Book contents
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: social choice, agency, inclusiveness and capabilities
- Part I Social Choice and Capabilities
- Part II Inclusiveness, Social and Individual Agency
- Part III Social Choice and Capabilities in Action
- Index
- References
Part III - Social Choice and Capabilities in Action
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
Book contents
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: social choice, agency, inclusiveness and capabilities
- Part I Social Choice and Capabilities
- Part II Inclusiveness, Social and Individual Agency
- Part III Social Choice and Capabilities in Action
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities , pp. 303 - 422Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
References
Aigner, D. J., and Chu, S. F. (1968) On estimating the industry production function. American Economic Review, 58 (4): 826–39.Google Scholar
Basu, K. (1987) Achievements, capabilities and the concept of well-being. Social Choice and Welfare, 4 (1): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, K., and Lopez-Calva, L. F. (2011) Functionings and capabilities. In Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 2, Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K. (eds.): 153–87. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75: 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., Lewis, J., Louviere, J. J., and Peters, T. J. (2008a) Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science and Medicine, 67 (5): 874–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coast, J., Peters, T. J., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., and Flynn, T. N. (2008b) An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Quality of Life Research, 17 (7): 967–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulter, A., and Cleary, P. (2001) Patients’ experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs, 20 (3): 244–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couzner, L., Crotty, M., Norman, R., and Ratcliffe, J. (2013) A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O in an older post-acute patient population relative to the general population. Applied Economics & Health Policy, 11 (4): 415–25.Google Scholar
Gotoh, R. (2014a) Equality of capabilities: how should we identify the boundary of an individual’s capability? Paper presented at the 14th SAET conference on current trends in economics, Tokyo, Waseda University, 21 August.Google Scholar
Gotoh, R. (2014b) Reconceptualization of the capability approach: opportunity set/autonomy/identity. Keizai Kenkyu, 65 (4): 318–31 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Grewal, I., Lewis, J., Flynn, T. N., Brown, J., Bond, J., and Coast, J. (2006) Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? Social Science and Medicine, 62 (8): 1891–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., and Bruster, S. (2002) The Picker Patient Experience questionnaire: development and validation using data from inpatient surveys in five countries. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14 (5): 353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H., Takemura, Y., and Kanda, K. (2011) Patient perception of nursing service quality: an applied model of Donabedian’s structure–process–outcome approach theory. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 25 (3): 419–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labarere, J., Francois, P., Auquier, P., Robert, C., and Fourny, M. (2001) Development of a French inpatient satisfaction questionnaire. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13 (2): 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74 (2): 132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1980) Equality of what? In The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, vol. 1, McMurrin, S. M. (ed.): 197–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K., and Williams, B. (eds.) (1982) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., Hamashima, C., Hisashige, A., and Tamura, M. (2002) Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Economics, 11 (4): 341–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations. www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
References
Acosta, A. (2010) El buen vivir en el camino del post-desarrollo: una lectura desde la constitución de Montecristi, Policy Paper 9. Quito: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
Acosta, A. (2012) Buen Vivir – Sumak Kawsay: Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Quito: Abya Yala.Google Scholar
Acosta, A. (2014) Poscrecimiento y posextractivismo: dos caras de una misma transformación cultural. In Pos-crecimiento y Buen Vivir: Propuestas globales para la construcción de sociedades equitativas y sustentables, Endara, G. (ed.): 93–122. Quito: FES-ILDIS.Google Scholar
Acosta, A., and Martínez, E. (eds.) (2011) La naturaleza con derechos: De la filosofía a la política. Quito: Abya Yala.Google Scholar
Agarwal, B., Humphries, J., and Robeyns, I. (2003) Exploring the challenges of Amartya Sen’s work and ideas: an introduction. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albro, R. (2006) The culture of democracy and Bolivia’s Indigenous movements. Critique of Anthropology, 26 (4): 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, S. (2005) Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6 (1): 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, P. (2013) El Sumak Kawsay en el discurso del movimiento indígena ecuatoriano. Indiana, 30: 283–99.Google Scholar
