Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:35:59.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2020

David A. Ellis
David A. Ellis
Affiliation:
Information, Decisions and Operations, School of Management University of Bath
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Smartphones within Psychological Science , pp. 187 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Mehl, M. R. & Conner, T. S. (eds.). (2012). Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H, Fraser, C, & Jaspars, J. M. F. (eds.). (1984). The Social Dimension: Volume 1: European Developments in Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aharony, N., Pan, W., Ip, C., Khayal, I., & Pentland, A. (2011). Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 7(6), 643–659.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10(10): e0139004.Google Scholar
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779), 505–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azrin, N. H., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1961). The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(1), 25.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2018). Working Memories: Postmen, Divers and the Cognitive Revolution. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self- reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, C. M., Miller, M. B., & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. Neuroimage, 47(Suppl. 1), S125.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. S. & Turban, S. (2018). The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1753), 20170239.Google Scholar
Binet, A. & Simon, T. (1916). The Development of Intelligence in Children: The Binet-Simon Scale (vol. 11). Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Boccia, M. L. & Roberts, J. E. (2000). Computer-assisted integration of physiological and behavioural measures. In Thompson, T, Felce, D, & Symons, F. J. (eds.), Behavioral Observation: Technology and Applications in Developmental Disabilities (pp. 83–97). Brookes.Google Scholar
Buchanan, T. & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90(1), 125–144.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, M. D., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaffin, D., Heidl, R., Hollenbeck, J. R., et al. (2017). The promise and perils of wearable sensors in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioural researchers. Behaviour Research Methods, 46(1), 112–130.Google Scholar
Choudhury, T. & Pentland, A. (2002, November). The sociometer: A wearable device for understanding human networks. In CSCW’02 Workshop: Ad Hoc Communications and Collaboration in Ubiquitous Computing Environments.Google Scholar
Chumbley, J. R. & Friston, K. J. (2009). False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields. Neuroimage, 44(1), 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, L. A. & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. W. (2018). Self-Observation in the Social Sciences. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004). Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: Methodological challenges and directions for child development research. Child Development, 75, 317–333.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S. & Lehman, B. J. (2012). Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In Mehl, M. R. & Conner, T. S. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life (pp. 89–107). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I. & Ellis, D. A. (2019). Social media addiction: Technological déjà vu. BMJ, 365, l4277.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I., Joinson, A., & Jones, S. L. (2018). Technologically enhanced dating: Augmented human relationships, robots and fantasy. In Papacharissi, Z (ed.), A Networked Self and Love (pp. 129–155). Routledge.Google Scholar
DeMasi, O., Kording, K., & Recht, B. (2017). Meaningless comparisons lead to false optimism in medical machine learning. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184604.Google Scholar
Doliński, D. (2018). Is psychology still a science of behavior? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13, e25025.Google Scholar
Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., & Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15274–15278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, D. (2012) Secondary data analysis. The Psychologist, 25, 97.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. (2019). Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 60–66.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Jenkins, R. (2012). Weekday affects attendance rate for medical appointments: Large-scale data analysis and implications. PLOS ONE, 7(12), e51365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2016). The future of … wearable technology. CREST Security Review, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2018). Failing to encourage physical activity with wearable technology: What next? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(9), 310–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, D. A., Wiseman, R., & Jenkins, R. (2015). Mental representations of weekdays. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0134555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, D. A., Kaye, L. K., Wilcockson, T. D., & Ryding, F. C. (2018). Digital traces of behaviour within addiction: Response to Griffiths (2017). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(1), 240–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmer, T., Chaitanya, K., Purwar, P., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2120–2138.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Reeves, D., & Felce, D. (2000). Palm-top computer technologies for behavioural observation research. In Thompson, T, Felce, D, & Symons, F. J. (eds.), Behavioral Observation: Technology and Applications in Developmental Disabilities (pp. 47–59). Brookes.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D. (1991). Computers and behavioural assessment: Current applications, future possibilities, and obstacles to routine use. Behavioral Assessment. 13(2), 159–179.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flake, J. K. & Fried, E. I. (2019). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/hs7wmGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. D., Seligman, M. E. P., & Koocher, G. P. (1999). The APA 1998 Annual Report. American Psychologist, 54, 537–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G. (2012). Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 975–991.Google Scholar
Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo and hetero-sexual interest in the male. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1, 85–93.Google Scholar
Freund, K. (1965). Diagnosing heterosexual pedophilia by means of a test for sexual interest. Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, K., Ellis, D. A., & Piwek, L. (2019). A simple location-tracking app for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2840–2846.Google Scholar
Gladstone, J. J., Matz, S. C., & Lemaire, A. (2019). Can psychological traits be inferred from spending? Evidence from transaction data. Psychological Science, 30(7), 1087–1096.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. K. & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362.Google Scholar
Hässler, T., Ullrich, J., Bernardino, M., et al. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behavior, 4(4), 380–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodson, G., Crisp, R. J., Meleady, R., & Earle, M. (2018). Intergroup contact as an agent of cognitive liberalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 523–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, B., Haustein, D., & Landeweerd, L. (2017). Smart-glasses: Exposing and elucidating the ethical issues. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 701–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G. (2005). Introduction to Social Psychology. Pearson.Google Scholar
Holter, N. J. (1961). New method for heart studies: Continuous electrocardiography of active subjects over long periods is now practical. Science, 134(3486), 1214–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huey, E. (1968). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (Reprint). MIT Press (originally published 1908).Google Scholar
Hung, H., Englebienne, G., & Quiros, L. C. (2014). Detecting conversing groups with a single worn accelerometer. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 84–91). ACM Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2663204.2663228Google Scholar
Ireland, T. & Garnier, S. (2018). Architecture, space and information in constructions built by humans and social insects: A conceptual review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1753), 20170244.Google Scholar
Jean-Louis, G., Kripke, D. F., Mason, W. J., Elliott, J. A., & Youngstedt, S. D. (2001). Sleep estimation from wrist movement quantified by different actigraphic modalities. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 105(2), 185–191.Google Scholar
Joinson, A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 433–438.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary approach-advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. Essai, 7(1), 26.Google Scholar
Kahng, S. & Iwata, B. A. (1998). Computerized systems for collecting real‐time observational data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(2), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalimeri, K., Lepri, B., Kim, T., Pianesi, F., & Pentland, A. (2011). Automatic modeling of dominance effects using granger causality. Human Behavior Understanding, 7065, 124–133.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keil, T. F., Koschate-Reis, M., & Levine, M. (2020). Contact Logger: Measuring everyday intergroup contact experiences in near-time. Behavior Research Methods. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-019-01335-wGoogle Scholar
Killingsworth, M. A. & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, T., Chang, A., Holland, L., & Pentland, A. (2008). Meeting mediator: Enhancing group collaboration with sociometric feedback. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 457–466). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1460563.1460636Google Scholar
Kim, T., McFee, E., Olguin Olguin, D., Waber, B., & Pentland, A. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 412–427.Google Scholar
Kornbrot, D. E., Wiseman, R., & Georgiou, G. J. (2018). Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0192808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. S., Mulgrew, J., Anderson, N. C., et al. (2020). Physically attractive faces attract us physically. Cognition, 198, 104193.Google Scholar
Lathia, N., Pejovic, V., Rachuri, K. K., et al. (2013). Smartphones for large-scale behaviour change interventions. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 12(3), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., et al. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723.Google Scholar
Levine, M., Taylor, P. J., & Best, R. (2011). Third parties, violence, and conflict resolution: The role of group size and collective action in the microregulation of violence. Psychological Science, 22(3), 406–412.Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. G. & Tatler, B. W. (2018). Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(10), 2162–2173.Google Scholar
MacKerron, G. & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000.Google Scholar
Matusik, J. G., Heidl, R., Hollenbeck, J. R., et al. (2018). Wearable Bluetooth sensors for capturing relational variables and temporal variability in relationships: A construct validation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 357–387.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2013). State of innovation. New Scientist, 219(2931), 26–27.Google Scholar
McGrath, M. J., Scanaill, C. N., & Nafus, D. (2014). Sensor Technologies: Healthcare, Wellness and Environmental Applications. Apress.Google Scholar
McKeown, S. & Dixon, J. (2017). The ‘contact hypothesis’: Critical reflections and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12295.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R. (2017). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A method for the naturalistic observation of daily social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 184–190.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R. & Conner, T. S. (eds.). (2012). Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mele, M. L. & Federici, S. (2012). Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 261–265.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozos, O. M., Sandulescu, V., Andrews, S., et al. (2017). Stress detection using wearable physiological and sociometric sensors. International Journal of Neural Systems, 27(2), 1650041.Google Scholar
Murakami Wood, D., Ball, K., Graham, S., et al. (2006). A Report on the Surveillance Society. Office of the Information Commissioner. https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/documents/1042390/surveillance-society-full-report-2006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Musch, J. & Reips, U. D. (2000). A brief history of Web experimenting. In Birnbaum, M (ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 61–88). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nielson, D. M., Smith, T. A., Sreekumar, V., Dennis, S., & Sederberg, P. B. (2015). Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(35), 11078–11083.Google Scholar
OFCOM. (2018). The Communications Market 2018. www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/multi-sector-research/cmr/cmr-2018Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251),aac4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orben, A. & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: Evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychological Science, 30(5), 682–696.Google Scholar
Paletta, L., Neuschmied, H., Schwarz, M., et al. (2014, March). Smartphone eye tracking toolbox: Accurate gaze recovery on mobile displays. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 367–368). ACM.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G. & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.Google Scholar
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031.Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., et al. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behaviour made easy. Behavior Research Methods.Google Scholar
Pérez-Edgar, K., MacNeill, L. A., & Fu, X. (2020). Navigating through the experienced environment: Insights from mobile eye tracking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 0963721420915880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420915880Google Scholar
Piwek, L. & Joinson, A. (2017). Automatic tracking of behavior with smartphones: Potential for behavior change interventions. In Little, L, Sillence, E, & Joinson, A (eds.), Behavior Change Research and Theory (pp. 137–165). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., & Andrews, S. (2016a). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1252.Google ScholarPubMed
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016b). The rise of consumer wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS MEDICINE, 13(2), e1001953.Google Scholar
Poltavski, D. V. (2015). The use of single-electrode wireless EEG in biobehavioral investigations. In Mobile Health Technologies (pp. 375–390). Humana Press.Google Scholar
Poppe, R., Van Der Zee, S., Heylen, D. K., & Taylor, P. J. (2014). AMAB: Automated measurement and analysis of body motion. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 625–633.Google Scholar
Pursey, K., Burrows, T. L., Stanwell, P., & Collins, C. E. (2014). How accurate is web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index in young adults? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e4.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. (1966). Sexual fetishism: An experimental analogue. The Psychological Record, 16(3), 293–296.Google Scholar
Reimers, S. (2007). The BBC internet study: General methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 147–161.Google Scholar
Reimers, S. & Stewart, N. (2009). Using SMS text messaging for teaching and data collection in the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 675–681.Google Scholar
Reimers, S. & Stewart, N. (2015). Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimers, S. & Stewart, N. (2016). Auditory presentation and synchronization in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 897–908.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. & Hill, P. L. (2017). Questions and answers about the policy relevance of personality traits. PsyArXiv.Google Scholar
Rollason, J. C., Outtrim, J. G., & Mathur, R. S. (2014). A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility® monitor with ultrasound in infertile women. International Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 657.Google Scholar
Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20(1), 114–121.Google Scholar
Sassenberg, K. & Ditrich, L. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. & Cohen, J. (2013). The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business. Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., Kendrick, L. R., Ziegler, F., & Wiseman, R. (2016). Predicting smartphone operating system from personality and individual differences. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 727–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., & Ziegler, F. (2018). The technology integration model (TIM): A new theory to predict technology adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 204–214.Google Scholar
Simon, W. T. & Schouten, P. G. (1992). The plethysmograph reconsidered: Comments on Barker and Howell. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 13–25.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Knopf.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A. (1950). Altruistic Love: A Study of American ‘Good Neighbors’ and Christian Saints. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sun, J. & Vazire, S. (2019). Do people know what they’re like in the moment? Psychological Science, 30(3), 405–414.Google Scholar
Tapp, J. & Walden, T. A. (2000). PROCODER: A system for collection and analysis of observational data from videotape. In Thompson, T, Felce, D, & Symons, F. J. (eds.) Behavioural Observation: Technology and Applications in Developmental Disabilities (pp. 61–70). Brookes.Google Scholar
Thai, S. & Page-Gould, E. (2018). ExperienceSampler: An open-source scaffold for building smartphone apps for experience sampling. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 729.Google Scholar
Tombs, S. & Silverman, I. (2004). Pupillometry: A sexual selection approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1937). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2(1), 230–265.Google Scholar
Uttal, W. R. (2001). The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158.Google Scholar
Weinberg, N. (2019). Computers in the Information Society. Routledge.Google Scholar
Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214–227.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. (2017, June). Using eye trackers as indicators of diagnostic markers: Implications from HCI devices. In International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies (pp. 308–315). Springer.Google Scholar
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. (1995). The MegaLab truth test. Nature, 373(6513), 391.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. (1996). ‘MegaLab UK’: Participatory science and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 167–169.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. (2007) Quirkology: The Curious Science of Everyday Lives. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. & Watt, C. (2010). Judging a book by its cover: The unconscious influence of pupil size on consumer choice. Perception, 39(10), 1417–1419.Google Scholar
Yarkoni, T. (2019). The generalizability crisis. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/jqw35Google Scholar
Yang, C. C. & Hsu, Y. L. (2010). A review of accelerometery-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors, 10(8), 7772–7788.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Song, X., Shao, X., Shibasaki, R., & Zhao, H. (2013). Unsupervised skeleton extraction and motion capture from 3D deformable matching. Neurocomputing, 100, 170–182.Google Scholar
Aarseth, E., Bean, A. M., Boonen, H., et al. (2017). Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 267–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139004.Google Scholar
Baranowski, T. O. M., Masse, L. C., Ragan, B., & Welk, G. (2008). How many days was that? We’re still not sure, but we’re asking the question better! Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7), S544.Google Scholar
Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self- reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Bianchi, A. & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195–1210.Google Scholar
Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioural addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 156–162.Google Scholar
Bisen, S. S. & Deshpande, Y. M. (2018). Understanding internet addiction: a comprehensive review. Mental Health Review Journal, 23(3), 165–184.Google Scholar
Black, A. (2018, February). Take a digital detox. Sunshine Coast Daily, p. 22.Google Scholar
