Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:06:19.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - UNION ORGANIZATION IN ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

By
Michael Wallerstein
Edited by
David Austen-Smith ,
Jeffry A. Frieden ,
Miriam A. Golden ,
Karl Ove Moene  and
Adam Przeworski
David Austen-Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Jeffry A. Frieden
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Miriam A. Golden
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Karl Ove Moene
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Adam Przeworski
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Few features of economic, social, or political life in industrialized democracies differ as much as the relative size of the trade union movement. The current density of union membership in the labor force ranges over almost the entire spectrum from above 90% in Sweden to under 20% in the United States (Goldfield 1987, 16). The level of unionization varies far more than such other characteristics of the labor force as the sectoral distribution of workers, the share of wages in GNP, rates of unemployment, or even the size of the public sector. Unionization rates vary more than such other forms of popular mobilization as electoral turnout or the share of the vote received by parties bearing communist, socialist, social democratic, or labor labels.

The economic effects of high levels of unionization are ambiguous. Unions that are large relative to the economy may simultaneously have more power in the labor market and more of an incentive to moderate their wage demands. A union that covers only a small fraction of an industry's work force, for example, can gain wage increases partly at the expense of employment among nonunion members, provided that union members have specialized skills not readily available elsewhere. In contrast, an industrial union covering the entire work force would be concerned with employment in all job categories. Bigger unions are not necessarily more militant unions (Cameron 1984; Olson 1982, chap. 4).

Type
Chapter
Information
Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein
The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy
 , pp. 116 - 145
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, Gerard. 1983. Le pouvoir syndical. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Pencavel, John H.. 1969. “American Trade Union Growth: 1900–1960.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 83:434–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, George S., and Elshelkh, Farouk. 1976. Union Growth and the Business Cycle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bain, George S., and Price, Robert. 1980. Profiles of Union Growth: A Comparative Statistical Portrait of Eight Countries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnett, George E. 1916. “Growth of Labor Organization in the United States, 1897–1914.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 30:780–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Irving. 1954. “The Growth of American Unions.” American Economic Review 44:301–18.Google Scholar
Block, Richard N., 1980. “Union Organizing and the Allocation of Union Resources.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34:101–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72:1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1984. “Social Democracy, Corporatism, and Labor Quiescence: The Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society.” In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Goldthorpe, John H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Kim B. 1984. “Unionization and Firm Performance: The Impact on Profits, Growth, and Productivity.” American Economic Review 74:893–919.Google Scholar
Coldrick, Arthur P., and Jones, Philip. 1979. The International Directory of the Trade Union Movement. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
Commons, John R., et al. 1918. History of Labour in the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John T. 1949. “The Development of Labor Organization: A Theoretical Framework.” In Insights into Labor Issues, ed. Lester, Richard A. and Shister, Joseph. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ellwood, David T., and Fine, Glen. 1987. “Effects of Right-to-work Laws on Union Organizing.” Journal of Political Economy 95:250–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorito, Jack. 1982. “American Trade Union Growth: An Alternative Model.” Industrial Relations 21:123–27.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., and Medoff, James L.. 1981. “The Impact of the Percentage Organized on Union and Nonunion Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63:561–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., and Medoff, James L.. 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldfield, Michael. 1987. The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Headey, Bruce. 1970. “Trade Unions and National Wages Policies.” Journal of Politics 32:407–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1988. “Capitalism, Social Democratic Corporatism, and Economic Growth.” Journal of Politics 50:677–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane, 1984a. “On the Political Economy of Welfare Expansion: A Comparative Analysis of Eighteen Advanced Capitalist Democracies, 1960–1971.” Comparative Political Studies 17:81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane. 1984b. “Governmental Redistribution in Rich Capitalist Democracies.” Policy Studies Journal 13:265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, A. G. 1964. “Trade Unions and Wage Inflation in the United Kingdom 1893–1961.” Review of Economic Studies 31:221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, A. G. 1969. “Wage Inflation in the United Kingdom 1948–1962: A Disaggregated Study.” Economic Journal 79:66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T. 1980. “The Determinants of Unionization: An Analysis of Interarea Differences.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33:147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T., and Addison, John T.. 1986. The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ingham, Geoffrey K. 1974. Strikes and Industrial Conflict. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office. 1979–83. Yearbook of Labour Statistics. Geneva: ILO.
Israel. Central Bureau of Statistics. 1980. Statistical Abstract of Israel 1980. Jerusalem: Hamakor.
Kalai, Ehud. 1985. “Solutions to the Bargaining Problem.” In Social Goals and Social Organization: Essays in Memory of Elisha Pazner, ed. Hurwicz, Leonid, Schmekller, David, and Sonnenschein, Hugo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kassalow, Everett M. 1980. “The Closed and Union Shop in Western Europe: An American Perspective.” Journal of Labor Research 1:323–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Shalev, Michael. 1979. “Strikes, Industrial Relations, and Class Conflict in Capitalist Societies.” British Journal of Sociology 30:164–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Shalev, Michael. 1980. “Strikes, Power, and Politics in Western Nations, 1900–1976.” Political Power and Social Theory 1:301–34.Google Scholar
Lazear, Edward P. 1983. “A Microeconomic Theory of Labor Unions.” In New Approaches to Labor Unions, ed. Reid, Joseph D.. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Lorwin, Lewis L. 1933. The American Federation of Labor: History, Policies, and Prospects. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1982. The International Almanac of Electoral History. 2d ed. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Ian M., and Solow, Robert W.. 1981. “Wage Bargaining and Employment.” American Economic Review 71:896–908.Google Scholar
Menil, George. 1971. Bargaining: Monopoly Power versus Union Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moore, William J., and Pearce, Douglas K.. 1976. “Union Growth: A Test of the Ashenfelter-Pencavel Model.” Industrial Relations 15:244–47.Google Scholar
Nash, John F. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18:155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1984. Labor Force Statistics 1962–1982.Paris: OECD.
Przeworski, Adam. 1984. “Union Growth: A Review of the Literature.” University of Chicago. Typescript.
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Joel. 1985. “Divide and Conquer: The Legal Foundations of Postwar U.S. Labor Policy.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Michael, and Korpi, Walter. 1980. “Working Class Mobilization and American Exceptionalism.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 1:31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Ian G. 1971. “The Growth of Australian Trade Unions: 1907–1969.” Journal of Industrial Relations 13:138–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheflin, Neil, Troy, Leo, and Koeller, C. T.. 1981. “Structural Stability in Models of American Trade Union Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shister, Joseph. 1953. “The Logic of Union Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 61:413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1980. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.Google Scholar
Sutton, John. 1986. “Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory: An Introduction.” Review of Economic Studies 53:708–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swindinsky, R. 1974. “Trade Union Growth in Canada, 1911–1970.” Relations Industrielles 29:435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troy, Leo, and Sheflin, Neil. 1985. U.S. Union Sourcebook. West Orange, NJ: Industrial Relations Data and Information Services.Google Scholar
Tu, Pierre N. V. 1984. Introductory Optimization Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1985. World Statistics in Brief. New York: UN.
United Nations. Food and Agricultural Organization. 1985. FAO Trade Yearbook, 1984. Rome: FAO.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1956. Labor in Iceland. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1980. International Labor Profiles. Detroit: Grand River Books.
Voos, Paula B. 1983. “Union Organizing: Costs and Benefits.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36:57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voos, Paula B. 1984a. “Does It Pay To Organize? Estimating the Cost to Unions.” Monthly Labor Review 107 (June): 43–44.Google Scholar
Voos, Paula B. 1984b. “Trends in Union Organizing Expenditures, 1953–1977.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:52–63.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1987. “Unemployment, Collective Bargaining, and the Demand for Protection.” American Journal of Political Science 31:729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1988a. “Parties in Government.” University of California, Los Angeles. Typescript.
Wallerstein, Michael. 1988b. “Union Growth from the Unions' Perspective.” Institute of Industrial Relations Working Paper no. 149. University of California, Los Angeles.
Weinstein, James. 1975. Ambiguous Legacy: The Left in American Politics. New York: New View-points.Google Scholar
Weyworth, William O. 1917. The Organizability of Labor. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1981. “Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development.” In The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, ed. Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold J.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. K., and Burkitt, B., 1973. “Wage Determination and Trade Unions.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 20:107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Erik O. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×