Anand, S., and Sen, A. K. (1994) Sustainable human development: concepts and priorities, Occasional Paper 1. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Anand, S., (1995) Gender inequality in human development: theories and measurement, Occasional Paper 19. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Anand, S., (1998) Consumption and human development: concepts and issues, occasional paper. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Basu, K., and Kanbur, R. (eds.) (2009) Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, vol. 1, Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beling, A. E., Vanhulst, J., Demaria, F., Rabi, V., Carballo, A. E., and Pelenc, J. (2018) Discursive synergies for a ‘great transformation’ towards sustainability: pragmatic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, degrowth, and buen vivir. Ecological Economics, 144: 304–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockstael, E., and Watene, K. (2016) Indigenous peoples and the capability approach: taking stock. Oxford Development Studies, 44 (3): 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choque, M. E. (2000) La reconstitución del ayllu y los derechos de los pueblos indígenas. Quito: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Choque, M. E., and Mamani, C. (2001) Reconstitución del ayllu y derechos de los pueblos indígenas: el movimiento indio en los Andes de Bolivia. Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 6 (1): 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.) (2018) New Frontiers of the Capability Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S. (eds.) (2008) The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costoya, M. M. (2012) Latin American post-neoliberal development thinking: the Bolivian ‘turn’ toward suma qamaña. European Journal of Development Research, 25 (2): 213–29.Google Scholar
Crabtree, J., and Chaplin, A. (2013) Bolivia: Processes of Change. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, D. (1991) Toward development ethics. World Development, 19 (5): 457–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Cadena, M. (2010) Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: conceptual reflections beyond ‘politics’. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (2): 334–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A. (2010a) Una minga para el postdesarrollo: Lugar, medio ambiente y movimientos sociales en las transformaciones globales. Lima: Programa Democracia y Transformación Global.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2010b) Latin America at a crossroads: alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies, 24 (1): 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A. (2011) Sustainability: design for the pluriverse. Development, 54 (2): 137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. (2002) Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37 (2): 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricant, N. (2010) Between the romance of collectivism and the reality of individualism: ayllu rhetoric in Bolivia’s landless peasant movement. Latin American Perspectives, 37 (4): 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Osco, M. (2005) Ayllu: decolonial critical thinking and an (other) autonomy. In Globalization and Autonomy Online Compendium, 1–2. www.globalautonomy.ca/global1/article.jsp?index=RS_FernandezOsco_Ayllu.xml.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003a) Rescuing human development concept from the Human Development Index. In Readings in Human Development: Concepts, Measures and Policies for a Development Paradigm, Fukuda-Parr, S., and Shiva Kumar, A. K. (eds.): 117–24. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003b) The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, G., Renouard, C., L’Huillier, H., and De La Martinière, R. (2013) Relational capability: a multidimensional approach, working paper 1306. Paris: ESSEC.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Wood, R., and Mamani-Vargas, R. (2017) The coercive side of collective capabilities: evidence from the Bolivian Altiplano. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18 (1): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, R. A. (1986) The fiscal role of the Andean ayllu. Man: Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society, 21 (4): 723–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet, D. (1997) Development ethics: a new discipline. International Journal of Social Economics, 24 (11): 1160–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosfoguel, R. (2016) Del ‘extractivismo económico’ al ‘extractivismo epistémico’ y al ‘extractivismo ontológico’: una forma destructiva de conocer, ser y estar en el mundo. Tabula Rasa, 24: 123–43.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2009a) La dimensión ecológica del buen vivir: entre el fantasma de la modernidad y el desafío biocéntrico. Revista Obets. 4: 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2009b) El mandato ecológico: Derechos de la naturaleza y políticas ambientales en la nueva constitución. Quito: Abya Yala.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2012) Transiciones Para Salir del Viejo Desarrollo. Lima: Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2014a) Buen vivir: sobre secuestros, domesticaciones rescates y alternativas. In Bifurcación del Buen Vivir y el Sumak Kawsay, Oviedo, A. F. (ed.): 23–45. Quito: Ediciones Yachay.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2014b) El postdesarrollo como crítica y el buen vivir como alternativa. In Buena vida, buen vivir: Imaginarios alternativos para el bien común de la humanidad, Delgado Ramos, G. C. (ed.): 61–95. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E. (2014c) Conflictos y extractivismos: conceptos, contenidos y dinamicas. DECURSOS: Revista en ciencias sociales, 27: 79–115.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E., and Acosta, A. (2011a) El buen vivir mas allá del desarrollo. Qué hacer, 181: 70–81.Google Scholar
