Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2020
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Royal VoicesLanguage and Power in Tudor England, pp. 242 - 263Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Allen, W., 1582. A briefe historie of the glorious martyrdom of XII. reuerend priests, executed vvithin these tvveluemonethes for confession and defence of the Catholike faith. Rheins: J. Foigny. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Anonymous, 1595. A students lamentation that hath sometime been in London an apprentice for the rebellious tumults lately in the citie hapning. Printed at London: [By E. Allde] For William Blackvvall. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., 1629. The historie of the reigne of King Henry the Seuenth. London: Printed by I.H. and R.Y. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Bain, J., 1900. Calendar of State Papers relating to Scotland and Mary, Queen of Scots, 1547–1603, Volume II. Edinburgh: H.M. General Register House.Google Scholar
Burnet, G., [1679] 1825. The History of the Reformation of the Church of England. Vol. 3, part 2. London: W. Baynes and Son.Google Scholar
Bruce, J., ed., 1849. Letters of Queen Elizabeth and King James VI. of Scotland. London: J. B. Nichols and Son, Printers.Google Scholar
Bruce, J., ed., 1853. Correspondence of Matthew Parker, D.D. Archbishop of Canterbury. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cawdrey, R., 1609. A table alphabeticall contayning and teaching the true writing and vnderstanding of hard vsuall English wordes, borrowed from the Hebrew, Greeke, Latine, or French &c. London: Printed by T.S. for Edmund Weauer. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Clifford, A., ed., 1809. The State Papers and Letters of Sir Ralph Sadler Knight-Banneret. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable and Company.Google Scholar
Day, A., 1599. The English secretary, or Methode of writing of epistles and letters with a declaration of such tropes, figures, and schemes, as either vsually or for ornament sake are therin required. At London: Printed by P.S. for C. Burbie. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Elder, J., 1555. The copie of a letter sent in to Scotlande of the arivall and landynge, and most noble marryage of … Philippe, prynce of Spaine to the … Princes Marye quene of England. Imprinted at London in Fletestrete at the signe of the Sunne ouer agaynst the Conduit, by John Waylande. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Ellis, H., 1824. Original Letters, Illustrative of English History; Including Numerous Royal Letters. London: Harding, Triphook and Lepard.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D., 1985. Sowards, J. Kelley, ed. Collected Works of Erasmus. Volume 25, Literary and Educational Writings 3. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Fulwood, W., 1568. The enimie of idlenesse teaching the maner and stile how to endite, compose and write all sorts of epistles and letters. Imprinted at London: By Henry Bynneman, for Leonard Maylard. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Gairdner, J., 1861. Letters and Papers Illustrative of the Reigns of Richard III and Henry VII. Vol. 2. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.Google Scholar
Grafton, R., 1550. All suche Proclamations, as have been sette furthe by the Kynges Maiestie. London: R. Grafton.Google Scholar
Grafton, R., 1569. A chronicle at large and meere history of the affayres of Englande and kinges of the same. Imprinted at London: By Henry Denham, dwelling in Paternoster Rowe, for Richarde Tottle and Humffrey Toye. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Hall, E., 1548. The vnion of the two noble and illustrate famelies of Lancastre [and] Yorke, beeyng long in continual discension for the croune of this noble realm. Londini: In officina Richardi Graftoni typis impress. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Hall, H., ed., 1908. A Formula Book of English Official Historical Documents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, J. O., 1846. Letters of the Kings of England: Now First Collected from the Originals in Royal Archives, and from Other Authentic Sources, Private as Well as Public. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. B., 1968. The Letters of Queen Elizabeth. London: Cassell and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Haynes, S., ed., 1740. A Collection of State Papers, Relating to Affairs in the Reigns of King Henry VIII, King Edward VI, Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, Transcribed from Original Letters and Other Authentick Memorials, Left by William Cecill Lord Burghley. London: William Bowyer.Google Scholar
Hooker, J., 1584. A pamphlet of the offices, and duties of euerie particular sworne officer, of the citie of Excester. Imprinted at London: By Henrie Denham. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. L., and Larkin, J. F., eds., 1964. Tudor Royal Proclamations: 1485–1553. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. L., and Larkin, J. F., eds., 1969. Tudor Royal Proclamations: 1553–1587. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jewel, J., 1582. A viewe of a seditious bul sent into Englande, from Pius Quintus Bishop of Rome, anno. 1569. At London: Printed by R. Newberie & H. Bynneman. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Madden, F., 1837. Documents Relating to Perkin Warbeck, with Remarks on His History. London: Printed by J. B. Nichols and Son.Google Scholar
May, S. W., 2004. Queen Elizabeth I: Selected Works. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Marten, A., 1588. An exhortation, to stirre vp the mindes of all her Maiesties faithfull subiects, to defend their countrey in this dangerous time, from the inuasion of enemies. Imprinted at London: By Iohn Windet. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Mychell, J., 1552. A breuiat chronicle contayning all the kynges, from Brute to this day, and many notable actes, gathered out of diuers chronicles, from Willyam Conqueroure, vnto the yeare of Christ. Canterbury: Printed at Canterbury in Saynt Paules parysh by John Mychell. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. G., 1857. Literary Remains of King Edward the Sixth. Edited from His Autograph Manuscripts, with Historical Notes and a Biographical Memoir. London: Roxburghe Club.Google Scholar
Norton, T., 1569. A warning agaynst the dangerous practises of papistes and specially the parteners of the late rebellion. Imprinted at London: By Iohn Daye, dwelling ouer Aldersgate. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Parsons, R., 1580. A brief discours contayning certayne reasons why Catholiques refuse to goe to church. Imprinted at Doway: By Iohn Lyon. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Peacham, H., 1577. The garden of eloquence conteyning the figures of grammer and rhetorick. Imprinted at London, in Fleetestrete, beneath the Conduite, at the signe of Saint Iohn Euaungelist, by H. Iackson. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Pocock, N., ed., 1884. Troubles Connected with the Prayer Book 1549. London: Camden Society.Google Scholar
