Book contents
- Salt Marshes
- Salt Marshes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 State of Salt Marshes
- Part I Marsh Function
- Part II Marsh Dynamics
- Part III Marsh Response to Stress
- 13 Climatic Impacts on Salt Marsh Vegetation
- 14 Impacts of Exotic and Native Species Invading Tidal Marshes
- 15 Marsh Edge Erosion
- 16 Upland Migration of North American Salt Marshes
- 17 Restoration of Tidal Marshes
- 18 Impacts of Climate Change and Sea Level Rise
- Index
- References
16 - Upland Migration of North American Salt Marshes
from Part III - Marsh Response to Stress
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2021
Book contents
- Salt Marshes
- Salt Marshes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 State of Salt Marshes
- Part I Marsh Function
- Part II Marsh Dynamics
- Part III Marsh Response to Stress
- 13 Climatic Impacts on Salt Marsh Vegetation
- 14 Impacts of Exotic and Native Species Invading Tidal Marshes
- 15 Marsh Edge Erosion
- 16 Upland Migration of North American Salt Marshes
- 17 Restoration of Tidal Marshes
- 18 Impacts of Climate Change and Sea Level Rise
- Index
- References
Summary
Tidal wetlands including salt marshes and mangroves tend to move inland with sea level rise as they have done in the past. In North America geological records from salt marsh deposits showed early evidence of marsh inland migration as far back as 3,000 years ago when rates of eustatic sea levels decreased (Lambeck and Bard 2000). Where this decrease was accompanied by a slow in isostatic adjustments, marsh vegetation was able to establish and enhance sediment deposition as described by FitzGerald et al. (2008). As the elevation of marshes increased, they migrated seaward and inland (Redfield 1972). At these historically low rates of sea-level rise and stable sediment supply, the rate of marsh migration inland is controlled by the slope of the hinterland. Brinson et al. (1995) noted that, if bordered by steeply sloping hinterlands, marsh migration would be “stalled.” In the Gulf Coast of Florida, Raabe and Stumpf (2016) used historical maps and satellite imagery to show that, despite retreat of marsh seaward edge with increased rates of sea level rise, the low slopes of the hinterland allowed extensive inland migration that compensated for that loss. In Chesapeake Bay, Hussein (2009) found that in low-relief submerging areas, coastal marshes accrete vertically and migrate laterally over adjacent forest soils to keep pace with sea-level rise. We are unaware of any studies that have determined the maximum slope required to prevent stalling of marsh migration under any scenario of sediment supply or sea level rise.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Salt MarshesFunction, Dynamics, and Stresses, pp. 423 - 442Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abraham, K. F., Jefferies, R. L., and Alisauskas, R. T. 2005. The dynamics of landscape change and snow geese in mid‐continent North America. Global Change Biology, 11(6): 841–855.Google Scholar
Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H. et al. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103: 29–37.Google Scholar
Arriaga Cabrera, L., Vázquez Domínguez, E., González Cano, J., Jiménez Rosenberg, R., Muñoz López, E., and Aguilar Sierra, V. (coordinators). 1998. Regiones marinas prioritarias de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad. México.Google Scholar
Arkema, K. K., and Samhouri, J. F. 2012. Linking ecosystem health and services to inform marine ecosystem-based management. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 79: 9–25.Google Scholar
Barbier, E. B. 2012. Progress and challenges in valuing coastal and marine ecosystem services. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6: 1–19.Google Scholar
Bernatchez, P., and Fraser, C. 2012. Evolution of coastal defence structures and consequences for beach width trends, Québec, Canada. Journal of Coastal Research, 28(6): 1550–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, S. M., Osland, M. J., Enwright, N. M., and Griffith, K. T. 2018. Coastal wetland adaptation to sea level rise: Quantifying potential for landward migration and coastal squeeze. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55: 2876–2887.Google Scholar
Brinson, M. M., Christian, R. R., and Blum, L. K. 1995. Multiple states in the sea-level induced transition from terrestrial forest to estuary. Estuaries, 18(4): 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown de Colstoun, E. C., Huang, C., Wang, P., Tilton, J. C., Tan, B., Phillips, J., Niemczura, S., Ling, P.-Y., and Wolfe, R. E. 2017. Global Man-made Impervious Surface (GMIS) Dataset from Landsat. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4P55KKF. Accessed 01 01 2017.Google Scholar
Burrough, P. A., and McDonnel, R. A. 1999. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CBD. 2015. Convention on Biological Diversity. TARGET 11 - Technical Rationale extended (provided in document COP/10/INF/12/Rev.1). www.cbd.int/sp/targets/rationale/target-11/.Google Scholar
Commission for the Environment, 2020. North American Environmental Atlas. www.cec.org/tools-and-resources/north-american-environmental-atlas/map-filesGoogle Scholar
CEC. 2015a. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. North American Protected Areas Network. www2.cec.org/nampan/.Google Scholar
CEC. 2015b. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. North America's Blue Carbon: Assessing the role of coastal habitats in the Continent's carbon budget. www.cec.org/bluecarbon.Google Scholar
CGIAR. 2015. Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research-Consortium of Spatial Information. Digital Elevation Model. www.cgiar-csi.org/data.Google Scholar
