Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:14:34.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - Other Forms of Psychotherapy

from Part I - Therapy Theory and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2021

Edited by
Rachel Gibbons  and
Jo O'Reilly
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Seminars in the Psychotherapies , pp. 79
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Clark, DA, Beck, AT. Cognitive Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Science and Practice. New York: Guilford Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. Compassion Focused Therapy. London: Routledge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, KS, McEppalan, AM, Dobson, D. Empirical validation and cognitive-behavioural therapies. In Dobson, KS, Dozois, DJA, eds., Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press. 2019; pp. 32–63.Google Scholar
Linehan, M. Cognitive Behaviour Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Niedtfeld, I, Bohus, M. Understanding the bio in biosocial theory of BPD: recent developments and implications for treatment. In Swales, M, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2019; pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Beck, J. Cognitive Therapy Basics and Beyond. New York: Guilford Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Beck, AT, Emery, G. Anxiety Disorders and Phobias. New York: Basic Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Beck, AT, Rush, A, Shaw, BF, Emery, G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York: Guilford Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kennerley, H, Kirk, J, Westbrook, D. An Introduction to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Skills and Applications, 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 2016.Google Scholar
Koerner, K. Doing Dialectical Behavior Therapy: A Practical Guide. New York: Guilford Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Rizvi, S. Chain Analysis in Dialectical Behavior Therapy. New York: Guilford Press, 2019.Google Scholar

