Book contents
- Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I What Is Sarcasm? How Is Sarcasm Expressed? What Does Sarcasm Do?
- Part II Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2022
Book contents
- Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I What Is Sarcasm? How Is Sarcasm Expressed? What Does Sarcasm Do?
- Part II Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sarcasm in Paul’s Letters , pp. 245 - 261Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Adams, Sean. 2010. ‘Lucian and the New Testament: An Evaluation of His Life, Work, and Relationship to New Testament Studies.’ The Expository Times 121.12:594–600.Google Scholar
Akimoto, Yoritaka, Takahashi, Hidetoshi, Gunji, Atsuko, Kaneko, Yuu, Asano, Michiko, Matsuo, Junko, Ota, Miho, et al. 2017. ‘Alpha Band Event-Related Desynchronization Underlying Social Situational Context Processing during Irony Comprehension: A Magnetoencephalography Source Localization Study.’ Brain and Language 175:42–46.Google Scholar
Allo, E.B. 1937. Saint Paul: Seconde épître aux Corinthiens. Études Bibliques. Paris: Librairie Lecoffre.Google Scholar
Arzt-Grabner, Peter, Kritzer, Ruth Elisabeth, Papathomas, Amphilochios, and Winter, Franz. 2006. 1. Korinther: Mit zwei Beiträgen von Michael Ernst, unter Mitarbeit von Günther Schwab und Andreas Bammer. Papyrologische Kommentare zum neuen Testament 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000a. ‘Irony Markers and Functions: Towards a Goal-Oriented Theory of Irony and Its Processing.’ Rask 12.1:3–20.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000b. ‘Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32.6:793–826.Google Scholar
Baltzer, K., Koenen, K., van der Kooij, A., and Wilk, F.. 2011. ‘Esaias / Isaias / Das Buch Jesaja.’ Pages 2484–695 in Septuaginta Deutsch: Erläuterungen und Kommentare zum griechischen Alten Testament. Edited by Karrer, Martin and Kraus, Wolfgang. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 1987. ‘Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case.’ Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31:73–93.Google Scholar
Barnett, P.W. 1984. ‘Opposition in Corinth.’ Journal for The Study of the New Testament 22: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, C.K. 1953. ‘Paul and the ‘Pillar’ Apostles.’ Pages 1–19 in Studia Paulina: in honorem Johannis de Zwaan septuagenarii. Edited by Sevenster, J.N. and Unnik, W.C.. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.K. 1971. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. 2nd ed. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.K. 1973. A Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.K. 1991. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2nd ed. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.K. 1994. The Acts of the Apostles. 2 vols. International Critical Commentary. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Baur, F.C. 1873. Paul, The Apostle of Jesus Christ, His Life and Works, His Epistles and Teaching: A Contribution to a Critical History of Primitive Christianity. Translated by A. P. 2nd ed. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Beard, Mary. 2014. Laughter in Ancient Rome: On Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berges, Ulrich. 2008. Jesaja 40–48. Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Alten Testament. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Bertschmann, Dorothea. 2014. Bowing before Christ – Nodding to the State? Reading Paul Politically with Oliver O’Donovan and John Howard Yoder. Library of New Testament Studies 502. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. 1972. Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition; eine exegetische Untersuchung zu seiner Apologie 2 Korinther 10-13. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. 1979. Galatians: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Churches in Galatia. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Boas, Evert van Emde, Rijksbaron, Albert, Huitink, Luuk, and de Bakker, Mathieu. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bogaert, Pierre Maurice. 2016. ‘Jeremias / Ieremias / Jeremia.’ Pages 577–95 in Einleitung in die Septuaginta. Edited by Kreuzer, Siegfried. Handbuch zur Septuaginta 1. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Bonnard, Pierre. 1953. L’épitre de saint Paul aux Galates. Commentaire du Nouveau Testament. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. 1969. Early Christian Experience. Translated by Paul Hammer. New Testament Library. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Braester, Marlena. 2009. ‘Du ‘signe ironique’ à l’énonce ironique.’ Semiotica 92.1–2:75–86.Google Scholar
Briones, David E. 2013. Paul’s Financial Policy: A Socio-Theological Approach. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bruce, F.F. 1982. The Epistle to the Galatians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Bruntsch, Richard, and Ruch, Willibald. 2017. ‘Studying Irony Detection Beyond Ironic Criticism: Let’s Include Ironic Praise.’ Frontiers in Psychology 8.606:1–15.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. 1985. The Second Letter to the Corinthians. Edited by Dinkler, Erich. Translated by Roy Harrisville. Minneapolis: Augsburg.Google Scholar