Gudynas, E., (2011b) La renovación de la crítica al desarrollo y el buen vivir como alternativa. Utopía y praxis Latinoamericana, 53: 71–83.Google Scholar
Harris, O. (2000) To Make the Earth Bear Fruit: Essays on Fertility, Work and Gender in Highland Bolivia. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L. (2012) El buen vivir: La (re)creación del pensamiento del PYDLOS. Huelva y Cuenca: PYDLOS Ediciones.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., and Cubillo-Guevara, A. P. (2014) Seis debates abiertos sobre el sumak kawsay. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 48: 25–40.Google Scholar
Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2010a) Paradigma occidental y paradigma indígena originario. America latina en movimiento, 452: 17–23.Google Scholar
Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2010b) Buen vivir/vivir bien: Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales andinas. Lima: Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas.Google Scholar
Kaul, I. (2014) Fostering sustainable human development: managing the macro-risks of vulnerability, occasional paper. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Ki-moon, B. (2010) Remarks at launch of 20th Human Development Report. United Nations, 4 November. www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2010-11-04/remarks-launch-20th-human-development-report.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (2015) A critical review of the capability approach in Australian Indigenous policy, Working Paper 102/2015. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (2016) The curious case of using the capability approach in Australian Indigenous policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17 (2): 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowii, A. (2014) Sumak kawsay. In Antología del pensamiento indigenista ecuatoriano sobre sumak kawsay, Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., García, A. G., and Guazha, N. D. (eds.): 161–8. Huelva y Cuenca: Universidad de Huelva.Google Scholar
Llasag Fernandez, R. (2009) El sumak kawsay y sus restricciones constitucionales. Foro: revista de derecho, 12: 113–25.Google Scholar
Longshore Smith, M., and Seward, C. (2009) The relational ontology of Amartya Sen’s capability approach: incorporating social and individual causes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10 (2): 213–35.Google Scholar
Macas, L. (2014) El sumak kawsay. In Antología del pensamiento indigenista ecuatoriano sobre sumak kawsay, Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., Guillén García, A., and Deleg Guazha, N. (eds.): 169–77. Huelva y Cuenca: PYDLOS Ediciones.Google Scholar
Mansilla, H. C. F. (2011) Ideologías oficiales sobre el medio ambiente en Bolivia y sus aspectos problemáticos. Ecuador Debate, 84: 89–106.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2007) ‘Human development’: the power of the idea. Journal of Human Development, 8 (1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, R. (2016) An alternative to ‘alternative development’? Buen Vivir and human development in Andean countries. Oxford Development Studies, 44 (3): 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. (2011) The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Monni, S., and Pallottino, M. (2015) A new agenda for international development cooperation: lessons learnt from the Buen Vivir experience. Development, 58 (1): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murra, J. (2002) El mundo andino: Población, medio ambiente y economía. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterlaken, I. (2011) Inserting technology in the relational ontology of Sen’s capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12 (3): 425–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviedo Freire, A. (2012) El posmoderno buen vivir y el ancestral sumakawsay. In Construyendo el buen vivir, Guillén García, A., and Phelan Casanova, M. (eds.): 49–84. Huelva y Cuenca: PYDLOS Ediciones.Google Scholar
Panzironi, F. (2012) The ‘Indigenous Capability – Right to Health’ and Australia’s ‘Close the Gap’ Indigenous health policy. In The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Panzironi, F., and Gelber, K. (eds.): 68–83. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, F. (2003) Gender and the foundations of social choice: the role of situated agency. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petras, J., and Veltmeyer, H. (2011) Social Movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and Popular Resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Programa de Pequeñas Donaciones (2012) Nuestro biocorredores para el buen vivir. Quito: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, S. (2012) Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43 (2): 240–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
República del Ecuador (2008) Constitución de la República del Ecuador. www.gob.ec/sites/default/files/regulations/2020-06/CONSTITUCION%202008.pdf.Google Scholar
