Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:36:54.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Case Studies of Professions 1: Sculpture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Edited by
Edmund Stewart ,
Edward Harris  and
David Lewis
Edmund Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Edward Harris
Affiliation:
University of Durham
David Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Skilled Labour and Professionalism in Ancient Greece and Rome , pp. 203 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Avramidou, A., 2015. Women dedicators on the Athenian Acropolis and their role in family festivals: the evidence for maternal votives between 530–450 BCE. CMA, 6, http://journals.openedition.org/mondesanciens/1365.Google Scholar
Bejor, G., 2012. Nella bottega del marmoraio. In di Bejor, M, Castoldi, M, Lambrugo, C, and Panero, E, eds., Botteghe e artigiani. Marmorari, bronzisti, ceramisti e vetrai nell’antichità classica. Milan, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Bergemann, J., 1999. Demos und Thanatos. Untersuchungen zum Wertsystem der Polis im Spiegel der attischen Grabreliefs des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. und zur Funktion der gleichzeitigen Grabbauten. Munich.Google Scholar
Blok, J. H., 2017. Citizenship in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boersma, J., 1970. Athenian Building Policy from 561/0 to 405/4 B.C. Groningen.Google Scholar
Bousquet, J., 1984. Inscriptions de Delphes. BCH, 108(2), pp. 695–701.Google Scholar
Burford, A. 1969. The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros: A Social and Economic Study of Building in the Asklepian Sanctuary, during the Fourth and Early Third Centuries B.C. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Burnett Grossman, J., 2013. Funerary Sculpture. The Athenian Agora, 35. Princeton.Google Scholar
Castoldi, M., 2012. Nella bottega del bronzista. In Bejor, G, Castoldi, M, Lambrugo, C, and Panero, E, eds., Botteghe e artigiani. Marmorari, bronzisti, ceramisti e vetrai nell’antichità classica. Milan, pp. 27–63.Google Scholar
Chatzidimitriou, A., 2005. Παραστάσεις εργαστηρίων και εμπορίου στην εικονογραφία των αρχαϊκών και κλασικών χρόνων. Athens.Google Scholar
Clairmont, C. W., 1993. Classical Attic Tombstones. Kilchberg.Google Scholar
Corso, A., 2013. The education of artists in ancient Greece. In Raviola, F, ed., L’ indagine e la rima: scritti per Lorenzo Braccesi. Rome, pp. 369–400.Google Scholar
Corso, A., 2016. Sugli agoni di artisti nella Grecia classica. RAL, 27, pp. 115–27.Google Scholar
Davies, J. K., 1971. Athenian Propertied Families. Oxford.Google Scholar
Davies, P. A., 2017. Articulating status in ancient Greece: status (in)consistency as a new approach. CCJ, 63, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, A., 2008. L’apporto cicladico nella più antica plastica monumentale in Attica. In Kourayos, N and Prost, F, eds., La sculpture des Cyclades à l’époque archaïque. Histoire des ateliers, rayonnement des styles, Actes du colloque international, Athènes 7–11 septembre 1998, BCH suppl. 48. Athens, pp. 195–254.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., 2008. Why did Attic building projects employ free laborers rather than slaves? ZPE, 166, pp. 108–12.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., 2010. Attic public construction: who were the builders? AncSoc, 40, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Feyel, Chr., 1998. La structure d’un groupe socio-économique: les artisans dans les grands sanctuaires grecs du IVe siècle. Topoi, 8(2), pp. 561–79.Google Scholar
Feyel, Chr., 2006. Les Artisans dans les sanctuaires grecs aux époques classique et hellénistique à travers la documentation financière en Grèce. Athens.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, P., 2016. La cité grecque entre Aristote et les modernes. Cahiers Glotz, 27, pp. 91–136.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J., 1976. Phokion: Studien zur Erfassung seiner historischen Gestalt. Munich.Google Scholar