Boase, J. & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519.Google Scholar
Bodford, J. E., Kwan, V. S. Y., & Sobota, D. S. (2017). Fatal attractions: Attachment to smartphones predicts anthropomorphic beliefs and dangerous behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(5), 320–326.Google Scholar
Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U. D. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157–165.Google Scholar
Butt, S. & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346–360.Google Scholar
Chekroud, S. R., Gueorguieva, R., Zheutlin, A. B., et al. (2018). Association between physical exercise and mental health in 1.2 million individuals in the USA between 2011 and 2015: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(9), 739–746.Google Scholar
Chóliz, M. (2012). Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: The test of mobile phone dependence (TMD). Progress in Health Science, 2(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
Chóliz, M., Pinto, L., Phansalkar, S. S., et al. (2016). Development of a brief multicultural version of the test of mobile phone dependence (TMDbrief) questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 650.Google Scholar
Christensen, M. A., Bettencourt, L., Kaye, L., et al. (2016). Direct measurements of smartphone screen-time: relationships with demographics and sleep. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165331.Google Scholar
Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 119–135.Google Scholar
Costigan, S. A., Barnett, L., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Lubans, D. R. (2013). The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 382–392.Google Scholar
Coyne, S. M., Rogers, A. A., Zurcher, J. D., Stockdale, L., & Booth, M. (2020). Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csibi, S., Griffiths, M. D., Cook, B., Demetrovics, Z., & Szabo, A. (2018). The psychometric properties of the smartphone application-based addiction scale (SABAS). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(2), 393–403.Google Scholar
Day, F. R., Ong, K. K., & Perry, J. R. (2018). Elucidating the genetic basis of social interaction and isolation. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Days, K. T. (2018). Parents, Media and Panic Through the Years. Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
Doliński, D. (2018). Is psychology still a science of behavior? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13, e25025.Google Scholar
Dozois, D. J. & Rnic, K. (2015). Core beliefs and self-schematic structure in depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 4, 98–103.Google Scholar
Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2012, July). Who is on your sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 79–86). ACM.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 739–741.Google Scholar
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516.Google Scholar
Elhai, J. D., Dvorak, R. D., Levine, J. C., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 251–259.Google Scholar
Elhai, J. D., Tiamiyu, M. F., Weeks, J. W., et al. (2018). Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 21–28.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2018). Failing to encourage physical activity with wearable technology: What next? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(9), 310–313.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A., Kaye, L. K., Wilcockson, T. D., & Ryding, F. C. (2018). Digital traces of behaviour within addiction: Response to Griffiths (2017). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(1), 240–245.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Shaw, H., & Geyer, K. (2019). Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernala, S. K., Burke, M., Leavitt, A., & Ellison, N. B. (2020). How Well Do People Report Time Spent on Facebook? An Evaluation of Established Survey Questions with Recommendations. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376435.Google Scholar
Foerster, M., Roser, K., Schoeni, A., & Röösli, M. (2015). Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: Derivation of a short scale MPPUS10. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 277–286.Google Scholar
Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Kaye, L. K., & Redding, C. (2017). My virtual friend: A qualitative analysis of the attitudes and experiences of smartphone users: Implications for smartphone attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 347–355.Google Scholar
Ha, J. H., Chin, B., Park, D. H., Ryu, S. H., & Yu, J. (2008). Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 783–784.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Xing, C., Ross, E. M., & Johnson, R. M. (2019). Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: Results of a four-week diary study. Media Psychology, 1–17. doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1688171Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., McMahon, C., Cruwys, T., et al. (2018). Social cure, what social cure? The propensity to underestimate the importance of social factors for health. Social Science & Medicine, 198, 14–21.Google Scholar
Heffer, T., Good, M., Daly, O., MacDonell, E., & Willoughby, T. (2019). The longitudinal association between social-media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults: An empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 7(3), 462–470.Google Scholar
Horwood, S. & Anglim, J. (2018). Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 349–359.Google Scholar
Houghton, S., Lawrence, D., Hunter, S. C., et al. (2018). Reciprocal relationships between trajectories of depressive symptoms and screen media use during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2453–2467.Google Scholar
Hussain, Z., Griffiths, M. D., & Sheffield, D. (2017). An investigation into problematic smartphone use: The role of narcissism, anxiety, and personality factors. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 378–386.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. S., Dudley, J., Horowitz-Kraus, T., DeWitt, T., & Holland, S. K. (2020). Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatrics. 174(1), e193869–e193869, Published online 4 November.Google Scholar
Ioannidou, F., Hermens, F., & Hodgson, T. L. (2017). Mind your step: The effects of mobile phone use on gaze behavior in stair climbing. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2(3–4), 109–120.Google Scholar
Jankowska, M. M., Schipperijn, J., & Kerr, J. (2015). A framework for using GPS data in physical activity and sedentary behavior studies. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 43(1), 48–56.Google Scholar
Jao, Y. L., Loken, E., MacAndrew, M., Van Haitsma, K., & Kolanowski, A. (2018). Association between social interaction and affect in nursing home residents with dementia. Ageing & Mental Health, 22(6), 778–783.Google Scholar
Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Gómez-Vela, M., González-Gil, F., & Caballo, C. (2007). Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research and Theory, 15(3), 309–320.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., George, M. J., Russell, M. R., & Odgers, C. L. (2019). Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: Little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1416–1433, 2167702619859336.Google Scholar
Johannes, N., Meier, A., Reinecke, L., et al. (2020). The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling. Media Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1768122Google Scholar
Jungselius, B. & Weilenmann, A. (2018, July). Conceptualizing ‘use’ in social media studies. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 325–329). ACM.Google Scholar
Kardos, P., Unoka, Z., Pléh, C., & Soltész, P. (2018). Your mobile phone indeed means your social network: Priming mobile phone activates relationship related concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 84–88.Google Scholar
Katevas, K., Arapakis, I., & Pielot, M. (2018, September). Typical phone use habits: Intense use does not predict negative well-being. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (p. 11). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In Blumler, J. G. & Katz, E (eds.), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, N., Tanei, S., Ogata, F., et al. (2006). Survey on cellular phone usage on students in Thailand. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 25(6), 377–382.Google Scholar
Khouja, J. N., Munafò, M. R., Tilling, K., et al. (2019). Is screen time associated with anxiety or depression in young people? Results from a UK birth cohort. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 82.Google Scholar
Kim, D., Lee, Y., Lee, J., Nam, J. K., & Chung, Y. (2014). Development of Korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e97920.Google Scholar
King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C., et al. (2014). ‘Nomophobia’: Impact of cell phone use interfering with symptoms and emotions of individuals with panic disorder compared with a control group. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 10, 28–35.Google Scholar
Koo, H. Y. (2009). Development of a cell phone addiction scale for Korean adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 39(6), 818–828.Google Scholar
Kuss, D., Harkin, L., Kanjo, E., & Billieux, J. (2018). Problematic smartphone use: Investigating contemporary experiences using a convergent design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 142.Google Scholar
Kwon, M., Lee, J. Y., Won, W. Y., et al. (2013a). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLOS ONE, 8(2), e56936.Google Scholar
Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013b). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e83558.Google Scholar
Lally, P., Van Jaarsveld, C. H., Potts, H. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998–1009.Google Scholar
Lee, H. K., Kim, J. H., Fava, M., et al. (2017). Development and validation study of the smartphone overuse screening questionnaire. Psychiatry Research, 257, 352–357.Google Scholar
Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., et al. for Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. The Lancet, 380(9838), 219–229.Google Scholar
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. Sage Open, 5(1), 2158244015573169.Google Scholar
Leung, L. (2008). Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media, 2(2), 93–113.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. H., Chang, L. R., Lee, Y. H., et al. (2014). Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI). PLOS ONE, 9(6), e98312.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. H., Lin, Y. C., Lee, Y. H., et al. (2015). Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 65, 139–145.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. H., Chiang, C. L., Lin, P. H., et al. (2016). Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0163010.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. H., Pan, Y. C., Lin, S. H., & Chen, S. H. (2017). Development of short‐form and screening cutoff point of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI‐SF). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 26(2), e1525.Google Scholar
Liu, P. T., Ruan, D. B., Yeh, X. Y., et al. (2018). Highly responsive blue light sensor with amorphous indium-zinc-oxide thin-film transistor based architecture. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8153.Google Scholar
Lopez-Fernandez, O., Honrubia-Serrano, L., Freixa-Blanxart, M., & Gibson, W. (2014). Prevalence of problematic mobile phone use in British adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 91–98.Google Scholar
Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., Pontes, H. M., et al. (2018). Measurement invariance of the short version of the problematic mobile phone use questionnaire (PMPUQ-SV) across eight languages. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1213.Google Scholar
Lucero, A. (2018). Living without a mobile phone: An autoethnography. Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 – DIS ’18, 765–776.Google Scholar
Martinotti, G., Villella, C., Di Thiene, D., et al. (2011). Problematic mobile phone use in adolescence: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health, 19(6), 545–551.Google Scholar
Marty-Dugas, J., Ralph, B. C. W., Oakman, J. M., & Smilek, D. (2018). The relation between smartphone use and everyday inattention. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 46–64.Google Scholar
McGrath, M. J., Scanaill, C. N., & Nafus, D. (2014). Sensor Technologies: Healthcare, Wellness and Environmental Applications. Apress.Google Scholar
McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., et al. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, e16800.Google Scholar
Merlo, L. J., Stone, A. M., & Bibbey, A. (2013). Measuring problematic mobile phone use: Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the PUMP Scale. Journal of Addiction, 9, 12807.Google Scholar
Mihajlov, M. & Vejmelka, L. (2017). Internet addiction: A review of the first twenty years. Psychiatria Danubina, 29(3), 260–272.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.Google Scholar
Mou, D. (2016). Battling severe mental illnesses with smartphones: How patients’ smartphone data can help improve clinical care. mHealth, 2, 32.Google Scholar
Oliver, E. (2010, June). The challenges in large-scale smartphone user studies. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Hot Topics in Planet-Scale Measurement (p. 5). ACM.Google Scholar
Orben, A. & Przybylski, A. (2019). Screens, teens and psychological well-being: Evidence from three time-use diary studies. Psychological Science, 30(5), 682–696.Google Scholar
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019a). Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(21), 10226–10228.Google Scholar
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019b). Reply to Foster and Jackson: Open scientific practices are the way forward for social media effects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31), 15334–15335.Google Scholar
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114.Google Scholar
Pachucki, M. C., Ozer, E. J., Barrat, A., & Cattuto, C. (2015). Mental health and social networks in early adolescence: A dynamic study of objectively-measured social interaction behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 40–50.Google Scholar
Panova, T. & Carbonell, X. (2018). Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 252–259.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., & Andrews, S. (2016). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1252.Google Scholar
Pontes, H. M. & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). A new era for gaming disorder research: Time to shift from consensus to consistency. Addictive Behaviors. 106059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106059Google Scholar
Proctor, R. N. (2012). The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: Evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 87–91.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2019). Investigating the motivational and psychosocial dynamics of dysregulated gaming: Evidence from a preregistered cohort study. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1257–1265, 2167702619859341.Google Scholar
Richardson, M., Hussain, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 109–116.Google Scholar
Rosen, L., Carrier, L. M., Miller, A., Rokkum, J., & Ruiz, A. (2016). Sleeping with technology: Cognitive, affective, and technology usage predictors of sleep problems among college students. Sleep Health, 2(1), 49–56.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501–2511.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Felt, J., et al. (2014). Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 364–375.Google Scholar
Rozgonjuk, D., Rosenvald, V., Janno, S., & Täht, K. (2016). Developing a shorter version of the Estonian smartphone addiction proneness scale (E-SAPS18). Cyberpsychology. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10 (4),article 4.Google Scholar
Rozgonjuk, D., Levine, J. C., Hall, B. J., & Elhai, J. D. (2018). The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 10–17.Google Scholar
Rutland, J. B., Sheets, T., & Young, T. (2007). Development of a scale to measure problem use of short message service: The SMS Problem Use Diagnostic Questionnaire. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(6), 841–844.Google Scholar
Ryding, F. C. & Kaye, L. K. (2018). ‘Internet addiction’: A conceptual minefield. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(1), 225–232.Google Scholar
Sas, C. (2019). Millennials: Digitally connected never unplugged? In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19) Workshop: Designing for Digital Wellbeing: A Research and Practice Agenda. (pp. 19–22). ACM.Google Scholar
Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use – a validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27.Google Scholar
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., Kendrick, L. R., Ziegler, F., & Wiseman, R. (2016). Predicting smartphone operating system from personality and individual differences. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 727–732.Google Scholar
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., & Ziegler, F. V. (2018). The Technology Integration Model (TIM). Predicting the continued use of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 204–214.Google Scholar
Sivadas, E. & Venkatesh, R. (1995). An examination of individual and object-specific influences on the extended self and its relation to attachment and satisfaction. ACR North American Advances. www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/7778/volumes/v22/NA%20-%2022Google Scholar
Stieger, S. & Lewetz, D. (2018). A week without using social media: Results from an ecological momentary intervention study using smartphones. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 618–624.Google Scholar
Stronge, S., Mok, T., Ejova, A., et al. (2019). Social media use is (weakly) related to psychological distress. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(9), 604–609.Google Scholar
Surrat, C. G. (1999). Netaholics? The Creation of a Pathology. New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Toda, M., Monden, K., Kubo, K., & Morimoto, K. (2004). Cellular phone dependence tendency of female university students. Japanese Journal of Hygiene, 59, 383–386.Google Scholar
Takao, M., Takahashi, S., & Kitamura, M. (2009). Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(5), 501–507.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. E. & Thompson, M. L. (2017). Smartphones: Addiction, or way of life? Journal of Ideology, 38 (1),Article 3.Google Scholar
Toda, M., Monden, K., Kubo, K., & Morimoto, K. (2004). Cellular phone dependence tendency of female university students. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi (Japanese Journal of Hygiene), 59(4), 383–386.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
UK Parliament (2018). Science and Technology Committee: Impact of social media and screen-use on young people’s health inquiry. www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/impact-of-social-media-young-people-17–19/.Google Scholar
Vanden Abeele, M., Beullens, K., & Roe, K. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(2), 213–236.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, A. J., Ferguson, C. J., Colder Carras, M., et al. (2018). A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., et al. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480.Google Scholar
Viner, R., Davie, M., & Firth, A. (2019). The Health Impacts of Screen Time: A Guide for Clinicians and Parents. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.Google Scholar
Vioque, J., Torres, A., & Quiles, J. (2000). Time spent watching television, sleep duration and obesity in adults living in Valencia, Spain. International Journal of Obesity, 24(12), 1683.Google Scholar
Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. M. (2016). Permanently online – permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703.Google Scholar
Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., & Young, R. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 194–203.Google Scholar
Ward, D. M., Dill-Shackleford, K. E., & Mazurek, M. O. (2018). Social media use and happiness in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(3), 205–209.Google Scholar
Widdicks, K., Ringenson, T., Pargman, D., Kuppusamy, V., & Lago, P. (2018). Undesigning the internet: An exploratory study of reducing everyday internet connectivity. In 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability (pp. 384–369). https://doi.org/10.29007/s221Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Yen, C. F., Tang, T. C., Yen, J. Y., et al. (2009). Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 863–873.Google Scholar
Yildirim, C. & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130–137.Google Scholar
Abraham, C. & Michie, S. (2008). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology, 27(3), 379–387.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
Allen, J. K., Stephens, J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R., Stewart, K. J., & Hauck, S. (2013). Randomized controlled pilot study testing use of smartphone technology for obesity treatment. Journal of Obesity, 151597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/151597Google Scholar
Althoff, T., White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2016). Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity: Study and implications. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), e315.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139004.Google Scholar
Apple (2017). App Store. www.appstore.com/.Google Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779.Google Scholar
Bakker, D., Kazantzis, N., Rickwood, D., & Rickard, N. (2016). Mental health smartphone apps: Review and evidence-based recommendations for future developments. JMIR Mental Health, 3(1), e7.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.Google Scholar
Barnett, I., Torous, J., Staples, P., et al. (2018). Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: A pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(8), 1660.Google Scholar
Baron, K. G., Abbott, S., Jao, N., Manalo, N., & Mullen, R. (2017). Orthosomnia: Are some patients taking the Quantified Self too far? Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 13(2), 351–354.Google Scholar
Baumel, A., Muench, F., Edan, S., & Kane, J. M. (2019). Objective user engagement with mental health apps: Systematic search and panel-based usage analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(9), e14567.Google Scholar
Biddiss, E. & Irwin, J. (2010). Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth: A systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(7), 664–672.Google Scholar
Bielak, A. A., Mogle, J., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2017). What did you do today? Variability in daily activities is related to variability in daily cognitive performance. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(5), 764–771.Google Scholar
Bird, E. L., Baker, G., Mutrie, N., et al. (2013). Behavior change techniques used to promote walking and cycling: A systematic review. Health Psychology, 32(8), 829.Google Scholar
Blandford, A., Gibbs, J., Newhouse, N., et al. (2018). Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions. Digital Health, 4, 2055207618770325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloss, C. S., Wineinger, N. E., Peters, M., et al. (2016). A prospective randomized trial examining health care utilization in individuals using multiple smartphone-enabled biosensors. PeerJ, 4, e1554.Google Scholar
Bondaronek, P., Slee, A., Hamilton, F. L., & Murray, E. (2019). Relationship between popularity and the likely efficacy: An observational study based on a random selection on top-ranked physical activity apps. BMJ Open, 9(11).Google Scholar
Bort-Roig, J., Gilson, N. D., Puig-Ribera, A., Contreras, R. S., & Trost, S. G. (2014). Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 44, 671–686.Google Scholar
Car, J., Sheikh, A., Wicks, P., & Williams, M. S. (2019). Beyond the hype of big data and artificial intelligence: Building foundations for knowledge and wisdom. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 143.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. A., Jankowska, M. M., Meseck, K., et al. (2015). Validity of PALMS GPS scoring of active and passive travel compared to SenseCam. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47, 662–667.Google Scholar
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013). Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e32.Google Scholar
Case, M. A., Burwick, H. A., Volpp, K. G., & Patel, M. S. (2015). Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA, 313(6), 625–626.Google Scholar
Celis-Morales, C. A., Perez-Bravo, F., Ibanez, L., et al. (2012). Objective vs. self-reported physical activity and sedentary time: Effects of measurement method on relationships with risk biomarkers. PLOS ONE, 7(5), e36345.Google Scholar
Chen, F. X., King, A. C., & Hekler, E. B. (2014, April). Healthifying exergames: Improving health outcomes through intentional priming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1855–1864). ACM.Google Scholar
Cho, C. H., Lee, T., & Kim, M. G. et al. (2019). Mood prediction of patients with mood disorders by machine learning using passive digital phenotypes based on the circadian rhythm: Prospective observational cohort study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e11029.Google Scholar
Choi, S., Kim, S., Yang, J. S., et al. (2014). Real-time measurement of human salivary cortisol for the assessment of psychological stress using a smartphone. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 2, 8–11.Google Scholar
Chorley, M. J., Whitaker, R. M., & Allen, S. M. (2015). Personality and location-based social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 45–56.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S. & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463.Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 181–189.Google Scholar
Conroy, D. E., Hojjatinia, S., Lagoa, C. M., et al. (2019). Personalized models of physical activity responses to text message micro-interventions: A proof-of-concept application of control systems engineering methods. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 172–180.Google Scholar
Cresswell, K. M., Blandford, A., & Sheikh, A. (2017). Drawing on human factors engineering to evaluate the effectiveness of health information technology. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 110(8), 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.Google Scholar
DeMasi, O., Kording, K., & Recht, B. (2017). Meaningless comparisons lead to false optimism in medical machine learning. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184604.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Care. (2018). The Future of Healthcare: Our Vision for Digital, Data and Technology in Health and Care. www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-future-of-healthcare-our-vision-for-digital-data-and-technology-in-health-and-care.Google Scholar
Donker, T., Petrie, K., Proudfoot, J., et al. (2013). Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11), e247.Google Scholar
Dressel, J. & Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4(1), eaao5580.Google Scholar
Du, H. Y., Newton, P. J., Zecchin, R., et al. (2011). An intervention to promote physical activity and self-management in people with stable chronic heart failure The Home-Heart-Walk study: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 12(1), 63.Google Scholar
Dunton, G. F. (2018). Sustaining health-protective behaviors such as physical activity and healthy eating. JAMA, 320(7), 639–640.Google Scholar
Dunton, G. F., Huh, J., Leventhal, A. M., et al. (2014). Momentary assessment of affect, physical feeling states, and physical activity in children. Health Psychology, 33(3), 255.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding Systems. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2016). The future of … wearable technology. CREST Security Review, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2018). Failing to encourage physical activity with wearable technology: What next? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(9), 310–313.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A., Kaye, L. K., Wilcockson, T. D., & Ryding, F. C. (2018). Digital traces of behaviour within addiction: Response to Griffiths (2017). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(1), 240–245.Google Scholar
Etkin, J. (2016). The hidden cost of personal quantification. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 967–984.Google Scholar
Ewell, P. J., Quist, M. C., Øverup, C. S., Watkins, H., & Guadagno, R. E. (2020). Catching more than pocket monsters: Pokémon Go’s social and psychological effects on players. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(2), 131–136.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, E. A., Haaland, B. A., Bilger, M., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4(12), 983–995.Google Scholar
Firth, J., Torous, J., Nicholas, J., et al. (2017a). Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 218, 15–22.Google Scholar
Firth, J., Torous, J., Nicholas, J., et al. (2017b). The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 287–298.Google Scholar
Forshaw, M. (2002). Essential Health Psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuoka, Y., Haskell, W., Lin, F., & Vittinghoff, E. (2019). Short- and long-term effects of a mobile phone app in conjunction with brief in-person counseling on physical activity among physically inactive women: The mPED randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 2(5), e194281–e194281.Google Scholar
Geyer, K., Ellis, D. A., & Piwek, L. (2019). A simple location-tracking app for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2840–2846.Google Scholar
Glynn, L. G., Hayes, P. S., Casey, M., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care: The SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice, 64(624), e384–e391.Google Scholar
Google. (2017). Play Store. https://play.google.com/store?hl=en.Google Scholar
Gravenhorst, F., Muaremi, A., Bardram, J., et al. (2015). Mobile phones as medical devices in mental disorder treatment: An overview. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(2), 335–353.Google Scholar
Gross, R., Ritz, J., Hughes, M. D., et al. (2019). Two-way mobile phone intervention compared with standard-of-care adherence support after second-line antiretroviral therapy failure: A multinational, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(1), e26–e34.Google Scholar
Grünerbl, A., Oleksy, P., Bahle, G., et al. (2012). Towards smart phone based monitoring of bipolar disorder. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services for HealthCare – mHealthSys ’12. ACM Press.Google Scholar
Guy, R., Hocking, J., Wand, H., et al. (2012). How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta‐analysis and systematic review. Health Services Research, 47(2), 614–632.Google Scholar
Haedt‐Matt, A. A., & Keel, P. K. (2011). Hunger and binge eating: A meta‐analysis of studies using ecological momentary assessment. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44(7), 573–578.Google Scholar
Hamer, M., Batty, G. D., & Kivimaki, M. (2011). Sleep loss due to worry and future risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: The Scottish Health Survey. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 19, 1437–1443.Google Scholar
Hammersley, V., Donaghy, E., Parker, R., et al. (2019). Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: A non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 69(686), e595–e604.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90.Google Scholar
Hekler, E. B., Klasnja, P., Chevance, G., et al. (2019). Why we need a small data paradigm. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Heneghan, C., Howick, J., O’Neill, B., et al. (2012). The evidence underpinning sports performance products: a systematic assessment. BMJ Open, 2(4), e001702.Google Scholar
Henson, P., David, G., Albright, K., & Torous, J. (2019). Deriving a practical framework for the evaluation of health apps. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(2), e52–e54.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W. & Patel, P. V. (2015). SurveySignal: A convenient solution for experience sampling research using participants’ own smartphones. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 235–253.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychological Science, 23(6), 582–588.Google Scholar
Howe, K. B., Suharlim, C., Ueda, P., et al. (2016). Gotta catch ’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: Difference in differences study. BMJ, 355, i6270.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Xiong, H., Leach, K., et al. (2016). Assessing social anxiety using GPS trajectories and point-of-interest data. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 898–903). ACM Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Lum, E., Jimenez, G., et al. (2019). Medication management support in diabetes: A systematic assessment of diabetes self-management apps. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 127.Google Scholar
Huffziger, S., Ebner-Priemer, U., Zamoscik, V., et al. (2013). Effects of mood and rumination on cortisol levels in daily life: An ambulatory assessment study in remitted depressed patients and healthy controls. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2258–2267.Google Scholar
Iacobucci, G. (2017). Patient data were shared with Google on an ‘inappropriate legal basis,’ says NHS data guardian. BMJ, 357, j2439.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2018). Digital phenotyping: A global tool for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 17(3), 276.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Why most clinical research is not useful. PLOS MEDICINE, 13(6), e1002049.Google Scholar
Jacobi, C., Hayward, C., de Zwaan, M., Kraemer, H. C., & Agras, W. S. (2004). Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: Application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 19–65.Google Scholar
Jahng, S., Solhan, M. B., Tomko, R. L., et al. (2011). Affect and alcohol use: An ecological momentary assessment study of outpatients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 572.Google Scholar
Jakicic, J. M., Davis, K. K., Rogers, R. J., et al. (2016). Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: The IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 316(11), 1161–1171.Google Scholar
Jankowska, M. M., Schipperijn, J., & Kerr, J. (2015). A framework for using GPS data in physical activity and sedentary behavior studies. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 43, 48–56.Google Scholar
Jewkes, R. & Dartnall, E. (2019). More research is needed on digital technologies in violence against women. The Lancet Public Health, 4(6), e270–e271.Google Scholar
James, P., Jankowska, M., Marx, C., et al. (2016). ‘Spatial energetics’: Integrating data from GPS, accelerometry, and GIS to address obesity and inactivity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51, 792–800.Google Scholar
Juniper Research. (2013). Smart Wearable Devices. Fitness, Healthcare, Entertainment & Enterprise 2013–2018. www.juniperresearch.com/reports/Smart_Wearable_Devices.Google Scholar
Kanjo, E., Younis, E. M., & Ang, C. S. (2019). Deep learning analysis of mobile physiological, environmental and location sensor data for emotion detection. Information Fusion, 49, 46–56.Google Scholar
Karasouli, E. & Adams, A. (2014). Assessing the evidence for e-resources for mental health self-management: A systematic literature review. JMIR Mental Health, 1(1), e3.Google Scholar
Kato, S., Waki, K., Nakamura, S., et al. (2016). Validating the use of photos to measure dietary intake: The method used by DialBetics, a smartphone-based self-management system for diabetes patients. Diabetology International, 7(3), 244–251.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195.Google Scholar
Kitsiou, S., Paré, G., & Jaana, M. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: A critical assessment of their methodological quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e150.Google Scholar
Klasnja, P., Hekler, E. B., Shiffman, S., et al. (2015). Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychology, 34(S), 1220.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.Google Scholar
Kwasnicka, D., Inauen, J., Nieuwenboom, W., et al. (2019). Challenges and solutions for N-of-1 design studies in health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 13(2), 163–178.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. E., Huckvale, K., Nicholas, J., et al. (2019). Using science to sell apps: Evaluation of mental health app store quality claims. npj Digital Medicine, 2(1), 18.Google Scholar
Lathia, N., Pejovic, V., Rachuri, K. K., et al. (2013). Smartphones for large-scale behavior change interventions. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 12(3), 66–73.Google Scholar
Lathia, N., Sandstrom, G. M., Mascolo, C., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Happier people live more active lives: Using smartphones to link happiness and physical activity. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0160589.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, A. G. & Chaput, J. P. (2017). Pokémon Go: A game changer for the physical inactivity crisis? Preventive Medicine, 101, 235–237.Google Scholar
Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., et al. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, 380, 219–229.Google Scholar
Leigh, S. & Flatt, S. (2015). App-based psychological interventions: Friend or foe? Evidence-Based Mental Health, 18(4), 97–99.Google Scholar
Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 143–163.Google Scholar
Lichtman, S. W., Pisarska, K., Berman, E. R., et al. (1992). Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. New England Journal of Medicine, 327(27), 1893–1898.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2011). Kin affiliation across the ovulatory cycle: Females avoid fathers when fertile. Psychological Science, 22(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
LiKamWa, R., Liu, Y., Lane, N. D., & Zhong, L. (2013, June). Moodscope: Building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns. In Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (pp. 389–402). ACM.Google Scholar
Lui, J. H., Marcus, D. K., & Barry, C. T. (2017). Evidence-based apps? A review of mental health mobile applications in a psychotherapy context. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(3), 199.Google Scholar
Ly, K. H., Topooco, N., Cederlund, H., et al. (2015). Smartphone-supported versus full behavioural activation for depression: A randomised controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0126559.Google Scholar
Lyons, E. J., Swartz, M. C., Lewis, Z. H., Martinez, E., & Jennings, K. (2017). Feasibility and acceptability of a wearable technology physical activity intervention with telephone counseling for mid-aged and older adults: A randomized controlled pilot trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(3), e28.Google Scholar
MacKerron, G. & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. & Linehan, C. (2017, May). A scoping review of exertion game research in 2017. In paper presented at the 1st GetAMoveOn Annual Symposium.Google Scholar
Marsch, L. A. (2018). Opportunities and needs in digital phenotyping. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(8), 1637.Google Scholar
Martinengo, L., Van Galen, L., Lum, E., et al. (2019). Suicide prevention and depression apps’ suicide risk assessment and management: A systematic assessment of adherence to clinical guidelines. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Mateo, G. F., Granado-Font, E., Ferré-Grau, C., & Montaña-Carreras, X. (2015). Mobile phone apps to promote weight loss and increase physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11), e253.Google Scholar
McCartney, M. (2016). Margaret McCartney: Game on for Pokémon GO. BMJ, 354, i4306.Google Scholar
Meers, K., Dejonckheere, E., Kalokerinos, E. K., Rummens, K., & Kuppens, P. (2020). mobileQ: A free user-friendly application for collecting experience sampling data. Behavior Research Methods, 1–6.Google Scholar
Mercer, K., Li, M., Giangregorio, L., Burns, C., & Grindrod, K. (2016). Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: A critical analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e40.Google Scholar
Mertz, L. (2016). Are wearables safe? IEEE Pulse, 7(1), 39–43.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.Google Scholar
Mistry, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 69(686), 422–423.Google Scholar
Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Montague, E., Burns, M. N., & Rashidi, P. (2014). The behavioral intervention technology model: An integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e146.Google Scholar
Mtema, Z., Changalucha, J., Cleaveland, S., et al. (2016). Mobile phones as surveillance tools: Implementing and evaluating a large-scale intersectoral surveillance system for rabies in Tanzania. PLOS MEDICINE, 13(4), e1002002.Google Scholar
Müller, S. R., Harari, G. M., Mehrotra, A., et al. (2017). Using human raters to characterize the psychological characteristics of GPS-based places. In Lee, S., Takayama, L., & Truong, K. (eds.), UbiComp ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 157–160). ACM Press.Google Scholar
Muse, E. D., Barrett, P. M., Steinhubl, S. R., & Topol, E. J. (2017). Towards a smart medical home. The Lancet, 389(10067), 358.Google Scholar
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Scherer, E. A., et al. (2016). Wearable devices and mobile technologies for supporting behavioral weight loss among people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Research, 244, 139–144.Google Scholar
Nebeker, C., Torous, J., & Ellis, R. J. B. (2019). Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 137.Google Scholar
Newman, M. G., Jacobson, N. C., Zainal, N. H., et al. (2019). The effects of worry in daily life: An ecological momentary assessment study supporting the tenets of the contrast avoidance model. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(4), 794–810, 2167702619827019.Google Scholar
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, R., Richardson, B., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., et al. (2019). Ecological momentary assessment of drinking in young adults: An investigation into social context, affect and motives. Addictive Behaviors, 98, 106019.Google Scholar
