References

Tasha Fairfield; Andrew E. Charman

doi:10.1017/9781108377522.021

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2022

Tasha Fairfield and

Andrew E. Charman

Show author details

Tasha Fairfield: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Andrew E. Charman: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference
Rethinking Qualitative Research
, pp. 645 - 658

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108377522.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, Peter. 2009. “A Case for Cases: Comparative Narratives in Sociological Research.” Sociological Methods and Research 38:38–70.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ahmadi, M., Baquero-Ruiz, M., Bertsche, W., Butler, E., Capra, A., Carruth, C., Cesar, C.L., Charlton, M., Charman, A.E., Eriksson, S., Evans, L.T., Evetts, N., Fajans, J., Friesen, T., Fujiwara, M.C., Gill, D.R., Gutierrez, A., Hangst, J.S., Hardy, W.N., Hayden, M.E., Isaac, C.A., Ishida, A., Jones, S.A., Jonsell, S., Kurchaninov, L., Madsen, N., Maxwell, D., McKenna, J.T.K., Menary, S., Michan, J.M., Momose, T., Munich, J.J., Nolan, P., Olchanski, K., Olin, A., Povilus, A., Pusa, P., Rasmussen, C.O., Robicheaux, F., Sacramento, R.L., Sameed, M., Sarid, E., Silveira, D.M., So, C., Tharp, T.D., Thompson, R.I., van der Werf, D.P., Wurtele, J.S., and Zhmoginov, A.I.. 2016. “An Improved Limit on the Charge of Antihydrogen from Stochastic Acceleration.” Nature 529:373–376.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Amel, and Sil, Rudra. 2012. “When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research.” Perspectives on Politics. 10(4):935–953.Google Scholar

Albertus, Michael. 2015. Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alkassar, Ammar, Nicolay, Thomas, and Rohe, Markus. 2005. “Obtaining True-Random Binary Numbers from a Weak Radioactive Source.” In Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L., Kumar, V. et al., eds., Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3481. Berlin: Springer, 634–646.Google Scholar

Allison, G.T. 1971. Essence of Decision. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Luis W., Alvarez, Walter, Asaro, Frank, and Michel, Helen. 1980. “Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction.” Science 208(4448):1095–1108.CrossRef Google Scholar

Amengual, Matthew. 2016. Politicized Enforcement in Argentina: Labor and Environmental Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David. 2016. “Journal Editors and ‘Results-Free’ Research: A Cautionary Note.” Comparative Political Studies 49(13):1809–1815.CrossRef Google Scholar

APSA. 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Atanasov, Pavel, Witkowski, Jens, Ungar, Lyle, Mellers, Barbara, and Tetlock, Philip. 2020. “Small Steps to Accuracy: Incremental Belief Updaters are Better Forecasters.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 160:19–35.Google Scholar

Bailey, R.A. 1983a. “Restricted Randomization.” Biometrika 70:183–198.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Barrenechea, Rodrigo, and Mahoney, James. 2019. “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Bayesian Process Tracing.” Sociological Methods & Research 48(3):451–484.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry. 2004. “Some Unfulfilled Promises of Quantitative Imperialism.” In Brady, and Collier, , eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry, 69–74.Google Scholar

Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beach, Derek. 2013. “Taking Mechanisms Seriously?” European Political Science 12:13–15.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. 2006. “Stirring the Frequentist Pot with a Dash of Bayes.” Political Analysis 14(3):339–344.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey, eds. 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. 2006. “Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods.” Annual Review of Political Science 9:455–476.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Berger, James. 2006. “The Case for Objective Bayesian Analysis.” Bayesian Analysis 1(3):385–402.Google Scholar

Berger, James, and Berry, Donald. 1988. “Statistical Analysis and the Illusion of Objectivity.” American Scientist 76(2):159–165.Google Scholar

Berger, James, and Sellke, Thomas. 1987. “Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P-Values and Evidence.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82(397):112–122.Google Scholar

Berry, Michael. 2002. “Singular Limits.” Physics Today 55(5):10–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Birnbaum, Allan. 1962. “On the Foundations of Statistical Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298):269–306.Google Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boone, Catherine. 2014. Property and Political Order in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowers, Jake, Nagler, Jonathan, Gerring, John, Jacobs, Alan, Green, Don, and Humphreys, Macartan. 2015. “A Proposal for a Political Science Registry.” http://blogs.bu.edu/jgerring/files/2015/09/AproposalforaPoliticalScienceRegistry.pdf.Google Scholar