Rich, R., 1548. An Admonicion or warnyng to all the Kynges Maiesties justices of peace in the name of the Lorde Protector and the rest of the Kynges Maiesties counsaill. Excusum Londini: In aedibus Richardi Graftoni. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Sherry, R., 1555. A treatise of schemes [and] tropes very profytable for the better vnderstanding of good authors, gathered out of the best grammarians [and] oratours by Rychard Sherry Londoner. Imprinted at London: By Iohn Day dwellinge ouer Aldersgate, beneth saint Martyns. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Stapleton, T., 1567. A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham. Louanii: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
State Papers, King Henry the Eighth. 1836. Correspondence Relative to Scotland and the Borders, 1513–1534. Vol. 4. London: His Majesty’s Commission for State Papers. State Papers Online, 1830–52.Google Scholar
State Papers, King Henry the Eighth. 1836. Correspondence Relative to Scotland and the Borders, 1534–46. Vol. 5. London: His Majesty’s Commission for State Papers. State Papers Online, 1830–52.Google Scholar
Stow, J., 1580. The chronicles of England from Brute vnto this present yeare of Christ. 1580. Printed at London: By [Henry Bynneman for] Ralphe Newberie. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Strype, J., 1822. Ecclesiastical Memorials Relating Chiefly to Religion and the Reformation of It. 3 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. R., 1922. Tudor Constitutional Documents, A.D. 1485–1603. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiburn, P., 1581. A checke or reproofe of M. Howlets vntimely shreeching in her Maiesties eares … . Imprinted in London: At the Three Cranes in the Vintree, by Thomas Dawson, for Toby Smyth. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Wilson, T., 1553. The arte of rhetorique for the vse of all suche as are studious of eloquence, sette forth in English, by Thomas Wilson. London: Richardus Graftonus. Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
Wood, M. A. E., ed., 1846. Letters of Royal and Illustrious Ladies of Great Britain. 3 vols. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
CEEC = Corpus of Early English Correspondence. 1998. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin at the Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary 2019. Simpson, John et al. (eds.). Oxford University Press. http://dictionary.oed.comGoogle Scholar
PCEEC = Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, text version. 2006. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin, with additional annotation by Ann Taylor. Helsinki: University of Helsinki and York: University of York. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, A., 2018. Language Purism and Social Hierarchies: Making a Romani Standard in Prizren. Language in Society. 47 (5), pp. 741–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, S., 2001. The Grand Style. In Adamson, S., Hunter, L., Magnusson, L., Thompson, A. and Wales, K., eds. Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide. London: Arden Shakespeare. pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Agha, A., 1999. Register. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 9 (1–2), pp. 216–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A., 2003. The Social Life of Cultural Value. Language & Communication. 23 (3), pp. 231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A., 2005. Voice, Footing, Enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 15 (1), pp. 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A., 2011. Large and Small Scale Forms of Personhood. Language & Communication. 31 (3), pp. 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allinson, R., 2012. A Monarchy of Letters: Royal Correspondence and English Diplomacy in the Reign of Elizabeth I. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allinson, R., and Parker, G., 2015. A King and Two Queens: The Holograph Correspondence of Philip II with Mary I and Elizabeth I. In Early Modern Exchanges: Dialogues between Nations and Cultures, 1550–1750. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Altman, J. G., 1982. Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Andreani, A., 2017. The Elizabethan Secretariat and the Signet Office: The Production of State Papers, 1590–1596. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L., 2018. AntConc. Windows. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconcGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, G., 2015. Coding Continental: Information Design in Sixteenth-Century English Vernacular Language Manuals and Translations. Renaissance Studies. 29 (1), pp. 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthurson, I., 2009. The Perkin Warbeck Conspiracy 1491–1499. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
Asser, J., 1906. Asser’s Life of King Alfred. Trans. Cook, Albert S.. Boston: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Aston, M., 1993. The King’s Bedpost: Reformation and Iconography in a Tudor Group Portrait. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austermühl, F., 2014. The Great American Scaffold: Intertextuality and Identity in American Presidential Discourse. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., 2005. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bajetta, C. M., ed., 2017. Elizabeth I’s Italian Letters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldo, M., 2019. Italian-Canadian Narratives of Return: Analysing Cultural Translation in Diasporic Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., and Levon, E., 2015. Picking the Right Cherries? A Comparison of Corpus-Based and Qualitative Analyses of News Articles about Masculinity. Discourse & Communication. 9 (2), pp. 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Holquist, M. and Emerson, C.. University of Texas Press Slavic Series 1. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baron, A., 2017. VARD 2. Lancaster: UCRELS, University of Lancaster. Available from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/vard/about/Google Scholar
Bauman, R., 1975. Verbal Art as Performance. American Anthropologist. 77 (2), pp. 290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C. L., 1990. Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology. 19, pp. 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, P., 2008. A Dictionary of English Manuscript Terminology, 1450 to 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, B. L., 2004. Seymour, Edward, Duke of Somerset [known as Protector Somerset] (c. 1500–1552), Soldier and Royal Servant. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, B. L., and Manchester, A., 2011. Writing and Rewriting Early Modern History: Five Sixteenth-Century English Chroniclers. Quidditas. 31 (1), pp. 138–71.Google Scholar
Bell, I., 2010. Elizabeth I: The Voice of a Monarch. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J., 2012. ‘And what comes out may be a kind of screeching’: The Stylisation of Chavspeak in Contemporary Britain. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 16 (1), pp. 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A., 2012. The Uniformitarian Principle and the Risk of Anachronisms in Language and Social History. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A., 2015. Linguistic Fingerprints of Authors and Scribes. In Auer, A., Schreier, D. and Watts, R. J., eds. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 114–32.Google Scholar
Bestgen, Y., 2018. Getting Rid of the Chi-Square and Log-Likelihood Tests for Analysing Vocabulary Differences between Corpora. Quaderns de Filologia – Estudis Lingüístics. 22 (22), p. 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., and Conrad, S., 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Leech, G. N., 1999. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bland, M., 1998. The Appearance of the Text in Early Modern England. Text: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies. 11, pp. 91–154.Google Scholar