References

Lemma, A, Target, M, Fonagy, P. Brief Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Barkham, M, Guthrie, E, Hardy, GE, Margison, F. Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy: A Conversational Model. London: SAGE, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luborsky, L, Singer, B, Luborsky, L. Is it true that ‘everyone has won and all must have prizes’? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975; 32(8): 995–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, MJ, Ogles, BM. efficacy, The and effectiveness of psychotherapy: common factors and outcome. In Lambert, MJ, ed., Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2004; pp. 139–93.Google Scholar
Frank, JD. Therapeutic factors in psychotherapy. Am J Psychother 1971; 25(3): 350–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemma, A, Roth, AD, Pilling, S. The competences required to deliver effective psychoanalytic/psychodynamic therapy. London: Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology UCL, 2008. www.ucl.ac.uk/drupal/site_pals/sites/pals/files/migrated-files/PPC_Clinicians_Background_Paper.pdf [Accessed 22/03/2019]Google Scholar
www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/clinical-educational-and-health-psychology/research-groups/core/competence-frameworks [Accessed 22/03/2019]Google Scholar
Koss, MP, Shiang, J. Research on brief psychotherapy. In Bergin, AE, Garfield, SL, eds., Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change, 4th ed. New York: Wiley. 1994; pp. 664–700.Google Scholar
Barkham, M, Shapiro, DA, Hardy, GE, Rees, A. Psychotherapy in two-plus-one sessions: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for subsyndromal depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67: 201–11.Google Scholar
Barkham, M, Guthrie, E, Hardy, GE, Margison, F . The efficacy and effectiveness of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy: a 30-year overview. In: Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy: A Conversational Model. London: SAGE. 2017; pp. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, M. Short-term dynamic psychotherapy. In Bloch, S, ed., An Introduction to the Psychotherapies, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006; pp. 111–40.Google Scholar
Mann, J. Time-Limited Psychotherapy. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, RP. Brief Psychoanalytic Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Holmes, J, Slade, A. Attachment in Therapeutic Practice. London: SAGE, 2018.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L, Crits-Christoph, P. Understanding Transference: The CCRT Method. New York: Basic Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L. Documenting symptom formation during psychotherapy. In Miller, NE, Luborsky, L, Barber, JP, Dogherty, J, eds., Psychodynamic Treatment Research: A Handbook for Clinical Practice. New York: Basic Books. 1993; pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
Schacht, TE, Binder, JL, Strupp, HH. The dynamic focus. In Strupp, HH, Binder, JL, eds., Psychotherapy in a New Key: A Guide to Time-Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books. 1984; pp. 65–109.Google Scholar
Hobson, RF. Forms of Feeling: The Heart of Psychotherapy. London: Routledge (Tavistock), 1985.Google Scholar
Malan, DH. Individual Psychotherapy and the Science of Psychodynamics. London: Butterworths, 1979.Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. Internal World and External Reality: Object Relations Theory Applied. New York: Jason Aronson, 1985.Google Scholar
Budman, SH, Gurman, AS. The practice of brief therapy. Prof Psychol Res Pr 1983; 14: 277–92. Cited in [8] p. 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C, Margison, F, Barkham, M. The contribution of reliable and clinically-significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evid Based Ment Health 1998; 1(3): 70–2.Google Scholar
Feltham, A, Martin, K, Walker, L. et al. Using goals in therapy: the perspective of people with lived experience. In Cooper, M, Law, D, eds., Working with Goals in Psychotherapy and Counselling. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018; pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
Meares, R, Stevenson, J, Comerford, A. Psychotherapy with borderline patients: a comparison between treated and untreated cohorts. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1999; 33: 467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, DA, Barkham, M, Rees, A et al. Effect of treatment duration and severity of depression on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural and psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 522–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, WB. Assimilation of problematic experiences. In Norcross, JC, ed., Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002; pp. 165–81.Google Scholar
Stiles, WB, Elliott, R, Llewelyn, SP et al. Assimilation of problematic experiences by patient in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 1990; 27: 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, WB, Reynolds, S, Hardy, GE et al. Evaluation and description of psychotherapy sessions by patients using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire and the Session Impacts Scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 41: 175–85.Google Scholar
The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Manual [Gateway reference: 08101 Version number: 2] National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health: 2018. www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/improving-access-to-psychological-therapies-manual.pdf [Accessed 22/03/2018]Google Scholar
Lemma, A, Target, M, Fonagy, P. The development of a brief psychodynamic protocol for depression: dynamic interpersonal therapy. Psychoanal Psychother 2010; 24(4): 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margison, FR. Psychotherapy: advances in training methods. Adv Psychiatr Treat 1999; 5: 329–37.Google Scholar
Shaw, CM, Margison, FR, Guthrie, E et al. Psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy by inexperienced therapists in a naturalistic setting: a pilot study. Eur J PsychotherCounsell Health 2001; 4: 87–101.Google Scholar
Maguire, GP, Goldberg, DP, Hobson, RF et al. Evaluating the teaching of a model of psychotherapy. Br J Psychiatry 1984; 144: 575–80.Google Scholar
Guthrie, E, Margison, FR, Mackay, H et al. Effectiveness of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy training for primary care counsellors. Psychother Res 2004; 14: 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, E, Moorey, J, Margison, F. et al. Cost-effectiveness of brief psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy in high utilizers of psychiatric services. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 56: 519–26.Google Scholar
Meares, R. Intimacy & Alienation: Memory, Trauma and Personal Being. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Agnew, RM, Harper, H, Shapiro, DA, et al. Resolving a challenge to the therapeutic relationship: a single case-study. Br J Med Psychol 1994; 67: 155–70.Google Scholar
Stiles, WB, Glick, MJ, Osatuke, K et al. Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped? J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 51: 81–92.Google Scholar
Guthrie, E, Moorey, J. The theoretical basis of the Conversational Model of Therapy. Psychoanal Psychother 2018; 32(3): 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, E, Hughes, R, Brown, RJ. Pi‐E: an empathy skills training package to enhance therapeutic skills of IAPT and other therapists. Br J Psychother 2018; 34(3): 408–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, S. The Handbook of Brief Therapies. London: SAGE Publications, 2019 .Google Scholar