OFCOM (2018). Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. Available from www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/134907/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, D., Foster, C. E., Rothnie, H., et al. (2007). Interventions to promote walking: Systematic review. BMJ, 334(7605), 1204.Google Scholar
Oikonomidi, T., Vivot, A., Tran, V. T., et al. (2019). A methodologic systematic review of mobile health behavior change randomized trials. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(6), 836–843.Google Scholar
O’Kane, M. J., Bunting, B., Copeland, M., & Coates, V. E. (2008). Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 336(7654), 1174–1177.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J. S., Sherrington, C., Zheng, E. R., Franco, M. R., & Tiedemann, A. (2019). Effect of interventions using physical activity trackers on physical activity in people aged 60 years and over: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1–8. DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2018-100324Google Scholar
Palmius, N., Tsanas, A., Saunders, K. E. A., et al. (2017). Detecting bipolar depression from geographic location data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64, 1761–1771.Google Scholar
Patel, M. S., Asch, D. A., & Volpp, K. G. (2015). Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA, 313(5), 459–460.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. B., Edwards, J. D., Andel, R., & Kilpatrick, M. (2016). Daily physical activity and cognitive function variability in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 24, 256–267.Google Scholar
Piwek, L. & Joinson, A. (2017). Automatic tracking of behavior with smartphones: Potential for behavior change interventions. In Little, L, Sillence, E, & Joinson, A (eds.), Behavior Change Research and Theory (pp. 137–165). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., & Andrews, S. (2016a). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1252.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S. & Joinson, A. (2016b). The rise of consumer wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS MEDICINE, 13(2): e1001953.Google Scholar
Portio Research. (2011). Portio Research Mobile Factbook 2011. Available from www.telecomsmarketresearch.com/Free_Telecoms_Market_Research/Portio_Research_Mobile_Factbook_2011_DownloadQ.pdf.Google Scholar
Puiatti, A., Mudda, S., Giordano, S., & Mayora, O. (2011). Smartphone-centred wearable sensors network for monitoring patients with bipolar disorder. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE.Google Scholar
Rachuri, K. K., Musolesi, M., Mascolo, C., et al. (2010, September). EmotionSense: A mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 281–290). ACM.Google Scholar
Reinertsen, E. & Clifford, G. D. (2018). A review of physiological and behavioral monitoring with digital sensors for neuropsychiatric illnesses. Physiological Measurement, 39(5), 05TR01.Google Scholar
Roda, A., Michelini, E., Zangheri, M., et al. (2016). Smartphone-based biosensors: A critical review and perspectives. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 79, 317–325.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Villa, E. & Torous, J. (2019). Regulating digital health technologies with transparency: The case for dynamic and multi-stakeholder evaluation. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (2019). Insights into undertaking research using apps. PsyPAG Quarterly, 109, 4–6.Google Scholar
Saeb, S., Lattie, E. G., Schueller, S. M., Kording, K. P., & Mohr, D. C. (2016). The relationship between mobile phone location sensor data and depressive symptom severity. PeerJ, 4, e2537.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, G. M., Lathia, N., Mascolo, C., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Putting mood in context: Using smartphones to examine how people feel in different locations. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 96–101.Google Scholar
Sandulescu, V., Andrews, S., Ellis, D., Dobrescu, R. & Mozos, O. M. (2015). Mobile app for stress monitoring using voice features. Proceedings of the IEEE E-health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB). IEEE.Google Scholar
Schueller, S. M., Aguilera, A., & Mohr, D. C. (2017). Ecological momentary interventions for depression and anxiety. Depression and Anxiety, 34(6), 540–545.Google Scholar
Segui, F. L., Bufill, C. P., Gimenez, N. A., Roldan, J. M., & Cuyas, F. G. (2018). The prescription of mobile apps by primary care teams: A pilot project in Catalonia. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(6), e10701.Google Scholar
Simpson, C. C. & Mazzeo, S. E. (2017). Calorie counting and fitness tracking technology: Associations with eating disorder symptomatology. Eating Behaviors, 26, 89–92.Google Scholar
Shankar, A., McMunn, A., Banks, J., & Steptoe, A. (2011). Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30(4), 377.Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Hagger-Johnson, G., & Shahab, L. (2014). Bidirectional association between mental health and physical activity in older adults: Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Preventive Medicine, 66, 74–79.Google Scholar
Stone, A. A. & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199–202.Google Scholar
Stone, A. A. & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Guidelines for Momentary Research, 24, 236–243.Google Scholar
Suk, M. & Prabhakaran, B. (2014). Real-time mobile facial expression recognition system – a case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 132–137). IEEE.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A. N. & Lachman, M. E. (2016). Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: A review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 289.Google Scholar
Thai, S. & Page-Gould, E. (2018). ExperienceSampler: An open-source scaffold for building smartphone apps for experience sampling. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 729.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, M., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swartz, L., & Tsai, A. C. (2013). Scaling up mHealth: Where is the evidence? PLOS MEDICINE, 10(2), e1001382.Google Scholar
Torous, J., Larsen, M. E., Depp, C., et al. (2018). Smartphones, sensors, and machine learning to advance real-time prediction and interventions for suicide prevention: A review of current progress and next steps. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(7), 51.Google Scholar
Torous, J., Lipschitz, J., Ng, M., & Firth, J. (2020). Dropout rates in clinical trials of smartphone apps for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 263(15), 413–419.Google Scholar
Trull, T. J. & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2014). The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 466–470.Google Scholar
Vaidyam, A. N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J. D., Kashavan, M. S., & Torous, J. B. (2019). Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: A review of the psychiatric landscape. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(7), 456–464.Google Scholar
van Berkel, N., Luo, C., Ferreira, D., Goncalves, J., & Kostakos, V. (2015). The curse of quantified-self: An endless quest for answers. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM 30 International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 973–978). ACM.Google Scholar
van Berkel, N., Goncalves, J., Hosio, S., et al. (2020). Overcoming compliance bias in self-report studies: A cross-study analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 134, 1–12.Google Scholar
Versluis, A., Verkuil, B., Spinhoven, P., van der Ploeg, M. M., & Brosschot, J. F. (2016). Changing mental health and positive psychological well-being using ecological momentary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e152.Google Scholar
Weise, S., Ong, J., Tesler, N. A., Kim, S., & Roth, W. T. (2013). Worried sleep: 24-h monitoring in high and low worriers. Biological Psychology, 94, 61–70.Google Scholar
Weisel, K. K., Fuhrmann, L. M., Berking, M., et al. (2019). Standalone smartphone apps for mental health – a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digital Medicine, 2(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., et al. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 7730.Google Scholar
Wiederhold, B. K. (2015). Behavioral health apps abundant, but evidence-based research nearly nonexistent. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(6), 309–310.Google Scholar
Wilbur, J., Michaels Miller, A., Chandler, P., & McDevitt, J. (2003). Determinants of physical activity and adherence to a 24‐week home‐based walking program in African American and Caucasian women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(3), 213–224.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, P. & Schoebi, D. (2007). Assessing mood in daily life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 258–267.Google Scholar
Williamson, A. E., McQueenie, R., Ellis, D. A., McConnachie, A., & Wilson, P. (2020). General practice recording of Adverse Childhood Experiences. BJGP Open 4(1), 20X101011.Google Scholar
Williamson, V., Darby, J., & Fear, N. T. (2019). Identifying probable post-traumatic stress disorder: Applying supervised machine learning to data from a UK military cohort AU – Leightley, Daniel. Journal of Mental Health, 28(1), 34–41.Google Scholar
Wolf, J. A., Moreau, J. F., Akilov, O., et al. (2013). Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatology, 149(4), 422–426.Google Scholar
Womble, L. G., Wadden, T. A., McGuckin, B. G., et al. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of a commercial internet weight loss program. Obesity Research, 12(6), 1011–1018.Google Scholar
Wykes, T. (2019). Racing towards a digital paradise or a digital hell? Journal of Mental Health, 28(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
Zangheri, M., Cevenini, L., Anfossi, L., et al. (2015). A simple and compact smartphone accessory for quantitative chemiluminescence-based lateral flow immunoassay for salivary cortisol detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 64, 63–68.Google Scholar
Abeele, M. M. V., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569.Google Scholar
Abels, M., Abeele, M. V., Van Telgen, T., et al. (2018). Nod, nod, ignore: An exploratory observational study on the relation between parental mobile media use and parental responsiveness towards young children. The Talking Species: Perspectives on the Evolutionary, Neuronal, and Cultural Foundations of Language, 195–228. https://thetalkingspecies.luef.eu/chapter/chapter_07.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aharony, N., Pan, W., Ip, C., Khayal, I., & Pentland, A. (2011). Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 7(6), 643–659.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D. & Shockley, K. (2009). Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype. In D. Russell Crane & Jeffrey E. Hill (eds.), Handbook of Families and Work: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, (pp. 265–284).Google Scholar
Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2019). Trait boredom is a predictor of phubbing frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4(3), 245–252.Google Scholar
Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Altman, I. (1993). Dialectics, physical environments, and personal relationships. Communications Monographs, 60(1), 26–34.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self- reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A. (1982). Strategies for ending relationships: Two studies. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 46(3), 223–241.Google Scholar
Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857.Google Scholar
Bielak, A. A., Mogle, J., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2017). What did you do today? Variability in daily activities is related to variability in daily cognitive performance. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(5), 764–771.Google Scholar
Brownell, K. D., & Horgen, K. B. (2004). Food Fight: The Inside Story of the Food Industry, America’s Obesity Crisis, and What We Can Do about It. Contemporary Books.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2003). The social structure of competition. In Rob Cross, Andrew Parker, & Lisa Sasson (eds.), Networks in the Knowledge Economy, 13–56.Google Scholar
Cheek, J. M. & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 330.Google Scholar
Chen, H. T. & Li, X. (2017). The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: Examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 958–965.Google Scholar
Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How ‘phubbing’ becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.Google Scholar
Choudhury, T. & Pentland, A. (2002, November). The sociometer: A wearable device for understanding human networks. In CSCW’02 Workshop: Ad Hoc Communications and Collaboration in Ubiquitous Computing Environments.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2015). UK nightclubs closing at ‘alarming rate’, industry figures suggest. BBC newsbeat. www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33713015/uk-nightclubs-closing-at-alarming-rate-industry-figures-suggest.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I. & Ellis, D. A. (2019). Social media addiction: Technological déjà vu. BMJ, 365, l4277.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I, Joinson, A., & Jones, S. L. (2018). Technologically enhanced dating: Augmented human relationships, robots and fantasy (pp. 145–171). In Papacharissi, Z (ed.), A Networked Self and Love. Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I., Jones, S. L., Joinson, A. N., & Hinds, J. (2019). The evolution of online ideological communities. PloS one, 14(5), e0216932.Google Scholar
DeMaris, A. (2018). Marriage advantage in subjective well-being: Causal effect or unmeasured heterogeneity? Marriage & Family Review, 54(4), 335–350.Google Scholar
de Montjoye, Y. A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3, 1376.Google Scholar
Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045–1068.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, H. (2019). Behind the screen of Facebook: Identity construction in the rehearsal stage of online interaction. New Media & Society, 22(6), 927–943, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819873644.Google Scholar
Do, T. M. T. & Gatica-Perez, D. (2014). Where and what: Using smartphones to predict next locations and applications in daily life. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 12, 79–91.Google Scholar
Dwyer, R. J., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–239.Google Scholar
Eagle, N., de Montjoye, Y. A., & Bettencourt, L. M. (2009, August). Community computing: Comparisons between rural and urban societies using mobile phone data. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (vol. 4, pp. 144–150). IEEE.Google Scholar
Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., & Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15274–15278.Google Scholar
Eagle, N., Macy, M., & Claxton, R. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981), 1029–1031.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292.Google Scholar
Elmer, T., Chaitanya, K., Purwar, P., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2120–2138.Google Scholar
Emanuel, R., Bell, R., Cotton, C., et al. (2015). The truth about smartphone addiction. College Student Journal, 49(2), 291–299.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K. & Stanton, S. C. (2019). Toward a mechanistic understanding of links between close relationships and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 483–489.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., et al. (2015). When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 3-19.Google Scholar
Fiore, A. T. & Donath, J. S. (2005, April). Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? In CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1371–1374). ACM.Google Scholar
Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Hearst, M. (2008, April). Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 797–806). ACM.Google Scholar
Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2010, January). Who’s right and who writes: People, profiles, contacts, and replies in online dating. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1994). America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (ed.). (1999). Personality Judgment: A Realistic Approach to Person Perception. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182.Google Scholar
Gershon, I. (2010). The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting Over New Media. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
González, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A., & Barabási, A. L. (2008). Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453(7196), 779–782.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360.Google Scholar
Haigh, A. (2015). Stop Phubbing. http://stopphubbing.com.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Toma, C., & Ellison, N. (2007, April). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 449–452). ACM.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017a). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Gosling, S. D., Wang, R., et al. (2017b). Patterns of behaviour change in students over an academic term: A preliminary study of activity and sociability behaviours using smartphone sensing methods. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 129–138.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Stachl, C., et al. (2019). Sensing sociability: Individual differences in young adults’ conversation, calling, texting, and app use behaviours in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000245Google Scholar
Hawkley, L. C., Wroblewski, K., Kaiser, T., Luhmann, M., & Schumm, L. P. (2019). Are US older adults getting lonelier? Age, period, and cohort differences. Psychology and Aging, 34(8), 1144.Google Scholar
Heller, A. S., Shi, T. C., Ezie, C. E. C., et al. (2020). Association between real-world experiential diversity and positive affect relates to hippocampal–striatal functional connectivity.Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0636-4Google Scholar
Herbst, K. C., Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2003). My head says yes but my heart says no: Cognitive and affective attraction as a function of similarity to the ideal self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1206Google Scholar
Hodson, G., Crisp, R. J., Meleady, R., & Earle, M. (2018). Intergroup contact as an agent of cognitive liberalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 523–548.Google Scholar
Hogan, B. (2018). Break-ups and the limits of encoding love. In Papacharissi, Z (ed.), A Networked Self and Love (pp. 113–128). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G. (2005). Introduction to Social Psychology. Pearson.Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. F., Hooker, E. D., Rohleder, N., & Pressman, S. D. (2018). The use of smartphones as a digital security blanket: The influence of phone use and availability on psychological and physiological responses to social exclusion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 80(4), 345–352.Google Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., et al. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44.Google Scholar
Joinson, A. N. (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 472–478.Google Scholar
Juniper Research. (2014). Mobile Messaging Markets. Technical Report. http://www.juniperresearch.com/press-release/mobile-messaging-pr1.Google Scholar
Katz, J. E. (1997). The social side of information networking. Society, 34(3), 9–12.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.Google Scholar
Keil, T. F., Koschate-Reis, M., & Levine, M. (2020). Contact Logger: Measuring everyday intergroup contact experiences in near-time. Behavior Research Methods. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-019-01335-wGoogle Scholar
Kreager, D. A., Cavanagh, S. E., Yen, J., & Yu, M. (2014). ‘Where have all the good men gone?’ Gendered interactions in online dating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 387–410.Google Scholar
Kushlev, K. & Dunn, E. W. (2019). Smartphones distract parents from cultivating feelings of connection when spending time with their children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1619–1639.Google Scholar
Kushlev, K. & Heintzelman, S. J. (2018). Put the phone down: Testing a complement-interfere model of computer-mediated communication in the context of face-to-face interactions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 702–710.Google Scholar
Kushlev, K., Dwyer, R., & Dunn, E. W. (2019a). The social price of constant connectivity: Smartphones impose subtle costs on well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 347–352. 0963721419847200.Google Scholar
Kushlev, K., Hunter, J. F., Proulx, J., Pressman, S. D., & Dunn, E. (2019b). Smartphones reduce smiles between strangers. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 12–16.Google Scholar
Lazarević, L. B., Bjekić, J., Živanović, M., & Knežević, G. (2020). Ambulatory assessment of language use: Evidence on the temporal stability of Electronically Activated Recorder and stream of consciousness data. Behavior Research Methods, 1–19. DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01361-zGoogle Scholar
Letzring, T. D., Wells, S. M., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 111.Google Scholar
