Book contents
- Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- About This Book
- Abbreviations
- Section 1 Prologue
- Section 2 Medicine
- Section 3 Science
- Chapter 10 The Swedish Systematic Literature Review on Suspected Traumatic Shaking (Shaken Baby Syndrome) and Its Aftermath
- Chapter 11 Interrogation and the Infanticide Suspect
- Chapter 12 Can Confession Substitute for Science in Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma?
- Chapter 13 Cognitive Bias in Medico-legal Judgments
- Chapter 14 Biomechanical Forensic Analysis of Shaking and Short-Fall Head Injury Mechanisms in Infants and Young Children
- Chapter 15 When Lack of Information Leads to Apparent Paradoxes and Wrong Conclusions
- Chapter 16 Epidemiology of Findings Claimed to Be Highly Specific for Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma, a Prerequisite to Improve Diagnosis of Child Abuse
- Chapter 17 Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Section 4 Law
- Section 5 International
- Section 6 Postface
- Appendix: Frequently Repeated Claims concerning Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 11 - Interrogation and the Infanticide Suspect
Mechanisms of Vulnerability to False Confession
from Section 3 - Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 June 2023
Edited by
Waney Squier and
Book contents
- Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- About This Book
- Abbreviations
- Section 1 Prologue
- Section 2 Medicine
- Section 3 Science
- Chapter 10 The Swedish Systematic Literature Review on Suspected Traumatic Shaking (Shaken Baby Syndrome) and Its Aftermath
- Chapter 11 Interrogation and the Infanticide Suspect
- Chapter 12 Can Confession Substitute for Science in Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma?
- Chapter 13 Cognitive Bias in Medico-legal Judgments
- Chapter 14 Biomechanical Forensic Analysis of Shaking and Short-Fall Head Injury Mechanisms in Infants and Young Children
- Chapter 15 When Lack of Information Leads to Apparent Paradoxes and Wrong Conclusions
- Chapter 16 Epidemiology of Findings Claimed to Be Highly Specific for Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma, a Prerequisite to Improve Diagnosis of Child Abuse
- Chapter 17 Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Section 4 Law
- Section 5 International
- Section 6 Postface
- Appendix: Frequently Repeated Claims concerning Shaken Baby Syndrome
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Doctors and prosecutors who defend the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome (SBS) point, among other things, to the many confessions obtained from parents and other caregivers as evidence of the reality of the diagnosis. Drawing on the existing social science research, this chapter examines the questions of (1) how, if at all, interrogations of those suspected of injuring or killing a child are conducted differently than other interrogations, and (2) what, if anything, would render such suspects more or less vulnerable to confession (true or false). The chapter examines how interrogations are typically conducted, and the primary reasons suspects confess, keeping in mind that their confessions can be either true or false. In the end, this chapter concludes that suspects in alleged shaken baby cases are arguably more vulnerable to false confession than those suspected of other crimes, and accordingly one cannot assume the reliability or truthfulness of confessions in these cases.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shaken Baby SyndromeInvestigating the Abusive Head Trauma Controversy, pp. 179 - 188Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adamsbaum, C, Grabar, S, Mejean, N, Rey-Salmon, C. Abusive head trauma: Judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126:546–55.Google Scholar
Brook, C. Wrongful Convictions Report. Is there evidentiary basis for shaken baby syndrome? The conviction of Joby Rowe. 2019. https://wrongfulconvictionsreport.org/2019/09/10/is-there-evidentiary-basis-for-shaken-baby-syndrome-the-conviction-of-joby-rowe.Google Scholar
Cenziper, D. Shaken science: Prosecutors build murder cases on disputed shaken baby syndrome diagnosis. Washington Post. 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/shaken-baby-syndrome.Google Scholar
Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Squier, W. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12(2):209–312.Google Scholar
Vinchon, M, De Foort-Dhellemmens, S, Desurmont, M, Delestret, I. Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: Comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Child’s Nervous System. 2010;26:637–45.Google Scholar
Drizin, SA, Leo, RA. The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review. 2004;82:891–1007.Google Scholar
Leo, RA, Ofshe, RJ. The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1998;88:429–96.Google Scholar
Garrett, BL. Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Innocence Project. https://innocenceproject.org.Google Scholar
Woody, WD, Forrest, KD. Understanding police interrogation: Confessions and consequences. New York University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Kassin, SM, Drizin, SA, Grisso, T et al. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior. 2010;34:3–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leo, RA. Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard University Press, 2009 (for reviews).Google Scholar
Papetti, R. The forensic unreliability of the shaken baby syndrome. Academic Forensic Pathology International, 2018.Google Scholar
Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: Shaken baby syndrome and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kozinski, W. The Reid interrogation technique and false confessions: A time for change. Seattle Journal for Social Justice. 2018;16:301–45 (for reviews).Google Scholar
Villalobos, JG, Davis, D. Interrogation and the minority suspect: Pathways to true and false confession. In Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 1). Miller, M, Bornstein, B, eds. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA. Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2012;18(4):673–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inbau, FE, Reid, JE, Buckley, JP, Jayne, BC. Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett, 2013.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA, Livingston, TN, Rerick, PO. Interrogation and the sexual assault suspect: On the synergy between pretext caller and police interrogator. In Criminal investigations of sexual offenses: Investigative techniques and operational challenges. Deslauriers-Varin, N, Bennell, C, eds. Springer, 2021, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Livingston, T, Rerick, PO, Villalobos, JG, Davis, D. Deception induced confession: Strategies of police interrogators and their lay collaborators. In Palgrave handbook of deceptive communication. Docan-Morgan, T, ed. Springer, 2019, pp. 747–67.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Villalobos, JG. Language and the law: Illustrations from cases of disputed sexual consent. In Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. Holtgraves, T, ed. Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 438–58.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA. To walk in their shoes: The problem of missing, misrepresented and misunderstood context in judging criminal confessions. New England Law Review. 2012;46(4):737–67.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA. Acute suggestibility in police interrogation: Self-regulation failure as a primary mechanism of vulnerability. In Suggestibility in legal contexts: Psychological research and forensic implications. Ridley, A, Gabbert, F, La Rooy, DJ, eds. Wiley, 2012, pp. 171–97.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA. Interrogation through pragmatic implication. In The Oxford handbook on language and law. Solan, L, Tiersma, P, eds. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 354–66.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA. Stereotype threat and the special vulnerabilities of sexual abuse/assault suspects to false confession. In Vilified: Wrongful allegations of person abuse. Burnett, R, ed. Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar
Najdowski, CJ. Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely. Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 2011;17(4):562–91.Google Scholar
National Research Council of the National Academies. The polygraph and lie detection. National Academies Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Steele, CM. Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Steele, CM, Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69(5):797–811.Google Scholar
Harris, GT, Hilton, NZ, Rice, ME, Eke, AW. Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007;28(2):85–95.Google Scholar
Jayne, BC, Buckley, JP. Investigator anthology: A compilation of articles and essays about the Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. John E. Reid & Associates, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Davis, D, Leo, RA, Follette, WC. Selling confession: Setting the stage with the ‘sympathetic detective with a time-limited offer. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2010;26(4):441–57.Google Scholar
Cronkright, M. What if a parent confesses to shaking a baby? Part two. 2020. www.Michiganparentdefense.com/blog/2020/January/what-if-a-parent-confesses-to-shaking-a-baby-par2.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH. Mental vulnerabilities and false confession. In Investigative interviewing: The essentials. St.-Ives, M, ed. Carswell, 2014, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar