References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014
With contributions by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Semantic Web ExplainedThe Technology and Mathematics behind Web 3.0, pp. 451 - 459Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
[1] . Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.openrdf.org.
[2] Apache Software Foundation. Formatting object processor. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://xml.apache.org/fop.
[3] Apache Software Foundation. Jena toolkit. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://jena.apache.org.
[4] , , , and , editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
[5] and . Expressive number restrictions in Description Logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(3):319–350, 1999.Google Scholar
[6] , , and . OilEd: a Reason-able ontology editor for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of KI2001, Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 2174 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 396–408. Springer-Verlag, September 2001.Google Scholar
[7] , , et al. OWL Web Ontology Language reference. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref, February 2004. W3C recommendation.
[8] . Turtle – terse RDF triple language. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle, December 2006.
[9] and , editors. N-triples. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ntriples, 2001. W3C RDF core WG internal working draft.
[10] . The design and implementation of the Redland RDF application framework. In Proceedings of WWW '01, the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 449–456. ACM Press, 2001. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.21.312.Google Scholar
[11] , editor. RDF/XML syntax specification (revised). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar, February 2004. W3C recommendation.
[12] , , , , and . Information integration through reasoning on meta-data. In Proceedings of IJCAI'03 Workshop “Al Moves to IA, Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Information Access and Mobile Computing”, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 65–77, August 2003.Google Scholar
[13] , editor. Extensive Stylesheet Language (XSL) Version 1.1. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl, December 2006. W3C recommendation.
[14] , , , and , editors. HTML 5: a vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5, December 2012. W3C candidate recommendation.
[15] . Ideas about Web architecture – yet another notation, Notation 3. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html, August 2005.
[16] , and . RFC1945 – Hypertext Transfer Protocol 1.0. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1945/rfc1945, May 1996.
[17] , and . RFC3986 – uniform resource identifiers (URI): generic syntax. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt, January 2005.
[18] , and . Computability and Logic, Fifth Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
[19] and . A semantics and complete algorithm for subsumption in the CLASSIC Description Logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:277–308, 1994.Google Scholar
[20] . Compiling XQuery to Java bytecodes. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on XQuery Implementation, Experience and Perspectives, pp. 31–36, June 2004. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://per.bothner.com/papers/Qexo04/index.html.Google Scholar
[21] , , , and , editors. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0, Fifth Edition. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml, November 2008. W3C recommendation.
[22] and , editors. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema, February 2004. W3C recommendation.
[23] and . The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7):107–117, 1998. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.109.4049.Google Scholar
[24] , and . Description Logics for conceptual data modeling. In and , editors, Logics for Databases and Information Systems, pp. 229–264. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.5.2743.Google Scholar
[25] . The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1):9–36, 1976.Google Scholar
[26] and , editors. XML Path Language (XPath). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, November 1999. W3C recommendation.
[27] , and , editors. SPARQL protocol for RDF. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol, January 2008. W3C recommendation.
[28] , editor. XML transformations (XSLT). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt, November 1999. W3C recommendation.
[29] , , , , and . DAML+OIL reference description. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference, March 2001. W3C Note.
[30] . The Beth property for the modal logic of graded modalities, with an application to the Description Logic ALCQ. In Proceedings of the 8th ESSLLI Student Session, pp. 59–68, 2003. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: https://sites.google.com/site/willemconradie/files/Conradie1.pdf.Google Scholar
[31] CoreFiling Ltd. XML schema validator. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.corefiling.com/opensource/schemaValidate.html.
[32] Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Dublin Core. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://dublincore.org.
[33] . Model construction for configuration design. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications ofDescription Logics. Technical University of Dresden, Germany, 2002. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.5.649.Google Scholar
[34] English Words of Hungarian Origin. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Hungarian_origin.
[35] , editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, 1998. Book review: Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.14.2583.
[36] , and , editors. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2003, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, volume 2870 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, October 2003.
[37] , , , and . OIL: an ontology infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):38–45, 2001.Google Scholar
[38] , , , and , editors. XML Query (XQuery). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel, December 2004. W3C recommendation.
[39] JSON RDF Task Force. JSON+RDF. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON, September 2011.
[40] Fourthought, Inc. 4suite: an open-source platform for XML and RDF processing. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://foursuite.sourceforge.net.
[41] and . RFC2045 – multipurpose internet mail extensions (MIME). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt, November 1996.
[42] . Improvements to propositional satisfiability search algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1995. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.43.255.
[43] Glasgow Haskell compiler. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.haskell.org/ghc.
