Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:48:49.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Frame-Shifting and Scalar Implicature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

Seana Coulson
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Nearly one hundred Internet companies are preparing to entice Wall Street with initial public offerings. Numerous firms delayed their IPOs after many technology stocks that debuted during the summer slid below their initial selling price But many analysts believe the market may not be able to support so many new tech stocks. Some portfolio managers say it will be a matter of too few dollars for too many deals instead of too much cash for a few IPOs.

– Peter Jon Shuler, for National Public Radio's Morning Edition (September 14,1999)

Anyone with any doubt about the prevalence of natural language quantifiers need only open the morning paper, turn on the television, or tune in a radio broadcast such as the one excerpted above. In this short passage, we have “nearly one hundred Internet companies,” “numerous firms,” “many analysts,” “so many new tech stocks,” “some portfolio managers,” “too few dollars,” “too many deals,” “too much cash,” and “a few IPOs.” Intuitively, one might hope for a straightforward mapping between quantifiers and quantities, perhaps expressed as a percentage point. But, as luck would have it, things are not that simple.

Moxey & Sanford (1993) demonstrate that the comprehension of quantified expressions requires knowledge of the domain in question. For example, “numerous ants” presumably refers to more ants than the number of firms referredto by “numerous firms” in the preceding excerpt. Moreover, Moxey & Sanford point out how inquiries about quantity are frequently directed at eliciting advice about the advisability of pursuing a particular course of action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Semantic Leaps
Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction
, pp. 246 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×