Bolander, B., 2013. Language and Power in Blogs: Interaction, Disagreements and Agreements. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigden, S., 2004. Howard, Henry, Earl of Surrey (1516/17–1547), Poet and Soldier. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brindle, A., 2016. Cancer Has Nothing on Islam: A Study of Discourses by Group Elite and Supporters of the English Defence League. Critical Discourse Studies. 13 (4), pp. 444–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J., 2014. Historical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 138–60.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, A., and Evans, M., 2017. Seven Rediscovered Letters of Princess Elizabeth Tudor. Historical Research. 90 (250), pp. 829–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, J., Mayew, W. J., Giboney, J. S., Elkins, A. C., Moffitt, K., Dorn, B., Byrd, M., and Spitzley, L., 2016. Which Spoken Language Markers Identify Deception in High-Stakes Settings? Evidence from Earnings Conference Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 35 (2), pp. 123–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H., 1992. Lordship, Kingship, and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy, 1400–1525. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, J., 2015. ‘Quod’ and ‘Seide’ in ‘Piers Plowman’. Notes and Queries. 62 (4), pp. 521–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, M. L., 1975. The Government Policy of Protector Somerset. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, U., 2008. An Inventory of Directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear. In Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, U., and Hübler, A., 2012. Introduction. In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, C., 1994. On Reporting Reporting: The Representation of Speech in Factual and Fictional Narratives. In Coulthard, M., ed. Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge. pp. 295–308.Google Scholar
Calude, A. S., 2009. Formulaic Tendencies of Demonstrative Clefts in Spoken English. In Ouali, H., Wheatley, K. M., Corrigan, R., and Moravcsik, E. A., eds. Formulaic Language. Volume 1, Distribution and Historical Change. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capone, A., 2005. Pragmemes (A Study with Reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics. 37 (9), pp. 1355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R., Peikola, M., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L., Skaffari, J., and Hiltunen, R., 2013. Pragmatics on the Page: Visual Text in Late Medieval English Books. European Journal of English Studies. 17 (1), pp. 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, M., 2010. How to Make a Composition: Memory-Craft in Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. In Radstone, S. and Schwarz, B., eds. Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
Chartier, R., 1992. Laborers and Voyagers: From the Text to the Reader. Diacritics. 22 (2), p. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, C., and Williams, J., 2001. Rebels, Pretenders & Imposters. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B., and Brown, A. L., eds., 1961. Select Documents of English Constitutional History: 1307–1485. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T., 2013. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066–1307. 3rd ed. Chichester; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Claridge, C., forthcoming. Quoting in Early Modern English Historiography. In Walker, T. and Grund, P. J., eds. The Dynamics of Speech Representation in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, C., 2017. Voices in Medieval History Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 16 (1), pp. 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., and Gerrig, R. J., 1990. Quotations as Demonstrations. Language. 66 (4), pp. 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., and Schmitt, N., 2012. The Processing of Formulaic Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 32, pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, S., 2014. State Correspondence in the Roman Empire: Imperial Communication from Augustus to Justinian. In Radner, K., ed. State Correspondence in the Ancient World: From New Kingdom Egypt to the Roman Empire. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressy, D., 2010. Dangerous Talk: Scandalous, Seditious, and Treasonable Speech in Pre-Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, C., 2004. Hutton, Matthew (1529?–1606), Archbishop of York. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., ed., 2011. Historical Sociopragmatics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., and Demmen, J., 2015. Keywords. In Biber, D. and Reppen, R., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., and Kytö, M., 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Currin, J. M., 1991. Pierre Le Pennec, Henry VII of England, and the Breton Plot of 1492: A Case Study in ‘Diplomatic Pathology’. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies. 23 (1), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dambrogio, J., and Starza Smith, D., 2017. Dictionary of Letterlocking. Letterlocking. Available from http://letterlocking.org/dictionary (accessed 17 February 2019).Google Scholar
Daybell, J., 2012. The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Cultures and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daybell, J., 2016. The Materiality of Early Modern Women’s Letters. In Daybell, J. and Gordon, A., eds. Women and Epistolary Agency in Early Modern Culture. London: Routledge. pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
Devine, M., 2016. Cheapside Cross (Eleanor Cross). Map of Early Modern London. Available from https://mapoflondon.uvic.ca/ELEA1.htm (accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Dickerman, E., and Walker, A., 1999. The Language of Blame: Henri III and the Dismissal of his Ministers. French History. 13 (1), pp. 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, N., 2010. Register. In Fried, M., Östman, J.-O. and Verschueren, J., eds. Variation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 221–33.Google Scholar
Doran, S., 2004. Pickering, Sir William (1516/17–1575), Courtier and Diplomat. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doran, S., 2005. Loving and Affectionate Cousins? The Relationship between Elizabeth I and James VI of Scotland 1586–1603. In S. Doran and G. Richardson, eds. Tudor England and Its Neighbours. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, F. M., 2009. Scottish Newspapers, Language and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, K., 2007. Elizabeth I and Her ‘Good George’: Unpublished Letters. In Beal, P. and Ioppolo, G., eds. Elizabeth I and the Culture of Writing. London: British Library. pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Dunlop, D., 1991. The ‘Masked Comedian’: Perkin Warbeck’s Adventures in Scotland and England from 1495 to 1497. The Scottish Historical Review. 70 (190), pp. 97–128.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L., 2005. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. 2nd ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliav-Feldon, M., 2012. Renaissance Impostors and Proofs of Identity. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., 2009. The Juvenile Translations of Elizabeth Tudor. Translation and Literature. 18 (2), pp. 157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R., 1965. Government by Edict? (Review Article). The Historical Journal. 8 (2), pp. 266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R., 1972. Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R., ed., 1982. The Tudor Constitution: Documents and Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M., forthcoming. ‘Saying thes woordes or the lyke’: Speech Representation in Sixteenth-Century Correspondence. In Walker, T. and Grund, P. J., eds. The Dynamics of Speech Representation in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M., 2013. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans, M., 2015. ‘The vsuall speach of the Court’? Investigating Language Change in the Tudor Family Network (1544–1556). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics. 1 (2), pp. 153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M., 2016a. Tudor Women Writing: Multimodal Style and Identity in the English Letters and Prose of Queen Katherine Parr and Princess Elizabeth. VARIENG 17.Google Scholar
Evans, M., 2016b. By the Queen: Collaborative Authorship in the Scribal Letters of Queen Elizabeth I. In Daybell, J. and Gordon, A., eds. Women and Epistolary Agency in Early Modern Culture. London: Routledge. pp. 36–54.Google Scholar
Evans, M., 2017. Royal Language and Reported Discourse in Sixteenth-Century Correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 18 (1), pp. 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M., 2018. Styling Power: A Corpus Linguistic Approach to the Correspondence of Queen Elizabeth I. In Montini, D. and Plescia, I., eds. Elizabeth I in Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezell, M. J. M., 2015. The Times Displayed: Late Seventeenth-Century English Commemorative Broadsheets and Media Hybridity. Yearbook of English Studies. 45, pp. 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Starcke, B. 2010. Corpus Linguistics in Literary Analysis: Jane Austen and Her Contemporaries. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H., Richardson, M., and Fisher, J. L., eds., 1984. An Anthology of Chancery English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S. M., 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A., and Macculloch, D., 2008. Tudor Rebellions. Rev. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., 1981. Literature as Social Discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Criticism. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.Google Scholar
Fox, A., 2000. Oral and Literate Culture in England, 1500–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C., and Marchi, A., 2012. Keyness: Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues. Presented at the Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies: More Than the Sum of Discourse Analysis, University of Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
Gal, S., 1995. Language, Gender and Power: An Anthropological Review. In Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M., eds. Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York: Routledge. pp. 169–82.Google Scholar
Gal, S., 2018. Registers in Circulation: The Social Organization of Interdiscursivity. Signs and Society. 6 (1), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garley, M., Slade, B., and Terkourafi, M., 2010. A Text in Speech’s Clothing: Discovering Specific Functions of Formulaic Expression in Beowulf and Blogs. In Wood, D., ed. Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication. London: Continuum. pp. 213–33.Google Scholar
Gaskell, P., 1972. A New Introduction to Bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giaxoglou, K., 2015. Entextualising Mourning on Facebook: Stories of Grief as Acts of Sharing. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 21 (1–2), pp. 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A., 2011. Flight of the Conchords: Recontextualizing the Voices of Popular Culture. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 15 (5), pp. 603–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J., 2011. The Queen’s Two Hands. In Petrina, A. and Tosi, L., eds. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J., 2016. From Palatino to Cresci: Italian Writing Books and the Italian Scripts of Early Modern English Letters. In Daybell, J. and Gordon, A., eds. Cultures of Correspondence in Early Modern Britain. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A., 2007. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, Z., 2017. Imitation, Interdiscursive Hubs, and Chronotopic Configuration. Language & Communication. 53, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, J., 1990. Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, S., 2005. Visual English. In D. Graddol and S. Goodman, eds. Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities. London; New York: Open University; Routledge. pp. 35–105.Google Scholar
Gordon, A., 2002. ‘The Act of Libel’: Conscripting Civic Space in Early Modern England. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 32 (3), pp. 375–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A., 2013. Writing Early Modern London: Memory, Text and Community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramley, S., 2012. The History of English: An Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, M., 2004. Howard, Thomas, Third Duke of Norfolk (1473–1554), Magnate and Soldier. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, M., 2000. Ælfric’s Preface to Genesis: Genre, Rhetoric and the Origins of the Ars Dictaminis. Anglo-Saxon England. 29, pp. 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grummitt, D., 2004. Husee, John. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., 1992. Contextualisation and Understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, eds. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 229–53.Google Scholar
Gunn, S. J., 2004a. Warbeck, Perkin [Pierrechon de Werbecque; alias Richard Plantagenet, duke of York] (c. 1474–1499), Impostor and Claimant to the English Throne. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunn, S. J., 2004b. Brandon, Charles, First Duke of Suffolk (c. 1484–1545), Magnate, Courtier, and Soldier. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, S., 1982. The Rediscovery of ‘Ideology’: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies. In Gurevitch, M., Bennett, T., Curran, J. and Woollacott, J., eds. Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen. pp. 56–90.Google Scholar
Hamling, T. and Richardson, C., 2017. A Day at Home in Early Modern England: Material Culture and Domestic Life, 1500–1700. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, E., 1966. Dialect, Language, Nation. American Anthropologist. 68 (4), pp. 922–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. W., 1976. The Proclamations of the Tudor Kings. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. R., 2001. Valla’s Elegantiae and the Humanist Attack on the Ars Dictaminis. Rhetorica. 19 (2), pp. 249–68.Google Scholar
Herman, P. C., ed., 2002. Reading Monarch’s Writing: The Poetry of Henry VIII, Mary Stuart, Elizabeth I, and James VI/I. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Hicks, M., 2014. What Was Personal about Personal Monarchy in the Fifteenth Century? In McGlynn, S. and Woodacre, E., eds. The Image and Perception of Monarchy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 8–22.Google Scholar