Burton, Ernest de Witt. 1921. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians. ICC. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Butler, H.E., ed. 1966. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2012. ‘Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction*.’ Noûs 46.4:587–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. 2009. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Campbell, John, and Katz, Albert. 2012. ‘Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony?’ Discourse Processes 49.6:459–80.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. Alastair. 1991. ‘Does Paul Acquiesce in Divisions at the Lord’s Supper.’ Novum Testamentum 33.1:61–70.Google Scholar
Campenhausen, Hans von. 1963. Aus der Frühzeit des Christentums. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Ciampa, Roy, and Rosner, Brian. 2010. The First Letter to the Corinthians. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Gerrig, Richard. 1984. ‘On the Pretense Theory of Irony.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113.1:121–6.Google Scholar
Clines, David J.A. 1989. Job 1–20; 21–37; 38–42. 3 vols. World Biblical Commentary 17–18B. Dallas: Word Books.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond. 1999. First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina 7. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 2007. ‘Salting a Wound or Sugaring a Pill: The Pragmatic Functions of Irony.’ Pages 319–38 in Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Edited by Gibbs, Raymond and Colston, Herbert. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 2017. ‘Irony Performance and Perception: What Underlies Verbal, Situational and Other Ironies?’ Pages 19–42 in Irony in Language Use and Communication. Edited by Athanasiadou, Angeliki and Colston, Herbert. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 2019. ‘Irony as Indirectness Cross-Linguistically: On the Scope of Generic Mechanisms.’ Pages 109–31 in Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Edited by Capone, Alessandro, García-Carpintero, Manuel, and Falzone, Alessandra. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 19. Springer.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. 1975. 1 Corinthians: A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthains. Translated by James Leitch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Cox, Claude. [Forthcoming]. Iob. Society of Biblical Literature Commentary on the Septuagint.Google Scholar
Cox, Claude. 2007. ‘To the Reader of Iob.’ Pages 667–70 in A New English Translation of the Septuagint. Edited by Pietersma, Albert and Wright, Benjamin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Claude. 2015. “Job.” Pages 385–400 in T&T Clark Companion to the Septuagint. Edited by James Aitken. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Cox, Claude. 2017. ‘The Book of Job in the New Testament.’ Available from: <www.academia.edu/33626545/Old_Greek_Job_in_the_New_Testament>..>Google Scholar
Cranfield, C.E.B. 1975. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. 6th ed. ICC. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 2006. ‘Why Irony Is Pretence.’ Pages 111–33 in The Architecture of the Imagination. Edited by Nichols, Shaun. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Nils. 2002. ‘Paul’s Letter to the Galatians: Epistolary Genre, Content, and Structure.’ Pages 117–42 in The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation. Edited by Nanos, Mark. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
deSilva, David. 2018. The Letter to the Galatians. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Winner, Ellen, Kaplan, Joan, Rosenblatt, Elizabeth, Hunt, Malia, Lim, Karen, McGovern, Angela, Qualter, Alison, and Smarsh, Bonnie. 1996. ‘Children’s Understanding of the Meaning and Functions of Verbal Irony.’ Child Development 67.6:3071–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhont, Marieke. 2018. Style and Context of Old Greek Job. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 183. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 1996. Greek Forms of Address. Oxford Classical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dines, Jennifer. 2015. ‘The Minor Prophets.’ Pages 438–55 in T&T Clark Companion to the Septuagint. Edited by Aitken, James K.. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dodd, Brian. 1999. Paul’s Paradigmatic “I”: Personal Example as Literary Strategy. Journal for the Study of The New Testament Supplement Series 213 177. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Driver, Samuel R., and Gray, George Buchanan. 1958. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Job. Repr. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Duling, D. 2008. ‘2 Corinthians 11:22: Historical Context, Rhetoric, and Ethnicity.’ HTS 64.2:819–43.Google Scholar
Dunn, James. 1988. Romans 1–8; Romans 9–16. 2 vols. World Biblical Commentary 38a, 38b. Dallas: Word Books.Google Scholar