Goodlett, V. C., 1991. Rhodian sculpture workshops. AJA, 95(4), pp. 669–81.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M., 2002. Workshops, marketplace and household: the nature of technical specialization in classical Athens and its influence on economy and society. In Cartledge, P, Cohen, E. E., and Foxhall, L, eds., Money, Labour and Land. London and New York, pp. 67–99.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G., 2016. The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece: Art, Poetry, and Subjectivity. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Hellmann, M.-Chr., 2000. Les déplacements des artisans de la construction en Grèce d’après les testimonia épigraphiques. In Blondé, Fr and Muller, A, eds., L’artisanat en Grèce ancienne: les productions, les diffusions. Actes du Colloque de Lyon (10–11 décembre 1998). Travaux et Recherches. Lille, pp. 265–80.Google Scholar
Hochscheid, H., 2015. Networks of Stone: Sculpture and Society in Archaic and Classical Athens. Oxford and Bern.Google Scholar
Hochscheid, H., 2017. Not quite Pheidias: status and labour specialization in Athenian sculpture. In Rodríguez Pérez, D, ed., Greek Art in Context: Archaeological and Art Historical Perspectives. Oxford, pp. 142–55.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C., 2018. Kinship in Athens: An Anthropological Analysis. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwit, J., 2015. Artists and Signatures in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London and New York.Google Scholar
Jockey, Ph., 2009. D’une cité l’autre. Brèves réflexions sur la mobilité des artisans de la pierre dans l’antiquité classique. In Moatti, C, Kaiser, W, and Pébarthe, Chr, eds., Le monde de l’itinérance en méditerranée de l’antiquité à l’époque moderne. Procédures de contrôle et d’identification. Bordeaux, pp. 139–59.Google Scholar
Kamen, D., 2013. Status in Classical Athens. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Keesling, C., 1999. Endoios’s painting from the Themistoklean wall: a reconstruction. Hesperia, 68(4), pp. 509–48.Google Scholar
Keesling, C., 2003. The Votive Statues of the Athenian Acropolis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keesling, C., 2017. Greek statue terms revisited: what does ἀνδριάς mean? GRBS, 57, pp. 837–61.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. F., 2014. Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City. New York.Google Scholar
Kissas, K., 2000. Die attischen Statuen- und Stelenbasen archaischer Zeit. Bonn.Google Scholar
Korres, M., 1995. From Pentelicon to Parthenon. Athens.Google Scholar
Lambert, S. D., 2000. The Erechtheum workers of ‘IG’ ii² 1654. ZPE, 132, pp. 157–60.Google Scholar
Larson, K. A., 2013. A network approach to Hellenistic sculptural production. JMA, 26(2), pp. 235–60.Google Scholar
Larson, M., 2013. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, 2nd ed. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B., 2001. Les associations de Technites dionysiaques à l’époque hellénistique, Études d’Archéologie Classique 12. Nancy.Google Scholar
Loomis, W. T., 1998. Wages, Welfare Costs and Inflation in Classical Athens. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mark, I. S., 1995. The lure of philosophy: craft and higher learning in ancient Greece. In Moon, W. G., ed., Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
Muller-Dufeu, M., 2011. Créer du vivant. Sculpteurs et artistes dans l’Antiquité grecque. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. H., Bjerstrup, L, Hansen, M. H. J., Rubinstein, L, and Vestergard, T, 1989. Athenian grave monuments and social class. GRBS, 30, pp. 411–20.Google Scholar
Nolte, S., 2005. Steinbruch, Werkstatt, Skulptur: Untersuchungen zu Aufbau und Organisation griechischer Bildhauerwerkstätten. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. J., 2000. Athenian funerary monuments: style, grandeur, and cost. In Oliver, G. J., ed., The Epigraphy of Death: Studies in the History and Society of Greece and Rome. Liverpool, pp. 59–80.Google Scholar
Paga, J., 2015. The monumental definition of Attica in the early democratic period. In Miles, M, ed., Autopsy in Athens: Recent archaeological Research on Athens and Attica. Oxford and Philadelphia, pp. 108–25.Google Scholar
