Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Romances since 1958: A Retrospect
- Puzzle and Artifice: The Riddle as Metapoetry in ‘Pericles’
- ‘Pericles’ in a Book-List of 1619 from the English Jesuit Mission and Some of the Play's Special Problems
- George Wilkins and the Young Heir
- Theatrical Virtuosity and Poetic Complexity in ‘Cymbeline’
- Noble Virtue in ‘Cymbeline’
- Directing the Romances
- Shakespeare and the Ideas of his Time
- The Letter of the Law in ‘The Merchant of Venice’
- Shakespeare’s Use of the ‘Timon’ Comedy
- Re-enter the Stage Direction: Shakespeare and Some Contemporaries
- The Staircases of the Frame: New Light on the Structure of the Globe
- Shakespeare in Max Beerbohm’s Theatre Criticism
- A Danish Actress and Her Conception of the Part of Lady Macbeth
- Towards a Poor Shakespeare: The Royal Shakespeare Company at Stratford in 1975
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
Towards a Poor Shakespeare: The Royal Shakespeare Company at Stratford in 1975
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Romances since 1958: A Retrospect
- Puzzle and Artifice: The Riddle as Metapoetry in ‘Pericles’
- ‘Pericles’ in a Book-List of 1619 from the English Jesuit Mission and Some of the Play's Special Problems
- George Wilkins and the Young Heir
- Theatrical Virtuosity and Poetic Complexity in ‘Cymbeline’
- Noble Virtue in ‘Cymbeline’
- Directing the Romances
- Shakespeare and the Ideas of his Time
- The Letter of the Law in ‘The Merchant of Venice’
- Shakespeare’s Use of the ‘Timon’ Comedy
- Re-enter the Stage Direction: Shakespeare and Some Contemporaries
- The Staircases of the Frame: New Light on the Structure of the Globe
- Shakespeare in Max Beerbohm’s Theatre Criticism
- A Danish Actress and Her Conception of the Part of Lady Macbeth
- Towards a Poor Shakespeare: The Royal Shakespeare Company at Stratford in 1975
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
I would be doing the late Buzz Goodbody a disservice if I called the production of Hamlet at Stratford in 1975 hers. Against the tide of our ‘director’s theatre’, over which the Royal Shakespeare Company has long exercised a moon-like influence, she found the courage and the skill to release the play to the actors. The actors, for their part, responded with a performance whose alertness to the text was not only exemplary but constantly invigorating. For the second time this decade Stratford has provided us with a major theatrical exploration of a familiar text; and this Hamlet, unlike Brook’s 1970 production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, is imitable.
I was once in a production of Ironhand which overwhelmed audiences in Manchester's small University Theatre. Transferred to the Teatro Regio in Parma it dwindled. Hamlet was not performed in the main auditorium, but in the bare and comfortless small studio/shack named, or unnamed, The Other Place. To call the production imitable is not to claim that it is transferable. It belonged to the physical context in which it had been rehearsed, and which it exploited.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 151 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1976
- 1
- Cited by