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (1990) Liberal democracy and ayllu democracy in Bolivia: the case of northern Potosí. Journal of Development Studies, 26 (4): 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6 (1): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2008) Sen’s capability approach and feminist concerns. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S. (eds.): 82–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2017) Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangha, K. K., Le Brocque, A., Costanza, R., and Cadet-James, Y. (2015) Application of capability approach to assess the role of ecosystem services in the well-being of Indigenous Australians. Global Ecology and Conservation, 4: 445–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, D., and Carruthers, D. (2010) Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (4): 12–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtes, F. (2010) Whose sustainability? Environmental domination and Sen’s capability approach. Oxford Development Studies, 38 (3): 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6 (4): 317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2002) Response to commentaries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37 (2): 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2008) The idea of justice. Journal of Human Development, 9 (3): 331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2013) The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14 (1): 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2014) Global warming is just one of many environmental threats that demand our attention. The New Republic, 23 August.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K., and Anand, S. (2000) The income component of the Human Development Index. Journal of Human Development, 1 (1): 83–106.Google Scholar
SENPLADES (2009) Plan Nacional para el buen vivir 2009–2013: Construyendo un estado plurinacional e intercultural – versión resumida. Quito: Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo de la República del Ecuador.Google Scholar
SENPLADES (2013) Buen vivir: Plan Nacional 2013–2017. Quito: Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo de la República del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2003) La caída del Angelus Novus: ensayos para una nueva teoría social y una nueva práctica política, vol. 1. Bogotá: ILSA.Google Scholar
Spedding Pallet, A. (2010) ‘Suma qamaña’ ¿kamsañ muni? (¿Qué quiere decir ‘vivir bien’?). Fe y pueblo, 17: 4–39.Google Scholar
Thomson, B. (2011) Pachakuti: indigenous perspectives, buen vivir, sumaq kawsay and degrowth. Development, 54 (4): 448–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (1990b) Defining and measuring human development. In Human Development Report 1990, 9–16. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (2004) Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP (2010a) Informe regional sobre desarrollo humano para América latina y el Caribe 2010. San José de Costa Rica: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
UNDP (2010b) Informe nacional sobre desarrollo humano en Bolivia 2010: Los cambios detrás del cambio. La Paz: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
UNDP (2011) Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
UNDP (2012) Ecuador: Economía y finanzas populares y solidarias para el buen vivir. Quito: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
UNDP (2013) Ciudadanía intercultural: Aportes desde la participación política de los pueblos indígenas en Latinoamérica. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Untoja Choque, F. (2001) Retorno al ayllu: Una mirada aymara a la globalización. La Paz: Fondo Editorial de los Diputados.Google Scholar
Vanhulst, J., and Beling, A. E. (2014) Buen Vivir: emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development? Ecological Economics, 101: 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas Llosa, M. (2004) Palabras de clausura. In Las amenazas a la democracia en América Latina: Terrorismo, neopopulismo y debilidad del estado de derecho, 123–30. Rosario: Editorial Amalevi.Google Scholar
Villalba, U. (2013) Buen Vivir vs development: a paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly, 34 (8): 1427–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola Recasens, A. (2014) Discursos ‘pachamamistas’ versus políticas desarrollistas: el debate sobre el sumak kawsay en los Andes. Íconos, 48: 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmüller, J. M. (2014) Human rights indicators as ‘Development 2.0’? Alternautas, 1 (1): 76–88.Google Scholar
Waldmüller, J. M. (2018) Lost through translation: political dialectics of eco-social and collective rights in Ecuador. In Human Rights Transformations in an Unequal World, Merry, S. E., and Destrooper, T. (eds.): 101–27. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. (2010) Development as buen vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, 53 (1): 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. (2011) Afro and Indigenous life-visions in/and politics: (de)colonial perspectives in Bolivia and Ecuador. Revista de Estudios Bolivianos, 18: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watene, K. (2016) Valuing nature: Māori philosophy and the capability approach. Oxford Development Studies, 44 (3): 287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watene, K., and Yap, M. (2015) Culture and sustainable development: Indigenous contributions. Journal of Global Ethics, 11 (1): 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismantel, M. (2006) Ayllu: real and imagined communities in the Andes. In The Seductions of Community: Emancipations, Oppressions, Quandaries, Creed, G. (ed.): 77–99. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Yampara, S. (2004) ¿Desarrollo/progreso o summa qamaña de los ayllus andinos? In Memoria del foro: ¿A dónde vamos? Progreso en diferentes culturas, 81–102. La Paz: Fundación PIEB – GTZ.Google Scholar