Palagia, O., 2010. Pheidias ‘Epoiesen’: attribution as value judgement. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 104: Exploring Ancient Sculpture: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Waywell, F. Macfarlane, and C. Morgan, eds., pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J., 1990. The Art of Ancient Greece: Sources and Documents. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J., 1995. The canon of Polykleitos and other canons. In Moon, W. G., ed., Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
Prignitz, S., 2014. Bauurkunden und Bauprogramm von Epidauros (400–350): Asklepiostempel, Tholos, Kultbild, Brunnenhaus, Vestigia 67. Munich.Google Scholar
Randall, R. H., 1953. The Erechtheum workmen. AJA, 57(3), pp. 199–210.Google Scholar
Salta, M., 1991. Attische Grabstelen mit Inschriften: Beiträge zur Topographie und Prosopographie der Nekropolen von Athen, Attika und Salamis vom Peloponnesischen Krieg bis zur Mitte des 4. Jhs. v. Chr. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sapirstein, Ph., 2019. Picturing work. In Lytle, E, ed., A Cultural History of Work in Antiquity. London, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Scholl, A., 1996. Die attischen Bildfeldstelen des 4. Jhs. v. Chr. Untersuchungen zu den kleinformatigen Grabreliefs im spätklassischen Athen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schultz, P., 2017. Politics and personality? The case of Kephisodotos the Younger. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Seaman, K., 2017. The social and educational background of elite Greek artists. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar
Sennett, R., 2008. The Craftsman. London.Google Scholar
Shear, T. L. Jr., 2016. Trophies of Victory: Public Building in Periklean Athens. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. R., 2007. Pindar, athletes, and the early Greek statue habit. In Hornblower, S and Morgan, C, eds., Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire. Oxford, pp. 83–139.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A., 2006. Archaeology and the Emergence of Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steiner, D., 1986. The Crown of Song: Metaphor in Pindar. London.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F., 1990. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F., 2017. Kritios and Nesiotes: two revolutionaries in context. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Stewart, E., 2016. Professionalism and the poetic persona in archaic Greece. CCJ, 62, pp. 200–23.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 2017. Poverty, Wealth, and Well-Being: Experiencing Penia in Democratic Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tsakirgis, B. 2005. Living and working around the Athenian Agora: a preliminary case study of three houses. In Ault, B. A. and Nevett, L. C., eds., Ancient Greek Houses and Households: Chronological, Regional, and Social Diversity. Philadelphia, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Verboven, K., 2014, Attitudes to work and workers in classical Greece and Greece and Rome. TSEG, 11(1), pp. 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viviers, D., 1992. Recherches sur les ateliers de sculpteurs et la Cité d’Athènes à l’époque archaïque: Endoios, Philergos, Aristoklès. Brussels.Google Scholar
Vlassopoulos, K., 2016. Que savons-nous vraiment de la société athénienne? Annales. HSS, 71(3), pp. 659–82.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D., 1977. The Ideology of the Athenian Metic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wijma, S., 2014. Embracing the Immigrant: The Participation of Metics in Athenian Polis Religion (5th–4th Century BC). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Young, R. S. 1951. An industrial district of ancient Athens. Hesperia, 20(3), pp. 138–288.Google Scholar
Zimmer, G., 1990. Griechische Bronzegusswerkstätten: zur Technologieentwicklung eines antiken Kunsthandwerkes. Mainz.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Bengtson, H., 1975. Die Staatsverträge des Altertums, II: Die Verträge der griechisch-römischen Welt von 700 bis 338 v. Chr., 2nd ed., Munich.Google Scholar
Bershadsky, N., 2012. The border of war and peace: myth and ritual in Argive-Spartan dispute over Thyreatis. In Wilker, J, ed., Maintaining Peace and Interstate Stability in Archaic and Classical Greece. Mainz, pp. 49–77.Google Scholar
