations that exist between the ingroup and a salient comparison outgroup. When people think of themselves as a member of a social group, they are motivated to protect the identity of their group, and this can lead them to appraise the ingroup's actions in ways that benefit their ingroup (Baumeister & Hastings, 1997; Iyer, Leach, & Pedersen, in press). We argue that such ingroup-serving motivations affect the appraisal of ingroup actions and the emotions that group members experience when they self-categorize as members of their group (Branscombe, Doosje, & McGarty, 2002; Montada & Schneider, 1989).

Even when the self has clearly played no causal role in an event, depending on the meaning that event has for a valued social identity, differential emotional reactions can occur (Branscombe et al., 1993; Cialdini et al., 1976; Doosje et al., 1998; Yzerbyt et al., 2002). As Smith (1999) notes, group-based emotional responses rest on appraisals that consider the event's implications for one's social identity, whereas personal emotional responses are based on appraisals that consider the event in terms of its implications for personal identity. In this chapter, we explore the processes that are instigated when people are reminded of their ingroup's past or present harmful actions toward another group. We focus on how appraisals that reduce the severity and injustice of the ingroup's actions can undermine the experience of collective guilt.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augoustinos, M., & LeCouteur, A. (in press). On whether to apologize to Indigenous Australians: The denial of white guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations. New York: W. W. Norton
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Hastings, S. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: How groups flatter and deceive themselves. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective memory and political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 277–293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1967). When does a harm-doer compensate a victim?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 435–441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bizman, A., Yinon, Y., & Krotman, S. (2001). Group-based emotional distress: An extension of self-discrepancy theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1291–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., Schiffhauer, K., & Valencia, L. (2003). Racial attitudes in response to thinking about White privilege. Manuscript submitted for publication
Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). Ingroup or outgroup extremity: Importance of the threatened identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, T., & Buss, A. H. (1964). Effects of justification for aggression and communication with the victim on postaggression dissonance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 403–412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. L. (1999). The age of apology. In R. L. Brooks (Ed.), When sorry isn't enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice (pp. 3–12). New York: New York University Press
Churchill, W. (1997). A little matter of genocide. San Francisco: City Lights Books
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, R. L. (1976). ‘Basking in reflected glory’: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). The specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Miller, P. A., Fultz, J., Mathy, R. M., Shell, R., Shea, C., & Reno, R. R. (1989). The relations of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 55–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estrada-Hollenbach, M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 215–231). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring guilt in children: A rose by any other name still has thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 19–74). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley
Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313). New York: Academic Press
Hornsey, M. J., Spears, R., Cremers, I., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Pedersen, A. (in press). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Joireman, J. A., Parrott, G. L. III, & Hammersla, J. (2002). Empathy and the self-absorption paradox: Support for the distinction between self-rumination and self-reflection. Self and Identity, 1, 53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. C. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press
Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 136–163). New York: Cambridge University Press
Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer reactions to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (in press). Collective guilt in the United States: Predicting support for social policies to alleviate social injustice. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Marques, J., Paez, D., & Sera, A. F. (1997). Social sharing, emotional climate, and the transgenerational transmission of memories: The Portuguese Colonial war. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective memory and political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 253–275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2003). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate ingroup advantage. Manuscript submitted for publication
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, D. K. (1990). The Japanese-American internment: Perceptions of moral community, fairness, and redress. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseman I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions. A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Personality, 5, 11–35
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Montada, L., Muller, L., & Muller-Fohrbrodt, G. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and education as privileges: exploring the generalizability of the existential guilt reaction. Social Justice Research, 13, 313–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (in press). Determinants of the intensity of gender-based guilt in men. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 277–292). Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Shaw, L. L., Batson, C. D., & Todd, R. M. (1994). Empathy avoidance: Forestalling feeling for another in order to escape the motivational consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 183–196). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence (p. 132). New York: Cambridge University Press
Steele, S. (1990). The content of our character. New York: Harper Perennial
Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 115–139). New York: Guilford Press
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. M. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution) – emotion action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (in press). Importance of social categorization for forgiveness and assignment of collective guilt for the Holocaust. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Gordijn, E., & Wigboldus, D. (2002). Intergroup emotions and self-categorization: The impact of perspective-taking on reactions to victims of harmful behavior. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×