Book contents
- Roman Frugality
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Roman Frugality
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 ‘Frugality’, Economy and Society in Archaic Rome (Late Seventh to Early Fourth Century BCE)
- Chapter 2 From Licinius Stolo to Tiberius Gracchus: Roman Frugality and the Limitation of Landholding
- Chapter 3 Frugality as a Political Language in the Second Century BCE: The Strategies of Cato the Elder and Scipio Aemilianus
- Chapter 4 Smallholding, Frugality and Market Economy in the Gracchan age
- Chapter 5 Frugalitas, or: The Invention of a Roman Virtue
- Chapter 6 Frugality, Building, and Heirlooms in an Age of Social Mobility
- Chapter 7 From Poverty to Prosperity: The Recalibration of Frugality
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Chapter 5 - Frugalitas, or: The Invention of a Roman Virtue
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 June 2020
Book contents
- Roman Frugality
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Roman Frugality
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 ‘Frugality’, Economy and Society in Archaic Rome (Late Seventh to Early Fourth Century BCE)
- Chapter 2 From Licinius Stolo to Tiberius Gracchus: Roman Frugality and the Limitation of Landholding
- Chapter 3 Frugality as a Political Language in the Second Century BCE: The Strategies of Cato the Elder and Scipio Aemilianus
- Chapter 4 Smallholding, Frugality and Market Economy in the Gracchan age
- Chapter 5 Frugalitas, or: The Invention of a Roman Virtue
- Chapter 6 Frugality, Building, and Heirlooms in an Age of Social Mobility
- Chapter 7 From Poverty to Prosperity: The Recalibration of Frugality
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
The chapter begins by looking into the absence of the noun frugalitas in authors before the first century BCE and traces the reasons for its rise to prominence as a virtue-label in Cicero. This involves consideration of the adjective frugi: primarily used of slaves and freedmen, it was adopted as an agnomen by Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi (cos. 133 BCE) in an act of onomastic creativity. Piso’s integration of frugi into his nomenclature ennobled the attribute and thereby facilitated Cicero’s investment in the abstract noun: at two specific moments in his career, here analysed in depth, i.e. the speeches against Verres (70 BCE) and the Tusculan Disputations along with the speech on behalf of king Deiotarus (45 BCE), Cicero made the unorthodox decision to promote frugalitas as a quintessential Roman virtue, thereby setting the stage for its stellar career in imperial times and later centuries. The chapter concludes with a survey of the use authors of the early empire (Horace, Valerius Maximus, Seneca the Elder, Petronius, Seneca the Younger, Quintilian and Pliny the Younger) made of frugi, frugaliter and frugalitas.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Roman FrugalityModes of Moderation from the Archaic Age to the Early Empire and Beyond, pp. 237 - 346Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Arena, V. (2011) ‘The Consulship of 78 BC. Catulus versus Lepidus: an optimates versus populares affair’, in Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F.. Cambridge: 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ax, W. (2011) Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. Orat. 1,4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge: 148–87.Google Scholar
Berno, F. R. (2014) ‘In Praise of Tubero’s Pottery: A Note on Seneca, Ep. 95.72–73 and 98.13’, in Seneca Philosophus, eds. Wildberger, J. and Colish, M. L.. Berlin and Boston: 369–91.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2000) ‘Mos, mores und mos maiorum: Die Erfindung der “Sittlichkeit” in der römischen Kultur’, in Moribus antiquis res stat Romana: Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr., eds. Braun, M., Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F.-H.. Munich and Leipzig: 303–52.Google Scholar
Biesinger, B. (2016) Römische Dekadenzdiskurse: Untersuchungen zur römischen Geschichtsschreibung und ihren Kontexten (2. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis 2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1982) ‘La réception du cynisme à Rome’, L’Antiquité Classique 51: 151–73.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (2016a) ‘Ciceros Werke über das Leben der Sklaven und Freigelassenen im spätrepublikanischen Rom’, Gymnasium 123: 569–95.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (2016b) Das Thema der Sklaverei in den Werken Ciceros. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (2011) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2000) ‘Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero’, in Mos Maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M.. Stuttgart: 25–97.Google Scholar
Braund, S. (2009) Seneca, De Cementia: Edited with Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Breitenstein, N. (2009) Petronius, Satyrica 1–15: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bruun, C. (2013) ‘Greek or Latin? The owner’s choice of names for vernae in Rome’, in Roman Slavery and Roman Material Culture, ed. George, M., Toronto, Buffalo, London: 19–42.Google Scholar
Carlon, J. M. (2009) Pliny’s Women: Constructing Virtue and Creating Identity in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ceaicovschi, K. (2009) ‘Cato the Elder in Aulus Gellius’, Illinois Classical Studies 33–4: 25–39.Google Scholar
