Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:40:53.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Forest landscape modeling as a tool to develop conservation targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Emin Zeki Baskent
Affiliation:
University, Faculty of Forestry, Turkey
Marc-André Villard
Affiliation:
Université de Moncton, Canada
Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Affiliation:
Mid-Sweden University, Sweden
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

International agreements emerging from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992 challenge the forestry sector to harmonize the ecological, economic, and socio-cultural values of forests. Criteria and Indicators (C&I) for the sustainable forest management initiative have been developed and implemented as part of the forest certification process. Within the past two decades, it has become clear that forest management regulations directly affect biodiversity conservation and thus have a critical role in moderating conservation values (Hunter 1999; Angelstam et al. 2004). The emerging idea of forest conservation in tandem with production has inspired researchers and forest managers to revisit the conventional philosophy of forest management. Various approaches, including timber management, integrated forest resource management, ecosystem management, landscape management, and spatial forest management have emerged to enhance sustainability.

A management planning process must follow a series of related activities. These typically begin with ecosystem surveys focusing on forest values such as wood, water, carbon, and biodiversity, followed by land stratification and the establishment of conservation targets and management objectives. Later, planning alternatives are developed to accommodate the principles, activities, or actions, and any constraints necessary for the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Nearly all current forest management practices apply planning methods that are believed to have a positive impact on forest ecosystems and ecological sustainability. Forest management typically integrates conservation of forests with the production of goods and services such as recreation, wood production, water quality, soil protection, and biodiversity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelstam, A., Dönz-Breuss, M. and Roberge, J. M. (eds.) 2004. Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecological Bulletins 51.
,Anonymous. 2007. SPECTRUM, an Analytical Tool for Building Natural Resource Management Models. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Inventory and Monitoring Institute.Google Scholar
Baskent, E. Z. and Keleş, S.. 2005. Spatial forest planning: a review. Ecological Modelling 188:145–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskent, E. Z. and Jordan, G. A.. 1995. Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25:1830–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskent, E. Z. and Jordan, G. A.. 2002. Forest landscape management modeling using simulated annealing. Forest Ecology and Management 165:29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskent, E. Z, Jordan, G. A. and Nurullah, A. M. M.. 2000. Designing forest landscape (ecosystems) management. Forestry Chronicle 76:739–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskent, E. Z., Terzioğlu, S. and Başkaya, Ş.. 2008. Developing and implementing multiple-use forest management planning in Turkey. Environmental Management 42:37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,BC Ministry of Forests. 1995. Biodiversity Guidebook: Forest Practices Code of British Columbia. Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
Bergeron, Y., Harvey, B., Leduc, A. and Gauthier, S.. 1999. Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: stand and forest level considerations. Forestry Chronicle 75:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, P., Sessions, J. and Johnson, K. N.. 1998. Ensuring the compatibility of aquatic habitat and commodity production goals in eastern Oregon with a taboo search procedure. Forest Science 44:96–112.Google Scholar
Bettinger, P., Johnson, D. L. and Johnson, K. N.. 2003. Spatial forest plan development with ecological and economic goals. Ecological Modelling 169:215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, P., Lennette, B. K., Johnson, K. N. and Spies, T. A.. 2005. A hierarchical spatial framework for forest landscape planning. Ecological Modelling 182:25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, M. and Forbes, G.. 2005. Forest Management Guidelines to Protect Native Biodiversity in the Greater Fundy Ecosystem, 2nd edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Co-operative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Bissonette, J. A. and Storch, I. (eds.) 2003. Landscape Ecology and Resource Management: Linking Theory with Practice. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Boston, K. and Bettinger, P.. 2001. Development of spatially feasible forest plans: a comparison of two modeling approaches. Silva Fennica 35:425–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bücking, W. 2003. Are there threshold numbers for protected forests?Journal of Environmental Management 67:37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunnell, F. L. and Huggard, D. J.. 1999. Biodiversity across spatial and temporal scales: problems and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L., Johnson, K., Bettinger, P. and Howard, T. E.. 2000. Forest Management, 4th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
DeGraaf, R. M. and Miller, R. I.. 1996. Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M.. 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management?Conservation Biology 8:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, E. J. and Crow, T. R.. 1999. HARVEST: linking timber harvest strategies to landscape patterns. Pp. 309–32 in Mladenoff, D. J. and Baker, W. L. (eds.) Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscapes: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. 2002. Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, J. M. and Whitman, A. A.. 2006. Biodiversity indicators for sustainable forestry: simplifying complexity. Journal of Forestry 104:203–10.Google Scholar