Dunn, James. 1993. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians. Black’s New Testament Commentaries. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Dunn, James. 1996. The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans/Carlisle: Paternoster Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Neil. 2004. ‘Strategies of Resistance and Hidden Transcripts in the Pauline Communities.’ Pages 97–122 in Hidden Transcripts and the Arts of Resistance: Applying the Work of James C. Scott to Jesus and Paul. Edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Semeia 48. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Leonetti, Manuel. 2014. ‘Fronting and Irony in Spanish.’ Pages 309–42 in Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives. Edited by Dufter, Andreas and Octavio de Toledo, Álvaro S.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon. 1987. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon. 2014. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Rev. ed. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Fein, Ofer, Yeari, Menahem, and Giora, Rachel. 2015. ‘On the Priority of Salience-Based Interpretations: The Case of Sarcastic Irony.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 12.1:1–32.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, John T. 1988. Cracks in an Earthen Vessel: An Examination of the Catalogues of Hardships in the Corinthian Correspondence. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 99. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph. 1993. Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 33. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph. 2008. First Corinthians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 32. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, Christopher. 1986. ‘Comparison, Self-Praise and Irony: Paul’s Boasting and the Conventions of Hellenistic Rhetoric.’ New Testament Studies 32.1:1–30.Google Scholar
Furnish, Victor. 1984. II Corinthians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2003. ‘Caught in a Web of Irony: Job and His Embarrassed God.’ Pages 37–55 in Job 28: Cognition in Context. Edited by Van Wolde, Ellen.Google Scholar
Geiger, Michaela. 2018. ‘Ambiguität und Ironie in Hi 40,6–32(MT).’ Pages 30–49 in Die Septuaginta – Geschichte, Wirkung, Relevanz: 6. internationale Fachtagung veranstaltet von Septuaginta Deutsch (LXX.D), Wuppertal 21.–24. Juli 2016. Edited by Meiser, Martin, Geiger, Michaela, Kreuzer, Siegfried, and Sigismund, Marcus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament 405. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Georgi, Dieter. 1986. The Opponents of Paul in Second Corinthians. Translated by Harold Attridge. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 1986. ‘On the Psycholinguistics of Sarcasm.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115.1:3–15.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2012. ‘Are Ironic Acts Deliberate?’ Journal of Pragmatics 44.1:104–15.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1997. ‘Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.’ Cognitive Linguistics 8.3:183–206.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 2007. ‘“And Olmert Is a Responsible Man”: On the Priority of Salience-Based yet Incompatible Interpretations in Nonliteral Language.’ Cognitive Studies 14.3:269–81.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Fein, Ofer. 1999. ‘Irony Comprehension: The Graded Salience Hypothesis*.’ HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 12.4:425–36.Google Scholar
Godet, Frédéric Louis. 1883. Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Edited by Chambers, Talbot W.. Translated by A. Cusin. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Good, Edwin. 1981. Irony in the Old Testament. 2nd ed. Bible & Literature Series 3. Sheffield: Almond.Google Scholar
Gräßer, Erich. 1969. ‘Das eine Evangelium: Hermeneutische Erwagungen zu Gal 1:6-10.’ Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 66.3:306–44.Google Scholar
Gräßer, Erich. 2005. Der Zweite Brief an die Korinther. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Ökumenischer Taschenbuchkommentar zum neuen Testament. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Gruen, Erich S. 2009. Diaspora: Jews Amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1998. Talk Is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt-Löhr, A., Konkel, M., Löhr, H., and Usener, K.. 2011. ‘Jezekiel / Ezechiel / Hesekiel.’ Pages 2849–992 in Septuaginta Deutsch: Erläuterungen und Kommentare zum griechischen Alten Testament. Edited by Karrer, Martin and Kraus, Wolfgang. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey. 2004. ‘Verbal Irony Use in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Conversations.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23.4:447–63.Google Scholar
Häner, T. 2019. ‘The Exegetical Function of the Additions to Old Greek Job (42,17a-e).’ Biblica 100.1:34–49.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. Walter. 1989. Abraham in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Contexts. Journal for the Study of The New Testament Supplement Series 213 29. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Murray. 2005. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hartley, John E. 1991. The Book of Job. Repr. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 1985. ‘“Have We Found Abraham to Be Our Forefather According to the Flesh?” A Reconsideration of Rom 4:1.’ Novum Testamentum 27.1:76–98.Google Scholar