Christes, J. (1979) Sklaven und Freigelassene als Grammatiker und Philologen im antiken Rom. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. (1995) ‘Lo spazio straniato: Percorsi psicologici e percezione del tribunale nelle orazioni di Cicerone pro Fonteio, pro Q. Roscio comoedo, pro Cluentio I’, MD 35: 9–57.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (2010) Aretai and Virtutes: Untersuchungen zu den Wertvorstellungen der Griechen und Römer. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. (2009) ‘Fear and freedom: a new interpretation of Pliny’s Panegyricus, in Ordine e sovversione nel mondo greco e romano, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 259–78.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1998) Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Latin Literature: A History, trans. by Solodow, J. B., revised by Fowler, D. and Most, G. W.. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cordier, P. (2006) ‘L’ethnographie romaine et ses primitifs: Les paradoxes de la “préhistoire” au présent’, Anabases 3: 173–93.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2000) ‘The Lex Ovinia and the emancipation of the senate’, in The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion and Historiography c. 400–133 BC, ed. Bruun, C.. Rome: 69–89.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (1998) ‘Austerity, excess, success, and failure in Hellenistic and early imperial Italy’, in Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity, ed. Wyke, M.. Oxford: 121–46.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2009) ‘Free yourself! Slavery, freedom and the self in Seneca’s Letters’, in Seneca and the Self, eds. Bartsch, S. and Wray, D.. Cambridge: 139–59.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1959) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2011) ‘Stuprum: public attitudes and penalties for sexual offences in republican Rome’, in Roman Readings: Roman Responses to Greek Literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian. Berlin and New York: 115–43.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2019) ‘Out of the past: Pliny’s Panegyricus and Roman historiography’, Maia 71: 380–411.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2000) Patrii sermonis egestas: Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (1994) The Historian L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi and the Roman Annalistic Tradition. Lanham, New York and London.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1922/2007) Plautine Elements in Plautus: (Plautinisches im Plautus), trans. by Drevikovsky, T. and Muecke, F.. Oxford. [= Elementi Plautini in Plauto. Florence, 1960].Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2010) ‘Horatius Anceps: persona and self-revelation in satire and song’, in Davis, G. (ed.) A Companion to Horace. Chichester: 271–90.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2013) Language, Truth, and Literature: A Defence of Literary Humanism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisthardt, J. M. (2015) Zwischen Princeps und Res Publica: Tacitus, Plinius und die Senatorische Selbstdarstellung in der Hohen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2003) ‘The “annalist” before the annalists: Ennius and his Annales’, in Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, eds. Eigler, U. et al. Darmstadt: 93–114.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007b) ‘Virgil vs. Ennius – or: the undoing of the Annalist’, in Ennius perennis: the Annals and beyond, eds. Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E.. Cambridge: 73–102.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2018) Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119: Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I., Hodgson, L., et al. (2013) Cicero, On Pompey’s Command (De Imperio), 27–49. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, Commentary, and Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I., Gotter, U., Havener, W. and Hodgson, L. (eds.) (2019a) Augustus and the Destruction of History: The Politics of the Past in Early Imperial Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I., Gotter, U., Havener, W. and Hodgson, L. (2019b) ‘Introduction’, in Augustus and the Destruction of History: The Politics of the Past in Early Imperial Rome, eds. Gildenhard, I. et al. Cambridge: 1–36.Google Scholar
Goddard, J. P. (1994) Moral Attitudes to Eating and Drinking in Ancient Rome. Diss. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. L. (1999). ‘Imagining Greek and Roman magic’, in Witchcraft and Magic in Europe 2: Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Flint, V. et al. London: 159–275.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. (2001) Griechenland in Rom? Die römische Rede über Hellas und ihre Kontexte (3.–1. Jh. v. Chr.). Habil. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1994) ‘Persius and the decoction of Nero’, in Reflections of Nero: Culture, History and Representation, eds. Elsner, J. and Masters, J.. London: 131–50.Google Scholar