Li-Barber, K. T. (2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 624–630.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2011). Kin affiliation across the ovulatory cycle: Females avoid fathers when fertile. Psychological Science, 22(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
Liu, J. (2017). Mobile phones, social ties and collective action mobilization in China. Acta Sociologica, 60(3), 213–227.Google Scholar
Markey, P. M. & Wells, S. M. (2002). Interpersonal perception in internet chat rooms. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(2), 134–146.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357.Google Scholar
McEwan, B. & Zanolla, D. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1565–1571.Google Scholar
McKeown, S. & Dixon, J. (2017). The ‘contact hypothesis’: Critical reflections and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12295.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R. & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The social dynamics of a cultural upheaval: Social interactions surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 14(6), 579–585.Google Scholar
Mikkola, H., Oinas, M. M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2008, March). Net-based identity and body image among young IRC-gallery users. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3080–3085). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298.Google Scholar
Montoya, M. R., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922.Google Scholar
Murray, S. (2019). How broadband and cell phone access have impacted marriage and divorce in the US. Review of Economics of the Household, 1–29.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, A. & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249.Google Scholar
O’Connor, S. C. & Rosenblood, L. K. (1996). Affiliation motivation in everyday experience: A theoretical comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 513–522Google Scholar
Onnela, J. P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., et al. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18), 7332–7336.Google Scholar
Osmani, V., Carreras, I., Matic, A., & Saar, P. (2014). An analysis of distance estimation to detect proximity in social interactions. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 5(3), 297–306.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2008). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies-New Edition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, A. (2014). Is online better than offline for meeting partners? Depends: Are you looking to marry or to date? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 664–667.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.Google Scholar
Pittman, M. & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155–167.Google Scholar
Piwek, L. & Joinson, A. (2016). ‘What do they snapchat about?’ Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., & Andrews, S. (2016). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1252.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A. Jr & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. M., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2014). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 99–114.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141.Google Scholar
Roesner, F., Gill, B. T., & Kohno, T. (2014, March). Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of Snapchat’s self-destructing messages. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 64–76). Springer.Google Scholar
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J. (2017). Marriage, choice, and couplehood in the age of the internet. Sociological Science, 4, 490–510.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J. & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17753–17758.Google Scholar
Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17–26.Google Scholar
Satchell, L. P. (2019). From photograph to face-to-face: Brief interactions change person and personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 266-276.Google Scholar
Sbarra, D. A., Briskin, J. L., & Slatcher, R. B. (2019). Smartphones and close relationships: The case for an evolutionary mismatch. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 596–618. 1745691619826535.Google Scholar
Scharlott, B. W. & Christ, W. G. (1995). Overcoming relationship-initiation barriers: The impact of a computer-dating system on sex role, shyness, and appearance inhibitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(2), 191–204.Google Scholar
Schöendienst, V. & Dang-Xuan, L. (2011, July). The role of linguistic properties in online dating communication – a large-scale study of contact initiation messages. In PACIS (p. 169).Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2011). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96.Google Scholar
Shaw, H., Taylor, P., Conchie, S., & Ellis, D. A. (2019). Language style matching: A comprehensive list of articles and tools. PsyArXiv.Google Scholar
Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., Tossell, C., Zhong, L., & Kortum, P. (2011). LiveLab: Measuring wireless networks and smartphone users in the field. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 38(3), 15–20.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Anderson, M. (2016). 5 Facts about Online Dating. Fact Tank. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/29/5-facts-about-online-dating/.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M., Gregem, M. M., Gergen, K. J., & Stroebe, W. (1992). Broken hearts or broken bonds. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1205–1212.Google Scholar
Stopczynski, A., Sekara, V., Sapiezynski, P., et al. (2014). Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e95978.Google Scholar
Sun, J. & Vazire, S. (2019). Do people know what they’re like in the moment? Psychological Science, 30(3), 405–414.Google Scholar
Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions a reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 3–33Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R. & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.Google Scholar
Tidwell, L. C. & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer‐mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.Google Scholar
Trzesniewski, K. H. & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking ‘Generation Me’: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75.Google Scholar
Tyson, G., Perta, V. C., Haddadi, H., & Seto, M. C. (2016, August). A first look at user activity on Tinder. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 461–466). IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Van Praag, H., Kempermann, G., & Gage, F. H. (2000). Neural consequences of enviromental enrichment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(3), 191–198.Google Scholar
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well‐being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302.Google Scholar
Wall, H. J., Taylor, P. J., Dixon, J., Conchie, S. M., & Ellis, D. A. (2013). Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1190–1195.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Z., et al. (2014, September). StudentLife: Assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioural trends of college students using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 3–14). ACM.Google Scholar
Wei, R. & Lo, V. H. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8(1), 53–72.Google Scholar
Wetzel, C. G. & Insko, C. A. (1982). The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(3), 253–276.Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2007). The art of selling one’s ‘self’ on an online dating site: The BAR approach. In Online Matchmaking (pp. 57–69). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2011). E-dating: The five phases on online dating. In Electronic Services: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (pp. 1376–1389). IGI Global.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. (2015). Mobile Cellular Subscriptions (per 100 people). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018) Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Yang, C. C. (2016). Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: Interact and browse on social media, but don’t compare. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 703–708.Google Scholar
Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.Google Scholar
Adam, H. & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925.Google Scholar
Adam, H. & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Reflections on enclothed cognition: Commentary on Burns et al. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 157–159.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimates and real world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139004.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & De Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.Google Scholar
Barry, C. T., McDougall, K. H., Anderson, A. C., et al. (2019). ‘Check your selfie before you wreck your selfie’: Personality ratings of Instagram users as a function of self-image posts. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103843.Google Scholar
Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., et al. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Bevan, C. & Fraser, D. S. (2016). Different strokes for different folks? Revealing the physical characteristics of smartphone users from their swipe gestures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 88, 51–61.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W. & Hopwood, C. J. (2019). Using machine learning to advance personality assessment and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 190–203.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2018). Life events and personality change. Journal of Personality, 86, 83–96.Google Scholar
Boyce, J., Wood, A. M. and Powdthavee, N. (2012). Is personality fixed? Personality changes as much as ‘variable’ economic factors and more strongly predicts changes to life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 22, 1–19.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. & Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). Language-based personality: A new approach to personality in a digital world. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 63–68.Google Scholar
Brady, R. R., Verran, J., Damani, N. N., & Gibb, A. P. (2009). Review of mobile communication devices as potential reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens. Journal of Hospital Infection, 71(4), 295–300.Google Scholar
Brady, R. R., Hunt, A. C., Visvanathan, A., et al. (2011). Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: A cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behaviours. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 17(6), 830–835.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burns, D. M., Fox, E. L., Greenstein, M., Olbright, G., & Montgomery, D. (2019). An old task in new clothes: A preregistered direct replication attempt of enclothed cognition effects on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 150–156.Google Scholar
Burtăverde, V., Vlăsceanu, S., & Avram, E. (2019). Exploring the relationship between personality structure and smartphone usage. Current Psychology, 1–13.Google Scholar
Canossa, A., Badler, J. B., El-Nasr, M. S., Tignor, S., & Colvin, R. C. (2015). In your face (t) impact of personality and context on gameplay behavior. In FDG.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1958). What is ‘objective’ in ‘objective personality tests’? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5(4), 285.Google Scholar
Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2011, June). Who’s who with big-five: Analyzing and classifying personality traits with smartphones. In 2011 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 29–36). IEEE.Google Scholar
Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2013). Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(3), 433–450.Google Scholar
Christensen, M. A., Bettencourt, L., Kaye, L., et al. (2016). Direct measurements of smartphone screen-time: relationships with demographics and sleep. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165331.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. W. (2018). Self-observation in the Social Sciences. Routledge.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta‐analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117.Google Scholar
Davis, J. L., Love, T. P., & Fares, P. (2019). Collective social identity: Synthesizing identity theory and social identity theory using digital data. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(3), 254–273.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(2), 53–79.Google Scholar
DeMasi, O., Kording, K., & Recht, B. (2017). Meaningless comparisons lead to false optimism in medical machine learning. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184604.Google Scholar
de Montjoye, Y. A., Quoidbach, J., Robic, F., & Pentland, A. S. (2013, April). Predicting personality using novel mobile phone-based metrics. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioural-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (pp. 48–55). Springer.Google Scholar
Edmonds, G. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., & Roberts, B. W. (2008). Is character fate, or is there hope to change my personality yet? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 399–413.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. (2013) Everyday Time Processing. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. (2019). Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 60–66.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Jenkins, R. (2015). Watch-wearing as a marker of conscientiousness. PeerJ, 3, e1210.Google Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.Google Scholar
Forbes. (2014). What kind of person prefers an iPhone? http://www.forbes.com/sites/toddhixon/2014/04/10/what-kind-ofperson-prefers-an-iphone/#d65d9533e5a6.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102(4), 652.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182.Google Scholar
Gao, N., Shao, W., & Salim, F. D. (2019). Predicting personality traits from physical activity intensity. Computer, 52(7), 47–56.Google Scholar
Gladstone, J. J., Matz, S. C., & Lemaire, A. (2019). Can psychological traits be inferred from spending? Evidence from transaction data. Psychological Science, 0956797619849435.Google Scholar
Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 379.Google Scholar
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.Google Scholar
Götz, F. M., Stieger, S., & Reips, U. D. (2017). Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176921.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Stachl, C., et al. (2019). Sensing sociability: Individual differences in young adults’ conversation, calling, texting, and app use behaviours in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000245Google Scholar
Hinds, J. & Joinson, A. (2019). Human and computer personality prediction from digital footprints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–211.Google Scholar
Horne, J. A. & Östberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97–110.Google Scholar
Hu, H., Bezemer, C. P., & Hassan, A. E. (2018). Studying the consistency of star ratings and the complaints in 1 & 2-star user reviews for top free cross-platform Android and iOS apps. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(6), 3442–3475.Google Scholar
IDC. (2016). Smartphone OS Market Share. Q2. www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp.Google Scholar
Joiner, R., Stewart, C., & Beaney, C. (2015). Gender digital divide. In Rosen, D. L., Cheever, N, & Mark, C (eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society (pp. 74–88). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (2001). The need for new constructs. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 84–103.Google Scholar
Kaye, L. K., Malone, S. A., & Wall, H. J. (2017). Emojis: Insights, affordances, and possibilities for psychological science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 66–68.Google Scholar
Kern, M. L. & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505.Google Scholar
Kneidinger-Müller, B. (2019). When the smartphone goes offline: A factorial survey of smartphone users’ experiences of mobile unavailability. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 1–10.Google Scholar
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805.Google Scholar
Laajaj, R., Macours, K., Hernandez, D. A. P., et al. (2019). Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations. Science Advances, 5 (7),eaaw5226.Google Scholar
Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2012). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 596–600.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2001). Issues in the study of personality development. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 67–83.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N. K. (1988). Self concept and product choice: An integrated perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J. & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality Traits (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCord, J. L., Harman, J. L., & Purl, J. (2019). Game-like personality testing: An emerging mode of personality assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 95–102.Google Scholar
Meadow, J. F., Altrichter, A. E., & Green, J. L. (2014). Mobile phones carry the personal microbiome of their owners. PeerJ, 2, e447.Google Scholar
Mickalowski, K., Mickelson, M., & Keltgen, J. (2008). Apple’s iPhone launch: A case study in effective marketing. The Business Review, 9(2), 283–288.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246.Google Scholar
Mønsted, B., Mollgaard, A., & Mathiesen, J. (2018). Phonebased metric as a predictor for basic personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 16–22.Google Scholar
Montag, C. & Elhai, J. D. (2019). A new agenda for personality psychology in the digital age? Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 128–134.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar
Pal, P., Roy, A., Moore, G., et al. (2013). Keypad mobile phones are associated with a significant increased risk of microbial contamination compared to touch screen phones. Journal of Infection Prevention, 14(2), 65–68.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.Google Scholar
Paxton, A. & Griffiths, T. L. (2017). Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1630–1638.Google Scholar
Pedrero-Pérez, E. J., Morales-Alonso, S., Rodríguez-Rives, E., et al. (2019). Smartphone nonusers: Associated sociodemographic and health variables. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(9), 597–603. DOI:10.1089/cyber.2019.0130Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A. & Andrews, S. (2016a). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1704.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016b). The rise of consumer wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS MEDICINE, 13(2), e1001953.Google Scholar
Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2011, October). Our Twitter profiles, our selves: Predicting personality with Twitter. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 180–185). IEEE.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. & Hill, P. L. (2017). Questions and answers about the policy relevance of personality traits. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/8cf7hGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Bogg, T. (2005). Conscientiousness and health across the life course. Review of General Psychology, 9, 156–168.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.Google Scholar
Sassenberg, K. & Ditrich, L. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
Seneviratne, S., Seneviratne, A., Mohapatra, P., & Mahanti, A. (2014). Predicting user traits from a snapshot of apps installed on a smartphone. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 18(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., Kendrick, L., Ziegler, F., & Wiseman, R. (2016). Predicting smartphone operating system from personality and individual differences. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 727–732Google Scholar
Soto, C. J. & John, O. P. (2017). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.Google Scholar
Srivastave, S. S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change. Journal of Personality and Social Research, 84(5), 1041–1053.Google Scholar
Stachl, C., Au, Q., Schoedel, R., et al. (2019a, June 12). Behavioral patterns in smartphone usage predict Big Five personality traits. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/ks4vdGoogle Scholar
Stachl, C., Pargent, F., Hilbert, S., et al. (2019b). Personality research and assessment in the era of machine learning. PsyArxiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/efnj8Google Scholar
Sun, J. & Vazire, S. (2019). Do people know what they’re like in the moment? Psychological Science, 30(3), 405–414.Google Scholar
Sundar, A. & Noseworthy, T. J. (2016). Too exciting to fail, too sincere to succeed: The effects of brand personality on sensory disconfirmation. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 44–67.Google Scholar
Tolea, M. I., Terracciano, A., Simonsick, E. M., et al. (2012). Associations between personality traits, physical activity level, and muscle strength. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 264–270.Google Scholar