Heckel, Ulrich. 1993. Kraft in Schwachheit: Untersuchungen zu 2. Kor 10-13. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament 2.56. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Héring, Jean. 1967. The Second Epistle of Saint Paul to the Corinthians. Translated by P.J. Allcock and A.W. Heathcote. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Herzog, William II. 1994. ‘Dissembling, a Weapon of the Weak: The Case of Christ and Caesar in Mark 12:13–17 and Romans 13:1–7.’ Perspectives in Religious Studies 21.4:339–60.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Yair. 1996. A Blemished Perfection: The Book of Job in Context. Journal for the Study of The New Testament Supplement Series 213. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Glenn. 1993. ‘Speaking like a Fool: Irony in 2 Corinthians 10–13.’ Pages 250–64 in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Olbricht, Thomas and Porter, Stanley. Journal for the Study of The New Testament Supplement Series 213 90. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Glenn. 1997. ‘Paul’s Use of Irony as a Rhetorical Technique.’ Pages 234–48 in The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture: Essays from the 1995 London Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley and Olbricht, Thomas. Journal for the Study of The New Testament Supplement Series 213 146. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, Neil. 2008. Lucian: A Selection. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard. 1998. 1 Corinthians. Abingdon New Testament Commentaries. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Hughes, Philip. 1962. Paul’s Second Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott.Google Scholar
Hurley, Robert. 2006. ‘Ironie dramatique dans la mise en intrigue de l’empire en Romains 13, 1–7’. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 35.1:39–63.Google Scholar
Ingram, Virginia. 2017. ‘The Book of Job as a Satire with Mention of Verbal Irony.’ St Mark’s Review 239:51–62.Google Scholar
Jackson, David R. 2010. ‘“Who Is This Who Darkens Counsel?”: The Use of Rhetorical Irony in God’s Charges against Job.’ The Westminster Theological Journal 72.1:153–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lee A. 2017. ‘Paul’s Letters Reheard: A Performance-Critical Examination of the Preparation, Transportation, and Delivery of Paul’s Correspondence.’ Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79.1:60.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jakob. 1965. Humour and Irony in the New Testament: Illuminated by Parallels in the Talmud and Midrash. Reykjavík: Bókaútgáfa Menningarsjóds.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1942. ‘Die Legitimität des Apostels: Eine Untersuchung zu II Korinther 10–13.’ Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 41:33–71.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1963. ‘Introduction to Ferdinand Christian Baur: Ausgewählte Werke in Einzelausgaben.’ Edited by Scholder, Klaus. 4 vols. Historisch-kritisch Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament mit einer Einführung von Ernst Käsemann. Stuttgart: Friedrich Fromman.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1980. Commentary on Romans. Edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey. Translated by Geoffrey Bromiley. 4th ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Katz, Albert. 2009. ‘On the Science and Art of Sarcasm.’ Pages 81–96 in Disguise, Deception, Trompe-l’oeil: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Boldt-Irons, Leslie, Federici, Corrado, and Virgulti, Ernesto. Studies on Themes and Motifs in Literature 99. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Katz, Albert N., and Pexman, Penny M.. 1997. ‘Interpreting Figurative Statements: Speaker Occupation Can Change Metaphor to Irony.’ Metaphor and Symbol 12.1:19–41.Google Scholar
Keaney, J.J., and Lamberton, Robert. 1996. [Plutarch] Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer. American Philological Association 40. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Kee, Doyle. 1980. ‘Who Were the “Super-Apostles” of 2 Corinthians 10–13.’ Restoration Quarterly 23.2:65–76.Google Scholar
Kepper, M., and Witte, M.. 2011. ‘Job / Das Buch Ijob / Hiob.’ Pages 2041–126 in Septuaginta Deutsch: Erläuterungen und Kommentare zum griechischen Alten Testament. Edited by Karrer, Martin and Kraus, Wolfgang. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1966. The Concept of Irony: With Constant Reference to Socrates. Translated by Lee Capel. London: Collins.Google Scholar
King, Justin. 2018. Speech-in-Character, Diatribe, and Romans 3:1-9: Who’s Speaking When and Why It Matters. Biblical Interpretation Series 163. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. 1986. 2. Korintherbrief. Kommentar zum neuen Testament. Würtzberg: Echter.Google Scholar
Knox, Wilfred. 1939. St Paul and the Church of the Gentiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kooij, A. van der 2016. ‘Esaias / Isaias / Jesaja.’ Pages 559–73 in Einleitung in die Septuaginta. Edited by Kreuzer, Siegfried. Handbuch zur Septuaginta 1. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Kooij, A., van der and Wilk, F.. 2011. ‘Esaias / Das Buch Jesaja. Einleitung.’ Pages 2484–504 in Septuaginta Deutsch: Erläuterungen und Kommentare zum griechischen Alten Testament. Edited by Karrer, Martin and Kraus, Wolfgang. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Koole, Jan Leunis. 1997. Isaiah III: Isaiah 40–48. Vol. 1. 3 vols. Historical Commentary on the Old Testament. Kampen: Kok.Google Scholar
Kovaz, David, Kreuz, Roger, and Riordan, Monica. 2013. ‘Distinguishing Sarcasm from Literal Language: Evidence from Books and Blogging.’ Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 50.8:598–615.Google Scholar
Kowatch, Kristy, Whalen, Juanita M., and Pexman, Penny M.. 2013. ‘Irony Comprehension in Action: A New Test of Processing for Verbal Irony.’ Discourse Processes 50.5:301–15.Google Scholar
Kraft, Robert, ed. 1974. The Testament of Job. Texts and Translations 5; PS 4. Missoula: Society of Biblical Literature & Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