References

Bateson, G, Jackson, DD, Haley, J, Weakland, J. Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behav Sci 1956; 1(4): 251–4.Google Scholar
Fromm-Reichmann, F. Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry 1948; 11(3): 263–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynne, LC, Ryckoff, IM, Day, J, Hirsh, SI. Pseudo-mutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics. Psychiatry 1958; 21: 205–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidz, RW, Lidz, T. The family environment of schizophrenic patients. J Psychiatry 1949; 106: 332–45.Google Scholar
Lidz, T, Cornelison, A, Fleck, S, Terry, D. The intrafamilial environment of schizophrenic patients. II. Marital schism and marital skew. Am J Psychiatry 1957; 114: 241–8.Google Scholar
Bowen, M. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York: Jason Aaronson, 1978.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, M. Genograms: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Norton Professional Books, 2008.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L. General System Theory. New York: George Braziller, 1968.Google Scholar
Segal, L. Brief therapy: the MRI approach. In Gurman, AS, Kniskern, DP, eds., Handbook of Family Therapy. Vol. II. New York: Brunner/Mazel. 1991; pp. 171–99.Google Scholar
Satir, V. Conjoint Family Therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavioural Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Minuchin, S, Fischman, S. Family Therapy Techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Colapinto, J. Structural family therapy. In Gurman, AS, Kniskern, DP, eds., Handbook of Family Therapy. Vol. II. New York: Brunner/Mazel. 1991; pp. 417–43.Google Scholar
Haley, J. Problem Solving Therapy, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, 1987.Google Scholar
Madanes, C. Strategic Family Therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss, 1981.Google Scholar
Selvini-Palazzoli, M, Boscolo, L, Cecchin, G, Prata, G. Hypothesizing–circularity–neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Fam Process 1980; 19(1): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, PM, Hare-Mustin, RT. Ethical concerns in family therapy. Prof Psychol 1978; 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldner, V. Feminism and family therapy. Fam Process 1985; 24(1): 2431–47.Google Scholar
Dallos, R, Draper, R. An Introduction to Family Therapy, 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L. Beyond power and control: toward a ‘second order’ family systems therapy. Fam Syst Med 1985; 3(4): 381–96.Google Scholar
de Shazer, S. Keys to Solution in Brief Therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985.Google Scholar
Lipchik, E. Beyond Technique in Solution Focused Therapy. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Andersen, T (ed.). The Reflecting Team: Dialogues and Dialogues about the Dialogues. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991.Google Scholar
White, M, Epston, E. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1990.Google Scholar
Anderson, H, Goolishian, HA. Human systems as linguistic systems: evolving ideas about implications for theory and practice. Fam Process 1988; 27: 371–93.Google Scholar
Dallos, R. Attachment Narrative Therapy: Integrating Systemic, Narrative and Attachment Approaches. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, SM. The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating Connection, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Gehart, D. Mindfulness and Acceptance in Couple and Family Therapy, New York: Springer, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, A. Family therapy and systemic interventions for child-focused problems: the current evidence base. J Fam Ther 2019; 41: 153–213.Google Scholar
Carr, A. Couple therapy, family therapy and systemic interventions for adult‐focused problems: the current evidence base. J Fam Ther 2019; 41: 492–536.Google Scholar
Gehart, D. Theory and Treatment Planning in Family Therapy: A Competency-Based Approach. Pacific Grove: Brookes Cole, 2015.Google Scholar
Carr, A. Family Therapy Concepts Process and Practice, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar

Further Reading

McGoldrick, M. The Genogram Casebook: A Clinical Companion to Genograms: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Norton Professional Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Reiter, MD. Family Therapy, An Introduction to Process, Practice and Theory. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Ritvo, EC, Glick, ID. Marriage and Family Therapy. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

