Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:54:39.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Stall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Wayne Johnson
Affiliation:
Aeromechanics Branch of NASA Ames Research Center
Get access

Summary

To maintain low drag and high lift, the flow over an airfoil section must remain smooth and attached to the surface. This flow has a rapid acceleration around the nose of the airfoil to the point of maximum suction pressure, and then a slow deceleration along the remainder of the upper surface to the trailing edge. The deceleration must be gradual for the flow to remain attached to the surface. At a high enough angle-of-attack, stall occurs: the deceleration is too large for the boundary layer to support, and the flow separates from the airfoil surface. The maximum lift coefficient at stall is highly dependent on the Reynolds number, Mach number, and the airfoil shape. Figure 8.12 shows clmax values from 1.0 to 1.6 for various airfoils, corresponding to stall angles-of-attack of 10° to 16°. The unstalled airfoil has a low drag and a lift coefficient linear with angle-of-attack. The airfoil in stall at high angles-of-attack has high drag, a loss of lift, and an increased nose-down pitch moment caused by a rearward shift of the center of pressure. The aerodynamic flow field of an airfoil or wing in stall is complex, and for the rotary wing there are important three-dimensional and unsteady phenomena as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, F.J. Jr., “A Simplified Theoretical Method of Determining the Characteristics of a Lifting Rotor in Forward Flight.” NACA Report 716, 1941.Google Scholar
Bousman, W.G.A Qualitative Examination of Dynamic Stall from Flight Test Data.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 43:4 (October 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousman, W.G.Evaluation of Airfoil Dynamic Stall Characteristics for Maneuverability.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 46:4 (October 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, L.W., McAlister, K.W., and McCroskey, W.J.Analysis of the Development of Dynamic Stall Based on Oscillating Airfoil Experiments.” NASA TN D-8382, January 1977.Google Scholar
Floros, M.W., Gold, N.P., and Johnson, W.An Exploratory Aerodynamic Limits Test with Analytical Correlation.” American Helicopter Society 4th Decennial Specialist's Conference on Aeromechanics, San Francisco, CA, January 2004.Google Scholar
Fradenburgh, E.A.Aerodynamic Efficiency Potential of Rotary Wing Aircraft.” American Helicopter Society 16th Annual National Forum, Washington, DC, May 1960.Google Scholar
Gessow, A., and Myers, G.C. Jr., Aerodynamics of the Helicopter. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1952.Google Scholar
Gormont, R.E.A Mathematical Model of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Radial Flow for Application to Helicopter Rotors.” USAAVLABS TR 72-67, May 1973.Google Scholar
Green, R.B., Galbraith, R.A.M., and Niven, A.J.Measurements of the Dynamic Stall Vortex Convection Speed.” Seventeenth European Rotorcraft Forum, Berlin, Germany, September 1991.Google Scholar
Gustafson, F.B., and Gessow, A.Effect of Blade Stalling on the Efficiency of a Helicopter Rotor as Measured in Flight.” NACA TN 1250, April 1947.Google Scholar
Gustafson, F.B., and Myers, G.C. Jr., “Stalling of Helicopter Blades.” NACA Report 840, 1946.Google Scholar
Hafner, R.The Bristol 171 Helicopter.” The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 53:460 (April 1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, N.D., and Garelick, M.S.Dynamic Stall Considerations in Helicopter Rotors.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 13:2 (April 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, N.D., and Young, M.I.Torsional Oscillation of Helicopter Blades due to Stall.” Journal of Aircraft, 3:3 (May-June 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, F.D.Rotary Wing Aerodynamics – Historical Perspective and Important Issues.” American Helicopter Society National Specialists' Meeting on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics, Arlington, TX, February 1987.Google Scholar
Harris, F.D., Tarzanin, F.J. Jr., and Fisher, R.K. Jr., “Rotor High Speed Performance, Theory vs. Test.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 15:3 (April 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.Rotorcraft Aerodynamic Models for a Comprehensive Analysis.” American Helicopter Society 54th Annual Forum, Washington, DC, May 1998.Google Scholar
Leishman, J.G., and Beddoes, T.S.A Generalised Model for Airfoil Unsteady Aerodynamic Behaviour and Dynamic Stall Using the Indicial Method.” American Helicopter Society 42nd Annual Forum, Washington DC, June 1986.Google Scholar
Leishman, J.G., and Beddoes, T.S.A Semi-Empirical Model for Dynamic Stall.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 34:3 (July 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leishman, J.G., and Crouse, G.L. Jr., “State-Space Model for Unsteady Airfoil Behavior and Dynamic Stall.” AIAA Paper No. 89-1319, April 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloud, J.L. III, and McCullough, G.B.Wind-Tunnel Tests of a Full-Scale Helicopter Rotor with Symmetrical and with Cambered Blade Sections at Advance Ratios from 0.3 to 0.4.” NACA TN 4367, September 1958.Google Scholar
McCormick, B.W. Jr., Aerodynamics of V/STOL Flight. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1967.Google Scholar
McCroskey, W.J.The Phenomenon of Dynamic Stall.” NASA TM 81264, March 1981.Google Scholar
McCroskey, W.J., and Fisher, R.K. Jr., “Detailed Aerodynamic Measurements on a Model Rotor in the Blade Stall Regime.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 17:1 (January 1972).Google Scholar
McCroskey, W.J., and Pucci, S.L.Viscous-Inviscid Interaction on Oscillating Airfoils in Subsonic Flow.” AIAA Journal, 20:2 (February 1982).Google Scholar
McHugh, F.J.What Are the Lift and Propulsive Force Limits of High Speed for the Conventional Rotor?” American Helicopter Society 34th Annual National Forum, Washington, DC, May 1978.Google Scholar
Martin, J.M., Empey, R.W., McCroskey, W.J., and Caradonna, F.X.An Experimental Analysis of Dynamic Stall on an Oscillating Airfoil.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 19:1 (January 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, T.R., Shinoda, P., Peterson, R.L., and Datta, A.Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Test of the UH-60A Airloads Rotor.” American Helicopter Society 67th Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, May 2011.Google Scholar
Peters, D.A.Toward a Unified Lift Model for Use in Rotor Blade Stability Analyses.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 30:3 (July 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petot, D.Progress in the Semi-Empirical Prediction of the Aerodynamic Forces due to Large Amplitude Oscillations of an Airfoil in Attached or Separated Flow.” Ninth European Rotorcraft Forum, Stresa, Italy, September 1983.Google Scholar
Petot, D.Dynamic Stall Modeling of the NACA 0012 Profile.” La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1984:6 (1984).Google Scholar
Petot, D.Differential Equation Modeling of Dynamic Stall.” La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1989:5 (1989), corrections dated October 1990.Google Scholar
Petot, D.An Investigation of Stall on a 4.2m Diameter Experimental Rotor.” Seventh International Workshop on Dynamics and Aeroelastic Modeling of Rotorcraft, St. Louis, MO, October 1997.Google Scholar
Sikorsky, I.A.Aerodynamic Parameters Selection in Helicopter Design.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 5:1 (January 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepniewski, W.Z.Introduction to Helicopter Aerodynamics. Morton, PA: Rotorcraft Publishing Committee, 1955 (first edition 1950).Google Scholar
Tanner, W.H.Charts for Estimating Rotary Wing Performance in Hover and at High Forward Speeds.” NASA CR 114, November 1964.Google Scholar
Tarzanin, F.J. Jr., “Prediction of Control Loads Due to Blade Stall.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 17:2 (April 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, H.Calculation of Rotor Performance and Loads Under Stalled Conditions.” American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, May 2003.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Stall
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Stall
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Stall
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.013
Available formats
×