Higgs, E., 2007. From Frankpledge to Chip and Pin: Identification and Identity in England, 1475–2005. In de Leeuw, K. and Bergstra, J., eds. A History of Information Security: A Comprehensive Handbook. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier. pp. 243–62.Google Scholar
Hiippala, T., 2012. Reading Paths and Visual Perception in Multimodal Research, Psychology and Brain Sciences. Journal of Pragmatics. 44 (3), pp. 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, D. A., 2018. Symbols of Power. In C. Gerrard and A. Gutiérrez, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Later Medieval Archaeology in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 418–32.Google Scholar
Ho, S. M., and Hancock, J. T., 2019. Context in a Bottle: Language-Action Cues in Spontaneous Computer-Mediated Deception. Computers in Human Behavior. 91, pp. 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoak, D., 1976. The King’s Council in the Reign of Edward VI. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoak, D., 2004. Edward VI (1537–1553), King of England and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, J., 2014. Dialect in Film and Literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, T. B., 2009. Impostures in Early Modern England: Representations and Perceptions of Fraudulent Identities. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Iannaccaro, G., and Petrina, A., 2014. To and from the Queen: Modalities of Epistolography in the Correspondence of Elizabeth I. Journal of Early Modern Studies. 3, pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A., and Jucker, A. H., 1995. The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics. In Jucker, A. H., ed. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R., 1984. Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Waugh, L. and Halle, M., eds. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. E., 2004. Parr, William, Marquess of Northampton (1513–1571), Nobleman and Courtier. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaworska, S., and Ryan, K., 2018. Gender and the Language of Pain in Chronic and Terminal Illness: A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis of Patients’ Narratives. Social Science & Medicine. 215, pp. 107–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaworski, A., and Coupland, N., 2004. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Metalanguage: Reflexivity, Evaluation and Ideology. In Jaworski, A., Coupland, N. and Galasinski, D., eds. Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 15–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, L., 2010. Opposition in Discourse: The Construction of Oppositional Meaning. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., 2016. Enregisterment: How Linguistic Items Become Linked with Ways of Speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass. 10 (11), pp. 632–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. L., 2015. Governing by Virtue: Lord Burghley and the Management of Elizabethan England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language: A Survey of Opinions concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., 2009. Dancing, Skating and Sex: Action and Text in the Digital Age. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice. 6 (3), pp. 283–302.Google Scholar
Jordon, W. K., 1968. Edward VI: The Young King. The Protectorship of the Duke of Somerset. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Jowitt, D., 1995. Queen Elizabeth’s English: A Response to Katie Wales. English Today. 11 (2), p. 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Pahta, P., 2011. Communicating Manuscripts: Authors, Scribes, Readers, Listeners and Communicating Characters. In Pahta, P. and Jucker, A. H., eds. Communicating Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I., 2007. Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English. In Fitzmaurice, S. M. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 107–38.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I., eds., 2008a. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I., 2008b. Speech Acts Now and Then. In Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I., 2014. Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaislaniemi, S., 2017. Code-Switching, Script-Shifting and Typeface-Switching in Early Modern English Manuscript Letters and Printed Tracts. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L. and Skaffari, J., eds. Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 165–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaislaniemi, S., Evans, M., Juvonen, T., and Sairio, A., 2017. ‘A graphic system which leads its own linguistic life’? Epistolary Spelling in English, 1400–1800. In Säily, T., Nurmi, A., Palander-Collin, M. and Auer, A., eds. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 187–213.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H., 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kempshall, M. 2011. Rhetoric and the Writing of History, 400–1500. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, K. E., 2014. Prosopography of the Book and the Politics of Legal Language in Late Medieval England. Journal of British Studies. 53 (3), pp. 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesson, A., and Smith, E., 2016. The Elizabethan Top Ten: Defining Print Popularity in Early Modern England. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
King, J. N. 1985. The Godly Woman in Elizabethan Iconography. Renaissance Quarterly. 38 (1), pp. 41–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. N. 1989. Tudor Royal Iconography: Literature and Art in an Age of Religious Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, A., 2014. The ‘Very, Very Words’: (Mis)quoting Scripture in Lancelot Andrewes’s and John Donne’s Sermons on Job 19:23–27. Studies in Philology. 111 (3), pp. 442–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, P., 1999. Court Records and Cartoons: Reflections of Spontaneous Dialogue in Early Romance Texts. In Jucker, A. H., Fritz, G. and Lebsanft, F., eds. Historical Dialogue Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, T., 2001. On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes. European Journal of English Studies. 5 (2), pp. 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, T., 2002. Towards a History of English Directives. In Fischer, A., Tottie, G. and Lehman, H. M., eds. Text Types and Corpora: Studies in Honour of Udo Fries. Gottingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen. pp. 165–76.Google Scholar