Chmura, G. L., Burdick, D., and Moore, G. 2012. Recovering salt marsh ecosystem services through tidal restoration, In: Tidal Marsh Restoration, ed. Roman, C.T. and Burdick, D.M., 233–251. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, J. A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J. M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., M. A.Merrifield, A., et al. 2013. Sea level change. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. K., Li, J., and Montagnes, D. J. 2012. Intermediate fragmentation per se provides stable predator‐prey metapopulation dynamics. Ecology Letters, 15: 856–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costanza, R., dArge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253–260.Google Scholar
Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K., and Halpern, B. S. 2008. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecology Letters, 11: 1304–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crooks, S. 2004. The effect of sea‐level rise on coastal geomorphology. Ibis, 146: 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, P. J. 2004. “Coastal Squeeze”: An historical perspective. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 10: 129–138.Google Scholar
Elvidge, C. D., Tuttle, B. T., Sutton, P. C., Baugh, K. E., Howard, A. T., Milesi, C., Bhaduri, B. and Nemani, R. 2007. Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces. Sensors, 7: 1962–1979.Google Scholar
Enwright, N. M., Griffith, K. T., and Osland, M. J. 2016. Barriers to and opportunities for landward migration of coastal wetlands with sea‐level rise. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(6): 307–316.Google Scholar
ESRI. 2015. Environmental Systems Research Institute. How slope works. http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//009z000000vz000000.Google Scholar
Erwin, K. L. 2009. Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, L. C. 2015. Resilience from coastal protection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(2053): 20140383.Google Scholar
Feagin, R. A., Martínez, M. L., Mendoza-Gonzalez, G., and Costanza, R. 2010. Salt marsh zonal migration and ecosystem service change in response to global sea level rise: a case study from an urban region. Ecology and Society, 15(4): 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGerald, D. M., Fenster, M. S., Argow, B. A., and Buynevich, I. V. 2008. Coastal impacts due to sea-level rise. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 36: 601–647.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, D. M., and Hughes, Z. 2019. Marsh processes and their response to climate change and sea-level rise. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47: 481–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Game, E. T., Grantham, H. S., Hobday, A. J., Pressey, R. L., Lombard, A. T., Beckley, L. E., Gjerde, K., Bustamante, R., Possingham, H. P., and Richardson, A. J. 2009. Pelagic protected areas: The missing dimension in ocean conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24: 360–369.Google Scholar
Guerry, A. D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Griffin, R., and Ruckelshaus, M., et al. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:7348–7355Google Scholar
Hitch, A. T., Purcell, K. M., Martin, S. B., Klerks, P. L., and Leberg, P. L. 2011. Interactions of salinity, marsh fragmentation and submerged aquatic vegetation on resident nekton assemblages of coastal marsh ponds. Estuaries and Coasts, 34: 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobday, A. J., Hartog, J. R., Timmiss, T. and Fielding, J. 2010. Dynamic spatial zoning to manage southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) capture in a multi-species longline fishery. Fisheries Oceanography, 19: 243–253.Google Scholar
Hughes, Z. J., FitzGerald, D. M., Wilson, C. A., Pennings, S. C., Więski, K., and Mahadevan, A. 2009. Rapid headward erosion of marsh creeks in response to relative sea level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(3): https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussein, A. H. 2009. Modeling of sea-level rise and deforestation in submerging coastal ultisols of Chesapeake Bay. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73(1): 185–196.Google Scholar
Hyrenbach, K., Keiper, C., Allen, S., Ainley, D., and Anderson, D. 2006. Use of marine sanctuaries by far‐ranging predators: Commuting flights to the California Current System by breeding Hawaiian albatrosses. Fisheries Oceanography, 15: 95–103.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Guevara, E. 2008. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe version 4. CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m database: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, S., and O’Carroll, S. 2007. Sandy barriers, climate change and long-term planning of strategic coastal infrastructures, Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Gulf of St. Lawrence (Québec, Canada). Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(4): 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Bosch, A. C., and Strange, E. 2009. Vulnerable species: the effects of sea-level rise on coastal habitats. In Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research., ed. Titus, J. G., Anderson, K. E., Cahoon, D. R., Gesch, D. B., Gill, S. K., Gutierrez, B. T., Thieler, E. R. and Williams, S. J., pp. 73–84: US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