Bolmarcich, S., 2009. The Athenian regulations for Samos (IG I3 48) again. Chiron, 39, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A., 1951. The Megarian Decree. AJP, 72, pp. 269–82.Google Scholar
Buckler, J., 1996. The battle of Koroneia and its historiographical legacy. In Fossey, J. M., ed., Boetia Antiqua, VI. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Boiotian Antiquities (Loyola University of Chicago, 24–26 May 1995). Amsterdam, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
Caratelli, G. P., 1966. Greek inscriptions of the Middle East. East and West, 16(1–2), pp. 31–6.Google Scholar
DʼAlessio, G. B., 2004. I colossi di Mirone: Posidippo 68, 4B. ZPE, 149, pp. 43–4.Google Scholar
Dandamayev, M. A., 1972. Politische und wirtschaftliche Geschichte. In Walser, G, ed., Beiträge zur Achämenidengeschichte. Wiesbaden, pp. 15–58.Google Scholar
Dinsmoor, W. B., Jr., 1980. The Propylaia to the Athenian Akropolis, I: The Predecessors. Princeton.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J., 1977. Aegina and Athens in the Archaic and Classical Periods: A Socio-Political Investigation. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J., 1985. Herodotus on the early hostilities between Aegina and Athens. AJP, 106, pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J., 1988. The chronology of the conflict between Athens and Aegina in Herodotus Bk. 6. QUCC, 57, pp. 49–89.Google Scholar
Figureia, T. J., 1993. Excursions in Epichoric History: Aiginetan Essays. Lanham.Google Scholar
Funck, B., 1985. Griechen im Perserreich. In Demandt, A et al., eds., Mit Fremden leben: eine Kulturgeschichte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Munich, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J., 1985. Stasis: Untersuchungen zu den inneren Kriegen in den griechischen Staaten des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Gill, D. W. J., 2006. Hippodamus and the Piraeus. Historia, 55(1), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Goossens, G., 1949. Artistes et artisans étrangers en Perse sous les Achéménides. Nouvelle Clio, 1–2, pp. 32–44.Google Scholar
Gorman, V. B., 2001. Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia: A History of the City to 400 B.C.E. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Guépin, J.-P., 1963. On the position of Greek artists under Achaemenid rule. Persica, 1, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
Gullath, B., 1982. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte Boiotiens in der Zeit Alexanders und der Diadochen. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M. and Lewis, D. M., 2016. Introduction. In Harris, E. M., Lewis, D. M., and Woolmer, M, eds., The Ancient Greek Economy. Cambridge, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C., 2016. Roman Artisans and the Urban Economy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, G. L., 2005. Defining identities: Greek artistic interaction with the Near East. In Suter, C. E. and Uehlinger, C, eds., Crafts and Images in Contact: Studies on Eastern Mediterranean Art of the First Millennium BCE. Fribourg, pp. 351–89.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, J., 1978. Die Griechen in Persien: Prosopographie der Griechen im Persischen Reich vor Alexander. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T., 1974. Die Nike der Messenier und Naupaktier in Olympia. Kunst und Geschichte im späten 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr. JDAI, 89, pp. 70–111.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S., 1982. Mausolus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ioakimidou, C., 1997. Die Statuenreihen griechischer Poleis und Bünde aus spätarchaischer und klassischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. N., 2007. After empire: Xenophonʼs Poroi and the reorientation of Athens’ political economy. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, L. H., 1990. The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, K., 1971. ʻArgousa pou kata to theionʼ. Zu Pausanias IX, 42, über die Gemälde im Tempel der Athena Areia zu Platää. AArch, 42, pp. 110–12.Google Scholar
