Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:10:59.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - Past, Future and the Maroon Community in Edouard Glissant's Le Quatrième Siècle

Celia Britton
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Edouard Glissant differs from the other writers considered in this book in that he is known as a philosopher as well as for his novels and poetry. The concepts of ‘Relation’ and ‘opacity’ that he develops in the essays collected in Poétique de la Relation in 1990 resonate closely with Nancy's reworking, over approximately the same period of time, of the notion of community. Nancy has written on mixed or creolized cultures in terms that are not unlike Glissant's treatment of this theme. But his more general concept of ‘being-singular-plural’ also has striking similarities with Glissant's ‘Relation’. In the first place, both insist on the primacy of the plural: the collective dimension of being is not something added on to an originary individual subject, but is itself originary. Like Nancy's singular beings, the component elements of Relation have no independent existence outside it: ‘La Relation, nous l'avons souligné, ne joue pas sur des éléments premiers, séparables ou réductibles […] Elle ne se précède pas dans son acte, ne se suppose aucun a priori’ (Poétique, p. 186). But at the same time, both writers refuse to conceive of this ‘primordial plurality’ (BSP, p. 67) as a fusion based on closure and sameness. ‘Relation’ theorizes the relation, precisely, of different elements: ‘non pas des indistinctions amalgamées, mais des écarts déterminants’ (Poétique, p. 157); and Glissant projects a new literature ‘par où le communautaire, sans s'effacer […] initierait à la totalité sans abdiquer le particulier; et relativiserait de la sorte le spécifique sans avoir à confondre l'Autre […] dans une transparence réductrice’ (pp. 67–68).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×