Yap, M., and Yu, E. (2016) Operationalising the capability approach: developing culturally relevant indicators of Indigenous wellbeing – an Australian example operationalising the capability approach: developing culturally. Oxford Development Studies, 44 (3): 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Ballet, J., Dubois, J.-L., and Mahieu, F.-R. (2007) Responsibility for each other’s freedom: agency as the source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development, 8 (2): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassand, M., and Kellerhals, J. (1975) Familles urbaines et fécondité. Geneva: Librairie de l’Université Georg.Google Scholar
Batterbury, S. (2007) Monde rural et transformations agraires au Sud: débat et défis. In Actes du Colloque International PRIPODE, 177–184. Paris: CICRED.Google Scholar
Billari, F., and Wilson, C. (2001) Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary western Europe, Working Paper 2001–039. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvalet, C., and Lelièvre, E. (1995) Du concept de ménage à celui d’entourage: une redéfinition de l’espace familial. Sociologie et Sociétés, 27 (2): 177–90.Google Scholar
Bonvalet, C., (eds.) (2012) De la famille à l’entourage: L’enquête biographies et entourage. Paris: INED.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H., and Swift, A. (2016) Family Values: The Ethics of Parent–Child Relationships. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calvès, E. A., and Marcoux, R. (2007) Les processus d’individualisation ‘à l’africaine’. Sociologie et sociétés, 39 (2): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappero, E., Salardi, P., and Scervini, F. (2018) From resources to functioning: rethinking and measuring conversion rates. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 232–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coenen-Huther, J., Kellerhals, J., and von Allmen, M. (1994) Les réseaux de solidarités dans la famille. Lausanne: Réalités sociales.Google Scholar
Cosio, M., Marcoux, R., Pilon, M., and Quesnel, A. (eds.) (2003) Éducation, famille et dynamiques démographiques. Paris: CICRED.Google Scholar
Dubois, J.-L., and Rousseau, S. (2001) Reinforcing household’s capabilities as a way to reduce vulnerability and prevent poverty in equitable terms. Paper presented at the conference ‘Justice and poverty: examining Sen’s capability approach’, University of Cambridge, 6 June.Google Scholar
ElderJr, G. H. (1995) The life course paradigm: social change and individual development. In Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development, ElderJr, G. H., and Lüscher, K. (eds.): 101–36. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hall, K. M. Q. (2017) Introducing joint capabilities: findings from a study of development in Honduras’ Garifuna ancestral villages. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18 (1): 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., and Boertien, D. (2017) Family dynamics and child outcomes: key findings and unresolved questions. European Journal of Population, 33 (2): 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. S. (2018) Education, capabilities and sustainable development. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 617–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
INSTAT (2016) Configuration des ménages et qualité de vie: Les avantages et désavantages des grands ménages au Mali. Bamako: Institut National de la Statistique.Google Scholar
Kobiane, J.-F. (2003) Pauvreté, structures familiales et stratégies éducatives à Ouagadougou. In Éducation, famille et dynamiques démographiques, Cosio, M., Marcoux, R., Pilon, M., and Quesnel, A. (eds.): 153–82. Paris: CICRED.Google Scholar
Kobiane, J.-F. (2006) Ménages et scolarisation des enfants au Burkina Faso: À la recherche des déterminants de la demande scolaire. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Academia-Bruylant.Google Scholar
Lange, M.-F., and Pilon, M. (2000) La persistance des inégalités d’accès à l’instruction. In Rapport de genre et questions de population, vol. 2, Genre, population et développement, Bozon, M. (ed.): 69–80. Paris: INED.Google Scholar
Laslett, P., and Wall, R. (eds.) (1972) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, R., Deschamps, J.-C., Elcheroth, G., Forney, Y., Gauthier, J.-A., Ghisletta, P., Kellerhals, J., Lalive d’Épinay, C., Le Goff, J.-M., de Ribaupierre, A., Sauvain-Dugerdil, C., Spini, D., Tettamanti, M., and Widmer, E. (2005) Why look at life courses in an interdisciplinary perspective? In Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Life Course, Levy, R., Ghisletta, P., Le Goff, J.-M., Spini, D., and Widmer, E. (eds.): 3–32. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Locoh, T., and Mouvagha-Sow, M. (2005) Vers de nouveaux modèles familiaux en Afrique de l’Ouest? Paper presented at the 25th congress of the Union International pour l’Étude Scientifique de la Population, Tours, 20 July.Google Scholar
Marcoux, R. (1994) Le travail ou l’école: L’activité des enfants et les caractéristiques des ménages en milieu urbain au Mali. Bamako: Éditions du CERPOD.Google Scholar
