Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T22:41:09.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Kinematic assessment of grasping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

By
Umberto Castiello  and
Caterina Ansuini
Edited by
Dennis A. Nowak  and
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Dennis A. Nowak
Affiliation:
Klinik Kipfenberg, Kipfenberg, Germany
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Get access

Summary

Summary

Research on grasping kinematics has proved to be particularly insightful in revealing important aspects of the motor control and selection processes underlying the control of hand action. The aim of this chapter is to provide a synthetic overview of the main kinematic techniques which have been utilized for describing and quantifying grasping movements. The first part of the chapter includes a brief description of the basic kinematic principles. The second part focuses on the main techniques used to perform kinematic analysis of grasping movements. Specifically, it describes video, optoelectronic, and sensor bending techniques. The third part is concerned with a brief review of studies which have characterized the kinematics of grasping not only in healthy adults but also in developmental, neuropsychological and comparative research. We conclude the chapter by discussing recent research issues and technical approaches which have recently started to emerge.

Introduction

Interest in the kinematic analysis of grasping was largely stimulated by the work of Marc Jeannerod who identified how specific kinematic landmarks modulate with respect to object properties to allow for both successful hand positioning and object grasping (Jeannerod, 1981, 1984). Since these early observations, this movement has been well characterized in those with no neurological damage. For subjects with central nervous system damage kinematic assessment allows a complete description of dysfunction and consequently assists with diagnosis and design of appropriate therapeutic regimes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sensorimotor Control of Grasping
Physiology and Pathophysiology
 , pp. 20 - 32
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allard, P., Stokes, I. A. F. & Blanchi, J. P. (Eds.) (1995). Three-dimensional Analysis of Human Movement. Human Kinetics, USA.
Ansuini, C., Santello, M., Massaccesi, S. & Castiello, U. (2006). Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. J Neurophysiol, 95, 2456–2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansuini, C., Tognin, V., Turella, L. & Castiello, U. (2007). Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping. Exp Brain Res, 178, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becchio, C., Sartori, L., Bulgheroni, M. & Castiello, U. (2007). The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: a kinematic study on social intention. Conscious Cogn, Epub ahead of print.
Becchio, C., Sartori, L., Bulgheroni, M. & Castiello, U. (2008). Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach to grasp movement. Cognition, 106, 894–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begliomini, C., Wall, M. B., Smith, A. T. & Castiello, U. (2007). Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci, 25, 1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bootsma, R. J., Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L. & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1994). The speed-accuracy trade off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res, 98, 535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappozzo, A., Catani, F., Croce, U. D. & Leardini, A. (1996). Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech, 2, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiello, U. (2003). Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 29, 416–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castiello, U. (2005). The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev Neurosci, 6, 726–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattaneo, L., Voss, M., Brochier, T.et al. (2005). A cortico-cortical mechanism mediating object-driven grasp in humans. Proc Nat Ac Sci, 102, 898–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christel, M. I., & Billard, A. (2002). Comparison between macaques' and humans' kinematics of prehension: the role of morphological differences and control mechanisms. Behav Brain Res, 131, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davare, M., Andres, M., Cosnard, G., Thonnard, J. L. & Olivier, E. (2006). Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping. J Neurosci, 26, 2260–2268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehara, Y., Fujimoto, H., Miyazaki, S.et al. (1997). Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems. Gait Posture, 5, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J., Liu, L. J., Murphy, M. C. & Mann, R. W. (1997). A comparison of lower extremity skeletal kinematics measured with pin- and skin-mounted markers. Human Movement Sci, 16, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, E. P., Debowy, D. J., Ro, J. Y., Ghosh, S. & Babu, K. S. (2002). Sensory monitoring of prehension in the parietal lobe: a study using digital video. Behav Brain Res, 135, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S. & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102, 415–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, S., Miall, R. C. & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2005). Parietal rTMS selectively disrupts the initiation of on-line adjustments to a perturbation of object size. J Cogn Neurosci, 17, 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S. & Westling, G. (1991). The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip. Exp Brain Res, 83, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, L. S. & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res, 86, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, L. S., Archibald, Y., Carey, D. & Goodale, M. A. (1991). A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 29, 803–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav, 16, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (1986). Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: a study in normal and brain-damaged subjects. Neuropsychologia, 24, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Boczek-Funcke, A. & Illert, M. (1998). Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res, 122, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, C. R., Theverapperuma, L. S., Hendrix, C. M. & Ebner, T. J. (2004). Monkey hand postural synergies during reach-to-grasp in the absence of vision of the hand and object. J Neurophysiol, 91, 2826–2837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghavan, P., Santello, M., Krakauer, J. W. & Gordon, A. M. (2006). Shaping the hand to object contours after stroke. The control of fingertip position during whole hand grasping. Soc Neurosci Abst, 655, 14.Google Scholar
Raos, V., Umiltà, M. A., Murata, A., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2006). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol, 95, 709–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, N. J., Valyear, K. F., Goodale, M., Milner, A. D. & Culham, J. C. (2007). Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: an fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage, 36 (Suppl. 2), T87–T93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Farnè, A., Jouffrais, C. & Boussaoud, D. (2000). Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey. Behav Brain Res, 117, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santello, M. & Soechting, J. F. (1998). Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. J Neurophysiol, 79, 1307–1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Steenbergen, B. & Kamp, J. (1996). The role of fragility information in the guidance of the precision grip. Hum Mov Sci, 15, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S. V. & Poizner, H. (2003). Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res, 151, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S. V., Hening, W.et al. (2006). Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Exp Brain Res, 168, 186–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeets, J. B. & Brenner, E. (1999). A new view on grasping. Mot Control, 3, 237–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunik, E., Frey, S. H. & Grafton, S. T. (2005). Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci, 8, 505–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofsten, C. & Rönnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 14, 610–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, P. L., MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G. & Cargoe, S. L. (1991a). Is object texture a constraint on human prehension? Kinematic evidence. J Mot Behav, 23, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, P. L., MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., Cargoe, S. L. & Fraser, M. B. (1991b). The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Mot Behav, 23, 192–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, D. A. (1991). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 2nd edn. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Zoia, S., Pezzetta, E., Blason, L.et al. (2006). A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study. Dev Neuropsychol, 30, 719–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×