Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:17:20.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Structural Steel Selection and Construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

Jeom Kee Paik
Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Classification society rules or recommended practices dictate the types of steel to be used in the assembly of the hull structures of ship-shaped offshore installations. The steel must exhibit high levels of buckling and fatigue performance and be amenable to corrosion management. It is recommended that the proportion of reduced thickness, high strength steel be minimised and the proportion of ordinary steel (e.g., grade A) be maximised in a hull structure. However, structural members that require an ordinary steel plate with a thickness greater than 30 mm may instead be made from high strength steel to avoid the need for heavy welding and to simplify the construction. The greater resistance of high strength steel to corrosion reduces the need for repairs in dry dock, which is critical for the long on site life required in a ship-shaped offshore installation. Three grades of steel are used in the assembly of hulls for installations that will be in service at sub-zero temperatures: grade D steel for use at −20°C, grade E steel for use at −40°C and grade F steel for use at −60°C. Steel may be exposed to colder temperatures than it has been designed to withstand or even to cryogenic conditions as a result of the accidental release of liquefied gas (e.g., liquefied natural gas or hydrogen). This can cause a brittle fracture in structural steel and a subsequent catastrophic failure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning
 , pp. 49 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodner, S. R. and Symonds, P. S. (1962). ‘Experimental and theoretical investigation of the plastic deformation of cantilever beams subjected to impulsive loading’. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 29: 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokenbrough, R. L. and Johnston, B. G. (1981). USS Steel Design Manual. United States Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
BSI (2019). BS EN 10025-2: Hot-Rolled Products of Non-alloy Structural Steels: Technical Delivery Conditions for Non-alloy Structural Steels. British Standard Institute, London.Google Scholar
Cowper, G. R. and Symonds, O. S. (1957). ‘Strain-hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams’. Technical Report No. 28, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
DNV (2015). Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures. Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C401, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
Dowling, N. E. (2012). Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 4th Edition, Pearson, London.Google Scholar
ECCS (1982). European Recommendations for the Fire Safety of Steel Structures. ECCS Technical Committee, 3, European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Brussels.Google Scholar
EN 1993-1-2 (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures: Part 1–2: General Rules: Structural Fre Design. European Standard, Brussels.Google Scholar
Forrestal, M. J. and Sagartz, M. J. (1978). ‘Elastic-plastic response of 304 stainless steel beams to impulse loads’. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 45: 685–687.Google Scholar
Hsu, S. S. and Jones, N. (2004). ‘Dynamic axial crushing of aluminum alloy 6063–T6 circular tubes’. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 1(3): 277–296.Google Scholar
Hughes, O. F. and Paik, J. K. (2010). Ship Structural Analysis and Design. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
IACS (2017). Normal and Higher Strength Hull Structural Steels (UR W11). International Association of Classification Societies, London.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2012). Structural Impact. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ko, Y. G., Kim, S. J. and Paik, J. K. (2018). ‘Effects of a deformable striking ship’s bow on the structural crashworthiness in ship-ship collisions’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(S1): S228–S250.Google Scholar
Mespaque, W., Frainer, V. J. and de Freitas Teixeira, P. R. (2012). ‘Analysis of hull-topside interaction by experimental approach on floating production unit P-53’. Applied Ocean Research, 37: 133–144.Google Scholar
NORSOK (2004). Design of Steel Structures. N-004, Revision 2, Standards Norway, Lysaker.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2007a). ‘Practical techniques for finite element modelling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (part I: theory)’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2(1): 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2007b). ‘Practical techniques for finite element modelling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (part II: verification)’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2(1): 81–85.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2010). ‘Chapter 8: Nonlinear finite element analysis’. Ship Structural Analysis and Design, edited by Hughes, O. F. and Paik, J. K., The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. and Chung, J. Y. (1999). ‘A basic study on static and dynamic crushing behavior of a steel stiffened tube’. Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 7(1): 219–238 (in Korean).Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Kim, K. J., Lee, J. H., Jung, B. G. and Kim, S. J. (2017). ‘Test database of the mechanical properties of mild, high-tensile and stainless steel and aluminum alloy associated with cold temperatures and strain rates’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 12(S1): S230–S256.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, D. H., Noh, S. H., Park, D. K. and Ringsberg, J. W. (2020a). ‘Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under cyclic axial-compressive loading’. Structures, 26: 996–1009.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, D. H., Noh, S. H., Park, D. K. and Ringsberg, J.W. (2020b). ‘Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under axial-compressive loading triggered by brittle fracture at cryogenic condition’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(S1): S29–S45.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, D. H., Park, D. K. and Ringsberg, J. W. (2021a). ‘Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under axial-compressive loading at a temperature of −80°C’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(3): 255–270.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Lee, S. Y., Park, D. K. and Thomas, G. (2021b). ‘Full-scale fire testing to collapse of steel stiffened plate structures under lateral patch loading (part 1): Without passive fire protection’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(3): 227–242.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Lee, S. Y., Park, D. K. and Thomas, G. (2021c). ‘Full-scale fire testing to collapse of steel stiffened plate structures under lateral patch loading (part 2): With passive fire protection’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(3): 243–254.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. and Thayamballi, A. K. (2000). ‘Buckling strength of steel plating with elastically restrained edges’. Thin-Walled Structures, 37: 27–55.Google Scholar
Rajput, A. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Effects of naturally-progressed corrosion on the chemical and mechanical properties of structural steels’. Structures, 29: 2120–2139.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S., Davidson, P. C., Chapman, J. C. and Dowling, P. J. (1988). ‘Strength and stiffness of ships’ plating under in-plane compression and tension’. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 130: 277–296.Google Scholar
Symonds, P. S. and Chon, C. T. (1974). ‘Approximation techniques for impulsive loading of structures of time-dependent plastic behaviour with finite-deflections’. Mechanical Properties of Materials at High Rates of Strain, Conference Series, edited by Harding, J. E.. American Institute of Physics, New York, 21: 299–316.Google Scholar
Symonds, P. S. and Jones, N. (1972). ‘Impulsive loading of fully clamped beams with finite plastic deflections’. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 14: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umunnakwe, C. B. (2020). Numerical Simulation of Ship Grounding by Taking into Consideration External Hydrodynamic Forces. Master Thesis, EMship+, University of Liège, Liège.Google Scholar
Yi, M. S., Hyun, C. M. and Paik, J. K. (2019). ‘An empirical formulation for predicting welding-induced biaxial compressive residual stresses on steel stiffened plate structures and its application to thermal plate buckling prevention’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(S1): S18–S33.Google Scholar
Yi, M. S., Lee, D. H., Lee, H. H. and Paik, J. K. (2020). ‘Direct measurements and numerical predictions of welding-induced initial deformations in a full-scale steel stiffened plate structure’. Thin-Walled Structures, 153: doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106786.Google Scholar
Yi, M. S., Noh, S. H., Lee, D. H., Seo, D. H. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Direct measurements, numerical predictions and simple formula estimations of welding-induced biaxial residual stresses in a full-scale steel stiffened plate structure’. Structures, 29: 2094–2105.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×