Tsapeli, F. & Musolesi, M. (2015). Investigating causality in human behaviour from smartphone sensor data: A quasi-experimental approach. EPJ Data Science, 4(1), 24.Google Scholar
Tuzcuiglu, A., Fayda, S. N., Tuniyazi, Y., & Zübeyde, Ö. Z. (2018). Do the effects of brand personality dimensions on brand loyalty change according to customers’ personalities? Turkish Journal of Marketing, 3(2), 84–107.Google Scholar
Vazire, S. & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 123.Google Scholar
Vazire, S. & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1202.Google Scholar
Wang, W., Harari, G. M., Wang, R., et al. (2018). Sensing behavioural change over time: Using within-person variability features from mobile sensing to predict personality traits. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(3), 141.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Xu, R., Frey, R. M., Fleisch, E., & Ilic, A. (2016). Understanding the impact of personality traits on mobile app adoption – Insights from a large-scale field study. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 244–256.Google Scholar
Yakoub, F., Zein, M., Yasser, K., Adl, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2015). Predicting personality traits and social context based on mining the smartphones SMS data. In Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications (pp. 511–521). Springer.Google Scholar
Ziegler, M., Horstmann, K. T., & Ziegler, J. (2019). Personality in situations: Going beyond the OCEAN and introducing the Situation Five. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 567.Google Scholar
Albert, G. & Lotan, T. (2018). How many times do young drivers actually touch their smartphone screens while driving? IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 12(6), 414–419.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimates and real world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10 (10), e0139004Google Scholar
Apple (2016). Apple ResearchKit. Available from http://researchkit.org.Google Scholar
Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, S. E., Lemmens, J. S., Weeda, W. D., & Huizinga, M. (2016). Measuring media multitasking. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 1–10Google Scholar
Bauerlein, M. (2011). Too dumb for complex texts? Educational Leadership, 68(5), 28–33.Google Scholar
Benson, L., English, T., Conroy, D. E., et al. (2019). Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use, variability, and flexibility: An experience sampling approach. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 1951.Google Scholar
Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2018). Screen media use and ADHD-related behaviours: Four decades of research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9875–9881.Google Scholar
Bielak, A. A., Mogle, J., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2017). What did you do today? Variability in daily activities is related to variability in daily cognitive performance. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(5), 764–771.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.Google Scholar
Boari, D., Fraser, M., Stanton Fraser, D., & Cater, K. (2012, May). Augmenting spatial skills with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1611–1620). ACM.Google Scholar
Bolt, D. B. & Crawford, R. A. (2000). Digital Divide: Computers and Our Children’s Future. TV Books Incorporated.Google Scholar
Bright Horizons. (2020). Modern Families Index 2020. Available from https://solutions.brighthorizons.co.uk/resources/research/modern-families-index-2020?gclid=CjwKCAiA6vXwBRBKEiwAYE7iS6BDDOAYPwulu9wb8MptsgK13zenoxgmYLNzDekkvRHw7FvPWPWDERoCJicQAvD_BwE.Google Scholar
Brown, H. R., Zeidman, P., Smittenaar, P., et al. (2014). Crowdsourcing for cognitive science – the utility of smartphones. PLOS ONE, 9(7), e100662.Google Scholar
Brunet, J. F., Dagenais, D., Therrien, M., Gartenberg, D., & Forest, G. (2017). Validation of sleep-2-Peak: A smartphone application that can detect fatigue-related changes in reaction times during sleep deprivation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1460–1469.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. E. (2011). Cognitive enhancement and education. School Field, 9(2), 145–162.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. E. & Lee, K. (2005). The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. In International Conference of Traffic and Transport Psychology. https://trid.trb.org/view/762956Google Scholar
Cain, N. & Gradisar, M. (2010). Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep Medicine, 11(8), 735–742.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44.Google Scholar
Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), 89–94.Google Scholar
Carr, N. (2010). What the Internet Is Doing To Our Brains. Roadshow.Google Scholar
Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., & Cross, C. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162593.Google Scholar
Christensen, M. A., Bettencourt, L., Kaye, L., et al. (2016). Direct measurements of smartphone screen-time: Relationships with demographics and sleep. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165331.Google Scholar
Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 119–135.Google Scholar
Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004). Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: Methodological challenges and directions for child development research. Child Development, 75, 317–333.Google Scholar
Costigan, S. A., Barnett, L., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Lubans, D. R. (2013). The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behaviour among adolescent girls: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 382–392.Google Scholar
Coughlan, G., Coutrot, A., Khondoker, M., et al. (2019). Toward personalized cognitive diagnostics of at-genetic-risk Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(19), 9285–9292.Google Scholar
Courage, M. L. (2017). Screen media and the youngest viewers: Implications for attention and learning. In Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts (pp. 3–28). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coutrot, A., Silva, R., Manley, E., et al. (2018). Global determinants of navigation ability. Current Biology, 28(17), 2861–2866.Google Scholar
Coutrot, A., Schmidt, S., Coutrot, L., et al. (2019). Virtual navigation tested on a mobile app is predictive of real-world wayfinding navigation performance. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213272.Google Scholar
Crone, E. A. & Konijn, E. A. (2018). Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. J., Yim, H., Sreekumar, V., et al. (2017). A hierarchical Bayesian model of ‘memory for when’ based on experience sampling data. In Bello, P, Guarini, M, McShane, M, & Scassellati, B (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 295–300). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Dora, J., van Hooff, M., Geurts, S., Kompier, M. A. J., & Bijleveld, E. (2020). Fatigue, boredom, and objectively-measured smartphone use at work. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/uy8rsGoogle Scholar
Downey, D. B. & Gibbs, B. G. (2020). Kids these days: are face-to-face social skills among American children declining? American Journal of Sociology, 125(4), 1030–1083.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. (2019). Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 60–66.Google Scholar
Engelberg, J. K., Hill, L. L., Rybar, J., & Styer, T. (2015). Distracted driving behaviours related to cell phone use among middle-aged adults. Journal of Transport & Health, 2(3), 434–440.Google Scholar
Engström, J., Johansson, E., & Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 97–120.Google Scholar
Felisoni, D. D. & Godoi, A. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education, 117, 175–187.Google Scholar
Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2019). Child’s play? Assessing the bidirectional longitudinal relationship between gaming and intelligence in early childhood. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 124–143.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Sage.Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., et al. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 82–96.Google Scholar
Frith, J. & Kalin, J. (2016). Here, I used to be: Mobile media and practices of place-based digital memory. Space and Culture, 19(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
Frost, P., Donahue, P., Goeben, K., et al. (2019). An examination of the potential lingering effects of smartphone use on cognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1055–1067.Google Scholar
Geyer, K., Ellis, D. A., & Piwek, L. (2019). A simple location-tracking app for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2840–2846.Google Scholar
Giang, W. C., Hoekstra-Atwood, L., & Donmez, B. (2014, September). Driver engagement in notifications: A comparison of visual-manual interaction between smartwatches and smartphones. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 2161–2165). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gielis, K. (2019, October). Screening for mild cognitive impairment through digital biomarkers of cognitive performance in games. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (pp. 7–13). ACM.Google Scholar
Gindrat, A. D., Chytiris, M., Balerna, M., Rouiller, E. M., & Ghosh, A. (2015). Use-dependent cortical processing from fingertips in touchscreen phone users. Current Biology, 25(1), 109–116.Google Scholar
Giunchiglia, F., Zeni, M., Gobbi, E., Bignotti, E., & Bison, I. (2018). Mobile social media usage and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 177–185.Google Scholar
Grant, D. A., Honn, K. A., Layton, M. E., Riedy, S. M., & Van Dongen, H. P. (2017). 3-minute smartphone-based and tablet-based psychomotor vigilance tests for the assessment of reduced alertness due to sleep deprivation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1020–1029.Google Scholar
Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind Change: How Digital Technologies Are Leaving Their Mark On Our Brains. Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
Hadar, A. A., Eliraz, D., Lazarovits, A., Alyagon, U., & Zangen, A. (2015). Using longitudinal exposure to causally link smartphone usage to changes in behaviour, cognition and right prefrontal neural activity. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 8(2), 318.Google Scholar
Haigh, A. (2015). Stop Phubbing. http://stopphubbing.com.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Hawi, N. S., Samaha, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). The Digital Addiction Scale for Children: Development and validation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.Google Scholar
Henkel, L. A. (2014). Point-and-shoot memories: The influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychological Science, 25(2), 396–402.Google Scholar
Horberry, T., Osborne, R., & Young, K. (2019). Pedestrian smartphone distraction: Prevalence and potential severity. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 515–523.Google Scholar
Houghton, S., Hunter, S. C., Rosenberg, M., et al. (2015). Virtually impossible: Limiting Australian children and adolescents daily screen based media use. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 5.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (2019). Spatial navigation: A behavioural biomarker for improved dementia diagnosis. Journal of Geriatric Care and Research, 6(1), 20–22.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. S., Dudley, J., Horowitz-Kraus, T., DeWitt, T., & Holland, S. K. (2020). Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Paediatrics, 174(1), e193869–e193869, Published online 4 November.Google Scholar
Hyman, I. E. Jr, Boss, S. M., Wise, B. M., McKenzie, K. E., & Caggiano, J. M. (2010). Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 597–607.Google Scholar
Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133.Google Scholar
Ioannidou, F., Hermens, F., & Hodgson, T. L. (2017). Mind your step: The effects of mobile phone use on gaze behaviour in stair climbing. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2(3–4), 109–120.Google Scholar
Johannes, N., Dora, J., & Rusz, D. (2019). Social smartphone apps do not capture attention despite their perceived high reward value. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 14.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaye, L. K., Monk, R. L., & Hamlin, I. (2018). ‘Feeling appy?’: Using app-based methodology to explore contextual effects on real-time cognitions, affect and behaviours. In Doing Research In and On the Digital (pp. 10–29). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieslich, P. J., Schoemann, M., Grage, T., Hepp, J., & Scherbaum, S. (2020). Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 317–341.Google Scholar
Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. (2010). Driver’s visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers’ eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 827–834.Google Scholar
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31(6), 617–623.Google Scholar
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. Sage Open, 5(1), 2158244015573169.Google Scholar
Linkenauger, S. A., Weser, V., & Proffitt, D. R. (2019). Choosing efficient actions: Deciding where to walk. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0219729.Google Scholar
Lui, K. F. & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 647–653.Google Scholar
Lumsden, J., Edwards, E. A., Lawrence, N. S., Coyle, D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: A systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games, 4(2), e11.Google Scholar
Mack, C. C., Harding, M., Davies, N., & Ward, G. (2019). RECAPP-XPR: A smartphone application for presenting and recalling experimentally controlled stimuli over longer timescales. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1804–1823.Google Scholar
Mackes, N. K., Golm, D., Sarkar, S., et al. (2020). Early childhood deprivation is associated with alterations in adult brain structure despite subsequent environmental enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(1), 641–649.Google Scholar
Mandryk, R. L. & Birk, M. V. (2019). The potential of game-based digital biomarkers for modeling mental health. JMIR Mental Health, 6(4), e13485.Google Scholar
Marsh, E. J. & Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 1–14.Google Scholar
Marty-Dugas, J., Ralph, B. C., Oakman, J. M., & Smilek, D. (2018). The relation between smartphone use and everyday inattention. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(1), 46.Google Scholar
Matsumura, K. & Yamakoshi, T. (2013). iPhysioMeter: A new approach for measuring heart rate and normalized pulse volume using only a smartphone. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1272–1278.Google Scholar
Mavoa, J., Carter, M., & Gibbs, M. (2018). Children and Minecraft: A survey of children’s digital play. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3283–3303.Google Scholar
McNab, F., Zeidman, P., Rutledge, R. B., et al. (2015). Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(20), 6515–6518.Google Scholar
McQueenie, R., Ellis, D. A., McConnachie, A., Wilson, P., & Williamson, A. E. (2019). Morbidity, mortality and missed appointments in healthcare: A national retrospective data linkage study. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 2.Google Scholar
Miyasike-daSilva, V., Allard, F., & McIlroy, W. E. (2011). Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails. Experimental Brain Research, 209(1), 73–83.Google Scholar
Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajärvi, L., et al. (2016). Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. NeuroImage, 134, 113–121.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Sio, U. N., Lau, S. W., et al. (2015). Sleep promotes analogical transfer in problem solving. Cognition, 143, 25–30.Google Scholar
Nasar, J., Hecht, P., & Wener, R. (2008). Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 69–75.Google Scholar
Nasar, J. L. & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 91–95.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1985). The role of theory in the ecological study of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 272–276.Google Scholar
Nielson, D. M., Smith, T. A., Sreekumar, V., Dennis, S., & Sederberg, P. B. (2015). Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(35), 11078–11083.Google Scholar
Nikkelen, S. W., Valkenburg, P. M., Huizinga, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Media use and ADHD-related behaviours in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(9), 2228.Google Scholar
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.Google Scholar
Owens, J. M., Tefft, B. C., Guo, F., et al. (2018). Crash Risk of Cell Phone Use While Driving: Case-Crossover Study of SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Data (No. 18–03148). https://trid.trb.org/view/1495640Google Scholar
Özkul, D. & Humphreys, L. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 351–365.Google Scholar
Paletta, L., Neuschmied, H., Schwarz, M., et al. (2014, March). Smartphone eye tracking toolbox: Accurate gaze recovery on mobile displays. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 367–368). ACM.Google Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., et al. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203.Google Scholar
Pindek, S., Krajcevska, A., & Spector, P. E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 147–152.Google Scholar
Piwek, L. & Joinson, A. (2016). ‘What do they snapchat about?’ Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367.Google Scholar
Protzko, J. & Schooler, J. W. (2019). Kids these days: Why the youth of today seem lacking. Science Advances, 5 (10),eaav5916.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2019). Digital screen time limits and young children’s psychological well‐being: Evidence from a population‐based study. Child Development, 90(1), e56–e65.Google Scholar
Ra, C. K., Cho, J., Stone, M. D., et al. (2018). Association of digital media use with subsequent symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adolescents. JAMA, 320(3), 255–263.Google Scholar
Redelmeier, D. A. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453–458.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Walking down memory lane: Where walkers look as they descend stairs provides hints about how they control their walking behaviour. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(4), 425–430. www.jstor.org/stable/27784419Google Scholar
Russell, G., Rodgers, L. R., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Ford, T. (2014). Prevalence of parent-reported ASD and ADHD in the UK: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e54402.Google Scholar
Schwebel, D. C., Stavrinos, D., Byington, K. W., et al. (2012). Distraction and pedestrian safety: How talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 266–271.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioural responses to social media. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035.Google Scholar
Seo, D. G., Park, Y., Kim, M. K., & Park, J. (2016). Mobile phone dependency and its impacts on adolescents’ social and academic behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 282–292.Google Scholar
Silk, J. S. (2019). Context and dynamics: The new frontier for developmental research on emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 2009–2014.Google Scholar
Spanakis, P., Jones, A., Field, M., & Christiansen, P. (2019). A Stroop in the hand is worth two on the laptop: Superior reliability of a smartphone based alcohol Stroop in the real world. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(4), 692–698.Google Scholar
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.Google Scholar
Stavrinos, D., Byington, K. W., & Schwebel, D. C. (2009). Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics, 123(2), e179–e185.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. & Minton, R. (2001). In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(4), 539–545.Google Scholar
Stieger, S., Lewetz, D., & Reips, U. D. (2018). Can smartphones be used to bring computer-based tasks from the lab to the field? A mobile experience-sampling method study about the pace of life. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2267–2275.Google Scholar
Stiglic, N. & Viner, R. M. (2019). Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 9(1), e023191.Google Scholar
Stothart, C., Mitchum, A., & Yehnert, C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48(2), 381–391.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., Monaghan, P., & Westermann, G. (2018). Investigating the association between children’s screen media exposure and vocabulary size in the UK. Journal of Children and Media, 12(1), 51–65.Google Scholar
Teki, S., Kumar, S., & Griffiths, T. D. (2016). Large-scale analysis of auditory segregation behavior crowdsourced via a smartphone app. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0153916.Google Scholar
Thornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014). The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting. Social Psychology, 45, 479–488.Google Scholar
Tamir, D. I., Templeton, E. M., Ward, A. F., & Zaki, J. (2018). Media usage diminishes memory for experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 161–168.Google Scholar
