Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T02:40:01.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Francisco Pina Polo
Francisco Pina Polo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Role of Ex-Consuls in Republican Rome, 218–31 BCE , pp. 221 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acimovic, A., 2007, Scipio Africanus, New York.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C., 1990, Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 bc to 50 bc, Toronto.Google Scholar
Allely, A., 2004, Lépide, le Triumvir, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Alvar Ezquerra, J., 1994, ‘Escenografía para una recepción divina: La introducción de Cibeles en Roma’, Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 20, 149–169.Google Scholar
Andreau, J., 1987, La vie financière dans le monde romain: Les métiers de manieurs d’argent (IVe siècle av.J.C.–IIIe siècle ap.J.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Astin, A., 1978, Cato the Censor, Oxford.Google Scholar
Astin, A., 1985, ‘Censorships in the Late Republic’, Historia 35, 175–199.Google Scholar
Astin, A., 1988, ‘Regimen morum’, Journal of Roman Studies 78, 14–34.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1958, Foreign Clientelae (264–70 bc), Oxford.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1962, ‘Waiting for Sulla’, Journal of Roman Studies 52, 47–61.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1964, Studies in Greek and Roman History, Oxford.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1969, ‘Cicero and the Commission of 146 b.c.’, in Bibauw, J. (ed.), Hommages à Marcel Renard, vol. 1, Brussels, 54–65.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1970, T. Quinctius Flamininus: Philhellenism and Realpolitik, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1971, ‘The Family and Early Career of T. Quinctius Flamininus’, Journal of Roman Studies 61, 102–111.Google Scholar
Badian, E., 1993, ‘The Legend of the Legate Who Lost His Luggage’, Historia 42, 203–210.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D., 1939, ‘Consular Provinces under the Late Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 29, 57–73.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D., 1954, ‘Rome and Macedon, 205–200 b.c.’, Journal of Roman Studies 44, 30–42.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D., 1967, ‘T. Quinctius Flamininus’, Phoenix 21, 177–190.Google Scholar
Barber, C., 2016, ‘The Lost Generation of the Roman Republic: Elite Losses and the Senate of the Hannibalic War’, PhD diss., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Barber, C., 2019, ‘Uncovering a “Lost Generation” in the Senate: Demography and the Hannibalic War’, in Armstrong, J. and Fronda, M. (eds.), Romans at War: Soldiers, Citizens, and Society in the Roman Republic, Andover, 154–170.Google Scholar
Bardon, H., 1952, La littérature latine inconnue: L’époque républicaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D., 1983, ‘A Reconsideration of the Roman Approval of Peace with Macedonia in 196 b.c.’, Phoenix 37, 218–223.Google Scholar
Barrandon, N., 2007, ‘Le rôle des légations sénatoriales dans la gestion de la province d’Hispanie Citérieure entre 133 et 82 avant J.-C.’, Domitia 8–9, 227–240.Google Scholar
Bates, R. L., 1986, ‘Rex in senatu: A Historical Biography of M. Aemilius Scaurus’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 130, 251–288.Google Scholar
Baudry, R., 2017, ‘Le Sénat et la norme: Les normes relatives au choix des témoins des sénatus-consultes’, in Itgenshorst, T. and Le Doze, P. (eds.), La norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains, Bordeaux, 319–331.Google Scholar
Baudry, R., 2020, ‘Auctoritas et hiérarchie sénatoriale à la fin de la République’, in David, J.-M. and Hurlet, F. (eds.), L’auctoritas à Rome: Une notion constitutive de la culture politique, Bordeaux, 201–217.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A., 1983, Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics: A Study of the Roman Jurists in Their Political Setting, 316–82 bc, Munich.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A., 1985, Lawyers in Roman Transitional Politics: A Study of the Roman Jurists in Their Political Setting in the Late Republic and Triumvirate, Munich.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A., 1992, Women and Politics in Ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar
Beck, H., 2000, ‘Quintus Fabius Maximus: Musterkarriere ohne Zögern’, in Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. (eds.), Von Romulus zu Augustus: Grosse Gestalten der römischen Republik, Munich, 79–91.Google Scholar
Beck, H., 2005, Karriere und Hierarchie: Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in den mittleren Republik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Beck, H., 2009, ‘From Poplicola to Augustus: Senatorial Houses in Roman Political Culture’, Phoenix 63, 361–387.Google Scholar
