Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction
Imperial Imagery and the Role of Social Dynamics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
Summary
The introductory chapter explores the methodology of approaching imperial imagery, from definitions and categorisations to modes of analysis. Defining imperial imagery as imagery that relates to imperial power, the authors reject universal models that purport to encompass all aspects of the production and use of such images in favour of context-based approaches which focus on the ways in which they became embedded in local image systems. The authors single out social dynamics, a term borrowed from economics, sociology, and psychology indicating how large-scale phenomena are the sum of many individual interactions. Social dynamics gives a way to understand how and why imperial imagery was created and used in Roman society at all levels. Imperial imagery had roles to play beyond the emperor’s own sphere, and he was often neither its author nor its audience; instead, individuals used imperial images to communicate with their immediate neighbours, geographically and socially. Multiple users and viewers across the spatial and social spectrums of the empire (and beyond) brought their own experiences to imperial images, and to understand them, we must analyse them in their local contexts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery , pp. 1 - 24Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alföldi-Rosenbaum, E. 1980. ‘Ruler portraits on Roman game counters from Alexandria (Studies on Roman game counters III)’, in Stucky, R. A. and Jucker, I. (eds.), Eikones: Studien zum griechischen und römischen Bildnis (Bern: Francke Verlag), 29–39.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. 1991. ‘Plancia Magna of Perge: women’s roles and status in Roman Asia Minor’, in Pomeroy, S. B. (ed.), Women’s History and Ancient History (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press), 249–72.Google Scholar
Boschung, D. and Eck, W. 2006. Die Tetrarchie: Ein neues Regierungssystem und seine mediale Präsentation (Wiesbaden: Reichert).Google Scholar
Brown, R. 2000. Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups, 2nd ed. (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Dally, O. 2007. ‘Das Bild des Kaisers in der klassischen Archäologie – oder: gab es einen Paradigmenwechsel nach 1968?’, JDAI 122: 223–57.Google Scholar
Dawson, C. D. 2016. Intimate Communities: Honorific Statues and the Political Culture of the Cities of Africa Proconsularis in the First Three Centuries ce. Diss., York University (Toronto).Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2018. Empire and Political Cultures in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dickenson, C. 2017. ‘Public statues as a strategy of remembering in early imperial Messene’, in Dijkstra, T. M., Kuin, I. N. I., Moser, M., and Weidgenannt, D. (eds.), Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 bc–100 ad) (Leiden: Netherlands Institute at Athens), 126–42.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. N. and Young, H. P. (eds.) 2001. Social Dynamics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1998a. Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: The Art of the Roman Empire, a.d. 100–450 (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1998b. ‘Art and architecture’, in Cameron, A. and Garnsey, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., Vol. 13: The Late Empire, ad 337–425 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 736–61.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2001. ‘Cultural resistance and the visual image: the case of Dura Europos’, CPh 96: 269–304.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2003. ‘Inventing Christian Rome: the role of early Christian art’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 71–99.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2005. ‘Sacrifice and narrative on the Arch of the Argentarii at Rome’, JRA 18: 83–98.Google Scholar
Finney, P. C. 1997. The Invisible God: The Earliest Christians on Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Flower, H. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Grabar, A. 1980. Christian Iconography; A Study of its Origins: The A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts, 1961, The National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hekster, O. 2015. Emperors and Ancestors: Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. A. 2015. Hidden Lives – Public Personae: Women and Civic Life in the Roman West (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Højte, J. M. 2005. Roman Imperial Statue Bases: From Augustus to Commodus (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press).Google Scholar
Laird, M. 2015. Civic Monuments and the Augustales in Roman Italy (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. 1997. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Maier, H. O. 2013. Picturing Paul in Empire: Imperial Image, Text, and Persuasion in Colossians, Ephesians, and the Pastoral Epistles (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2006. ‘Framing the sun: the Arch of Constantine and the Roman cityscape’, Art Bulletin 88: 223–42.Google Scholar
Mathews, T. 2003. The Clash of Gods: A Reinterpretation of Early Christian Art (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mayer, E. 2002. Rom ist dort, wo der Kaiser ist: Untersuchungen zu den Staatsdenkmälern des dezentralisierten Reiches von Diocletian bis zu Theodosius II (Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums; Bonn: Rudolf Habelt).Google Scholar
Mayer, E. 2010. ‘Propaganda, staged applause, or local politics? Public monuments from Augustus to Septimius Severus’, in Ewald, B. and Noreña, C. (eds.), The Emperor and Rome (New Haven: Yale University Press), 119–27.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 2001. The Emperor in the Roman World: 31 bc–ad 337, 3rd ed. (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Moralee, J. 2004. For Salvation’s Sake: Provincial Loyalty, Personal Religion, and Epigraphic Production in the Roman and Late Antique Near East (New York; London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Noreña, C. 2011. Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Papi, E. 2004. ‘A new Golden Age? The northern praefectum urbi from the Severans to Diocletian’, in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.), Approaching Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 53–81.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. R. 2003. ‘The emperor and the cities of Italy’, in Lomas, K. and Cornell, T. (eds.), Bread and Circuses (London; New York: Routledge), 89–104.Google Scholar
Polley, A. R. 2004/5 [2007]. ‘Usurpations in Africa: ruler and ruled in the Third Century Crisis’, AJAH n.s. 3/4: 143–70.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1982 [1903]. ‘The modern cult of monuments: its character and its origin’. Oppositions 25 (Fall 1982): 21–51.Google Scholar
Riggs, C. 2002. ‘Facing the dead: recent research on the funerary art of Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt’, AJA 106: 85–101.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1905. ‘Interprétation des tessères en os avec figures, chiffres et légendes’, Revue Archéologique 5: 110–24.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. 1989. ‘Floreat Perge’, in Mackenzie, M. M. and Roueché, C. (eds.), Images of Authority: Papers Presented to Joyce Reynolds on the Occasion of her Seventieth Birthday (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society): 206–22.Google Scholar
Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1996. ‘Typology and diversity in the portraits of Augustus’, JRA 9: 30–47.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. 2003. Statues in Roman Society: Representation and Response (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. 2010. Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Varner, E. 2004. Mutilation and Transformation: Damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture (Leiden; Boston: Brill).Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul (Cambridge; New York; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1983. Provinzielle Kaiserporträts: zur Rezeption der Selbstdarstellung des Princeps (Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 2002. Un’arte per l’impero: funzione e intenzione delle immagini nel mondo romano (Milan: Electa).Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by