Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Secondary Cities: Introduction to a Research Agenda
- 2 Shedding Light or Casting Shadows? Relations between Primary and Secondary Cities
- 3 Small and Medium-Sized Towns as Secondary Cities: The Case of Switzerland
- 4 From Sleepy Hollow to Winning from Second: Identity, Autonomy and Borrowed Size in an Australian Urban Region
- 5 Metropolization Processes and Intra-Regional Contrasts: The Uneven Fortunes of English Secondary Cities
- 6 Situating the Secondary City: Uneven Development and Regional Gentrification in Tacoma, WA
- 7 Borrowed Social Performance: Labour and Community Organizations in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California
- 8 Intra-Regional Relationality and Green City-Regionalism: Placing the Role of ‘Secondary Cities’
- 9 Conclusion: Advancing the Secondary City Perspective
- Index
4 - From Sleepy Hollow to Winning from Second: Identity, Autonomy and Borrowed Size in an Australian Urban Region
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Secondary Cities: Introduction to a Research Agenda
- 2 Shedding Light or Casting Shadows? Relations between Primary and Secondary Cities
- 3 Small and Medium-Sized Towns as Secondary Cities: The Case of Switzerland
- 4 From Sleepy Hollow to Winning from Second: Identity, Autonomy and Borrowed Size in an Australian Urban Region
- 5 Metropolization Processes and Intra-Regional Contrasts: The Uneven Fortunes of English Secondary Cities
- 6 Situating the Secondary City: Uneven Development and Regional Gentrification in Tacoma, WA
- 7 Borrowed Social Performance: Labour and Community Organizations in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California
- 8 Intra-Regional Relationality and Green City-Regionalism: Placing the Role of ‘Secondary Cities’
- 9 Conclusion: Advancing the Secondary City Perspective
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The Australian urban system has been shaped by its historical origins: separate periods of colonization and dependent development within the British Empire (Arnold et al, 1993; Schreuder and Ward, 2010). Six very separate colonial centres were established over the course of the 19th century as England occupied the country – Sydney as the capital of New South Wales (NSW) was created as a convict camp in 1788, as was Hobart on the southern island of Van Diemen's Land in 1804 and Moreton Bay-Brisbane in 1824 in south-eastern Queensland. In contrast, other colonies in the west – King George Sound (later Perth, 1826) – and south – Melbourne anchoring the Port Phillip colony (1835) and Adelaide, South Australia (1836) – were established as ‘free’ colonies based on commercial land uses. Limited by an arid interior and boosted by their roles as administration hubs, these ports and points of initial settlement in turn became the major centres of their 19th-century export-oriented economies: wheat from South and Western Australia, wool and meat from the remainder.
While large and dominant economically and politically, with all but Brisbane and Hobart becoming primate cities, the presence of these colonial capitals did not preclude the existence of other townships, servicing their inland pastoral, agricultural and later mining economies. Some of these centres saw themselves as successfully rivalling the first-order cities and, in the 20th century, grew on the basis of particular industries; examples include the steel cities of Newcastle and Wollongong adjacent to Sydney, Whyalla north of Adelaide and Kwinana near Perth (Rich, 1987). Despite the existence of such specialized centres, however, Australia remains a highly concentrated nation, with 70 per cent of its population residing in its state capitals, most of which show a high degree of primacy (Tomaney, 2010). Thus, in 2016, Sydney accommodated 65 per cent of its state population, Melbourne 75 per cent, Adelaide and Perth 75 per cent (ABS, 2018). This is despite many a political intervention – emanating from state and federal governments and supported by the regions – to decentralize the population. Being a secondary city in such a system therefore means being much smaller and massively overshadowed economically, culturally and politically. The ‘first city bonus’ in Australia is a large one (Cardoso and Meijers, 2010).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Secondary CitiesExploring Uneven Development in Dynamic Urban Regions of the Global North, pp. 79 - 102Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2021