Book contents
- Rule in International Politics
- Rule in International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Theorizing Rule
- 2 Authority in International Relations
- 3 Ruling the World
- 4 Anarchy, Authority, Rule: Reconsidered
- Part II Practicing Rule
- Part III Resisting Rule
- Index
- References
4 - Anarchy, Authority, Rule: Reconsidered
from Part I - Theorizing Rule
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2023
Book contents
- Rule in International Politics
- Rule in International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Theorizing Rule
- 2 Authority in International Relations
- 3 Ruling the World
- 4 Anarchy, Authority, Rule: Reconsidered
- Part II Practicing Rule
- Part III Resisting Rule
- Index
- References
Summary
Over thirty years ago, Frank Klink and I wrote a paper on anarchy, authority, and rule—the first of its kind and a touchstone for subsequent theorizing about states and their relations. We sought to rebut prevailing claims about anarchy as the absence of authority and replace these concepts with a scheme centered on conditions of rule in every society. We identified three forms of rule: hegemony (inspired by Gramsci), hierarchy (drawing on Weber), and heteronomy (inspired by Kant, drawing on liberal theory). We argued that the relations of states exhibit elements of all three forms of rule to the abiding advantage of some few states. There is today a great deal of interest in rule in international relations but less interest in our three-part conceptual scheme. Looking back, I believe it holds up in its own terms but works even better when situated in an overarching framework linking three types of speech acts, derivative types of rules, and correlative forms of rule. I erected this framework in World of Our Making (1989) and reprise it here. I conclude by showing how modernity has reinvigorated status to support sovereign equality, thereby conjoining hegemony and hierarchy in a durably heteronomous world.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rule in International Politics , pp. 87 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, John. 2005. Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Barder, Alexander D. 2015. Empire Within: International Hierarchy and Its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2015. “Sovereignty and the Personality of the State,” in Schuett, Robert and Stirk, Peter M. R. (eds.), The Concept of the State in International Relations: Philosophy, Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 81–107.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Paul. 2020. The Grammar of Status Competition: International Hierarchies as Domestic Practice. PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2016. “Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70(3): 623–654.Google Scholar
Böröcz, József. 1997. “Stand Reconstructed: Contingent Closure and Institutional Change.” Sociological Theory 15(3): 215–248.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 1995. “Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies: Comments.” Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6(1): 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel H. 2007. Bounding Power: Republican Security from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2):139–170.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66(4): 609–643.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2016. “The Heterarchic Structure of Twenty-First-Century International Governance.” Korean Journal of International Studies 14(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Fei, Xiaotong. 1992. From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1988. “Legitimacy in the International System.” American Journal of International Law 82(4): 705–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1971. “A Structural Theory of Imperialism.” Journal of Peace Research 8(2): 81–117.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1991. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M., and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53(2): 379–408.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 1997. “Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch.” European Journal of International Law 8(4): 566–582.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lanoszka, Alexander. 2013. “Beyond Consent and Coercion: Using Republican Political Theory to Understand International Hierarchies.” International Theory 5(3): 382–413.Google Scholar
Larkins, Jeremy. 2010. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D., and Kaplan, Abraham. 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, Gerhard E. 1966. Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1992. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(1): 67–85.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2008. International Legal Theory: Essays and Engagements, 1966–2006. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013a. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2013b. “Recognition and the Constitution of Epochal Change.” International Relations 27(2): 121–140.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2017. “Center-Periphery Relations: What Kind of Rule, and Does It Matter?” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 6(1): 5–16.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, and Klink, Frank F.. 1989. “Anarchy, Authority, Rule.” International Studies Quarterly 33(2): 149–173.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, and Onuf, Peter. 2006. Nations, Markets, and War: Modern History and the American Civil War. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.). 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A. (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Cambridge Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays in International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2019. Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4): 387–415.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 1997. “Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2): 321–340.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1922. Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, III. Abteilung, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 vol., continuous pagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, and Friedheim, Daniel. 1995. “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.” International Organization 49(4): 689–721.Google Scholar