Kremendahl, Dieter. 2000. Die Botschaft der Form: Zum Verhältnis von Antiker Epistolographie und Rhetorik im Galaterbrief. Novum Testamentum et orbis antiquus 46. Freiburg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, and Glucksberg, Sam. 1989. ‘How to Be Sarcastic: The Echoic Reminder Theory of Verbal Irony.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118.4:374–86.Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, and Roberts, Richard. 1995. ‘Two Cues for Verbal Irony: Hyperbole and the Ironic Tone of Voice. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity 10.1:21–31.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam, and Brown, Mary. 1995. ‘How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124.1:3–21.Google Scholar
Kynes, Will. 2012. My Psalm Has Turned into Weeping, Job’s Dialogue with the Psalms. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lagrange, M. 1931. Saint Paul, épître aux Romains. Études bibliques. Paris: J. Gabalda et Fils.Google Scholar
Lampe, G.W.H. 1968. A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon (accessed via Thesaurus Linguae Graecae).Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. 2006. ‘The Evolution of Eirōneia in Classical Greek Texts: Why Socratic Eirōneia Is Not Socratic Irony.’ Pages 49–83 in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXI: Winter 2006. Edited by Sedley, David. Vol. 31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. 2010. ‘Reconsidering Socratic Irony.’ Pages 237–59 in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Edited by Morrison, Donald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lateiner, Donald. 1995. Sardonic Smile: Nonverbal Behavior in Homeric Epic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lauber, Stephan. 2017. ‘Ironie im Ijob-Buch.’ Pages 156–73 in «Darum, Ihr Hirten, Hört das Wort des Herrn» (Ez 34,7.9): Studien zu Prophetischen und weisheitlichen Texten. Edited by Gregor Müller, Christoph and Helmer, Matthias. Fuldaer Studien 21. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Levy, Harry. 1976. Lucian: Seventy Dialogues. The American Philological Association Series of Classical Texts. Norman: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Lichtenberger, Hermann. 2017. ‘Da lachen ja die Engel! Humor im neuen Testament.’ Pages 95–112 in Religion und Humor. Edited by Martin Dober, Hans. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1923. An die Galater: Erklärt von Hans Lietzmann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1931. An die Korinther I & II. 3rd ed. Handbuch zum neuen Testament 9. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. B. 1876. St. Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians: A Revised Text with Introduction, Notes and Dissertations by J.B. Lightfoot. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lim, Sung. 2015. ‘A Double-Voiced Reading of Romans 13:1–7 in Light of the Imperial Cult.’ HTS Theological Studies 71.1:1–10.Google Scholar
Lim, Timothy H. 1987. ‘“Not in Persuasive Words of Wisdom, but in the Demonstration of the Spirit and Power”.’ Novum Testamentum 29.2:137–49.Google Scholar
Linss, Wilhelm C. 1998. ‘The Hidden Humor of St Paul.’ Currents in Theology and Mission: 25: 195–99.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Richard. 2016. The Epistle to the Romans: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Loubser, J.A. 1992. “A New Look at Paradox and Irony in 2 Corinthians 10-13.” Neotestamentica 26.2:507–21.Google Scholar
Lucariello, Joan. 1994. ‘Situational Irony: A Concept of Events Gone Awry.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123.2:129–45.Google Scholar
Luciani, Didier. 2009. ‘L’ironie vétéro-testamentaire: de Good à Sharp.’ Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses 85.4:385–410.Google Scholar
Lust, Johan. 2016. ‘Jezekiel / Ezechiel / Hesekiel.’ Pages 613–32 in Einleitung in die Septuaginta. Edited by Kreuzer, Siegfried. Handbuch zur Septuaginta 1. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, R.A.F. 1959. ‘Purpose of the Yahweh Speeches in the Book of Job.’ Biblica 40.2:435–45.Google Scholar
MacLeod, M.D. 1991. Lucian: A Selection. Classical Texts. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. 1980. ‘Mē Genoito in the Diatribe and Paul.’ Harvard Theological Review 73.1–2:231–40.Google Scholar
Manson, T.W. 1962. ‘Romans.’ Pages 940–54 in Peake’s Commentary on the Bible. Edited by Matthew Black. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Marshall, John W. 2008. ‘Hybridity and Reading Romans 13.’ Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31.2:157–78.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph. 2014. 2 Corinthians. 2nd ed. World Biblical Commentary 40. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. Louis. 1997. Galatians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 33A. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Matera, Frank. 2003. II Corinthians: A Commentary. The New Testament Library. London: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
McClelland, S.E. 1982. ‘“Super-Apostles, Servants of Christ, Servants of Satan’: A Response.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 14:82–87.Google Scholar
McLay, Tim. 2003. The Use of the Septuagint in New Testament Research. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Meier, Mischa (Bielefeld). 2006. ‘Kalokagathia.’ Edited by Hubert Cancik, Helmuth Schneider, Manfred Landfester, Christine Salazar, and Francis Gentry. Brill’s New Pauly. Available from <https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/kalokagathia-e607270?s.num=0&s.f.s2_parent=s.f.book.brill-s-new-pauly&s.q=Kalokagathia>..>Google Scholar