Törnros, J. E., & Bolling, A. K. (2005). Mobile phone use – effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(5), 902–909.Google Scholar
Turner, A., Topor, M., Stewart, A., et al. (2019). Open Code and Software: A Primer from UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN). www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/ukrn/UKRN_Primer_Open_Code_Software.pdf.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – And Completely Unprepared For Adulthood – And What That Means For The Rest Of Us. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Uncapher, M. R., Thieu, M. K., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 483–490.Google Scholar
Vadillo, M. A., Gold, N., & Osman, M. (2018). Searching for the bottom of the ego well: Failure to uncover ego depletion in Many Labs 3. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 180390.Google Scholar
Voinea, C., Vică, C., Mihailov, E., & Savulescu, J. (2020). The internet as cognitive enhancement. Science and Engineering Ethics.Google Scholar
Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., Lim, V. K., & Ferris, D. L. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1068.Google Scholar
Waller, J. M., Silk, J. S., Stone, L. B., & Dahl, R. E. (2014). Co-rumination and co-problem solving in the daily lives of adolescents with major depressive disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 869–878.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Harari, G., Hao, P., Zhou, X., & Campbell, A. T. (2015, September). SmartGPA: How smartphones can assess and predict academic performance of college students. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 295–306). ACM.Google Scholar
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154.Google Scholar
Westgate, E. C. & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689.Google Scholar
White, K. M., Hyde, M. K., Walsh, S. P., & Watson, B. (2010). Mobile phone use while driving: An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers’ hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
Wilmer, H. H. & Chein, J. M. (2016). Mobile technology habits: Patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1607–1614.Google Scholar
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J. J., & Reeves, B. (2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 167–192.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, F., Shalom, D., Gonzalez, P. A., et al. (2016). Arithmetic on your phone: A large scale investigation of simple additions and multiplications. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168431.Google Scholar
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514.Google Scholar
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 227–247. DOI:10.2307/249577Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
Alsaleh, M., Alomar, N., & Alarifi, A. (2017). Smartphone users: Understanding how security mechanisms are perceived and new persuasive methods. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173284.Google Scholar
Aly, A., Macdonald, S., Jarvis, L., & Chen, T. M. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Terrorist online propaganda and radicalization. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40, 1–9.Google Scholar
Android. (2018). Services Overview. https://developer.android.com/guide/components/services.Google Scholar
Annansingh, F. & Veli, T. (2016). An investigation into risks awareness and e-safety needs of children on the internet: A study of Devon, UK. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(2), 147–165.Google Scholar
Aviv, A. J., Gibson, K. L., Mossop, E., Blaze, M., & Smith, J. M. (2010). Smudge attacks on smartphone touch screens. Woot, 10, 1–7.Google Scholar
Balebako, R., Marsh, A., Lin, J., Hong, J. I., & Cranor, L. (2014). The Privacy and Security Behaviors of Smartphone App Developers. Available from https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/The_Privacy_and_Security_Behaviors_of_Smartphone_App_Developers/6470528.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bansal, G. (2017). Distinguishing between privacy and security concerns: An empirical examination and scale validation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(4), 330–343.Google Scholar
Barbaro, M., Zeller, T., & Hansell, S. (2006). A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 4417749. New York Times, 9(2008), 8.Google Scholar
Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9).Google Scholar
Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53.Google Scholar
BBC (2000). The Shipman Tapes. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2000/the_shipman_murders/the_shipman_files/613286.stm.Google Scholar
BBC (2019a). Samsung: Anyone’s Thumbprint Can Unlock Galaxy S10 Phone. Available from www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-50080586.Google Scholar
BBC (2019b). Google Pixel 4 Face Unlock Works If Eyes Are Shut. Available from www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-50085630.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. & Hargittai, E. (2013). Connected and concerned: Variation in parents’ online safety concerns. Policy & Internet, 5(3), 245–269.Google Scholar
British Psychological Society (2013). Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. Available from www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public.Google Scholar
Brownell, K. D. & Horgen, K. B. (2004). Food Fight: The Inside Story of the Food Industry, America’s Obesity Crisis, and What We Can Do about It. Contemporary Books.Google Scholar
Brostoff, S. & Sasse, M. A. (2000). Are passfaces more usable than passwords? A field trial investigation. In People and Computers XIV – Usability or Else! (pp. 405–424). Springer.Google Scholar
Burton, A. M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10(3), 243–248.Google Scholar
Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2011). Mental representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 102(4), 943–958.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Chung, W., Qin, J., et al. (2008). Uncovering the dark Web: A case study of Jihad on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1347–1359.Google Scholar
Chin, E., Felt, A. P., Sekar, V., & Wagner, D. (2012, July). Measuring user confidence in smartphone security and privacy. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar
Crawford, H. & Renaud, K. (2014). Understanding user perceptions of transparent authentication on a mobile device. Journal of Trust Management, 1(1), 7.Google Scholar
Crawford, H., Renaud, K., & Storer, T. (2013). A framework for continuous, transparent mobile device authentication. Computers & Security, 39, 127–136.Google Scholar
Creese, S., Hodges, D., Jamison-Powell, S., & Whitty, M. (2013, July). Relationships between password choices, perceptions of risk and security expertise. In International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, and Trust (pp. 80–89). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Daley, J. (2014). Spare Us the Small Print. Available from www.fairerfinance.com/business/blog/spare-us-the-small-print.Google Scholar
De Montjoye, Y. A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3, 1376.Google Scholar
Dennis, S., Garrett, P., Yim, H., et al. (2019a). Privacy versus open science. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1839–1848.Google Scholar
Dennis, S., Yim, H., Garrett, P., Sreekumar, V., & Stone, B. (2019b). A system for collecting and analyzing experience-sampling data. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1824–1838.Google Scholar
Dienlin, T. & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An extended privacy calculus model for SNSs: Analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368–383.Google Scholar
Dienlin, T. & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 285–297.Google Scholar
Dienlin, T., Masur, P., & Trepte, S. (2019). A longitudinal analysis of the privacy paradox. SocArXiv. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/fm4h7Google Scholar
Dwork, C. & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2016). The future of … wearable technology. CREST Security Review, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
Enck, W., Octeau, D., McDaniel, P. D., & Chaudhuri, S. (2011, August). A study of Android application security. USENIX Security Symposium, 2, 2.Google Scholar
Felt, A. P., Chin, E., Hanna, S., Song, D., & Wagner, D. (2011, October). Android permissions demystified. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 627–638). ACM.Google Scholar
Felt, A. P., Egelman, S., & Wagner, D. (2012, October). I’ve got 99 problems, but vibration ain’t one: A survey of smartphone users’ concerns. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices (pp. 33–44). ACM.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, L. & Klieber, W. (2015). Smartphone security. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 14(4), 16–21.Google Scholar
Geyer, K., Ellis, D. A. & Piwek, L. (2019). A simple location-tracking app for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2840–2846.Google Scholar
George, M. J. & Odgers, C. L. (2015). Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 832–851.Google Scholar
Glisson, W. B., Storer, T., Mayall, G., Moug, I., & Grispos, G. (2011). Electronic retention: What does your mobile phone reveal about you? International Journal of Information Security, 10(6), 337.Google Scholar
Gluck, J. P. (1997). Harry F. Harlow and animal research: Reflection on the ethical paradox. Ethics & Behavior, 7(2), 149–161.Google Scholar
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378.Google Scholar
Grispos, G., Glisson, W. B., & Storer, T. (2015). Recovering residual forensic data from smartphone interactions with cloud storage providers. arXiv. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-801595-7.00016-1Google Scholar
Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 633–649.Google Scholar
Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. & Joinson, A. (2019). Human and computer personality prediction from digital footprints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–211.Google Scholar
Holman, E. A., Garfin, D. R., Lubens, P., & Silver, R. C. (2020). Media exposure to collective trauma, mental health, and functioning: Does it matter what you see? Clinical Psychological Science, 8(1), 111–124. 2167702619858300.Google Scholar
Houghton, D. J. & Joinson, A. N. (2010). Privacy, social network sites, and social relations. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(1–2), 74–94.Google Scholar
Hviid, A., Hansen, J. V., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: A nationwide cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 513–520.Google Scholar
Isaak, J. & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56–59.Google Scholar
James, P., Jankowska, M., Marx, C., et al. (2016). ‘Spatial energetics’: Integrating data from GPS, accelerometry, and GIS to address obesity and inactivity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(5), 792–800.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. & Burton, A. M. (2008). 100% accuracy in automatic face recognition. Science, 319(5862), 435.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. & Burton, A. M. (2011). Stable face representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1671–1683.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121(3), 313–323.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., McLachlan, J. L., & Renaud, K. (2014). Facelock: Familiarity-based graphical authentication. PeerJ, 2, e444.Google Scholar
Jeon, W., Kim, J., Lee, Y., & Won, D. (2011, July). A practical analysis of smartphone security. In Symposium on Human Interface (pp. 311–320). Springer.Google Scholar
John, N. A. & Nissenbaum, A. (2019). An agnotological analysis of APIs: Or, disconnectivity and the ideological limits of our knowledge of social media. The Information Society, 35(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Jones, C. M., McCarthy, R. V., Halawi, L., & Mujtaba, B. (2010). Utilizing the technology acceptance model to assess the employee adoption of information systems security measures. Issues in Information Systems, 11(1), 9.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., Towse, J. N., & Race, N. (2015). Susceptibility to email fraud: A review of psychological perspectives, data-collection methods, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 5(3), 13–29.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., Towse, J. N., Race, N., & Harrison, T. (2019). Email fraud: The search for psychological predictors of susceptibility. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0209684.Google Scholar
Kearns, G. S. (2016). Countering mobile device threats: A mobile device security model. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 8(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Khan, S., Nauman, M., Othman, A. T., & Musa, S. (2012, June). How secure is your smartphone: An analysis of smartphone security mechanisms. In Proceedings Title: 2012 International Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare and Digital Forensic (CyberSec) (pp. 76–81). IEEE.Google Scholar
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Clancy, E., Mellor, D. J., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2019). Sexting and psychological distress: The role of unwanted and coerced sexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 237–242.Google Scholar
Korshunov, P. & Marcel, S. (2018). Deepfakes: A new threat to face recognition? Assessment and detection. arXiv Preprint:1812.08685. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08685Google Scholar
Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109–125.Google Scholar
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.Google Scholar
Leavitt, N. (2011). Mobile security: Finally a serious problem? Computer, 44(6), 11–14.Google Scholar
Liang, H. & Xue, Y. (2009). Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 71–90.Google Scholar
Liang, H. & Xue, Y. (2010). Understanding security behaviours in personal computer usage: A threat avoidance perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(7), 394–413.Google Scholar
Lopez, T., Sharp, H., Tun, T., et al. (2019, May). Talking about security with professional developers. In Proceedings of the Joint 7th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry and 6th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (pp. 34–40). IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Siponen, M. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986.Google Scholar
Maarek, M., McGregor, L., Louchart, S., & McMenemy, R. (2019, June). How could serious games support secure programming? Designing a study replication and intervention. In 2019 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW) (pp. 139–148). IEEE.Google Scholar
Macaulay, P. J., Boulton, M. J., Betts, L. R., et al. (2019). Subjective versus objective knowledge of online safety/dangers as predictors of children’s perceived online safety and attitudes towards e-safety education in the United Kingdom. Journal of Children and Media, 1–20. DOI:10.1080/17482798.2019.1697716Google Scholar
Marks, D. F. (2018). American psychologists, the Central Intelligence Agency, and enhanced interrogation. Health Psychology Open, 5(2), 2055102918796610.Google Scholar
McKenna, P. (2007). The rise of cyberbullying. New Scientist, 195(2613), 26–27.Google Scholar
Metz, C. & Satariono, A. (2019). Facebook restricts live streaming after New Zealand shooting. The New York Times, 15.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.Google Scholar
Mylonas, A., Kastania, A., & Gritzalis, D. (2013). Delegate the smartphone user? Security awareness in smartphone platforms. Computers & Security, 34, 47–66.Google Scholar
Newman, L. H. (2019). An iPhone app that protects your privacy – for real this time. Wired. Available from www.wired.com/story/guardian-firewall-ios-app/.Google Scholar
Ng, B. Y. & Rahim, M. (2005). A socio-behavioural study of home computer users’ intention to practice security. PACIS 2005 Proceedings, 20.Google Scholar
Ng, B. Y., Kankanhalli, A., & Xu, Y. C. (2009). Studying users’ computer security behaviour: A health belief perspective. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 815–825.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., McDonald, J. T., & Glisson, W. B. (2017, January). Exploitation and detection of a malicious mobile application. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
Ojeda, M., Del Rey, R., & Hunter, S. C. (2019). Longitudinal relationships between sexting and involvement in both bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 81–89.Google Scholar
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(21), 10226–10228.Google Scholar
Osmani, V., Carreras, I., Matic, A., & Saar, P. (2014). An analysis of distance estimation to detect proximity in social interactions. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 5(3), 297–306.Google Scholar
Pieterse, H., Olivier, M., & van Heerden, R. (2019). Evaluation framework for detecting manipulated smartphone data. SAIEE Africa Research Journal, 110(2), 67–76.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., & Andrews, S. (2016). Can programming frameworks bring smartphones into the mainstream of psychological science? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1252.Google Scholar
Ponemon Institute Research. (2015). Report on the State of Mobile Application Insecurity. Sponsored by IBM Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC. Publication Date: 2015 Feb.Google Scholar
Povolotskiy, R., Gupta, N., Leverant, A. B., Kandinov, A. & Paskhover, B. (2019). Head and neck injuries associated with cell phone use. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.Google Scholar
Powell, R. A., Digdon, N., Harris, B., & Smithson, C. (2014). Correcting the record on Watson, Rayner, and Little Albert: Albert Barger as ‘Psychology’s lost boy’. American Psychologist, 69(6), 600.Google Scholar
Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S., & Jain, A. K. (2003). Biometric recognition: Security and privacy concerns. IEEE Security & Privacy (2), 33–42.Google Scholar
Quintana, D. S. (2020). A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis generation. Elife, 9, e53275.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, R., Oh, T., & Stackpole, W. (2012, June). Android anti-virus analysis. In Annual Symposium on Information Assurance & Secure Knowledge Management (pp. 35–40). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.295.7508&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., et al. (2012). Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents. Pediatrics, 130(4), 667–673.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. J., Kramer, R. S., & Burton, A. M. (2015). Face averages enhance user recognition for smartphone security. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119460.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543.Google Scholar
Scharkowa, M., Mangoldb, F., Stierc, S. and Breuerc, J. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117.Google Scholar
Scully, R. P. (2019). Hidden surveillance. New Scientist, 243(3247), 20–21.Google Scholar
Seneviratne, S., Seneviratne, A., Mohapatra, P., & Mahanti, A. (2014). Predicting user traits from a snapshot of apps installed on a smartphone. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 18(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., & Barabási, A. L. (2010). Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science, 327(5968), 1018–1021.Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Bandara, A. K., & Levine, M. (2019). The psychology of privacy in the digital age. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11), e12507.Google Scholar
Szot, T., Specht, C., Specht, M., & Dabrowski, P. S. (2019). Comparative analysis of positioning accuracy of Samsung Galaxy smartphones in stationary measurements. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215562.Google Scholar
Symantec (2014). How Safe Is Your Quantified Self? Available from www.symantec.com/content/en/us/enterprise/media/security_response/whitepapers/how-safe-is-your-quantified-self.pdf.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. V., Gavin, J., Van Steen, T., & Morey, Y. (2017). A content analysis of thinspiration, fitspiration, and bonespiration imagery on social media. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(1), 40.Google Scholar
Thompson, N., McGill, T. J., & Wang, X. (2017). ‘Security begins at home’: Determinants of home computer and mobile device security behaviour. Computers & Security, 70, 376–391.Google Scholar
Tiggemann, M. & McGill, B. (2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
Trepte, S., Scharkow, M., & Dienlin, T. (2020). The privacy calculus contextualized: The influence of affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106115.Google Scholar
Tsai, H. Y. S., Jiang, M., Alhabash, S., et al. (2016). Understanding online safety behaviours: A protection motivation theory perspective. Computers & Security, 59, 138–150.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, D., Rashid, A., Williams, E., & Warinschi, B. (2018, May). Safe cryptography for all: Toward visual metaphor driven cryptography building blocks. In 2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Security Awareness from Design to Deployment (SEAD) (pp. 41–44). IEEE.Google Scholar