[44] Google. Google Scholar. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://scholar.google.com.
[45] . rdfDB: an RDF database. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://guha.com/rdfdb.
[46] , , and . Enabling inferencing. In Marchiori [77]. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/enabling.html.
[47] and . RACER User's Guide and Reference Manual Version 1.7.19. Montreal, Canada, 2003. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/r.f.moeller/racer/racer-manual-1-7-19.pdf.Google Scholar
[48] , , and . A comparison of RDF query languages. In Proceedings of ISWC 2004, the 3rd International Conference on The Semantic Web, volume 3298 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 502–517, November 2004. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.105.8731.Google Scholar
[49] and , editors. SPARQL 1.1 query language. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query, November 2012. W3C proposed recommendation.
[50] and . Very large scale retrieval and web search. In Ellen Voorhees and Donna Harman, editors, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval, pp. 199–231. MIT Press, 2005. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://es.csiro.au/pubs/trecbook_for_website.pdf.Google Scholar
[51] . Amphetadesk – syndicated news aggregator. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.disobey.com/amphetadesk.
[52] and The DARPA agent markup language. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(6):67–73, 2000.Google Scholar
[53] . Consistency checking reduced to satisfiability of concepts in terminological systems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 18:95–131, 1996.Google Scholar
[54] . Optimising tableaux decision procedures for Description Logics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, 1997. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/1997/phd.pdf.
[55] . The FaCT system. In , editor, Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods: International Conference on Tableaux'98, volume 1397 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 307–312. Springer-Verlag, 1998. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/1998/Horr98b.pdf.Google Scholar
[56] . Implementation and optimization techniques. In Baader et al. [4], pp. 306–346.
[57] , and . The even more irresistible SROIQ. In Proceedings of KR 2006, the 10th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 57–67. AAAI Press, 2006. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/2006/HoKS06a.pdf.Google Scholar
[58] and . Reducing OWL entailment to Description Logic satisfiability. In Fensel et al. [36], pp. 17–29.
[59] and . Three theses of representation in the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of WWW2003, the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 39–47. ACM Press, May 2003. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/2003/p50-horrocks.pdf.Google Scholar
[60] and . A Description Logic with transitive and inverse roles and role hierarchies. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(3):385–410, 1999. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/1999/090385.pdf.Google Scholar
[61] and . Ontology reasoning in the SHOQ(D) Description Logic. In IJCAI'01: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 1, pp. 199–204. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/2001/ijcai01.pdf.Google Scholar
[62] and . Decidability of SHIQ with complex role inclusion axioms. LTCS Report LTCS-02-06, Dresden University of Technology, Germany, 2002. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/2002/HoSa02b.pdf.Google Scholar
[63] , and . A Description Logic with transitive and converse roles, role hierarchies and qualifying number restrictions. LTCS Report LTCS-99-08, LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH Aachen, 1999. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/ian.horrocks/ Publications/download/1999/HoST99b.pdf (revised version).Google Scholar
[64] , Ulrike Sattler and Stephan Tobies. Practical reasoning for expressive Description Logics. In Proceedings of LPAR'99, the 6th International Conference on Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning, volume 1705 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 161–180. Springer-Verlag, 1999. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.36.5145.Google Scholar
[65] , and . A gentle introduction to Haskell 98, 1999. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.haskell.org/tutorial.
[66] , and . Piggy bank: experience the Semantic Web inside your web browser. In Proceedings of ISWC 2005, the 4th International Conference on the Semantic Web, volume 3729 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 413–430. Springer-Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
[67] Internet Archive. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.archive.org.
[68] ISO Prolog standard ISO/IEC 13211-1. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=INCITS%2fISO%2fIEC+13211-1-1995+(R2007), 1995.
[69] and , editors. Resource Description Framework (RDF) concepts and abstract syntax. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts, February 2004. W3C recommendation.
[70] . A method for web robots control. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html, 1996. Technical report, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
[71] . RDFLib Python library. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: https://github.com/RDFLib.
[72] . Enabling Semantic Web programming by integrating RDF and Common LISP. In Proceedings of SWWS'01, 1st Semantic Web Working Symposium, pp. 403–410, July 2001. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.\penalty\z@ist.\penalty\z@psu.\penalty\z@edu/\penalty\z@viewdoc/\penalty\z@summary?\penalty\z@doi=10.1.1.21.\penalty\z@3921.Google Scholar
[73] , Huei Chuang and Kent Seamons. Document ranking and the vector-space model. IEEE Software, 14(2):67–75, 1997.Google Scholar
[74] . Intelligent handling of RDF sources (in Hungarian). M.Sc. thesis, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 2003.