Kohnen, T., 2007. Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis. In Fitzmaurice, S. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Methods in Historical Pragmatics: Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, T., 2008. Tracing Directives Through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis. In Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kohnen, T., 2009. Historical Corpus Pragmatics: Focus on Speech Acts and Texts. In Jucker, A. H., Schreier, D. and Hundt, M., eds. Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse: Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Ascona, Switzerland, 14–18 May 2008. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, J., 2012. Long Lexical Bundles and Standardisation in Historical Legal Texts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. 47 (2–3), pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, J., 2013a. Formulaic Discourse Across Early Modern English Medical Genres: Investigating Shared Lexical Bundles. In Jucker, A. H., Landert, D., Seiler, A. and Studer-Joho, N., eds. Meaning in the History of English: Words and Texts in Context. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, J., 2013b. How a Community of Practice Creates a Text Community: Middle Scots Legal and Administrative Discourse. In Kopaczyk, J. and Jucker, A. H., eds. Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 225–50.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R., 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R., and Leeuwen, T. van, 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., 2004. Formulaic Performance in Conventionalised Varieties of Speech. In Schmitt, N., ed. Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, J. C., 1990. Power in Performance: The Creation of Textual Authority in Weyewa Ritual Speech. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1, Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lass, R., 1999. Phonology and Morphology. In Lass, R., ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 56–186.Google Scholar
Lazar, M. M., ed., 2005. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, K. M., Aziz, S., Botzakis, S., Ehret, C., Landry, D., and Rowsell, J., 2017. Readings and Experiences of Multimodality. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. 66 (1), pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., and Short, M., 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T., 1992. The Schoolbook as a Multimodal Text. Internationale Schulbuchforschung. 14 (1), pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
Lehto, A., 2015. The Genre of Early Modern English Statutes: Complexity in Historical Legal Language. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Lempert, M., and Perrino, S., 2007. Entextualization and the Ends of Temporality. Language & Communication. 27 (3), pp. 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, C., 2013. The Heart and Stomach of a King: Elizabeth I and the Politics of Sex and Power. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lutzky, U., 2015. Quotations in Early Modern English Witness Depositions. In Arendholz, J., Bublitz, W. and Kirner-Ludwig, M., eds. The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin; München; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 343–67.Google Scholar
Machan, T. W., 2005. English in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansky, J., 2016. ‘Unlawfully Published’: Libels and the Public Sphere in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly. 67 (3), pp. 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, I., 2017. Whose Letters Are They Anyway? Addressing the Issue of Scribal Writing in Bess of Hardwick’s Early Modern English Letters. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L. and Skaffari, J., eds. Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 219–50.Google Scholar
Marcus, I., 2018. The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing: Exploring Bess of Hardwick’s Manuscript Letters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, G., 2000. Intertextual Authority in Reported Speech: Production Media in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Journal of Pragmatics. 32 (7), pp. 879–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, S. W., and Bryson, A., 2016. Verse Libel in Renaissance England and Scotland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, P. G., 2015. Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
McGlynn, S., 2014. Fighting the Image of the Reluctant Warrior: Philip Augustus as Rex-Not-Quite-So-Bellicosus. In McGlynn, S. and Woodacre, E., eds. The Image and Perception of Monarchy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 148–67.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., 1963. King Lear Act I Scene 1: A Stylistic Note. Review of English Studies. 14 (53), pp. 54–6.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D., and Walker, B., 2011. Discourse Presentation in Early Modern English Writing: A Preliminary Corpus-Based Investigation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 16 (1), pp. 101–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, A., and Jeffries, N., 2017. I Say ‘Shard’, You Say ‘Sherd’: Contrasting and Complementary Approaches to a Piece of Early Modern ‘Venice Glass’. In Richardson, C., Hamling, T. and Gaimster, D., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Material Culture in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge. pp. 452–65.Google Scholar
Mears, N., 2016. State Papers and Related Collections. In Sangha, L. and Willis, J. P., eds. Understanding Early Modern Primary Sources. London; New York: Routledge. pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, A. 2001. Genre as a Variable in Sociohistorical Linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5 (2), pp. 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mish, C. C., 1953. Black Letter as a Social Discriminant in the Seventeenth Century. PMLA. 68 (3), pp. 627–30.Google Scholar
Montrose, L. A., 1999. Idols of the Queen: Policy, Gender, and the Picturing of Elizabeth I. Representations. 68, pp. 108–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., 2002. Reporting Direct Speech in Early Modern Slander Depositions. In Minkova, D. and Stockwell, R., eds. Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., 2011. Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, E., 2012. The Social Life of Style. Language and Literature. 21 (1), pp. 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. M., ed., 2011. Katherine Parr: Complete Works and Correspondence. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Näslund, S., 2016. Tacit Tango: The Social Framework of Screen-Focused Silence in Institutional Telephone Calls. Journal of Pragmatics. 91, pp. 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevala, M., 2004a. Address in Early English Correspondence: Its Forms and Socio-Pragmatic Functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevala, M., 2004b. Accessing Politeness Axes: Forms of Address and Terms of Reference in Early English Correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics. 36 (12), pp. 2125–60.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., 2001. Continental Conventions in Early English Correspondence. In Diller, H.-J. and Gorlach, M., eds. Towards a History of English as a History of Genres. Heidelberg: Universitatsverlag C. Winter. pp. 203–24.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., and Raumolin-Brunberg, H., 1995. Constraints on Politeness: The Pragmatics of Address Formulae in Early English Correspondence. In Jucker, A. H., ed. Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 541–601.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., and Raumolin-Brunberg, H., 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Newsome, H., 2018. ‘sche that schuld be medyatryce (mediatrice) In thyr (these) matars’: Performances of Mediation in the Letters of Margaret Tudor, Queen of Scots (1489–1541). PhD thesis. University of Sheffield, Sheffield.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. G., 1964. Discourse in Froissart’s Chroniques. Speculum. 39 (2), pp. 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, M. M., 2004. Brydges, John, First Baron Chandos (1492–1557), Landowner and Soldier. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, F., 2006. Kingship: The Politics of Enchantment. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J., 2002. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pahta, P., and Jucker, A. H., eds., 2011. Communicating Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M., 2010. Correspondence. In Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I., eds. Historical Pragmatics. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 651–78.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M., and Nevala, M., 2010. Reporting and Social Role Construction in Eighteenth-Century Personal Correspondence. In Pahta, P., Nevala, M., Nurmi, A. and Palander-Collin, M., eds. Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