Kansteiner, S. et al., eds., 2014. Der Neue Overbeck. Die antiken Schriftquellen zu den bildenden Künsten der Griechen. 5 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kissas, K., 2000. Die attischen Statuen- und Stelenbasen archaischer Zeit. Bonn.Google Scholar
Kopanias, K., 2006. Kimon, Mikon und die Datierung des Athener Theseion. In Kreutz, N and Schweizer, B, eds., Tekmeria. Archäologische Zeugnisse in ihrer kulturhistorischen und politischen Dimension. Beiträge für Werner Gauer. Münster, pp. 155–64.Google Scholar
Krumeich, R., 1996. Namensbeischrift oder Weihinschrift? Zum Fehlen des Miltiadesnamens beim Marathongemälde. AA, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
Krumeich, R., 1997. Bildnisse griechischer Herrscher und Staatsmänner im 5. Jh. v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Kunze, E., 1963. Ausgrabungen in Olympia 1962/3. ArchDelt, 18, pp. 107–10.Google Scholar
Legon, R. P., 1972. Samos in the Delian League. Historia, 21, pp. 145–58.Google Scholar
Linder, M., 2019. Der ʻStaat’ und die Künstler. Zum Kunstschaffen in archaischer und klassischer Zeit vor dem Hintergrund der griechischen Staatenpolitik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
MacDonald, B. R., 1983. The Megarian Decree. Historia, 32, pp. 385–410.Google Scholar
Marcadé, J., 1953. Recueil des signatures de sculpteurs grecs, Vol. 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Matheson, S. B., 1995. Polygnotos and Vase Painting in Classical Athens. Madison.Google Scholar
Milschoefer, A., 1977. Ancient Athens: Piraeus and Phaleron. Chicago.Google Scholar
Moretti, L., 1957. Olympionikai, i vincitori negli antichi agoni Olimpici. Rome.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. H. and Gabrielsen, V., 2004. Lindos. In Hansen, M. H., and Nielsen, T. H., eds. 2004. An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Greek Poleis. Oxford, cols. 1202–4.Google Scholar
Nylander, C., 1970. Ionians in Pasargadae: Studies in Old Persian Architecture. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Nylander, C., 1972 . Foreign craftsmen in Achaemenid Persia. In Tajvidi, A and Kiani, M.-J, eds., The Memorial Volume of the Vth International Congress of Iranian Art and Archaeology. Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz, 11th–18th April 1968. Tehran, pp. 311–18.Google Scholar
Pébarthe, C., 1999. Thasos, l’empire d’Athènes et les emporia de Thrace. ZPE, 126, pp. 131–54.Google Scholar
Perry, J. S., 2006. The Roman Collegia: The Modern Evolution of an Ancient Concept. Leiden.Google Scholar
Picard, C., 1963. Manuel dʼarchéologie grecque. La sculpture – IV siècle, Vol. 4.2. Paris.Google Scholar
Picard, O., 1998. Thucydide I.101 et le tribut de Thasos. REA, 100(3–4), pp. 591–8.Google Scholar
Piérart, M., 1995. Chios entre Athènes et Sparte: la contribution des exilés de Chios à l’effort de guerre Lacédémonien pendant la guerre du Péloponnèse: IG V 1,2 + SEG XXXIX 370*. BCH, 119, pp. 253–82.Google Scholar
Pleket, H. W., 1963. Thasos and the popularity of the Athenian empire. Historia, 12, p. 70–7.Google Scholar
Quinn, T. J., 1981. Athens and Samos, Lesbos and Chios: 478–404 B.C. Manchester.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A., 1949. Dedications from the Athenian Akropolis. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J., 1999. Sparta, Thebes and autonomia. Eirene, 35, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A., 1946. Greeks in Persia. AJA, 50, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Roaf, M., 1980. Texts about sculptures and sculptors at Persepolis. Iran, 18, pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A., 1989. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne Ve siècle av. JC-Ier siècle ap. JC. Rome.Google Scholar
Croix, Sainte, de, G. E. M., 1972. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. London.Google Scholar
Sealey, R., 1991. An Athenian decree about the Megarians. In Flower, M. A. and Toher, M, eds., Georgica. Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell. London, pp. 152–8.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A., 1999. Cult warfare: the dioskouroi between Sparta and Athens. In Hägg, R, ed., Ancient Greek Hero Cult. Stockholm, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Simon, E., 1963. Polygnotan painting and the Niobid Painter. AJA, 67, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. D., 1990. Polygnotos’ nekyia: a reconstruction and analysis. AJA, 94, pp. 213–35.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. D., 2005. The painting in the Stoa Poikile. In Barringer, J. M. and Hurwit, J. M., eds., Periklean Athens and its Legacy: Problems and Perspectives, Austin, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