Van Kleek, M., Liccardi, I., Binns, R., et al. (2017, May). Better the devil you know: Exposing the data sharing practices of smartphone apps. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5208–5220). ACM.Google Scholar
Vishwanath, A., Herath, T., Chen, R., Wang, J., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Why do people get phished? Testing individual differences in phishing vulnerability within an integrated, information processing model. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 576–586.Google Scholar
Vishwanath, A., Harrison, B., & Ng, Y. J. (2018). Suspicion, cognition, and automaticity model of phishing susceptibility. Communication Research, 45(8), 1146–1166.Google Scholar
Wachter, S. (2018). Normative challenges of identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, profiling, discrimination, and the GDPR. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(3), 436–449.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Kosinski, M. (2018). Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 246.Google Scholar
Weir, C., Rashid, A., & Noble, J. (2016a). How to improve the security skills of mobile app developers? Comparing and contrasting expert views. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2016). www.usenix.org/conference/soups2016/workshop-program/wsiw16/presentation/weirGoogle Scholar
Weir, C., Rashid, A., & Noble, J. (2016b, November). Reaching the masses: A new subdiscipline of app programmer education. In Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (pp. 936–939). ACM.Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2018). Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(2), 105–109.Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. & Buchanan, T. (2016). The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims – both financial and non-financial. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(2), 176–194.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J., Beardmore, A., & Joinson, A. N. (2017). Individual differences in susceptibility to online influence: A theoretical review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 412–421.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J., Hinds, J., & Joinson, A. N. (2018). Exploring susceptibility to phishing in the workplace. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 120, 1–13.Google Scholar
Williamson, A. E., McQueenie, R., Ellis, D. A., McConnachie, A., & Wilson, P. (2020). General practice recording of Adverse Childhood Experiences. BJGP Open, 4(1), 20X101011.Google Scholar
Woodlock, D. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602.Google Scholar
Yang, C. C., Holden, S. M., & Carter, M. D. (2018). Social media social comparison of ability (but not opinion) predicts lower identity clarity: Identity processing style as a mediator. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(10), 2114–2128.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2019, May). Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. In ICASSP 2019 – 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 8261–8265). IEEE.Google Scholar
Zimmer, M. (2018). Addressing conceptual gaps in big data research ethics: An application of contextual integrity. Social Media & Society, 4(2), 2056305118768300.Google Scholar
Aarseth, E., Bean, A. M., Boonen, H., et al. (2017). Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 267–270.Google Scholar
Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Bratton, L., et al. (2019). Claims of causality in health news: A randomised trial. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 91.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Ellis, D. A., Shaw, H., & Piwek, L. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimates and real world smartphone use. PLOS ONE, 10 (10), e0139004.Google Scholar
Apple (2016). Apple ResearchKit. Available from http://researchkit.org.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2018). Working Memories: Postmen, Divers and the Cognitive Revolution. Routledge.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Billieux, J., Philippot, P., Schmid, C., et al. (2015). Is dysfunctional use of the mobile phone a behavioural addiction? Confronting symptom‐based versus process‐based approaches. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 22(5), 460–468.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19, 1747021819886519.Google Scholar
Blandford, A., Gibbs, J., Newhouse, N., et al. (2018). Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions. Digital Health, 4, 2055207618770325.Google Scholar
Blank, G., Dutton, W. H., & Lefkowitz, J. (2019) Perceived Threats to Privacy Online: The Internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2019. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. (2017). Theory and observation in science. In E. N. Zalt (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/science-theory-observation/.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.Google Scholar
Brand, M., Rumpf, H. J., King, D. L., Potenza, M. N., & Wegmann, E. (2020). Clarifying terminologies in research on gaming disorder and other addictive behaviors: Distinctions between core symptoms and underlying psychological processes. Current Opinion in Psychology.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
Cahalan, S. (2019). Stanford professor who changed America with just one study was a liar. New York Post. Available from https://nypost.com/2019/11/02/stanford-professor-who-changed-america-with-just-one-study-was-also-a-liar/.Google Scholar
Cascardi, M. & Brown, C. (2016). Concept creep or meaningful expansion? Response to Haslam. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 24–28.Google Scholar
Chabris, C. F., Hebert, B. M., Benjamin, D. J., et al. (2012). Most reported genetic associations with general intelligence are probably false positives. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1314–1323.Google Scholar
Chivers, T. (2019). Does psychology have a conflict-of-interest problem? Nature, 571, 20–23.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2016). The earth is round (p<. 05). In Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (eds.), What If There Were No Significance Tests? (pp. 69–82). Routledge.Google Scholar
Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. I., Ellis, D. A., Bowman, N. D., et al. (2019a). Avoiding irrelevance: The manifestation and impacts of technophobia in psychological science. PsyArXiv DOI:10.31234/osf.io/b9f4pGoogle Scholar
Davidson, B. I. & Ellis, D. A. (2019b). Social media addiction: Technological déjà vu. BMJ, 365, l4277.Google Scholar
Davis, F. D., Bagozzie, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models authors. INFORMS, 35(8), 982e1003.Google Scholar
Deng, T., Kanthawala, S., Meng, J., et al. (2019). Measuring smartphone usage and task switching with log tracking and self-reports. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Dennis, S., Yim, H., Garrett, P., Sreekumar, V., & Stone, B. (2019a). A system for collecting and analyzing experience-sampling data. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1824–1838.Google Scholar
Dennis, S., Garrett, P., Yim, H., et al. (2019b). Privacy versus open science. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1839–1848.Google Scholar
Doliński, D. (2018). Is psychology still a science of behaviour? Social Psychological Bulletin. 13, e25025.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. (1995). Technophobia then and now. Nature, 376(6542), 653–654.Google Scholar
Extance, A. (2018). How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature, 561(7722), 273.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. (2019). Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 60–66.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A. & Merdian, H. L. (2015). Thinking outside the box: Developing dynamic data visualizations for psychology with Shiny. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1782.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Shaw, H., & Geyer, K. (2019). Do smartphone usage scales predict behaviour? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 86–92.Google Scholar
Elmer, T., Chaitanya, K., Purwar, P., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2120–2138.Google Scholar
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., & Hall, B. J. (2019). Problematic smartphone use and mental health problems: Current state of research and future directions. Dusunen Adam, 32(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
Elson, M., Ferguson, C. J., Gregerson, M., et al. (2019). Do policy statements on media effects faithfully represent the science? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 12–25.Google Scholar
Epskamp, S. (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in a fast-paced methodological world. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 145–155.Google Scholar
Ferreira, D., Kostakos, V., & Schweizer, I. (2017). Human sensors on the move. In Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness (pp. 9–19). Springer.Google Scholar
Firth, U. (online first, 2019). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Flake, J. K. & Fried, E. I. (2019). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/hs7wmGoogle Scholar
Francis, G. (2012). Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 975–991.Google Scholar
Formotus (2016). Figuring the Costs of Custom Mobile Business App Development. Available from www.formotus.com/14018/blog-mobility/figuring-the-costs-of-custom-mobile-business-app-development.Google Scholar
Geyer, K., Ellis, D. A., & Piwek, L. (2019). A simple location-tracking app for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2840–2846.Google Scholar
Giardino, V. (2019). Philosophy and psychological science: Let’s revive the cognitive revolution! APS Observer, 32(4).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, R. (2018). The research behind Google’s new tools for digital well-being. Wired. www.wired.com/story/the-research-behind-googles-new-tools-for-digital-well-being/.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Xing, C., Ross, E. M., & Johnson, R. M. (2019). Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: Results of a four-week diary study. Media Psychology, 1–17.Google Scholar
Hand, D. J. (2014). Wonderful examples, but let’s not close our eyes. Statistical Science, 29(1), 98–100.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2016). Concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Hässler, T., Ullrich, J., Bernardino, M., et al. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–7.Google Scholar
Haxby, J. V., Parasuraman, R., Lalonde, F., & Abboud, H. (1993). SuperLab: General-purpose Macintosh software for human experimental psychology and psychological testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(3), 400–405.Google Scholar
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186.Google Scholar
Heffer, T., Good, M., Daly, O., MacDonell, E., & Willoughby, T. (2019). The longitudinal association between social-media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults: An empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 7(3), 462–470.Google Scholar
Houghton, S., Lawrence, D., Hunter, S. C., et al. (2018). Reciprocal relationships between trajectories of depressive symptoms and screen media use during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2453–2467.Google Scholar
Hutson, M. (2018). Missing data hinder replication of artificial intelligence studies. Available from www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/missing-data-hinder-replication-artificial-intelligence-studies.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. S., Dudley, J., Horowitz-Kraus, T., DeWitt, T., & Holland, S. K. (2019). Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online 4 November.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Klavans, R. & Boyack, K. W. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561, 167–169.Google Scholar
Jacobucci, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2020). Machine learning and psychological research: The unexplored effect of measurement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1745691620902467.Google Scholar
Jeong, M., Zo, H., Lee, C. H., & Ceran, Y. (2019). Feeling displeasure from online social media postings: A study using cognitive dissonance theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 231–240.Google Scholar
Johannes, N., Meier, A., Reinecke, L., et al. (2019). The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/t3wc2Google Scholar
Keil, T. F., Koschate-Reis, M., & Levine, M. (2020). Contact Logger: Measuring everyday intergroup contact experiences in near-time. Behavior Research Methods. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-019-01335-wGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217.Google Scholar
Kim, P. H., Ployhart, R. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2018). Editors’ comments: Is organizational behavior overtheorized?. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 541–545.Google Scholar
King, W. R. & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B. (2014). What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology? Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 326–338.Google Scholar
Kubovy, M. (2020). Lives as collections of strands: An essay in descriptive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 497–515. 1745691619887145.Google Scholar
Kuss, D. J. & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311.Google Scholar
Lakens, D. (2015). Comment: What p-hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo and LaLande (2012). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 829–832.Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., et al. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In Cicchetti, D & Grove, W (eds.), Thinking Clearly about Psychology. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Baron, J. (2012). Behavioral Research Data Analysis with R. Springer.Google Scholar
Luijken, K., Groenwold, R. H., Van Calster, B., Steyerberg, E. W., & van Smeden, M. (2019). Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective. Statistics in Medicine, 38(18), 3444–3459.Google Scholar
Martin, B. R. (2011). The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254.Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 147.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Mondol, A. S., Ra, H. K., Salekin, A., et al. (2016). LifeMaps: An automated diary system based on the structure of lives. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM, SenSys’16 (pp. 348–349).Google Scholar
Montag, C. & Elhai, J. D. (2019). A new agenda for personality psychology in the digital age? Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 128–134.Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M. & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behavior, 3(3), 221–229.Google Scholar
Nagel, M., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., et al. (2018). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nature Genetics, 50(7), 920.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K. & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618.Google Scholar
Obradović, S. (2019). Publication pressures create knowledge silos. Nature Human Behavior, 3, 1028.Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251),aac4716.Google Scholar
Orben, A. & Przybylski, A. (2019). Screens, teens and psychological well-being: Evidence from three time-use diary studies. Psychological Science, 30(5), 682–696.Google Scholar
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(21), 10226–10228.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114.Google Scholar
Parker, S. (1995). Science Discoveries: Alexander Graham Bell. Chelsea House Publishers.Google Scholar
Parsons, S., Kruijt, A. W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395.Google Scholar
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031.Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13.Google Scholar
Pelosi, A. J. (2019). Personality and fatal diseases: Revisiting a scientific scandal. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(4), 421–439.Google Scholar
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227.Google Scholar
Pentland, A. (2008). Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Phaf, R. H. (2020). Publish less, read more. Theory & Psychology, 0959354319898250.Google Scholar
Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes La Bond, C. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 2053951717700924.Google Scholar
Piwek, L., Petrini, K., & Pollick, F. (2016). A dyadic stimulus set of audiovisual affective displays for the study of multisensory, emotional, social interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1285–1295.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A. (2019). The costs of reproducibility. Neuron, 101(1), 11–14.Google Scholar
Pontes, H. M. & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). A new era for gaming disorder research: Time to shift from consensus to consistency. Addictive Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106059Google Scholar
Protzko, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). Kids these days: Why the youth of today seem lacking.Science Advances, 5 (10),eaav5916.Google Scholar
Reeves, B., Ram, N., Robinson, T. N., et al. (2019). Screenomics: A framework to capture and analyze personal life experiences and the ways that technology shapes them. Human–Computer Interaction, 1–52. DOI:10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652Google Scholar
REF 2021 (n.d.). Guidance pages that list key documents providing guidance on REF 2021. Available from www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/.Google Scholar
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2019). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 30–45.Google Scholar
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Runyan, J. D. & Steinke, E. G. (2015). Virtues, ecological momentary assessment/intervention and smartphone technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 481.Google Scholar
Ryding, F. C. & Kaye, L. K. (2018). ‘Internet addiction’: A conceptual minefield. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(1), 225–232.Google Scholar
Sassenberg, K. & Ditrich, L. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.Google Scholar
Sochat, V. V., Eisenberg, I. W., Enkavi, A. Z., et al. (2016). The experiment factory: Standardizing behavioural experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 610.Google Scholar
Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time & Society, 22(3), 335–355.Google Scholar
Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., Rotello, C. M., et al. (2019). Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 335–349.Google Scholar
Stronge, S., Mok, T., Ejova, A., et al. (2019). Social media use is (weakly) related to psychological distress. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(9), 604–609.Google Scholar
Szot, T., Specht, C., Specht, M., & Dabrowski, P. S. (2019). Comparative analysis of positioning accuracy of Samsung Galaxy smartphones in stationary measurements. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215562.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (June, 2013). How Technology is Revolutionizing Our Understanding of Human Cooperation (inaugural lecture). Twente University Press.Google Scholar
Tomko, R. L., McClure, E. A., Cato, P. A., et al. (2019). An electronic, smart lighter to measure cigarette smoking: A pilot study to assess feasibility and initial validity. Addictive Behaviors, 98, 106052.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2019a). More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 372–379. 0963721419838244.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2019b). Stop debating whether too much smartphone time can hurt teens, and start protecting them. TIME. http://time.com/5555737/smartphone-mental-health-teens/.Google Scholar
UK Parliament (2018). Science And Technology Committee: Impact of Social Media and Screen-Use on Young People’s Health Inquiry. www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/impact-of-social-media-young-people-17–19/.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, A. J., Ferguson, C. J., Colder Carras, M., et al. (2018). A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
van Smeden, M., Lash, T. L., & Groenwold, R. H. (2020). Reflection on modern methods: Five myths about measurement error in epidemiological research. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(1), 338–347.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157e178.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328e376.Google Scholar
Waithira, N., Mutinda, B., & Cheah, P. Y. (2019). Data management and sharing policy: The first step towards promoting data sharing. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 80.Google Scholar
Wellcome (2020). What Researchers Think about the Culture They Work In. Available from https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf.Google Scholar
Wiederhold, B. K. (2019). Should smartphone use be banned for children? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22 (4), 1–2.Google Scholar
Wilcockson, T. D. W., Ellis, D. A., & Shaw, H. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.Google Scholar
Yarkoni, T. (2019). The generalizability crisis. PsyArXiv. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/jqw35Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×