Book contents
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
2 - Backlash in Theoretical Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2021
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 2 sets out the theoretical framework for the book. It suggests that there are four main drivers of backlash politics. The first is the tribunals’ abiding dependence on states. No matter how independent international courts are on paper, they still rely on state cooperation to hear cases, hold perpetrators to account, and garner compliance. Moreover, the tribunals depend on states for their operating budgets, staff, and normative legitimacy. The second driving factor of backlash is normative discontent. High rates of ratification mask underlying and significant normative divides about which human rights and accountability norms matter and why. The chapter then goes on to consider two additional drivers of backlash politics: the domestic consequences of international adjudication and the likelihood of future repression. The chapter concludes with an overview of the courts examined throughout the book and a discussion of Saving the International Justice Regime’s empirical approach.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Saving the International Justice RegimeBeyond Backlash against International Courts, pp. 35 - 61Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021