Box, George. 1980. “Sampling and Bayes Inference in Scientific Modeling and Robustness.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 143(4):383–430.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brady, Henry, and Collier, David, eds. (RSI). 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua, and Aronow, Peter. 2015. “Irregularities in LaCour (2014).” https://stanford.edu/~dbroock/broockman_kalla_aronow_lg_irregularities.pdf.Google Scholar

Büthe, Tim, and Jacobs, Alan. 2015. “Conclusion: Research Transparency for a Diverse Discipline.” Qualitative and Multimethod Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association’s QMMR Section 13(1):50–63.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald. 1975. “‘Degrees of Freedom’ and the Case Study.” Comparative Political Studies 8:178–193.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel. 1997. “Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.” American Journal of Sociology 102(6):1565–1605.Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy. 1990. “‘Discovering’ Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory.” Sociological Science & Medicine 30(11):1161–1172.Google Scholar

Chaudhry, Kiran. 1997. The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44(4): 823–830.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth Berins. 1991. Shaping The Political Arena: Critical Junctures, The Labor Movement, And Regime Dynamics In Latin America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Collier, David, Brady, Henry, and Seawright, Jason. 2010. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference.” In Brady, and Collier, , eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry, 161–199.Google Scholar

Collier, David, and Mahoney, James. 1996. “Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research.” World Politics 49(1):56–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collier, David, Seawright, Jason, and Munck, Gerardo. 2010. “The Quest for Standards: King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry.” In Collier, and Brady, , eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry, 33–63.Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths Toward Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Copestake, James, Goertz, Gary, and Haggard, Stephan. 2020. “The Veil of ignorance Process Tracing (VoiPT) Methodology.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 18(2):19–26.Google Scholar

Cox, Richard T 1961. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

D’Agostini, Giulio. 2003. Bayesian Reasoning in Data Analysis. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRef Google Scholar

de Finetti, Bruno. 1937. “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources.” In Kyburg, Henry E. and Smokler, Howard E.K., eds., Studies in Subjective Probability 2nd ed. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Kreiger, 53–118.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi, and Mosteller, Frederick. 1989. “Methods for Studying Coincidences.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(408):853–861.Google Scholar

Dimitrov, Radoslav. 2020. “Empty Institutions in Global Environmental Politics.” International Studies Review 22(3):626–650.Google Scholar

Downing, Brian. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2010. “Design-Based Inference.” In Brady, and Collier, , eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry, 273–311.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Earman, John. 1992. Bayes or Bust? MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson, eds., Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7, Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 79–138.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Edgington, Eugene. 2011. “Randomization Tests.” In Lovric, Miodrag, ed., International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_56 Google Scholar

Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Falleti, Tulia, and Mahoney, James. 2015. “The Comparative Sequential Method.” In Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds., Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 211–239.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. “Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies.” World Development 47:42–57.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha, and Charman, Andrew. 2017. “Explicit Bayesian Analysis for Process Tracing.” Political Analysis 25(3):363–380.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha, and Garay, Candelaria. 2017. “Redistribution under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking.” Comparative Political Studies 50(14):1871–1906.Google Scholar

Fearon, James. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43(2):169–195.Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Freedman, David. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather,” Sociological Methodology 21:291–313.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy, and Peterson, David. 2020. “Replication.” In Elman, Colin, Gerring, John, and Mahoney, James, eds., The Production of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Jeffrey, Baker, Joshua, Mellers, Barbara, Tetlock, Philip, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 2018. “The Value of Precision in Probability Assessment: Evidence from a Large-Scale Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament.” International Studies Quarterly 62(2):410–422.Google Scholar

Galavotti, Maria Carla. 2005. Philosophical Introduction to Probability. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Garay, Candelaria. 2007. “Social Policy and Collective Action: Unemployed Workers, Community Associations, and Protest in Argentina.” Politics & Society 35:301–328.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John, Stern, Hal, Dunson, David, Vehtari, Aki, and Rubin, Donald. 2013. Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

George, Alexander. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory Development.” In Lauren, P., ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in Theory, History, and Policy. New York: Free Press, 43–68.Google Scholar

George, Alexander, and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

George, Alexander, and McKeown, Timothy. 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” Advances in Information Processing in Organizations 2:21–58.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan, Green, Donald, and Kaplan, Edward. 2004. “The Illusion of Learning from Observational Research.” In Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers, and Massoud, Tarek, eds., Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 251–73.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40(3):231–253.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney, and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.Google Scholar

Glymour, C. 1980. Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2017. Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Martin, and Goldstein, Inge F., 1978. How Do We Know: An Exploration of the Scientific Process. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, and LaPorte, Jody. 2019. “Process Tracing and the Problem of Missing Data.” Sociological Methods & Research, published online 12 February, https://doi-org/10.1177/0049124119826153.Google Scholar