Parish, H. L., 2004. Holgate, Robert (1481/2–1555), Archbishop of York. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., 1991. Scribes, Scripts, and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation, and Dissemination of Medieval Texts. London; Rio Grande, Ohio: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., 1992. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., 2009. Grammarians’ Languages Versus Humanists’ Languages and the Place of Speech Act Formulas in Models of Linguistic Competence. In Corrigan, R., Moravcsik, E. A., Ouali, H. and Wheatley, K. M., eds. Formulaic Language. Volume 1, Distribution and Historical Change. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L., and Skaffari, J., eds., 2017. Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. 1990. The Word of a Prince: A Life of Elizabeth I from Contemporary Documents. London: The Folio Society.Google Scholar
Petrina, A., and Tosi, L., eds., 2011. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Plowden, A., 2004. Grey [Married Name Dudley], Lady Jane (1537–1554), Noblewoman and Claimant to the English Throne. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollnitz, A., 2010. Humanism and Court Culture in the Education of Tudor Royal Children. In Betteridge, T. and Riehl, A., eds. Tudor Court Culture. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press. pp. 42–58.Google Scholar
Pratt, T., and D’Onofrio, A., 2017. Jaw Setting and the California Vowel Shift in Parodic Performance. Language in Society. 46 (3), pp. 283–312.Google Scholar
Proctor, K., and Su, L. I.-W., 2011. The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse: American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate. Journal of Pragmatics. 43 (13), pp. 3251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F., ed., 2003. Elizabeth I: Her Life in Letters. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Raffield, P., 2004. Images and Cultures of Law in Early Modern England: Justice and Political Power, 1558–1660. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ratia, M., and Suhr, C., 2017. Verbal and Visual Communication in Title Pages of Early Modern English Specialised Medical Texts. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L. and Skaffari, J., eds. Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P., 2018. USAS Online English Tagger. Lancaster: UCREL, University of Lancaster. Available from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/tagger.htmlGoogle Scholar
Reagan, T., 2016. The Conceptualization of Language Legitimacy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 13 (1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renouard, P, 1800. Copy of an Original Letter from Queen Elizabeth to the Earl of Warwick. Exhibited to the Society of Antiquaries by Peter Renouard, Esq. F. A. S. in Whose Family This Curious Paper Has Long Remained. Archaeologia; or, Miscellaneous Tracts Relating to Antiquity. 13, pp. 201–3.Google Scholar
Richardson, L., 2003. Plagiarism and Imitation in Renaissance Historiography. In Kewes, P., ed. Plagiarism in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 106–18.Google Scholar
Richardson, M., 2001. The Fading Influence of the Medieval Ars Dictaminis in England after 1400. Rhetorica. 19 (2), pp. 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M., 1973. Studies in the Style and Narrative Technique of Edward Hall’s Chronicle. Helsinki: Memoires de la Societe Neophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., 2000. Reading in Early Modern England: Contexts and Problems. Critical Survey. 12 (2), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, F., 2012. The Caution in England and Wales. In L. M. Solan and P. M. Tiersma, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 313–25.Google Scholar
Rogos-Hebda, J., 2016. The Visual Text: Bibliographic Codes as Pragmatic Markers on a Manuscript Page. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies. 51 (3), pp. 37–44.Google Scholar
Russell, G., 2014. The Neglected History of the History of Printed Ephemera. Melbourne Historical Journal. 42 (1), pp. 7–36.Google Scholar
Satoh, A., 2001. Constructing Imperial Identity: How to Quote the Imperial Family and Those Who Address Them in the Japanese Press. Discourse & Society. 12 (2), pp. 169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, S., 2012. Contract Formation as a Speech Act. In L. M. Solan and P. M. Tiersma, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Language. pp. 100–113.Google Scholar
Schneiderová, A., 2018. Historical Background to English Legal Language. Journal of Modern Science. 37 (2), pp. 117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, C. 2016. Introduction: Current Trends in Register Research. In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, H. C., 1943. The Teaching of Handwriting in Tudor and Stuart Times. Huntington Library Quarterly. 6 (4), pp. 381–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., and Tribble, C., 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R., 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., and Short, M., 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Short, M., and Wynne, M., 1999. Hypothetical Words and Thoughts in Contemporary British Narratives. Narrative. 7 (3), pp. 307–34.Google Scholar
Shagan, E. H., 1999. Protector Somerset and the 1549 Rebellions: New Sources and New Perspectives. The English Historical Review. 114 (455), pp. 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, K., 2009. Selling the Tudor Monarchy: Authority and Image in Sixteenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, D., 2004. Gordon, Alexander (c. 1516–1575), Bishop of Galloway. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shrank, C., 2000. Rhetorical Constructions of a National Community: The Role of the King’s English in Mid-Tudor writing. In Shepard, A. and Withington, P., eds. Communities in Early Modern England: Networks, Place, Rhetoric. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press. pp. 180–98.Google Scholar
Shrank, C., 2010. ‘This fatall Medea,’ ‘this Clytemnestra’: Reading and the Detection of Mary Queen of Scots. Huntington Library Quarterly. 73 (3), pp. 523–41.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W., 2017. Deceptive Ambiguity by Police and Prosecutors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slavin, A. J., 1982. The Tudor Revolution and the Devil’s Art: Bishop Bonner’s Printed Forms. In Guth, D. J. and McKenna, J. W., eds. Tudor Rule and Revolution: Essays for G. R. Elton from His American Friends. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Slobe, T., 2018. Style, Stance, and Social Meaning in Mock White Girl. Language in Society. 47 (4), pp. 541–67.Google Scholar
Smith, J. J., 2017. From ‘secreit’ Script to Public Print: Punctuation, News Management and the Condemnation of the Earl of Bothwell. Huntington Library Quarterly. 80 (2), pp. 223–38.Google Scholar