Beck, H. and Walter, U., 2001–2004, Die frühen römischen Historiker, 2 vols., Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), 2011, Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Becker, M., 2017, ‘Suntoque aediles curatores urbis … ’: Die Entwicklung der stadtrömischen Aedilität in republikanischer Zeit, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bellomo, M., 2019, Il comando militare a Roma nell’età delle guerre puniche (264–201 a.C.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bergemann, J., 1990, Römische Reiterstatuen: Ehrendenkmäler im öffentlichen Bereich, Mainz.Google Scholar
Bergk, A., 2011, ‘The Development of the Praetorship in the Third Century bc’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: High Office Holding in the Roman Republic, Cambridge, 61–74.Google Scholar
Berrendonner, C., 2009, ‘Guerre du droit et droit de la guerre: Les mésaventures de C. Hostilius Mancinus’, in Chausson, F. (ed.), Occidents romains: Sénateurs, chevaliers, militaires, notables dans les provinces d’Occident, Paris, 23–34.Google Scholar
Billows, R., 1989, ‘Legal Fiction and Political Reform at Rome in the Early Second Century b.c.’, Phoenix 43, 112–133.Google Scholar
Bispham, E., 2006, ‘Coloniam deducere: How Roman Was Roman Colonization during the Middle Republic?’, in Bradley, G. J. and Wilson, J. P. (eds.), Greek and Roman Colonization, Swansea, 73–160.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J., 1975, Lex Publica: Gesetz und Recht in der römischen Republik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J., 1990, Zwischen Republik und Prinzipat: Zum Charakter des Zweiten Triumvirats, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der, 2021, ‘Novitas between Republic and Empire’, in Nebelin, M. and Tiersch, C. (eds.), Semantische Kämpfe zwischen Republik und Prinzipat? Kontinuität und Transformation der politischen Sprache in Rom, Göttingen, 457–478.Google Scholar
Blösel, W., 2011, ‘Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar’, in Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (eds.), Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, Stuttgart, 55–80.Google Scholar
Bodel, J., 1995, ‘Chronology and Succession 2: Notes on Some Consular Lists on Stone’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 105, 279–296.Google Scholar
Bonnefond-Coudry, M. (see Coudry, M.).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F., 1977, Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny, London.Google Scholar
Bothorel, J., 2023, Gouverner par le hasard: Le tirage au sort des provinces sous la République romaine et au début du Principat (IIIe s. av. J.-C.–Ier s. apr. J.-C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Bowman, D. A., 1987, Roman Ambassadors in the Greek East: 196 to 146 b.c., Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C., 2000, The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J., 1973, A Commentary on Livy: Books XXXI–XXXIII, Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J., 1974, ‘Supporters and Opponents of Tiberius Gracchus’, Journal of Roman Studies 64, 125–135.Google Scholar
Broadhead, W., 2007, ‘Colonization, Land Distribution and Veteran Settlement’, in Erdkamp, P. (ed.), A Companion to the Roman Army, Malden, 148–163.Google Scholar
Broughton MRR = Broughton, T. R. S., 1951–1952, 1986, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, 3 vols. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S., 1991, ‘Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman “Also-Rans”’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 81, part 4.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H., 1978, Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49–44 v. Chr:. Untersuchungen zu Herrschaftsetablierung im Bürgerkrieg, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bühler, D., 2009, Macht und Treue: Publius Ventidius. Eine römische Karriere zwischen Republik und Monarchie, Munich.Google Scholar
Buongiorno, P., 2016, ‘Senatus consulta: Struttura, formulazioni linguistiche, tecniche (189 a.C.–138 d.C.)’, Annali del Seminario Giuridico dell'Università di Palermo 59, 17–60.Google Scholar
Bur, C., 2018, La citoyenneté dégradée: Une histoire de l’infamie à Rome (312 av. J.-C.–96 apr. J.-C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Bur, C., 2021, ‘L’antihellénisme de Caton l’Ancien: Une image publique construite par un homo novus?’, in Bur, C. and Humm, M. (eds.), Caton l’Ancien et l’hellénisme: Images, traditions et réception, Paris, 43–80.Google Scholar
Burton, P., 1996, ‘The Summoning of the Magna Mater to Rome (205 b.c.)’, Historia 45, 36–63.Google Scholar
Cabrero, J., 2000, Escipión el Africano, Madrid.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2007, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. II: Dall’intervento in Sicilia fino alla invasione annibalica (264–216 a.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2013, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. III: Dalla resistenza di Fabio fino alla vittoria di Scipione, Rome.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2014, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. IV: Dalla ‘liberazione della Grecia’ alla pace infida con Antioco III (201–194 a.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2016, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. V: Dalla pace infida alla espulsione di Antioco dalla Grecia (194–190 a.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2017a, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. VI: Dalla spedizione degli Scipioni in Asia alla pace di Apamea (190–188 a.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Canali de Rossi, F., 2017b, Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma. Vol. VII: Problemi e contraccolpi della grande espansione egemonica (188–183 a.C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Candau, J., 2011, ‘Republican Rome: Autobiography and Political Struggles’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, Leiden, 121–159.Google Scholar