Good., I.J. 1980 “C73. The Diminishing Significance of a p-value as the Sample Size Increases,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 11(3–4):307–313.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Goodman, Steven. 1993. “p Values, Hypothesis Tests, and Likelihood: Implications for Epidemiology of a Neglected Historical Debate.” American Journal of Epidemiology. 137(5): 485–496.Google Scholar

Greenland, Sander. 2006. “Bayesian Perspectives for Epidemiological Research.” International Journal of Epidemiology 35:765–775.Google Scholar

Gregory, Phil. 2005. Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas, Sobel, David, Tenenbaum, Joshua, and Gopnik, Alison. 2011. “Bayes and Blickets: Effects of Knowledge on Causal Induction in Children and Adults.” Cognitive Science 35:1407–1455.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2015. Nations Under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All-Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics & Society 38(2):152–204.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2012. “Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule,” American Political Science Review 106(3):495–516.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Hall, Peter. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 373–404.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and Power in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Howson, Colin. 1984. “Bayesianism and Support by Novel Facts.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35:245–251.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howson, Colin, and Urbach, Peter. 2006. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed. Chicago: Carus Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan, and Jacobs, Alan. 2015. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach.” American Political Science Review 109(4):653–73.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan, de la Sierra, Raul Sanchez, and van der Windt, Peter. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21:1–20.Google Scholar

Hunter, Douglas. 1984. Political/Military Applications of Bayesian Analysis. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Ileto, Reynaldo. 1985. “The Past in the Present Crisis.” In May, R.J. and Nemenzo, Francisco, eds., The Phillipines after Marcos. London: Croom Helm, 7–16.Google Scholar

Iversen, Gudmund. 1984. Bayesian Statistical Inference. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Jackman, Simon. 2009. Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Alan. 2016. “Introduction: Mechanisms and Process Tracing.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 14(1):13–15.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Jaynes, E.T. 1976. “Confidence Intervals vs. Bayesian Intervals.” In Harper, W.L. and Hooker, Cliff, eds., Foundations of Probability Theory. Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol. II. Holland: Springer Netherlands, 175–257.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Jefferys, William. 2003. “Bayes’ Theorem,” Journal of Scientific Exploration 17(3): 537–542.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Jefferys, William, and Berger, James. 1992a. “Sharpening Ockham’s Razor on a Bayesian Strop.” Purdue University Technical Report.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Richard. 1983. The Logic of Decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, Harold. 1939. Theory of Probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Valen. 2013. “Revised Standards for Statistical Evidence.” PNAS 110(48):19313–19317.Google Scholar

Kadane, Joseph B., and Seidenfeld, Teddy. 1990. “Randomization in a Bayesian Perspective.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 25:329–345.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren, and Read, Benjamin. 2015a. Field Research in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Karl, Terry. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Robert. 2009. “The Political Effects of Inequality in Latin America: Some Inconvenient Facts.” Comparative Politics 41(3):359–79.Google Scholar

Kay, Critobal. 2002. “Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform, Industrialisation and Development.” Third World Quarterly 23(6):1073–1102.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Peter. 1979. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Khan, Amil. 2010. The Long Struggle: The Seeds of the Muslim World’s Frustration. Ropley, Hampshire, UK: John Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Sidney Verba (KKV). 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Koch, Thomas, and Denike, Kenneth. 2006. “Rethinking John Snow’s South London Study: A Bayesian Evaluation and Recalculation.” Social Science & Medicine 63:271–283.Google Scholar

Kreuzer, Marcus. 2016. “Assessing Causal Inference Problems with Bayesian Process Tracing: The Economic Effects of Proportional Representation and the Problem of Endogeneity.” New Political Economy 21(5):473–483.Google Scholar

Kuntz, Philipp, and Thompson, Mark. 2009. “More than Just the Final Straw: Stolen Elections as Revolutionary Triggers.” Comparative Politics 41(3):253–272.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurtz, Marcus. 2009.“The Social Foundations of Institutional Order: Reconsidering War and the ‘Resource Curse’ in Third World State Building.” Politics & Society 37(4):479–520.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Laitin, David. 2013. “Fisheries Management.” Political Analysis 21:42–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lane, David. 1980. “Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test—Comment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 75(371):587–589.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack. 2002. In Brecher, Michael, and Harvey, Frank, eds., Evaluating Methodology in International Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Lieberman, Evan. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99(3):435–452.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lindley, D.V. 1956. “On a Measure of the Information Provided by an Experiment.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27(4):986–1005.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Loredo, T.J. 1990. “From Laplace to Supernova SN1987A: Bayesian Inference in Astrophysics.” In Fougère, P.F., ed., Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual MaxEnt Workshop, held at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Loredo, T.J., and Lamb, D.Q.. 2001. “Bayesian analysis of neutrinos observed from supernova SN 1987A.” arXiv:astro-ph/0107260.Google Scholar