JPL. 2015. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/statistics.html: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. T., Gehrels, W. R., and Belknap, D. F. 1995. Late Holocene relative sea-level rise and the geological development of tidal marshes at Wells, Maine, USA. Journal of Coastal Research, 11: 136–153.Google Scholar
Kirwan, M. L., Walters, D. C., Reay, W. G., and Carr, J. A. 2016. Sea level driven marsh expansion in a coupled model of marsh erosion and migration. Geophysical Research Letters, 43: 4366–4373.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., and Bard, E. 2000. Sea-level change along the French Mediterranean coast for the past 30 000 years. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 175(3–4): 203–222.Google Scholar
Lewison, R., Hobday, A. J., Maxwell, S., Hazen, E., Hartog, J. R., Dunn, D. C., Briscoe, D., et al. 2015. Dynamic ocean management: Identifying the critical ingredients of dynamic approaches to ocean resource management. BioScience, 65: 486–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, M. L., Mendoza-González, G., Silva-Casarín, R., and Mendoza-Baldwin, E. 2014. Land use changes and sea level rise may induce a “coastal squeeze” on the coasts of Veracruz, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 29: 180–188.Google Scholar
McGranahan, G., Balk, D., and Anderson, B. 2007. The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, E., Chmura, G. L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk, M., Duarte, C. M., and Silliman, B.R. 2011. A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(10): 552–560.Google Scholar
MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis: Island Press Washington, DC.Google Scholar
NOAA. 2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Center for Environmental Information. Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces. http://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/dmsp/download_global_isa.html: NOAA.Google Scholar
Nordlie, F. G. 2003. Fish communities of estuarine salt marshes of eastern North America, and comparisons with temperate estuaries of other continents. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 13(3): 281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendleton, E. A., Thieler, E. R., and Williams, S. J. 2010. Importance of coastal change variables in determining vulnerability to sea-and lake-level change. Journal of Coastal Research, 26: 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontee, N. 2013. Defining coastal squeeze: A discussion. Ocean and Coastal Management, 84: 204–207Google Scholar
Raabe, E. A., and Stumpf, R. P. 2016. Expansion of tidal marsh in response to sea-level rise: Gulf Coast of Florida, USA. Estuaries and Coasts, 39(1): 145–157.Google Scholar
Redfield, A. C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs, 42(2): 201–237.Google Scholar
Salgado, K., and Martínez, M. L. 2017. Is ecosystem-based coastal defense a realistic alternative? Exploring the evidence. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 21(6): 837–848.Google Scholar
Schleupner, C. 2008. Evaluation of coastal squeeze and its consequences for the Caribbean island Martinique. Ocean and Coastal Management, 51: 383–390.Google Scholar
Sutton-Grier, A. E., Wowk, K., and Bamford, H. 2015. Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environmental Science and Policy, 51: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W. V., Kopp, R. E., Weaver, C. P., Obeysekera, J., Horton, R. M., Thieler, E. R., and Zervas, C.. 2017. Global and regional sea level rise scenarios for the United States. NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 083. NOAA/NOS Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and ServicesGoogle Scholar
Thorne, K., MacDonald, G., Guntenspergen, G., Ambrose, R., Buffington, K., Dugger, B., Freeman, C., et al. 2018. US Pacific coastal wetland resilience and vulnerability to sea-level rise. Science Advances, 4(2): 3270.Google Scholar
Titus, J. G., and Neumann, J. E.. 2009. Implications for decisions. In coastal sensitivity to sea-level rise: A focus on the mid-Atlantic region. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research., ed. Titus, J. G., Anderson, K. E., Cahoon, D. R., Gesch, D. B., Gill, S. K., Gutierrez, B. T., Thieler, E. R. and Williams, S. J., pp. 141–156: US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, V., Tenerelli, P., and Sciandrello, S. 2012. Mapping and quantifying habitat fragmentation in small coastal areas: A case study of three protected wetlands in Apulia (Italy). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 693–713.Google Scholar
Torio, D. D., and Chmura, G. L. 2013. Assessing coastal squeeze of tidal wetlands. Journal of Coastal Research, 29: 233–243.Google Scholar
Torio, D. D., and Chmura, G. L. 2015. Impacts of sea level rise on marsh as fish habitat. Estuaries and Coasts, 38: 1288–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. 2015. United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change. NAMAs, Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions. http://unfccc.int/focus/mitigation/items/7172.php.Google Scholar
White, E. P., and Brown, J. H. 2005. The template: patterns and processes of spatial variation. In Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes, ed. Lovett, G. M., Jones, C. G., Turner, M. G., and Weathers, K. C., pp. 31–47: Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
White, E. and Kaplan, D. 2017. Restore or retreat? Saltwater intrusion and water management in coastal wetlands. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(1): e01258.Google Scholar
Zacheis, A., Hupp, J. W., and Ruess, R. W. 2001. Effects of migratory geese on plant communities of an Alaskan salt marsh. Journal of Ecology, 89(1): 57–71.Google Scholar