Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:12:17.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Innovation? Shakespeare as Intercultural Catalyst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2011

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

English publicly funded theatre in the twenty-first century, in which Shakespeare plays a considerable role, is becoming increasingly focused on the processes and products of innovation. The term ‘innovation’ has developed into something of a buzzword amongst cultural economists, policymakers and practitioners. Yet, notwithstanding the proliferation of cultural policy and think-tank documents discussing its merits, it is not always clear what form such innovation should take or even what constitutes innovation in the first place. In aesthetic terms innovation is not the same as ‘novelty for its own sake’. Instead, as defined by the OED, it is ‘the alteration of what is established by the introduction of new elements or forms’. Idealized cultural innovation within publicly funded theatre thus operates as an alteration of established modes of production and the subsequent reinvigoration of resulting products. This understanding of innovation – as opposed to the alternative ‘introduction of novelties’ – is what permeates the policy work of John Holden (researcher for think-tank Demos), Brian McMaster (former artistic director of the Edinburgh Festival) and Arts Council England (the arms-length funding body for the arts). The process of innovation is assumed to be radical and risky, but, most importantly, value-generative. It is thus part of an idealized process of production which ensures both aesthetic excellence and cultural value creation.

Cultural economists remind us that innovation is not the same thing as variety or diversity of work. If a theatre simply produces a multitude of plays by different playwrights they are not necessarily innovating. However, if the Royal Shakespeare Company only produces plays by Shakespeare but constantly reworks and redevelops the form and presentation of those plays it has the potential to be innovative. Innovation can thus occur within the performance of an established cultural product:

Few fans at a Rolling Stones concert want to see the Stones take an entirely new musical direction; most come to hear old favourites and relive youthful memories… At the same time, the production technology and skill required to reproduce a simulacrum of a recorded disc in a live setting – or the character of earlier performances – is considerable, and may be regarded as innovative.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 13 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McMaster, BrianSupporting Excellence in the Arts: From Measurement to JudgementLondon 2008 Council England, ArtsLondon 2008Google Scholar
Oakley, KateSperry, BrookePratt, AndyThe Art of Innovation: How Fine Art Graduates Contribute to InnovationBakhshi, HasanLondon 2008Google Scholar
Throsby, DavidBakhshi, HasanCulture of Innovation: An Economic Analysis of Innovation in Arts and Cultural OrganisationsLondon 2010Google Scholar
Crealey, MariaApplying New Product Development Models to the Performing Arts: Strategies for Managing RiskInternational Journal of Arts Management 5 2003 24Google Scholar
Castañer, XavierCampos, LorenzoThe Determination of Artistic Innovation: Bringing in the Role of OrganizationsJournal of Cultural Economics 26 2002 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts Council EnglandTheatre Assessment 2009London 2009 5Google Scholar
Thinking through Interculturalism’Marranca, BonnieDasgupta, GautamInterculturalism and Performance: Writings from PAJNew York 1991 4Google Scholar
Artaud, AntoninThe Theatre and its DoubleLondon 1970Google Scholar
Adorno, TheodorThe Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass CultureBernstein, J. M.London 2001Google Scholar
Authenticity and CommoditizationTourismAnnals of Tourism Research 15 1988 371Google Scholar
Kennedy, DennisShakespeare and Cultural TourismTheatre Journal 50 1998 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, JacquesMargins of PhilosophyHemel Hempstead 1982 17Google Scholar
Lanier, DouglasShakespeare and Modern Popular CultureOxford 2002 3Google Scholar
Purcell, StephenPopular Shakespeare: Simulation and Subversion on the Modern StageBasingstoke 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, EugenioThe Paper Canoe: A Guide to Theatre AnthropologyFowler, RichardLondon 1995 96Google Scholar
Massai, SoniaWorld-wide Shakespeares: Local Appropriations in Film and PerformanceLondon 2005 5Google Scholar
Chillington Rutter, CarolShakespeare Performances in England 2009Shakespeare Survey 63Cambridge 2010 356Google Scholar
Billington, MichaelMyths and Metaphors Create Stunning African TempestGuardian 19 2009 38Google Scholar
Bosman, AntonCape of Storms: The Baxter Theatre Centre–RSC 2009Shakespeare Quarterly 2010 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyman, Philipwww.whatsonstage.com/reviews/theatre/london/E8831235038970/The+Tempest+%28RSC%29.html 2010
, C. K. PrahaladRamaswamy, VenkatCo-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value CreationJournal of Interactive Marketing 18 2004 5Google Scholar
quoted, BrookHeilpern, JohnConference of the Birds: The Story of Peter Brook in AfricaHarmondsworth 1977 24Google Scholar
Innes, ChristopherAvant Garde Theatre 1892–1992London 1993 3Google Scholar
Halpern, RichardShakespeare Among the ModernsIthaca 1997 16Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S.The Beating of a DrumNation and Athenaeum 6 1923 16Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S.The Waste LandThe Waste Land, Prufrock and Other PoemsMineola 1998Google Scholar
Bradbrook, M. C.Shakespeare's Primitive ArtAnnual Shakespeare Lecture of the British Academy 1965Google Scholar
Barba, SeeThe Paper CanoeBarba, EugenioLondon 1968Google Scholar
Schechner, RichardThe Future of Ritual: Writings on Culture and PerformanceLondon 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993
Culture, DeepThoughts on Third-World TheatreNew Theatre Quarterly 6 1990 335Google Scholar
Brown, John RussellTheatrical Pillage in Asia: Redirecting the Intercultural TrafficNew Theatre Quarterly 14 1998 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 116
1990
Huxley, AldousBrave New WorldLondon 1994Google Scholar
Snyder, CareyWhen the Indian was in VogueLawrence, D. H.Huxley, AldousTourism, EthnologicalModern Fiction Studies 53 2007 662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×