Luebbert, Gregory. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacKay, David. 2003. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2010. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.” World Politics 62(1):120–47.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227–249.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Vanderpoel, Rachel. 2015. “Set Diagrams and Qualitative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48(1):65–100.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary, and Davis, Ernest. 2013. “How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition?” Psychological Science 24(12):2351–2360.CrossRef Google Scholar

Margold, Stella. 1957. “Agrarian Land Reform in Egypt.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 17(1):9–19.Google Scholar

McKeown, Timothy. 1999. “Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview.” International Organization 53(1):161–190.Google Scholar

Mildenberger, Matto. 2018. “Process-Tracing, Counterfactual Comparisons and Causal Inference.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1872. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 8th ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar

Monogan, James. 2015. “Research Preregistration in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48(3):425–29.Google Scholar

Morey, Richard, Hoekstra, Rink, Rouder, Jeffrey, Lee, Michael, and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan. 2016. “The Fallacy of Placing Confidence in Confidence Intervals.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(1):103–123.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oakes, Michael. 1990 Statistical Inference. Epidemiology Resources Inc.Google Scholar

Oaksford, Michael, and Chater, Nick. 2007. Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Oxford Cognitive Science Series. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Owen, John. 1994. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace.” International Security 19(2):87–125.Google Scholar

Papineau, David. 1994. “The Virtues of Randomization.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45(2):437–450.Google Scholar

Parkes, E.A. [1855] 2013. “Review XIII: Mode of Communication of Cholera. By John Snow, ND. Second Edition.” International Journal of Epidemiology 42:1543–1552.Google Scholar

Patton, Michael Quinn. 2001. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94:251–67.Google Scholar

Pinches, Michael. 1991. “The Working Class Experience of Shame, Inequality, and People Power in Tatalon, Manila.” In Kerkvliet, Benedict and Mojares, Resil, eds. From Marcos to Aquino: Local Perspectives on Political Transition in the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press, 166–186.Google Scholar

Pólya, George. 1954. Patterns of Plausible Inference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge. 2015. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pratt, John. 1962. “On the Foundations of Statistical Inference: Discussion.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298):314–316.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Adam, Przeworski, and Teune, H.. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Ramsey, P.F. 1926. “Truth and Probability,” reprinted in Kyburg, Henry E. and Smokler, Howard E.K., eds., Studies in Subjective Probability, 1964. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Rapport, Aaron. 2015. “Hard Thinking about Hard and Easy Cases in Security Studies.” Security Studies 24:431–465.Google Scholar

Richards, Mark, Alvarez, Walter, Self, Stephen, Karlstrom, Leif, Renne, Paul, Manga, Michael, Sprain, Courtney, Smit, Jan, Vanderkluysen, Loÿc, and Gibson, Sally. 2015. “Triggering of the Largest Deccan Eruptions by the Chicxulub Impact.” GSA Bulletin 127(11–12):1507–1520.Google Scholar

Ricks, Jacob, and Liu, Amy. 2018. “Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51(4):842–46.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rohlfing, Ingo. 2012. Case Studies and Causal Inference. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Roos, Leslie R. Jr., Roos, Noralou P., and McKinley, Barbara. 1977. “Implementing Randomization.” Policy Analysis 3(4):547–559.Google Scholar

Rosencrantz, Roger D. 1977. Inference, Method and Decision: Towards a Bayesian Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Ross, Michael. 2004. “How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases.” International Organization 58(1):35–67.Google Scholar

Rossi, Peter, and Zellner, Arnold. 1989. “The ET Interview: Professor Arnold Zellner.” Econometric Theory 5(2):287–317.Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 1977. “Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization.” The Annals of Statistics 6(1):34–58.Google Scholar

Runhardt, Rosa. 2020. “Concrete Counterfactual Tests for Process Tracing.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference.Google Scholar

Saint-Mont, Uwe. 2015. “Randomization Does Not Help Much, Comparability Does.” PLOS ONE 10(7): e0132102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132102.Google Scholar