Stewart, E., 2017. Greek Tragedy on the Move. Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenson-Evers, H., 1996. Die griechischen Architekten archaischer und klassischer Zeit. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. G., 1998. Oinoe and the Painted Stoa: ancient and modern misunderstandings. AJP, 119, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, R. A., 1972. Argos and the Argolid from the End of the Bronze Age to the Roman Occupation. London.Google Scholar
Walser, G., 1967. Griechen am Hofe des Großkönigs. In Walder, E et al., eds., Festgabe zum sechzigsten Geburtstag von H. von Greyerz. Bern, pp. 189–202.Google Scholar
Walser, G., 1984. Hellas und Iran: Studien zu den griechisch-persischen Beziehungen vor Alexander. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Wick, T. E., 1979. Megara, Athens and the west in the Archidamian War: a study in Thucydides. Historia, 28, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., 2010. Sparta und die griechische Staatenwelt in archaischer und klassischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Wycherley, R. E., 1964. Hippodamus and Rhodes. Historia, 13, pp. 135–9.Google Scholar
Zachos, G. A., 2003. Mnaseas and Mnason: two Elateians of the Third Sacred War. C&M, 54, pp. 113–26.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Bagnall, R. S. and Frier, B. W., 1994. The Demography of Roman Egypt. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baker, M., 2000. Figured in Marble: The Making and Viewing of Eighteenth-Century Sculpture. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Barresi, P., 2003. Province dell’Asia Minore: costo dei marmi, architettura pubblica e committenza. Rome.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S., 1962. The nature of a profession. In Henry, N. B., ed., Education for the Professions. Chicago, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Bergamasco, M., 1995. Le διδασκαλικαί nella ricerca attuale. Aegyptus, 75, pp. 95–167.Google Scholar
Brandt, H., 1992. Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft Pamphyliens und Pisidiens im Altertum. Bonn.Google Scholar
Butler, H., 1989. Publications of the Princeton University Archaeological Expedition to Syria in 1904–1905: Div. 2 Ancient Architecture in Syria. Leiden.Google Scholar
Calabi Limentani, I., 1958. Studi sulla società romana: il lavoro artistico. Milan.Google Scholar
Calabi Limentani, I., 1961, ‘Lapidarius’. In Bianchi Bandinelli, R and Becatti, G, eds., Enciclopedia dell’arte antica, classica e orientale, Vol. 4. Rome.Google Scholar
Campbell, R., 1747. The London Tradesman. London.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., 2006. Spirits of the Dead: Roman Funerary Commemoration in Western Europe. Oxford.Google Scholar
Charles-Picard, G., 1961. Sur une famille de sculpteurs d’Aquitaine, d’après une stele funéraire du Musée de Bordeaux. RA, 2, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C. M., 1993. Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000–1700, 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
Claridge, A., 2015. Marble carving techniques, workshops, and artisans. In Friedland, E, Grunow Sobocinski, M, and Gazda, E. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture. Oxford, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
Corso, A., 2016. Drawings in Greek and Roman Architecture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Craske, M., 2000. Contacts and contracts: Sir Henry Cheere and the formation of a new commercial world of sculpture in mid-eighteenth-century London. In Sicca, C and Yarrington, A, eds., The Lustrous Trade: Material Culture and the History of Sculpture in England and Italy, c. 1700–c. 1860. London and New York, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar
Curchin, L., 1983. Personal wealth in Roman Spain. Historia, 32, 227–44.Google Scholar