Marie, A. (ed.) (1997) L’Afrique des individus: Itinéraires citadins dans l’Afrique contemporaine. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Nouhou, A. M., Cissé, S., Fané, A. D., Doumbia, A. G., and Sauvain-Dugerdil, C. (2016) Stratégies familiales et qualité de vie au Mali à travers les données du recensement. African Population Studies, 30 (2 Suppl.): http://aps.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/895.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilon, M., and Vimard, P. (1998) Structures et dynamiques familiales à l’épreuve de la crise en Afrique subsaharienne. Paper presented at the Chaire Quetelet ‘Ménages et familles face à la crise’, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 27 November.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6 (1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2016) Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17 (3): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvain-Dugerdil, C. (2018) Une vie florissante sans enfant? Infécondité et qualité de vie en Suisse, Working Paper 2018/72. Lausanne: Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES.Google Scholar
Sauvain-Dugerdil, C., Nouhou, A. M., Cissé, S., Diawara, A. k., and Doumbia, A. G. (2018) Configurations familiales et situation des femmes: le cas du Mali à travers les données du recensement. In Observer, décrire et analyser les structures familiales, Cauchi-Duval, N. (ed.): 5–24. Paris: AIDELF.Google Scholar
Sauvain-Dugerdil, C., and Thiriat, M. P. (2009) Développer le genre en démographie: De la naissance à l’âge adulte. Paris: CEPED.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2006) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2017) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, expanded edn. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. (2002) What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8 (3): 448–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toulmin, C. (1992) Cattle, Women and Wells: Managing Household Survival in the Sahel. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vos, F. R., and Ballet, J. (2018) Final education, well-being and aspirations: a capability-based analysis on high school pupils in France. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 549–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, M., and Unterhalter, E. (2007) The capability approach: its potential for work in education. In Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, Walker, M., and Unterhalter, E. (eds.): 1–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.) (1983) Family Forms in Historic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayack Pambè, M., and Pilon, M. (2011) Sexe du chef de ménage et inégalités scolaires à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Autrepart, 59 (3): 125–44.Google Scholar
Widmer, E. (2010) Family Configurations: A Structural Approach to Family Diversity. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Widmer, E., and Spini, D. (2017) Misleading norms and vulnerability in the life course: definition and illustration. Research in Human Development, 14 (1): 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Alkire, S., Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Deneulin, S., Ryan, R., and Silva, S. (2019) Measuring the freedom aspects of capabilities. www.researchgate.net/publication/228355513_Measuring_the_Freedom_Aspects_of_Capabilities%27.Google Scholar
Black, C. (2008) Working for a Healthier Tomorrow: Dame Carol Black’s Review of the Health of Britain’s Working Age Population. London: TSO.Google Scholar
DWP and DH (2017) Improving Lives: The Future of Work, Health and Disability, Cm 9526. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Fevre, R. (2017) Why work is so problematic for people with disabilities and long-term health problems. Occupational Medicine, 67 (8): 593–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fevre, R., Foster, D., Jones, M., and Wass, V. (2016) Closing disability gaps at work: deficits in evidence and variations in experience. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. (2005) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical insights and Empirical Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Litchfield, P. (2014) An Independent Review of the Work Capability Assessment: Year Five. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. London: Institute of Health Equity, University College London.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. (2017) Disability, Health and Human Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1988) Freedom of choice: concept and content. European Economic Review, 32 (2/3): 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamin, J. (2018) Should we give preference to Rogini? An ethical perspective on disability, health inequalities and work. Paper presented at the Human Development & Capability Association conference ‘Human development and social inclusion in an urbanizing world’, Buenos Aires, 1 September.Google Scholar
UK government (2010) Equality Act.Google Scholar
Venkatapuram, S. (2013) Health, vital goals and capabilities. Bioethics, 27 (5): 271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddell, G., and Burton, A. K. (2006) Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? London: TSO.Google Scholar
WHO (1998) The Solid Facts: Social Determinants of Health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
References
Appleby, J. (2013) Spending on Health and Social Care over the Next 50 Years: Why Think Long Term? London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
Brownlee, I. (1998) New Labour – new penology? Punitive rhetoric and the limits of managerialism in criminal justice policy. Journal of Law and Society, 25 (3): 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, R. and Watson, N. (2016) Operation Modulus: putting Christie into practice in Gorbals, working paper. Glasgow: What Works Scotland.Google Scholar