Michel, Otto. 1978. Der Brief an die Römer. 5. bearb. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das neue Testament 4. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Minchin, Elizabeth. 2010a. “From Gentle Teasing to Heavy Sarcasm: Instances of Rhetorical Irony in Homer’s Iliad.” Hermes: Zeitschrift für klassische Philologie 138.4:387–402.Google Scholar
Minchin, Elizabeth. 2010b. ‘The Expression of Sarcasm in the Odyssey.’ Mnemosyne: Bibliotheca Classica Batava 4.63:533–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret. 1991. Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. Vol. 28. Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zu Theologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Montgomery, James. 1951. The Books of Kings. Edited by Snyder Gehman, Henry. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Moo, Douglas. 1996. The Epistle to the Romans. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Moo, Douglas. 2013. Galatians. 3 vols. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Moule, C.F.D. 1953. An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, Terence. 1972. ‘Formulas in New Testament Epistles.’ Journal of Biblical Literature 91.3:380–90.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. 2009. Keys to First Corinthians: Revisiting the Major Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. 2010. Keys to Second Corinthians: Revisiting the Major Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, John. 1967. The Epistle to the Romans: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition and Notes. Lenski’s Commentary on the New Testament. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott.Google Scholar
Nanos, Mark. 2002. The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-Century Context. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Naselli, Andrew David. 2017. ‘Is Every Sin Outside the Body except Immoral Sex? Weighing Whether 1 Corinthians 6:18b Is Paul’s Statement or a Corinthian Slogan.’ Journal of Biblical Literature 136.4:969–87.Google Scholar
Newell, Lynne. 1992. ‘Job: Repentant or Rebellious.’ Pages 441–56 in Sitting with Job: Selected Studies on the Book of Job. Edited by Zuck, Roy B.. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Ngunga, Abi, and Schaper, Joachim. 2015. ‘Isaiah.’ Pages 456–68 in T&T Clark Companion to the Septuagint. Edited by Aitken, James K.. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nikolakopoulos, Konstantin. 2001. ‘Aspekte der ,paulinischen Ironie’ am Beispiel des Galaterbriefes.’ Biblische Zeitschrift 45.2. Ferdinand Schöningh:193–208.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Lars. 2015. Greek Interjections: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. TL 273. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Novenson, Matthew. 2016. ‘The Self-Styled Jew of Romans 2 and the Actual Jews of Romans 9–11.’ Pages 133–62 in The So-Called Jew in Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Edited by Rodríguez, Rafael and Thiessen, Matthew. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Nygren, Anders. 1952. Commentary on Romans. Translated by Carl Rasmussen. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Bernhard. 2012. Performanzkritik der Paulusbriefe. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament 296. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shinichiro. 2002. ‘Politeness and the Perception of Irony: Honorifics in Japanese.’ Metaphor and Symbol 17.2:119–39.Google Scholar
Olley, John W. 2009. Ezekiel: A Commentary Based on Iezekiēl in Codex Vaticanus. Septuagint Commentary Series. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Omanson, Roger L. 1992. ‘Acknowledging Paul’s Quotations.’ The Bible Translator 43.2:201–13.Google Scholar
Oswalt, John. 1998. The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 40–66. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Parsons, Gregory W. 1992. ‘Literary Features of the Book of Job.’ Pages 35–50 in Sitting with Job: Selected Studies on the Book of Job. Edited by Zuck, Roy B.. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Pawlak, Matthew C. 2018. ‘Consistency Isn’t Everything: Self-Commendation in 2 Corinthians.’ Journal for the Study of the New Testament: 360–82.Google Scholar
Pawlak, Matthew C. 2019. ‘How to Be Sarcastic in Greek: Typical Means of Signaling Sarcasm in the New Testament and Lucian.’ HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 32.4:545–64.Google Scholar
Pawlak, Matthew C. 2021. ‘Is Galatians an Ironic Letter?: Θαυµάζω, Ancient Letter Writing Handbooks, and Galatians 1:6’. Novum Testamentum 63.2:249–70.Google Scholar
Pelham, Abigail. 2010. ‘Job as Comedy, Revisited.’ Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 35.1:89–112.Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. 2008. ‘It’s Fascinating Research: The Cognition of Verbal Irony.”’ Current Directions in Psychological Science 17.4:286–90.Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Ferretti, Todd R., and Katz, Albert N.. 2000. ‘Discourse Factors That Influence Online Reading of Metaphor and Irony.’ Discourse Processes 29.3:201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, Robert Henry. 1953. Introduction to the Old Testament. Repr.; Rev. ed. London: Black.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Marília Pulquério Futre. 2012. ‘Irony, Satire and Parody in Lucian’s ‘The Dead Come to Life, or The Fisherman.’ Trends in Classics 4.2:296–315.Google Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka. 2016. ‘Echo and Inadequacy in Ironic Utterances.’ Journal of Pragmatics 101:54–65.Google Scholar