References

Hepple, J. An introduction to cognitive analytic therapy (CAT). 2010 – revised 2012, 2015, 2016, 2018. www.psychiatrycpd.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Ryle, A, Kellett, S, Hepple, J et al. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) at thirty. Adv PsychiatrTreat 2014; 20: 258–68.Google Scholar
Clarke, S, Thomas, P, James, K. Cognitive analytic therapy for personality disorder: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 129–34.Google Scholar
Chanen, AM, Jackson, HJ, McCutcheon, LK et al. Early intervention for adolescents with borderline personality disorder using cognitive analytic therapy: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193: 477–84.Google Scholar
Chanen, AM, Jackson, HJ, McCutcheon, LK et al. Early intervention for adolescents with borderline personality disorder: quasi-experimental comparison with treatment as usual. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43: 397–408.Google Scholar
Evans, M, Kellett, S, Heyland, S et al. Cognitive analytic therapy for bipolar disorder: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother 2017; 24(1): 22–35.Google Scholar
Kellett, S, Stockton, C, Marshall, H et al. Efficacy of narrative reformulation during cognitive analytic therapy for depression: randomized dismantling trial. J Affect Disord 2018; 239: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvert, R, Kellett, S, Hagan, T. Group cognitive analytic therapy for female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Br J Clin Psychol 2015; 28: 1–23.Google Scholar
Hepple, J, Sutton, L (eds.). Cognitive Analytic Therapy and Later Life. A New Perspective on Old Age. Hove and New York: Brünner-Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, J, Clayton, P (eds.). Cognitive Analytic Therapy for People with Intellectual Disabilities and their Carers. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
Kerr, I, Dent-Brown, K, Parry, G. Psychotherapy and mental health teams. Int Rev Psychiatry 2007; 19: 63–80.Google Scholar
Pollock, P, Stowell-Smith, M, Göpfert, M (eds.). Cognitive Analytic Therapy for Offenders: A New Approach to Forensic Psychotherapy, London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Fosbury, JA, Bosley, CM, Ryle, A et al. A trial of cognitive analytic therapy in poorly controlled type I patients. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 959–64.Google Scholar
Meadows, J, Kellett, S. Development and evaluation of Cognitive Analytic Guided Self-Help (CAT-SH) for use in IAPT services. Behav Cogn Psychother 2017; 45(3): 266–84.Google Scholar
Hepple, J. Cognitive analytic therapy in a group. Reflections on a dialogic approach. Br J Psychother 2012; 28(4): 474–95.Google Scholar
Hepple, J, Bowdrey, S. Cognitive analytic therapy in an open dialogic group – adaptations and advantages. Reformulation 2015; 43: 16–19.Google Scholar
Hepple, J. The witness and the judge. Cognitive analytic therapy in later life. The case of Maureen. Br J Ther Integr 2005; 2(2): 21–27.Google Scholar
Hepple, J. CAT reflective practice groups. Reformulation 2019; 54:16–22.Google Scholar

References

RCPsych Psychotherapies. www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mental-health/treatments-and-wellbeing/psychotherapies?searchTerms=GROUP%20PSYCHOTHERAPY [Accessed 6/11/2020]Google Scholar
Yalom, ID. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2005.Google Scholar
De Mare, P. Michael Foulkes and the Northfield experiment. In Pines, M, ed., The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge. 1983; pp. 218–31.Google Scholar
Pines, M. The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
Bion, WR. Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd, 1961.Google Scholar
Foulkes, SH. Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Karnac Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Wotton, L. Between the notes. Group Anal 2012; 46(10): 48–60.Google Scholar
Behr, H, Hearst, L. Group-Analytic Psychotherapy: A Meeting of Minds. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd, 2005.Google Scholar
Foulkes, SH. Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. Complexity and Group Processes: A Radically Social Understanding of Individuals. Hove: Brunner-Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. Affects and cognition in a social theory of unconscious processes. Group Anal 2005; 38(1): 159–76.Google Scholar
Zinkin, L. Malignant mirroring. Group Anal 1983; 16: 113–26.Google Scholar
Shermer, VL, Pines, M. Ring of Fire. Primitive Affects and Object Relations in Group Psychotherapy. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, RD. Attacks on the reflective space: containing primitive emotional states. In Schermer, VL, Pines, M, eds., Ring of Fire. Primitive Affects and Object Relations in Group Psychotherapy. London: Routledge. 1994; pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
Nitsun, M. The Anti-group: Destructive Forces in the Group and Their Creative Potential. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Brown, D. Pairing Bion and Foulkes. In Lipgar, RM, Pines, M, eds., Building on Bion. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2003; pp. 153–80.Google Scholar
Hopper, E. Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of Groups. London: Jessica Kinsgley Publishers Ltd, 2003.Google Scholar
Foulkes, SH. Group Analytic Psychotherapy: Methods and Principles. London: Gordon and Breech, 1975.Google Scholar
Barwick, N. Core concepts: what does the conductor do? Part 1. In Barwick, N, Weegman, M, eds., Group Therapy. A Group-Analytic Approach. London: Routledge. 2018; pp. 51–69.Google Scholar
Zinkin, L. The group as container and contained. Group Anal 1989; 22: 227–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlapobersky, J. From the Couch to the Circle: Group-Analytic Psychotherapy in Practice. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Papanastassiou, M. The Pygmalion concept in group analysis. The conductor’s anti-group and the search for the group as a container. Group Anal 2019; 52(1): 36–50.Google Scholar
Foulkes, SH, Anthony, EJ. Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytic Approach. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.Google Scholar
Hopper, E, Weinberg, H. The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies. London: Karnac Books; 2011.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, S. Group Analytic Psychotherapy. Working with Affective, Anxiety and Personality Disorders. Hove: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Brown, D. Assessment and selection for group. In Roberts, J, Pines, M, eds., The Practice of Group Analysis. London: Routledge. 1991; pp. 55–72.Google Scholar