Chiappero, E., Salardi, P., and Scervini, F. (2018) From resources to functioning: rethinking and measuring conversion rates. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 232–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christie Commission (2011) Report of the Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services. Edinburgh: Scottish government.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. (2005) The capability approach: its development, critiques and recent advances, Global Poverty Research Group Working Paper 32. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
Collier, A. (1998) Stratified explanation and Marx’s conception of history. In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Archer, M. (ed.): 258–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cullingworth, J., Brunner, R., and Watson, N. (2018) The Operation Modulus approach: further lessons for public service reform, working paper. Glasgow: What Works Scotland.Google Scholar
Dean, H., Bonvin, J.-M., Vielle, P., and Farvaque, N. (2005) Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European Societies, 7 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., and Sagovsky, N. (2006) Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drèze, J., and Sen, A. K. (2002) India: Development and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, G., and West, D. (2013) Community development and umbrella bodies: networking for neighbourhood change. British Journal of Social Work, 44 (6): 1582–601.Google Scholar
Friedli, L. (2012) CS06-03 – Mental health, resilience and inequalities: a social determinants perspective. European Psychiatry, 27 (1): DOI 10.1016/S0924-9338(12)74077-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedli, L. (2013) ‘What we’ve tried, hasn’t worked’: the politics of assets based public health. Critical Public Health, 23 (2): 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, A. (2013) Infotopia: unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics & Society, 41 (2): 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. (2003) Development as empowerment. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmwood, J. (2013) Public reasoning without sociology: Amartya Sen’s theory of justice. Sociology, 47 (6): 1171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., and Eden, C. (2000) The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2 (3): 337–58.Google Scholar
Hvinden, B., and Halvorsen, R. (2017) Mediating agency and structure in sociology: what role for conversion factors? Critical Sociology, 44 (6): 1–17.Google Scholar
Independent Budget Review Panel (2010) Report of the Independent Budget Review Panel. Edinburgh: Independent Budget Review Panel.Google Scholar
Krishnakumar, J., and Nogales, R. (2018) Demystifying the use of simultaneous equation models for operationalising the capability approach. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 246–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. (2005) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupton, R., Hills, J., Stewart, K., and Vizard, P. (2013) Labour’s social policy record: policy, spending and outcomes 1997–2010, Social Policy in Cold Climate Research Report 1. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
McLaren, I. (2016) Thriving Places’ Family Meal and Homework Club: parents’ experiences of social capital, MSc dissertation. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. London: Institute of Health Equity, University College London.Google Scholar
Marmot, M., and Wilkinson, R. (1999) Social Determinants of Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meijer, A. (2011) Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: from a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71 (4): 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalbandian, J. (2008) Predicting the future: why citizen engagement no longer is optional. Public Management, 90 (11): 35–7.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour Policy and Society. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., and Knops, A. (2004) Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33 (2): 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Orton, M. (2011) Flourishing lives: the capabilities approach as a framework for new thinking about employment, work and welfare in the 21st century. Work, Employment and Society, 25 (2): 352–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittell, H., and Webber, M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2): 155–69.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2003) Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3): 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6 (1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2017) Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. (2011) Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. (2012) Capabilities, contributive injustice and unequal divisions of labour. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13 (4): 580–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J. (2016) Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. American Review of Public Administration, 47 (7): 826–39.Google Scholar
Wolff, J., and de-Shalit, A. (2007) Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J., (2013) On fertile functionings: a response to Martha Nussbaum. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14 (1): 161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2003) World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zeemering, E. S. (2008) Governing interlocal cooperation: city council interests and the implications for public management. Public Administration Review, 68 (4): 731–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar