Book contents
- The Roman Republic and Political Culture
- Classical Scholarship in Translation
- The Roman Republic and Political Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Original Essays
- Part II Translations
- Chapter 4 Benevolence and Freedom
- Chapter 5 Capitol, Comitium, and Forum
- Chapter 6 Face to Face with the Ancestors
- Chapter 7 Rituals of Integration in the Roman Republic
- Chapter 8 The Message of the Medium
- Chapter 9 The memoria of the gentes as the Backbone of Collective Memory in Republican Rome
- Chapter 10 The Ritual Grammar of Institutionalized Politics
- Chapter 11 Aristocratic Roles and the Crisis of the Roman Republic
- Chapter 12 Monuments and Consensus
- Chapter 13 Publicity or Participation?
Chapter 6 - Face to Face with the Ancestors
Political Monuments and Public Memory in Republican Rome
from Part II - Translations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2025
- The Roman Republic and Political Culture
- Classical Scholarship in Translation
- The Roman Republic and Political Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Original Essays
- Part II Translations
- Chapter 4 Benevolence and Freedom
- Chapter 5 Capitol, Comitium, and Forum
- Chapter 6 Face to Face with the Ancestors
- Chapter 7 Rituals of Integration in the Roman Republic
- Chapter 8 The Message of the Medium
- Chapter 9 The memoria of the gentes as the Backbone of Collective Memory in Republican Rome
- Chapter 10 The Ritual Grammar of Institutionalized Politics
- Chapter 11 Aristocratic Roles and the Crisis of the Roman Republic
- Chapter 12 Monuments and Consensus
- Chapter 13 Publicity or Participation?
Summary
Monuments hold a special significance for the shaping and the perpetuation of historical memory. The past is discussed in terms of the conceptual, idealized past of public monuments; the local past of ancient sites from the early days of the community; the genealogical past of homes and tombs; and the unifying past of historiography. Noting that the historical memory of the Romans will only transpire if these different forms of memory are synthesized, each one with due recognition to the institutions and situations in which memory were deployed, Tonio Hölscher argues for a certain hierarchy: prioritization of material expressions of the past leads him to regard Roman historiography as an offshoot of historical memory with limited social impact; monuments, on the other hand, powerful and with vast visibility in the centre of the city, wield inescapable impact upon Roman society. The essay concludes with Hölscher expressing his opinion on the place and design of the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, the planning of which had become the focus of a major public debate in Germany at the time.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Roman Republic and Political CultureGerman Scholarship in Translation, pp. 166 - 199Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025