References

Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
Rudrauf, D. Structure-function relationships behind the phenomenon of cognitive resilience in neurology: insights for neuroscience and medicine. Adv Neurosci 2014; 2014: 1–28.Google Scholar
Sharp, C, Fonagy, P, Goodyer, I. Social Cognition and Developmental Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Jurist, EJ. Mentalized affectivity. Psychoanal Psychol 2005; 22: 426–44.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P, Allison, E, Campbell, C. In Bateman, A, Fonagy, P, eds., Mentalizing, Resilience, and Epistemic Trust. Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 2019; pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
Bales, D, Verheul, R, Hutsebaut, J. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) for borderline personality disorder. Personal Ment Health 2017; 11: 118–31.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P, Gergely, G, Jurist, EL, Target, M. Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development if the Self. New York: Other Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P, Luyten, P. A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol 2009; 21: 1355–81.Google Scholar
Lieberman, MD. Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 259–89.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P, Bateman, A. The development of borderline personality disorder: a mentalizing model. J Pers Disord 2008; 22: 4–21.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P, Campbell, C, Bateman, A. Update on Diagnostic Issues for Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatric Times July 2016; 33(7).Google Scholar
Luyten, P, Fonagy, P, Lowyck, B, Vermote, R. Assessment of mentalization. In Bateman, A, Fonagy, P, eds., Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 2012; pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Sharp, C, Ha, C, Carbone, C et al. Hypermentalizing in adolescent inpatients: treatment effects and association with borderline traits. J Pers Disord 2013; 27: 3–18.Google Scholar
Ensink, K, Normandin, L, Target, M et al. Mentalization in children and mothers in the context of trauma: an initial study of the validity of the Child Reflective Functioning Scale. Br J Dev Psychol 2015; 33: 203–17.Google Scholar
Choi-Kain, LW, Fitzmaurice, GF, Zanarini, MC, Laverdiere, O, Gunderson, JG. The relationship between self-reported attachment styles, interpersonal dysfunction, and borderline personality disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2009; 197: 816–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunderson, J, Lyons-Ruth, K. BPD’s interpersonal hypersensitivity phenotype: a gene–environment–developmental model. J Pers Disord 2008; 22: 22–41.Google Scholar
Deckers, JW, Lobbestael, J, van Wingen, GA et al. The influence of stress on social cognition in patients with borderline personality disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015; 52: 119–29.Google Scholar
Berthelot, N, Ensink, K, Bernazzani, O et al. Intergenerational transmission of attachment in abused and neglected mothers: the role of trauma-specific reflective functioning. Infant Ment Health J 2015; 36: 200–12.Google Scholar
Luyten, P, Fonagy, P. Mentalizing and trauma. In Bateman, A, Fonagy, P, eds., Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 2019.Google Scholar
Weightman, MJ, Air, TM, Baune, BTFP. A review of the role of social cognition in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry 2014; 5: 179–83.Google Scholar
Luyten, P, Fonagy, P. The stress–reward–mentalizing model of depression: an integrative developmental cascade approach to child and adolescent depressive disorder based on the research domain criteria (RDoC) approach. Clin Psychol Rev 2018; 64: 87–98.Google Scholar
Lemma, A, Target, M, Fonagy, P. Brief Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Billeke, P, Boardman, S, Doraiswamy, PM. Social cognition in major depressive disorder: a new paradigm? Transl Neurosci 2013; 4: 437–47.Google Scholar
Sharp, C, Vanwoerden, SJ Hypermentalizing in borderline personality disorder: a model and data. J Infant Child Adolesc Psychother 2015; 14: 33–45.Google Scholar
Fotopoulou, A, Tsakiris, M. Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference. Neuropsychoanalysis 2017; 19: 3–28.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. Concerning knowledge of mental states. Br J Med Psychol 1990; 63: 199–214.Google Scholar
Debbané, M, Benmiloud, J, Salaminios, G et al. Mentalization-based treatment in clinical high-risk for psychosis: a rationale and clinical illustration. J Contemp Psychother 2016; 46: 217–25.Google Scholar