Salsburg, David. 2002. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Savage, L.J., Barnard, George, Cornfield, Jerome, Bross, Irwin, Box, George, Good, I.J., Lindley, D.V., Clunies-Ross, C.W., Pratt, John, Levene, Howard, Goldman, Thomas, Dempster, A.P., Kempthorne, Oscar, and Birnbaum, Allan. 1962. “On the Foundations of Statistical Inference: Discussion.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298):307–326.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. “Efficient Process Tracing.” In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey, eds., Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten, and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. Set Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schultz, Kenneth. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research, A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61(2):294–308.Google Scholar

Thomas, Sellke, Bayarri, M.J., and Berger, James. 2001. “Calibration of p Values for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses.” The American Statistician 55(1):62–71.Google Scholar

Sewell, William. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” In McDonald, Terrence, ed., The Historical Turn in the Human Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, Warren. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Singh, Purna. 2015. “Subnationalism and Social Development: A Comparative Analysis of Indian States.” World Politics 67(3):506–62.Google Scholar

Sivia, D.S., with Skilling, J.. 2006. Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar

Skilling, John. 2008. “This Physicist’s View of Gelman’s Bayes.” Bayesian Analysis 0(0):1–6.Google Scholar Google Scholar Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Slater, Dan. 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115(1):203–254.Google Scholar

Snow, John. 1854. On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. Second Edition. London: John Churchill, New Burlington Street. (digitized by Google).Google Scholar

Soifer, Hillel David. 2015. State-Building in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steiger, J. H., and Fouladi, R. T. 1997. “Noncentrality Interval Estimation and the Evaluation of Statistical Models.” In Harlow, L., Mulaik, S., and Steiger, J., eds., What if There were no Significance Tests? Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum: 221–257.Google Scholar

Stokes, Leah. 2020. Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm, and Corbin, Juliet, eds. 1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Suárez, Mauricio. 2011. Philosophy of Probability and Statistical Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tai, Hung-Chao. 1974. Land Reform and Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tannenwald, Nina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Mark. 1995. The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Mark, and Kuntz, Philipp. 2005. “More than Just the Final Straw: Stolen Elections as Revolutionary Triggers.” Paper presented at the “Authoritarian Regimes: Conditions of Stability and Change” conference, Swedish Institute, Istanbul, May.Google Scholar

Trimberger, Ellen. 1978. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt and Peru. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Tsai, Lily. 2007. Accountability without Democracy: How Solidarity Groups Provide Public Goods in Rural China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Google Scholar

Ullman, Tomer, and Tenenbaum, Joshua B.. 2020. “Bayesian Models of Conceptual Development: Learning as Building Models of the World.” Annual Review of Developmental Psychology 2:533–58.Google Scholar

van Belle, Gerald. 2008. Statistical Rules of Thumb 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. San Francisco: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Matzke, Dora, and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. 2015. “Model Comparison and the Principle of Parsimony.” In Busemeyer, Jerome, Wang, Zheng, Townsend, James, and Eidels, Ami, eds., Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vinten-Johansen, Howard Brody, Paneth, Nigel, Rachman, Stephen, and Rip, Michael. 2003. Cholera, Chloroform, and the Science of Medicine: A Life of John Snow. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan. 2007. “A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problems of P Values.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(5):779–804.Google Scholar

Waldner, David. 2015. “What Makes Process Tracing Good? Causal Mechanisms, Causal Inference, and the Completeness Standard in Comparative Politics.” In Bennett, and Checkel, , eds., Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Chapter 5). New York: Cambridge University Press:126–152.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Warriner, Doreen. 1962. Land Reform and Development in the Middle East: A Study of Egypt, Syria, and Iraq. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Wason, P.C. 1968. “Reasoning about a Rule.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(3):273–281.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Weller, Nicholas, and Barnes, Jeb. 2014. Finding Pathways: Mixed-Method Research for Studying Causal Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Western, Bruce. 2001. “Bayesian Thinking about Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology 107(2):353–78.Google Scholar

Western, Bruce, and Jackman, Simon. 1994. “Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 88(2):412–423.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winters, Jeffrey. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, Elisabeth. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Worrall, John. 2004. “Why There’s No Cause to Randomize.” Technical Report 24.04, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Yom, Sean. 2015. “From Methodology to Practice: Inductive Iteration in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48(5):616–644.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Zabell, S.L. 2005. Symmetry and its Discontents: Essays on the History of Inductive Philosophy. Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zaks, Sherry. 2017. “Relationships Among Rivals.” Political Analysis 25(3):344–362.Google Scholar

Zellner, Arnold, Keuzenkamp, A., and McAleer, Michael, eds. 2002. Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping it Sophisticatedly Simple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ziblatt, Daniel. 2009. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103(1):1–21.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive