from Part II - Eu Law Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2018
Introduction
If the number of authorisations available for grant has been limited to a maximum, these ‘limited authorisations’ need to be granted by means of an ‘allocation procedure’ in which applications are being compared with each other. Among the most well-known allocation procedures are the auction, the comparative assessment (‘beauty contest’), the lottery and allocation in order of receipt of the allocations (‘first come, first served’). It should be clear from the outset that the chosen allocation procedure might have important consequences for the final outcome of the allocation.
The issue of the (optimal) choice of the allocation procedure can be approached from among various disciplines and, within the discipline of law, from among various perspectives. This chapter explores whether EU law contains any preferences for allocation procedures or criteria to be applied and, if so, on which grounds. An example of such a preference might be that an auction is being preferred to a lottery. Th us, there might exist some kind of hierarchy between allocation procedures: some allocation procedures are considered ‘better’ than other allocation procedures from the perspective of EU law.
In order to unveil this possible hierarchy between allocation procedures from an EU law perspective, this chapter will first provide for some conceptual preliminaries necessary to understand the idea of a hierarchy between allocation procedures (Section 2). Next, this chapter will identify so-called ‘baseline’ requirements, i.e. minimal requirements that all allocation procedures should satisfy (Section 3). This chapter will then examine whether additional requirements can be imposed on allocation procedures. To that end, Section 4 adopts a bottom-up approach, identifying preferences for specific allocation procedures in sector-specific EU legislation. Complementarily, Section 5 will discuss whether EU law also provides for general guidance as to the choice of allocation procedures. In that respect, the areas of internal market law (fundamental freedoms), competition law and state aid law will be distinguished. Finally, the conclusion will discuss to what extent there exists some hierarchy between allocation procedures from the perspective of EU law (Section 6).
Conceptual Preliminaries
In order to clarify the line of reasoning to be followed in this chapter, some central terms need to be defined in advance.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.