Book contents
- The Roman de la Rose and Thirteenth-Century Thought
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- The Roman de la Rose and Thirteenth-Century Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Primary Texts
- Introduction
- Part I Epistemology and Language
- Part II Natural Law, Politics, and Society
- Chapter 5 The Personal and the Political
- Chapter 6 Human Nature and Natural Law in Jean de Meun’s Roman de la Rose
- Chapter 7 A Politico-Communal Reading of the Rose
- Part III Unfinished Business
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
Chapter 7 - A Politico-Communal Reading of the Rose
The Fiore Attributed to Dante Alighieri
from Part II - Natural Law, Politics, and Society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2020
- The Roman de la Rose and Thirteenth-Century Thought
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- The Roman de la Rose and Thirteenth-Century Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Primary Texts
- Introduction
- Part I Epistemology and Language
- Part II Natural Law, Politics, and Society
- Chapter 5 The Personal and the Political
- Chapter 6 Human Nature and Natural Law in Jean de Meun’s Roman de la Rose
- Chapter 7 A Politico-Communal Reading of the Rose
- Part III Unfinished Business
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
Summary
This chapter considers the late thirteenth-century Italian reception of the Rose, especially the Fiore, attributed to Dante. I suggest a work that is both a synthesis and a new approach to the question by re-inserting the Tuscan reworking into its Florentine politico-cultural context. The Fiore brings out the link, already present in the French poem, between Jean de Meun and the city-states of the peninsula and is thus situated at the intersection of two generations of Italian intellectuals (between that of Brunetto and that of Dante). Meanwhile, the socio-political context of the city of Florence explains several of the translator’s choices in transforming the Fiore into a veritable epic of Florentine socio-political practices. Anti-Franciscan polemic is decisive here: it produces the myth of Falsembiante (False Appearance/Faux Semblant), which becomes in turn crucial for successive literary generations. I would like, thus, to propose a general interpretation of the poem, paying particular attention to the politico-rhetorical rereading of the French text offered in the Italian translation-reworking.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The ‘Roman de la Rose' and Thirteenth-Century Thought , pp. 149 - 170Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020