Bion, WR. Differentiation of the psychotic from the non-psychotic personalities. Int J Psychoanal 1957; 38: 266–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Debbané, M, Salaminios, G, Luyten, P et al. Attachment, neurobiology, and mentalizing along the psychosis continuum. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. Mentalization Based Treatment: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. Mentalization Based Treatment for Personality Disorders: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbard, G. When is transference work useful in dynamic psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163(10): 1667–9.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. The effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder – a randomised controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1563–9.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. 8-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder: mentalization-based treatment versus treatment as usual. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 631–38.Google Scholar
Bales, D, van Beek, N, Smits, M et al. Treatment outcome of 18-month, day hospital mentalization-based treatment (MBT) in patients with severe borderline personality disorder in the Netherlands. J Pers Disord 2012; 26: 815–20.Google Scholar
Bales, DL, Timman, R, Andrea, H et al. Effectiveness of day hospital mentalization-based treatment for patients with severe borderline personality disorder: a matched control study. Clin Psychol Psychother 2015; 22: 409–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bales, D, Timman, R, Luyten, P, Busschbach, J, Verheul, R. Implementation of evidence-based treatments for borderline personality disorder: the impact of organizational changes on treatment outcome of mentalization-based treatment. Personal Ment Health 2017; 11(4): 266–77.Google Scholar
Petersen, B, Toft, J, Christensen, L et al. A 2-year follow-up of mentalization orientated group therapy following day hospital treatment for patients with personality disorders. Personal Ment Health 2010; 4: 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. Randomized controlled trial of out-patient mentalization based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 1666: 1355–64.Google Scholar
Bateman, A. Treating borderline personality disorder in clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry 2012; 169: 1–4.Google Scholar
Somma, A, Ferrara, M, Terrinoni, A et al. Hypermentalizing as a marker of borderline personality disorder in Italian adolescents: a cross-cultural replication of Sharp and colleagues’ (2011) findings. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregulation 2019; 6: 5. doi:10.1186/s40479-019-0104-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, C, Kalpakci, A, Mellick, W. First evidence of a prospective relation between avoidance of internal states and borderline personality disorder features in adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015; 24: 283–90.Google Scholar
Bo, S, Sharp, C, Beck, E et al. First empirical evaluation of outcomes for mentalization-based group therapy for adolescents with BPD. Personal Disord 2017; 8: 396–401.Google Scholar
Rossouw, T, Fonagy, P. Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012; 51: 1304–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asen, E, Fonagy, P. Mentalization-based therapeutic interventions for families. J Fam Ther 2012; 34: 347–70.Google Scholar
Midgley, N, Alayza, A, Lawrence, H, Bellew, R. Adopting minds: a mentalization based therapy for families in a post-adoption support service: preliminary evaluation and service user experience. Adopt Foster 2018; 42: 22–37.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P. A randomized controlled trial of a mentalization-based intervention (MBT-FACTS) for families of people with borderline personality disorder. Personal Disord 2019; 10(1): 70–9.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, Fonagy, P, Bolton, R. Antisocial personality disorder: a mentalizing framework. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2013; XI(2): 178–86.Google Scholar
Bateman, A, O’Connell, J, Lorenzini, N, Gardner, T, Fonagy, P. A randomised controlled trial of mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for patients with comorbid borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 304: 304–11.Google Scholar
Philips, B, Wennberg, P, Konradsson, P, Franck, J. Mentalization-based treatment for concurrent borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder: a randomise controlled feasibility study. Eur Addict Res 2018; 24: 1–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, P, Hellier, J, Barrett, B et al. The NOURISHED randomised controlled trial comparing mentalization-based treatment for eating disorders (MBT-ED) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM-ED) for patients with eating disorders and symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Trials 2016; 17: 549–63.Google Scholar
Fuggle, P, Bevington, D, Cracknell, L et al. The Adolescent Mentalization-based Integrative Treatment (AMBIT) approach to outcome evaluation and manualization: adopting a learning organization approach. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015; 20(3): 419–35.Google Scholar
Asen, E, Campbell, C, Fonagy, P. Social systems: beyond the microcosm of the individual and family. In Bateman, A, Fonagy, P, eds., Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 2019; pp. 229–43.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×