Graf, F. (1997) ‘How to cope with a difficult life: a view of ancient magic’, in Envisioning Magic, eds. Schäfer, P. and Kippenberg, H. G.. Leiden, New York, Cologne: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermehl, P. (2006) Petronius, Satyrica 79–141: Ein philologisch-literarischer Kommentar, Bd. 1: Sat. 79–110. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2007) ‘Poets, patrons, rulers: the Ennian traditions’, in Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond, eds. Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E.. Cambridge: 129–44.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. (2016) Ordnung in Unordnung: Kommunikation, Konsum und Konkurrenz in der stadtrömischen Gesellschaft der frühen Kaiserzeit, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2011) ‘Down the pan: historical exemplarity in the Panegyricus’, in Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, P.. Cambridge: 142–74.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität’, in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, eds. Gehrke, H-J. and Möller, A.. Tübingen: 301–38.Google Scholar
Itgenshorst, T. (2017) ‘Au-delà d’une fabrique de la norme: l’oeuvre de Valère Maxime’, in La norme sous la République romaine et le Haut-Empire, eds. Itgenshorst, T. and Le Doze, P., Bordeaux: 517–31.Google Scholar
Jakab, É. (1997) Praedicere und cavere beim Marktkauf: Sachmängel im griechischen und römischen Recht. Munich.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (2003) Römische Geschichtsschreibung der republikanischen Zeit. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (2012) ‘Prozessparteien und politische Gegner als dramatis personae: Charakterstilisierung in Ciceros Reden’, in Studium declamatorium: Untersuchungen zu Schulübungen und Prunkreden von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit, eds. Schröder, B.-J. and Schröder, J.-P.. Leipzig: 35–106.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R. (1995) Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik: Die Magistratur. Munich.Google Scholar
Labate, M. (1996) ‘Il sermo oraziano e i generi letterari’, in Zeitgenosse Horaz: der Dichter und seine Leser seit zwei Jahrtausenden, eds. Krasser, H. and Schmidt, E. A., Tübingen: 424–41.Google Scholar
Langlands, R (2008) ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: the case of severitas’, CCJ 54: 160–87.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1989) ‘La leggitimazione del lusso privato da Ennio a Vitruvio: momenti, problemi, personaggi’, Maia 41: 3–34.Google Scholar
Latte, K. (1960/1968) ‘Der Historiker L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi’, in Kleine Schriften. Munich: 837–47.Google Scholar
Liebs, D. (2012) Summoned to the Roman Courts: Famous Trials from Antiquity, trans. Garber, R. L. R. and Cürten, C. G.. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1979) ‘The tradition of Roman moral conservatism’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History I, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 7–58.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1992) ‘The idea of the republic and the foundations of Roman morality: second part’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 5–40.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1900) The Captivi of Plautus: edited with Introduction, Apparatus Criticus and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1981) ‘The leges de repetundis and associate measures under the Republic’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 8: 162–212.Google Scholar
Litchfield, H. W. (1914) ‘National exempla virtutis in Roman literature’, HSCP 25: 1–71.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, U. (2007) Exemplarische Vergangenheit: Valerius Maximus und die Konstruktion des sozialen Raumes in der frühen Kaiserzeit. Göttingen.Google Scholar
MacLean, R. (2018) Freed Slaves and Roman Imperial Culture: Social Integration and the Transformation of Values. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (2013) Light from the Gentiles: Hellenistic Philosophy and Early Christianity: Collected Essays, 1959–2012. Boston.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2007) Cicero, Philippics 3–9, ed. with Introduction, Translation and Commentary, 2 vols. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2012) ‘Cicero and Dicaearchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 307–49.Google Scholar
Menner, J. (2006) ‘D. 33, 7, 18, 4 – vilicus und vilica als Objekte eines Erbschaftsstreites’, in Sklaverei und Freilassung im römischen Recht: Symposium für Hans Josef Wieling zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Finkenauer, T.. Heidelberg: 153–87.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (2007) ‘Philosophy and ethics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge: 165–80.Google Scholar
Nelsestuen, G. A. (2014) ‘Overseeing res publica: the rector as vilicus in De Re Publica 5’, CA 33: 130–73.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1977) ‘L’onomastique des groupes dirigeants sous la République’, in L’onomastique latine. Actes du colloque international, 13–15 octobre 1975, Paris, 45–61.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011) Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
North, H. F. (1966) Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2009) Magic, Witchcraft, and Ghosts in the Greek and Roman Worlds: A Sourcebook, 2nd edn. New York.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (1995) Theatrum Arbitri: Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius. Leiden, Boston, Cologne.Google Scholar
