Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:37:24.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Considerations in the Planning and Delivery of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Rachel Thomasson
Affiliation:
Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences
Elspeth Guthrie
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences
Allan House
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences
Get access

Summary

planning and delivery of liaison psychiatry services requires many decisions regarding, for example, staffing profile; the type of work to be undertaken and by which members of the team; the relation between the team’s work and the work of other parts of the local mental health services; and how outcomes will be measured. Putting all these decisions together with the rationale for them amounts to what is sometimes called a programme theory or logic model for the service – outlining what is expected to work for whom and under what circumstances. These decisions are not made in isolation: key influences on the final shape of a service will depend upon the views (and financial support!) of service commissioners, which are in turn influenced by national policy. Even a carefully worked-out configuration for a liaison service is unlikely to be realised exactly as planned – implementation (delivery) will be influenced by the practical limitations experienced by staff in day-to-day work, and by the views of patients and of the health professionals who do (or do not) refer to the service.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Walker, A, Barrett, JR, Lee, W et al. Organisation and delivery of liaison psychiatry services in general hospitals in England: Results of a national survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fay, D, Borrill, C, Amir, Z, Haward, R, West, MA. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi‐sample study of team innovation in health care. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2006;79(4):553–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, SK, Brumfitt, SM. Benefits and losses: A qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking. BMJ Qual Saf. 2008;17(2):127–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Mickan, SM. Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teams. Austral Health Rev. 2005;29(2):211–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, EA, McMeekin, AT, Khan, S, Makin, S, Shaw, B, Longson, D. An analysis of whether a working-age ward-based liaison psychiatry service requires the input of a liaison psychiatrist. BJPsych Bull. 2017;41(3):151–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomons, LC, Thachil, A, Burgess, C et al. Quality of psychiatric care in the general hospital: Referrer perceptions of an inpatient liaison psychiatry service. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(3):260–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saraiva, S, Guthrie, E, Walker, A et al. The nature and activity of liaison mental services in acute hospital settings: A multi-site cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruddy, R, House, A. Is clinical service development simply applied evidence-based medicine? A focus group study. Psychiatric Bull. 2005;29(7):259–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossey, M, Godier-McBard, L, Guthrie, EA et al. Understanding liaison psychiatry commissioning: An observational study. Ment Health Rev J. 2020;25(4):301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NHS England. Implementing the Five-Year Forward View for Mental Health. London; 2016.Google Scholar
Jasmin, K, Walker, A, Guthrie, E et al. Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: A qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, A, Guthrie, E, Walker, A et al. A programme theory for liaison mental health services in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breuer, E, De Silva, MJ, Shidaye, R et al. Planning and evaluating mental health services in low-and middle-income countries using theory of change. BJPsych. 2016;208(s56):s5562.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×