Stæhr, A., 2015. Reflexivity in Facebook Interaction – Enregisterment across Written and Spoken Language Practices. Discourse, Context & Media. 8, pp. 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, P., 2011. Visible and Invisible Letters: Text versus Image in Renaissance England and Europe. In Dalbello, M. and Shaw, M., eds. Visible Writings: Cultures, Forms, Readings. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Steele, R., ed., 1910. A Bibliography of Royal Proclamations of the Tudor and Stuart Sovereigns and of Others Published under Authority, 1485–1714. With an Historical Essay on Their Origin and Use, by Robert Steele. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Steen, S. J., 2001. Reading Beyond the Words: Material Letters and the Process of Interpretation. Quidditas. 22, pp. 55–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Steffens, N. K., and Haslam, S. A. 2013. Power through ‘Us’: Leaders’ Use of We-Referencing Language Predicts Election Victory. PLoS ONE 8 (10), pp. e77952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubbs, M., and Barth, I., 2003. Using Recurrent Phrases as Text-Type Discriminators: A Quantitative Analysis and Some Findings. Functions of Language. 10 (1), pp. 61–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukker, N., Spooren, W., and Steen, G., 2016. Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition: Introduction to the Volume. In Stukker, N., Spooren, W. and Steen, G., eds. Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M., 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., and Jucker, A. H., 2010. Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, S-K., 2007. Intertextual Networks in the Correspondence of Lady Katherine Paston. In Nevalainen, T. and Tanskanen, S-K., eds. Letter Writing. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. D., ed., 2004. Documents of Lady Jane Grey, Nine Days Queen of England, 1553. New York: Algora Pub.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1999. Business Writing in History: What Caused the Dictamen’s Demise? The Journal of Business Communication. 36 (1), p. 40–54.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J., 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. M., 2017. Throckmorton, John I (by 1524–80), of Feckenham, Worcs. History of Parliament Online. Available from //www.historyofparliamentonline.org/Google Scholar
Trend, N. A., 2017. Wighton: The Church, the Village, and Its People, 1400–1500. PhD thesis. University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Trosborg, A., 1995. Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law. Journal of Pragmatics. 23 (1), pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Tselentis, J. 2012. Typefaces and Specimens. In Haley, A., Poulin, R., Tselentis, J., Seddon, T., Leonidas, G., Saltz, I., Henderson, K. with Alterman, T., Typography, References: A Comprehensive Visual Guide to the Language, History, and Practice of Typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers. pp. 147–206.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, J., 2017. Quantifying Contrasts: A Method of Computational Analysis of Visual Features on the Early Printed Page. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L. and Skaffari, J., eds. Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 95–124.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, L., and Dancygier, B., 2017. Multimodal Artefacts and the Texture of Viewpoint. Journal of Pragmatics. 122, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D., and Kubo, S., 2002. Introduction. In Essays in Speech Act Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. 2004. Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. In Jaworski, A., Coupland, N. and Galasinski, D., eds. Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin; New York: Mouton De Gruyter. pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
Vertot, Abbe de, 1763. Ambassades de Messieurs de Noailles en Angleterre. Paris: A Leyde.Google Scholar
Waag, A., 2019. Gender and the Language of Politics in Thirteenth-Century Queens’ Letters. Historical Research. 92 (256), pp. 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, K., 1994. Royalese: The Rise and Fall of ‘the Queen’s English’. English Today. 10 (3), p. 3–10.Google Scholar
Wales, K., 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, T., and Grund, P. J., 2017. ‘Speaking base approbious words’: Speech Representation in Early Modern English Witness Depositions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 18 (1), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Warvik, B., 2003. ‘When you read or hear this story read’: Issues of Orality and Literacy in Old English Texts. In Hiltunen, R. and Skaffari, J., eds. Discourse Perspectives on English: Medieval to Modern. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 13–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, T., 1991. Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550–1640. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wei, L., and Milroy, L., 1995. Conversational Code-Switching in a Chinese Community in Britain: A Sequential Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 23 (3), pp. 281–99.Google Scholar
Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, C., 2011. Epic, Epitome, and the Early Modern Historical Imagination. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H., 2000. On the Limitations of Linguistics Applied. Applied Linguistics. 21 (1), pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, A., 2016. Bess of Hardwick’s Letters: Language, Materiality, and Early Modern Epistolary Culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. T., 2016. “My evil favoured writing”: Uglyography, Disease, and the Epistolary Networks of George Talbot, Sixth Earl of Shrewsbury. Huntington Library Quarterly. 79 (3), pp. 387–409.Google Scholar
Williams, G. T., 2013. Women’s Epistolary Utterance: A Study of the Letters of Joan and Maria Thynne, 1575–1611. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, R. G., 2005. The Arts of Letter-Writing. In Minnis, A. and Johnson, I., eds. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume II The Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., 2009. Language and Politics. In Culpeper, J., ed. English Language: Description, Variation and Context. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 576–93.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and Meyer, M., eds., 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wood, J. L., 2004. Text in Context: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach to Margaret Paston. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 5 (2), pp. 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodacre, E., and McGlynn, S., 2014. The Image and Perception of Monarchy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Woolf, D., 2000. Reading History in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, D. R., 2003. The Social Circulation of the Past: English Historical Culture, 1500–1730. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woudhuysen, H., 2007. The Queen’s Own Hand: A Preliminary Account. In Beal, P. and Ioppolo, G., eds. Elizabeth I and the Culture of Writing. London: British Library. pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Wray, A., 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A., 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Youngs, F. A., 1971. Definitions of Treason in an Elizabethan Proclamation. The Historical Journal. 14 (4), p. 675–91.Google Scholar