Harris, L. D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hof, J., Bevers, M., Joyce, L. and Kent, B.. 1994. An integer programming approach for spatially and temporally optimizing wildlife populations. Forest Science 40:177–91.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. L. (ed.) 1999. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Johnson, K. N., Stuart, T. and Crimm, S. A.. 1986. FORPLAN, Version 2: An overview. Washington, D.C.:USDA Forest Service, Land Management Planning Systems Section.Google Scholar
Jumppanen, J., Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T. and Uuttera, J.. 2003. Spatial harvest scheduling approach for areas involving multiple ownership. Forest Ecology and Management 5:27–38.Google Scholar
Juutinen, A. and Mönkkönen, M.. 2004. Testing alternative indicators for biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forests: ecology and economics. Ecological Economics 50:35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karahalil, U. 2003. Toprak Koruma ve Odun Üretimi Fonksiyonlarının Doğrusal Programlama İle Modellenmesi (Karanlıkdere Planlama Birimi Örneği). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Keane, R. E., Parsons, R. A. and Hessburg, P. F.. 2002. Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach, Ecological Modelling 151:29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keleş, S. 2003. Ormanların Su ve Odun Üretimi Fonksiyonlarının Doğrusal Programlama Tekniği İle Optimizasyonu (Karanlıkdere Planlama Birimi Örneği). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Kurttila, M. 2001. The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning – a landscape ecological perspective. Forest Ecology and Management 142:129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B., Margules, C. R. and Botkin, D. B.. 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conservation Biology 14:941–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G., Nelson, J. D. and Wardman, C. W.. 2000. A target-oriented approach to forest ecosystem design – changing the rules of forest planning. Ecological Modelling 127:269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. and Taylor, W. W.. 2002. Integrating Landscape Ecology and Resource Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, C. and Moore, T.. 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:468–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehle, C., Deusen, P. V., Wigley, B. T.et al. 2006. A test of sustainable forestry guidelines using bird habitat models and the Habplan harvest scheduler. Forest Ecology and Management 232:56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J.. 1994. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Unpublished Report. Corvallis, OR: Forest Science Department, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
McGarigal, K. and McComb, W. J.. 1995. Relationship between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregan Coast Range. Ecological Monographs 65:235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,McGregor Model Forest Association. 2001. ECHO Planning System Overview Manual. Available online at www.mcgregor.bc.ca.
Mendoza, G. A. and Prabhu, R. 2006. Participatory modeling and analysis for sustainable forest management: overview of soft system dynamics models and applications. Forest Policy and Economics 9:179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A. T. 1999. Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling. Forest Science 45:45–52.Google Scholar
Murray, A. T. and Church, R. L.. 1995. Heuristic solution approaches to operational forest planning problems. OR Spectrum 17:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. D. and Finn, S. T.. 1991. The influence of cut-block size and adjacency rules on harvest levels and road networks. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R. F. 1989. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4:355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurullah, A. M. M., Jordan, G. A. and Baskent, E. Z.. 2000. Spatial stratification. Forestry Chronicle 76:311–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohman, K. and Eriksson, L. O.. 1998. The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:1032–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parviainen, J. and Frank, G.. 2003. Protected forests in Europe approaches – harmonizing the definitions for international comparison. Journal of Environmental Management 67:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probst, J. R. and Crow, T. R.. 1991. Integrating biodiversity and resource management. Journal of Forestry 89:12–17.Google Scholar
Radeloff, V. C., Mladenoff, D. J., Gustafson, E. J.et al. 2006. Modeling forest harvesting effects on landscape pattern in the Northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. Forest Ecology and Management 236:113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwasser, H. 1994. Ecosystem management: can it sustain diversity and productivity?Journal of Forestry 92:6–10.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1993. How forest fragmentation hurts species and what to do about it. Pp. 85–90 in Proceedings of Sustainable Ecological Systems: Implementing an Ecological Approach to Land Management. July 12–15, 1993. Flagstaff, AZ: USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-247.Google Scholar
Temple, A. S. 1986. Predicting impacts of habitat fragmentation on forest birds: a comparison of two models. Pp. 301–4 in Verner, J., Morrison, M. L. and Ralph, C. J. (eds.) Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. W., Forsman, E. D., Lint, J. B.et al. 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl: a report of the Interagency Scientific Committee to address the conservation of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service, USDI BLM, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, K. R., Feunekes, U., Cogswell, A. and Cox, E.. 1999. A forest planning system for solving spatial harvest scheduling problems. Canadian Operations Research Society National Conference, June 7–9, 1999. Windsor, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Wilcove, D., McLellan, C. H. and Dobson, A. P.. 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. Pp. 237–356 in Soulé, M. E. (ed.) Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×