Park, M. E. (1918) The Plebs in Cicero's Day: A Study of Their Provenance and of Their Employment. Cosmos Press.Google Scholar
Peer, A. (2008) ‘Cicero’s last Caesarian speech: the Pro Rege Deiotaro as a final warning before the Ides of March’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XIV, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 189–208.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pittia, S. (2004) ‘Les élites Siciliennes au miroir du plaidoyer cicéronien contre Verrès’, in Autocélébration des élites locales dans le monde romain, ed. M. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, L. Lamoine and Trément, F.. Clermont-Ferrand: 15–31.Google Scholar
Pobjoy, M. P. (2013) ‘L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi’, The Fragments of the Roman Historians, vol. 1: Introduction, eds. Cornell, T. J.. Oxford: 231–9.Google Scholar
Prag, J. R. W. (2013) ‘Provincials, patrons, and the rhetoric of repetundae’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 267–83.Google Scholar
Prag, J. and Repath, I. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in Petronius: A Handbook, eds. Prag, J. and Repath, I.. Malden and Oxford: 1–15.Google Scholar
Ramsay, W. (1869) The Mostellaria of Plautus, with Notes Critical and Explanatory Prolegomena and Excursus. London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1976) ‘The Ciceronian aristocracy and its properties’, in Studies in Roman Property: By the Cambridge University Research Seminar in Ancient History, ed. Finley, M. I.. Cambridge: 85–102.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (eds.) (2006) Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria: Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2009) ‘Sex in the Satyrica: outlaws in literatureland’, in Petronius: A Handbook, eds. Prag, J. and Repath, I.. Malden and Oxford: 82–100.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2017) Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. (2017) ‘Popular public opinion in a nutshell: nicknames and non-elite political culture in the late republic’, in Popular Culture in the Ancient World, ed. Grig, L.. Cambridge: 91–106.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. (1995) ‘Seneca on the fear of poverty in the Epistulae Morales’, L’Antiquité Classique 64: 91–8.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. (2008) ‘Choosing a cognomen in Rome: some aspects’, in A Roman Miscellany: Essays in Honour of Anthony R. Birley on his Seventieth Birthday, eds. Schellenberg, H. M., Hirschmann, V.–E. and Krieckhaus, A.. Gdansk: 79–91.Google Scholar
Salway, B. (1994) ‘What’s in a name? A survey of Roman onomastic practice from c. 700 BC to AD 700’, JRS 84: 125–45.Google Scholar
Santoro L’Hoir, F. (1992) The Rhetoric of Gender Terms: ‘Man’, ‘Woman’, & the Portrayal of Character in Latin Prose. Leiden, New York, Cologne.Google Scholar
Scheidle, K. (1993) Modus optumum: Die Bedeutung des ‘rechten Maßes’ in der römischen Literatur (Republik – frühe Kaiserzeit), untersucht an den Begriffen ‘Modus – Modestia – Moderatio – Temperantia’, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. and Setaioli, A. (2011) A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012) ‘The fourth virtue’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Notre Dame: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares, Vol. I: 62–47 B.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Solin, Heikki (2017) ‘Zur Entwicklung des römischen Namensystems’, in Politische Kultur und soziale Struktur der Römischen Republik: Bilanzen und Perspektiven (= Akten der internationalen Tagung anlässlich des 70. Todestages von Friedrich Münzer, Münster, 18.–20. Oktober 2012), eds. Haake, M. and Harders, A.-C.. Stuttgart: 135–54.Google Scholar
Stemmler, M. (2000) ‘Auctoritas exempli: zur Wechselwirkung von kanonisierten Vergangenheitsbildern und gesellschaftlicher Gegenwart in der spätrepublikanischen Rhetorik’, in Mos Maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Stemmler, M. and Linke, B.. Stuttgart: 141–205.Google Scholar
Struever, N. S. (1970) The Language of History in the Renaissance: Rhetorical and Historical Consciousness in Florentine Humanism. Princeton.Google Scholar
Strunk, T. E. (2017) History after Liberty: Tacitus on Tyrants, Sycophants, and Republicans. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (2007) Terentia, Tullia, and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. Abingdon.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982) ‘Civilis princeps: between citizen and king’, JRS 72: 32–48.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and their Successors. London and New York.Google Scholar
West, D. A. (1995a) Cast out Theory: Horace Odes 1.4 and 4.7. Presidential Address, Classical Association.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. (2019) The Arts of Imitation in Latin Prose: Pliny’s Epistles/Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1995) ‘Libertino patre natus: true or false?’, in Homage to Horace, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 296–313.Google Scholar
Wolstencroft, S. (2019) ‘From ferocity to friendship: how Horace changed satire’, Omnibus 78: 10–12.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. (2011) Fighting Hydra-like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic. Bristol.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by