Davies, J. K., 1971. Athenian Propertied Families. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dentzer, J.-M., 1986. Conclusion: Développement et culture de la Syrie du Sud dans la période préprovinciaele (1er s. avant J.-C.–1er s. après J.-C.). In Dentzer, J.-M., ed., Hauran I: Recherches archéologiques sur la Syrie du sud a l’époque hellénistique et romaine. Paris, pp. 387–420.Google Scholar
Drew-Bear, T., 1980. An act of foundation at Hypaipa. Chiron, 10, pp. 509–36.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R., 1982. The Economy of the Roman Empire. Quantitative Studies, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. and Lehmann, A. C., 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, pp. 273–305.Google Scholar
Erim, K. T. and Reynolds, J. M., 1991. Sculptors of Aphrodisias in the inscriptions of the city. In Basgelen, N and Lugal, M, eds., Festschrift für J. Inan. Istanbul, pp. 517–38.Google Scholar
Freidson, E., 1970. Profession of Medicine. New York.Google Scholar
Freidson, E., 1983. The theory of professions: state of the art. In Dingwall, R and Lewis, P, eds., The Sociology of the Professions. London, pp. 19–37.Google Scholar
Freu, C., 2011. Apprendre et exercer un métier dans l’Égypte romaine (Ier–VIe siècles ap. J.-C.). In Monteix, N and Tran, N, eds., Les savoirs professionnels des gens de métier: études sur le monde du travail dans les sociétés urbaines de l’empire romain. Naples, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. W., 1984. An estimate of the size and structure of the national product of the early Roman empire. Review of Income and Wealth, 30, pp. 263–88.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. W., 1987. Premodern Financial Systems: A Historical Comparative Study. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M., 2002. Workshop, household and marketplace. In Cartledge, P, Cohen, E, and Foxhall, L, eds., Money, Land and Labour in Ancient Greece. London, pp. 67–99.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L., 1997. Architectural likenesses: models and plans of architecture in classical antiquity. JRA, 10, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C., 2016. Roman Artisans and the Urban Economy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heisel, J. P., 1993. Antike Bauzeichnungen. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E., 2015. Hidden Lives, Public Personae: Women and Civic Life in the Roman West. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hochscheid, H., 2015. Networks of Stone: Sculpture and Society in Archaic and Classical Athens. Bern.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K., 1978. Economic growth and towns in classical antiquity. In Abrams, P and Wrigley, E. A., eds., Towns in Societies: Essays in Economic History and Historical Sociology. Cambridge, pp. 35–77.Google Scholar
Huskinson, J., 2015. Roman Strigillated Sarcophagi: Art & Social History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jockey, P., 1998. Les représentations d’artisans de la pierre dans le monde gréco-romain et leur éventuelle exploitation par l’historien. Topoi, 8(2), pp. 625–52.Google Scholar
Johns, C. H. W., 1904. Babylonian and Assyrian Laws, Contracts, and Letters. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jongman, W., 2007. The early Roman Empire: consumption. In Scheidel, W, Morris, E. L., and Saller, R. P., eds., The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World. Cambridge, pp. 592–618.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R., 1992. Work, Identity and Legal Status at Rome. London.Google Scholar
Keppie, L., 1991. Understanding Roman Inscriptions. London.Google Scholar
Klegon, D., 1978. The sociology of professions: an emerging perspectives. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5(3), pp. 259–83.Google Scholar
Larson, M. S., 2013. The Rise of Professionalism: Monopolies of Competence and Sheltered Markets, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Liu, J., 2013. Professional association. In Erdkamp, P, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome, Cambridge, pp. 352–68.Google Scholar
Melchor Gil, E., 1994. El mecenazgo cívico en la Bética. La contribución de los evergetas al desarrollo de la vida municipal. Cordoba.Google Scholar