Plummer, A. 1915. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Pogoloff, Stephen. 1992. Logos and Sophia: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 134. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela. 2014. ‘Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony.’ International Review of Pragmatics 6.1:127–68.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley. 1991. ‘The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?’ Journal of Biblical Literature 110.4:655–77.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley. 1992. Idioms of the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. Biblical Languages: Greek 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ritter-Müller, Petra. 2000. Kennst du die Welt? – Gottes Antwort an Ijob: Eine sprachwissenschaftliche und exegetische Studie zur ersten Gottesrede Ijob 38 und 39. Altes Testament und Moderne 5. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. H. 1991. ‘ΘΑΥΜΑΖΩ: An Expression of Perplexity in Some Examples from Papyri Letters.’ Neotestamentica 25.1:109–22.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. H. 1992. ‘Paul’s Expression of Perplexity in Galatians 1:6: The Force of Emotive Argumentation.’ Neotestamentica 26.2:329–38.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia. 2001. ‘Facial Expression and Sarcasm.’ Perceptual and Motor Skills 93.1:47–50.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia. 2007. ‘Vocal Features of Conversational Sarcasm: A Comparison of Methods.’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36.5:361–69.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Rafael. 2016. ‘Romans 5–8 in Light of Paul’s Dialogue with a Gentile Who “Calls Himself a Jew”.’ Pages 101–32 in The So-Called Jew in Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Edited by Rodríguez, Rafael and Thiessen, Matthew. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Rusten, Jeffery, and Cunningham, I.C., eds. 1993. Theophrastus: Characters. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Ryan. 2013. Rethinking Paul’s Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13. 10. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Ryan. 2016. ‘Paul, Samson Occom, and the Constraints of Boasting: A Comparative Rereading of 2 Corinthians 10–13*.’ Harvard Theological Review 109.4:512–35.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Ryan. 2018. ‘Did Paul Refuse an Offer of Support from the Corinthians?’ Journal for the Study of the New Testament 40.3:312–36.Google Scholar
Schlatter, A. 1928. ‘Der frühere Brief an die Korinther.’ Erläuterungen zum neuen Testament. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Stuttgart: Calwer.Google Scholar
Schmeller, Thomas. 1987. Paulus und die „Diatribe”: Eine vergleichende Stilinterpretation. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen 19. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandung GmbH & Co.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hans. 1963. Der Brief des Paulus an die Römer. THNT 6. Berlin: Evangelische Verlaganstalt.Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. 1971. Gnosticism in Corinth: An Investigation of the Letters to the Corinthians. Translated by John Steely. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Leonhard. 1873. ‘Alexander Numenius.’ Page 123 in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Edited by Smith, W.. Vol. 1. 3 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Schrage, Wolfgang. 1991. Der erste Brief an die Korinther. 4 vols. Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum neuen Testament 7. Braunschweig: Benziger.Google Scholar
Schröter, Jens. 2013. From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon. Translated by Wayne Coppins. Waco: Baylor.Google Scholar
Schütz, Roland. 1958. Humor und Ironie bei Jesus und Paulus. Freies Christentum 29. Frankfurt: Deutscher Bund für Freies Christentum.Google Scholar
Seto, Ken-Ichi. 1998. ‘On Non-Echoic Irony.’ Pages 239–56 in Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Edited by Carston, Robyn and Uchida, Seiji. Pragmatics and Beyond 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shead, Andrew. 2015. ‘Jeremiah.’ Pages 469–86 in T&T Clark Companion to the Septuagint. Edited by James Aitken. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Shelley, Cameron. 2001. ‘The Bicoherence Theory of Situational Irony.’ Cognitive Science 25.5:775–818.Google Scholar
Siebenmann, Paul Charles. 1997. ‘The Question of Slogans in 1 Corinthians.’ Ph.D. diss. Texas: Baylor University.Google Scholar