[75] and . RDF query specification. In Marchiori [77]. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/rdfquery.html.
[76] . Metalog. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Metalog. W3C research paper.
[77] , editor. Proceedings of QL'98, the Query Languages 1998 Conference. World Wide Web Consortium, December 1998. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98.
[78] . GENVL and WWWW: tools for taming the web. In Proceedings of the 1st World Wide Web Conference (WWW-1), pp. 79–90. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
[79] and , editors. XML syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX), Second Edition. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx, December 2010. W3C recommendation.
[80] . Inkling: RDF query using SquishQL. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/rdfquery, February 2005.
[81] , and . Three implementations of SquishQL, a simple RDF query language. In Proceedings of ISWC 2002, the First International Conference on the Semantic Web, volume 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 423–435. Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
[82] . RFC2141 – URN syntax. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2141, May 1997.
[83] . Expressive Description Logics: foundations for practical applications, 2001. Habilitation thesis, University of Hamburg. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.94.4283.
[84] and . RDF net API. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2003/SUBM-rdf-netapi-20031002.
[85] . Reasoning in Description Logics using resolution and deductive databases. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany, January 2006. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/boris.motik/pubs/motik06PhD.pdf.
[86] , and , editors. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, structural specification and functional-style syntax, Second Edition. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax, December 2012. W3C recommendation.
[87] National Institute of Standards and Technology. Text Retrieval Conference Series. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://trec.nist.gov.
[88] . Terminological cycles: semantics and computational properties. In , editor, Principles of Semantic Networks, pp. 331–362. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1991. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.49.6816.Google Scholar
[89] Netscape. Open directory project. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.dmoz.org.
[90] , and . The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: combining interoperability and flexibility. In Proceedings of EKAW2000, the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Methods, Models, and Tools, volume 1937 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 17–32. Springer-Verlag, October 2000.Google Scholar
[91] OpenGALEN Foundation. GALEN (generalised architecture for languages, ency-clopaedias and nomenclatures in medicine). Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.opengalen.org.
[92] , , and . The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.31.1768.
[93] , , et al. XQuery implementation in a relational database system. In Proceedings of VLDB'05, the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1175–1186. ACM Press, 2005.Google Scholar
[94] , and , editors. OWL Web Ontology Language semantics and abstract syntax. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics, February 2004. W3C recommendation.
[95] Polymeta – a meta search engine using query expansion. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.polymeta.com.
[96] Eric Prud'hommeaux and Andy Seaborne, editors. SPARQL query language for RDF. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query, January 2008. W3C recommendation.
[97] and . Evaluation of the music ontology framework. In Proceedings of ESWC2012, the 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference, May 27–31, 2012, volume 7295 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
[98] RDFizers. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/RDFizers.
[99] Alberto Reggiori. RDFStore – Perl/C RDF storage and API. Version 0.51. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://rdfstore.sourceforge.net, 2006.
[100] RSSOwl – a newsreader for everyone. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.rssowl.org/overview.
[101] . Subsumption in KL-ONE is undecidable. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 421–431. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1989.Google Scholar
[102] and . Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 48(1):1–26, February 1991.Google Scholar
[103] Additional materials for this book, The Semantic Web Explained. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.swexpld.org.
[104] Stanford Medical Informatics. Protégé. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://protege.stanford.edu.
[105] Danny|Sullivan. Checking your listing in search engines. In Search Engine Watch. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167861, October 2001.
[106] . The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(3):341–376, 1944. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2102968.Google Scholar
[107] , , and , editors. XML Schema Part 1: Structures, Second Edition. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1, October 2004. W3C recommendation.
[108] Unified Modeling Language. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.uml.org.
[109] Stuart|Weibel, Jean|Godby, Eric|Miller and Ron|Daniel. OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop report, Dublin, Ohio, USA. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://dublincore.org/workshops/dc1/report.shtml, March 1995.
[110] Jan|Wielemaker, Guus|Schreiber and Bob|Wielinga. Prolog-based infrastructure for RDF: performance and scalability. In Fensel et al. [36], pp. 644–658.
[111] World Wide Web Consortium. RDF validator. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator.
[112] World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Web activity. Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw.
[113] Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! Accessed 30 March 2013. URL: http://www.yahoo.com.
[114] , and . Using metadata to enhance web information gathering. In Proceedings of WebDB2000, the 3rd international Workshop on the World Wide Web and Databases, volume 1997 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 38–57. Springer-Verlag, May 2001.Google Scholar