Millerson, G., 1964. The Qualifying Associations: A Study in Professionalization. London.Google Scholar
Minns, C. and Wallis, P., 2013. The price of human capital in a pre-industrial economy: premiums and apprenticeship contracts in 18th century England. Explorations in Economic History, 50(3), pp. 335–50.Google Scholar
Moltesen, M., 2000. The Esquiline Group: Aphrodisian statues in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek. AntP, 27, pp. 111–29.Google Scholar
Moore, W. E., 1976. The Professions: Roles and Rules. New York.Google Scholar
Pegoretti, G., 1843–4. Manuele practico per l’estimazione dei lavori architettonici, stradali, idraulici e di fortificazione per uso degli ingegneri ed architetti, 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Pfanner, M., 1989. Über das Herstellen von Porträts. Ein Beitrag zu Rationalisierungsmassnahmen und Produktionsmechanismen von Massenware im späten Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 104, pp. 157–257.Google Scholar
Ponza di San Martino, L., 1841. Prontuario di stima ad uso degli ingegneri e degli architetti nella direzione de’ lavori pubblici. Turin.Google Scholar
Prest, W., 1987. The Professions in Early Modern England. London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., 1975. Architecture and sculpture: the activities of the Cossutti. PBSR, 43, pp. 36–47.Google Scholar
Rondelet, J., 1867. Traité théorique et pratique de l’art de bâtir, 3rd ed., 5 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Roueché, C., 1993. Performers and Partisans at Aphrodisias in the Roman and Late Roman Periods: A Study Based on Inscriptions from the Current Excavations at Aphrodisias in Caria. London.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. and Erim, K., 1982. ‘Sculptors from Aphrodisias: some new inscriptions’. Papers of the British School at Rome, 50, pp. 102–15.Google Scholar
Russell, B., 2013. The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade. Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, B. and Wootton, W., 2017. Makers and making: classical art in action. In Lichtenberger, A and Raja, R, eds., The Diversity of Classical Archaeology. Turnhout, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., 2010. Real wages in early economies: evidence for living standards from 1800 BCE to 1300 CE. JESHO, 53, pp. 425–62.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., 2008. Sarcophagi and Roman citizenship. In Ratté, C and Smith, R. R. R., eds., Aphrodisias Papers 4: New Research on the City and its Monuments. Portsmouth, RI, pp. 347–94.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., 2011. Marble workshops at Aphrodisias. In D’Andria, F and Romeo, I, eds., Roman Sculpture in Asia Minor. Portsmouth, RI, pp. 62–76.Google Scholar
Smits, W. and Stromback, T., 2001. The Economics of the Apprenticeship System. Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Stevens, F., van der Horst, F., Nijhuis, F., and Bours, S., 2000. The division of labour in vision care: professional competence in a system of professions. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(4), pp. 431–52.Google Scholar
Stroszeck, J., 1988. Die dekorativen römischen Sarkophage: Löwen-Sarkophage, Die antiken Sarkophagreliefs 6.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Torelli, M., 1980. Industria estrattiva, lavoro artigianale, interessi economici: qualche appunto. In D’Arms, J and Kopff, E. C., eds., The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome: Studies in Archaeology and History. Rome, pp. 313–23.Google Scholar
Van Nijf, O. M., 1997. The Civic World of Professional Associations in the Roman East. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Voorhis, J., 1998. Apprentices’ pieces and the training of sculptors at Aphrodisias. JRA, 11, pp. 175–92.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B., 1980. Nicomedia and the marble trade. PBSR, 48, 23–69.Google Scholar
Westermann, W. L., 1914. Apprentice contracts and the apprentice system in Roman Egypt. CP, pp. 295–315.Google Scholar
Yee, H., 2001. The concept of a profession: a historical perspective on the accounting profession in China. In Carnegie, G, ed., Proceedings of the Second Accounting History International Conference. Osaka, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×