Siegert, Folker. 1985. Argumentation bei Paulus: Gezeigt an Röm 9–11. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament 34. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Sim, Margaret. 2016. A Relevant Way to Read: A New Approach to Exegesis and Communication. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spencer, Aída Besançon. 1981. ‘The Wise Fool (and the Foolish Wise): A Study of Irony in Paul.’ Novum Testamentum 23.4:349–60.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1984. ‘Verbal Irony: Pretense or Echoic Mention.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113.1:130–36.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1978. ‘Les ironies comme mentions.’ Poétique 36:399–412.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. ‘Irony and the Use–Mention Distinction.’ Pages 295–318 in Radical Pragmatics. Edited by Cole, Peter. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1998. “Irony and Relevance: A Reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi.” Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Edited by Carston, Robyn and Seiji Uchida, . Pragmatics and Beyond 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spotorno, Nicola, Cheylus, Anne, Van Der Henst, Jean-Baptiste, and Noveck, Ira A.. 2013. ‘What’s Behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing.’ PLOS ONE 8.6:1–10.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley. 1981. The Diatribe and Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 57. Chico: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley. 1984. ‘Paul’s Dialogue with a Fellow Jew in Romans 3:1-9.’ The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 46.4:707–22.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley. 1994. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sumney, Jerry. 1990. Identifying Paul’s Opponents: The Question of Method in 2 Corinthians. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 40. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sundermann, Hans-Georg. 1996. Der schwache Apostel und die Kraft der Rede. 575. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony. 1973. ‘Meaning of Sarx in 1 Corinthians 5:5: A Fresh Approach in the Light of Logical and Semantic Factors.’ Scottish Journal of Theology 26.2:204–28.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony. 2000. The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, Runar M. 2003. Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans 2: Function and Identity in the Context of Ancient Epistolography. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret. 1994. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary. 2 vols. International Critical Commentary 32B. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira. 2000. ‘Verbal Irony as Implicit Display of Ironic Environment: Distinguishing Ironic Utterances from Nonirony.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32.12:1777–806.Google Scholar
Van Voorst, Robert. 2010. ‘Why Is There No Thanksgiving Period in Galatians? An Assessment of an Exegetical Commonplace.’ Journal of Biblical Literature 129.1:153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonach, A. 2011. ‘Jeremias / Das Buch Jeremia.’ Pages 2696–814 in Septuaginta Deutsch: Erläuterungen und Kommentare zum griechischen Alten Testament. Edited by Kraus, Wolfgang and Karrer, Martin. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Waite, Maurice, ed. 2013. ‘Irony.’ Pocket Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, D.B. 1996. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Wan, Sze-kar. 2008. ‘Coded Resistance: A Proposed Rereading of Romans 13:1–7.’ Pages 173–84 in The Bible in the Public Square: Reading the Signs of the Times. Edited by Kittredge, Cynthia Briggs, Bradshaw Aitken, Ellen, and Draper, Jonathan. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Weiss, Johannes. 1910. Der erste Korintherbrief. 9th ed. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das neue Testament 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
White, John. 1971. ‘Introductory Formulae in the Body of the Pauline Letter.’ Journal of Biblical Literature 90.1:91–97.Google Scholar
Wilckens, Ulrich. 1978. Der Brief an die Römer. 3 vols. Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum neuen Testament 6. Zürich: Benziger.Google Scholar
Williams, James G. 1971. ‘You Have Not Spoken Truth of Me: Mystery and Irony in Job.’ Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 83.2:231–55.Google Scholar
Willis, Wendell Lee. 1985. Idol Meat in Corinth: The Pauline Argument in 1 Corinthians 8 and 10. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. ‘The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?’ Lingua 116.10:1722–43.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2013. ‘Irony Comprehension: A Developmental Perspective.’ Journal of Pragmatics 59A:40–56.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2017. ‘Irony, Hyperbole, Jokes and Banter.’ Pages 201–20 in Formal Models in the Study of Language: Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts. Edited by Blochowiak, Joanna, Grisot, Cristina, Durrleman, Stephanie, and Laenzlinger, Christopher. Springer.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Sperber, Dan. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. 1995. Conflict and Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Woodland, Jennifer, and Voyer, Daniel. 2011. ‘Context and Intonation in the Perception of Sarcasm.’ Metaphor and Symbol 26.3:227–39.Google Scholar
Wooten, Cecil (trans.). 1987. Hermogenes’ On Types of Style. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Yao, Jun, Song, Jie, and Singh, Michael. 2013. ‘The Ironical Chinese Bei-Construction and Its Accessibility to English Speakers.’ Journal of Pragmatics 55:195–209.Google Scholar
Zahn, T. 1910. Der Brief des Paulus an die Römer. 2. Aufl. Kommentar zum neuen Testament 6. Leipzig: A. Deichert.Google Scholar
Zmijewski, Josef. 1978. Der Stil der paulinischen “Narrenrede”: Analyse der Sprachgestaltung in 2 Kor 11,1–12,10 als Beitrag zur Methodik von Stiluntersuchungen neutestamentlicher Texte. Bonner Biblische Beiträge 52. Köln–Bonn: Peter Hanstein.Google Scholar