Catalano, P., 1960, Contributi allo studio del diritto augurale, Turin.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M., 1986, Caton: Les Origines, Paris.Google Scholar
Clemente, G., 1976, ‘“Esperti”, ambasciatori del senato e la formazione della politica estera romana tra il III e il II secolo a.C.’, Athenaeum 54, 319–352.Google Scholar
Coles, A., 2017, ‘Founding Colonies and Fostering Careers in the Middle Republic’, The Classical Journal 112, 280–317.Google Scholar
Coles, A., 2020, Roman Colonies in Republic and Empire, Leiden.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2013, The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Cotton, H. M., 1986, ‘The Role of Cicero’s Letters of Recommendation: iustitia vs gratia?’, Hermes 114, 443–460.Google Scholar
Coudry, M., 1993, ‘Le princeps senatus: vie et mort d’une institution républicaine’, Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome: Antiquité 105, 103–134 = Senatus: Treize études, Stuttgart, 2021, 129–57.Google Scholar
Coudry, M., 1994, ‘Sénatus-consultes et acta senatus: rédaction, conservation et archivage des documents emanant du sénat, de l’époque de César à celle des Sévères’, in Demougin, S. (ed.), La mémoire perdue: A la recherche des archives oubliées, publiques et privées, de la Rome antique, Paris, 65–102 = Senatus: Treize études, Stuttgart, 2021, 91–128.Google Scholar
Coudry, M., 2020 (11989), Le Sénat de la République romaine. De la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste: pratiques délibératives et prise de decisión, Rome.Google Scholar
Courtney, E., 1989, ‘Notes on Cicero’s Post reditum Speeches’, Rheinisches Museum 132, 47–53.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W., 1984, M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Crawford, M., 1974, Roman Republican Coinage, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cursi, M. F., 1996, La struttura del postliminium, Naples.Google Scholar
Daguet-Gagey, A., 2015, Splendor aedilitatum.L’édilité à Rome (Ier s. avant J.-C.-III s. après J.-C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Daly, G., 2002, Cannae: The Experience of Battle in the Second Punic War, London.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. H., 1970, Romans on the Bay of Naples, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dart, C., 2014, The Social War, 91 to 88 bce: A History of the Italian Insurgency against the Roman Republic, Farnham.Google Scholar
David, J.-M., 1992, Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la République romaine, Rome.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E., 1993, Clientèles et pouvoir à l’époque de Cicéron, Rome.Google Scholar
Develin, R., 1980, ‘The Roman Command Structure and Spain 218–190 b.c.’, Klio 62, 355–367.Google Scholar
Díaz Fernández, A., 2015, Provincia et imperium: El mando provincial en la República romana (227–44 a.C.), Seville.Google Scholar
Díaz Fernández, A. and Pina Polo, F., 2021, ‘Managing Economic Public Information in Rome: The Aerarium as Central Archive of the Roman Republic’, in Rosillo-López, C. and García Morcillo, M. (eds.), Managing Information in the Roman Economy, New York, 43–59.Google Scholar
Dixon, S., 2007, Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, London.Google Scholar
Dorey, T. A., 1955, ‘The Dictatorship of Minucius’, Journal of Roman Studies 45, 92–96.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. K., 2015, Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Drummond, A., 1996, s.v. interrex, OCD 3rd edition, 761–762.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, M., 1982, ‘Y a-t-il une politique linguistique romaine?’, Ktèma 7, 187–210.Google Scholar
Eckert, A., 2016, Lucius Cornelius Sulla in der antiken Erinnerung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M., 1976, ‘T. Quinctius Flamininus and the Campaign against Philip in 198 b.c.’, Phoenix 30, 119–142.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M., 1987, Senate and General: Individual Decision Making and Roman Foreign Relations, 264–194 b.c., Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M., 2006, Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M., 2008, Rome Enters the Greek East: From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 b.c., Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Elster, M., 2003, Die Gesetze der Mittleren römischen Republik, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P., 1992, ‘Polybius, Livy, and the Fabian Strategy’, Ancient Society 23, 127–147.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P., 1998, Hunger and the Sword: Warfare and Food Supply in Roman Republican Wars (264–30 b.c.), Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Errington, R. M., 1989, ‘Rome against Philip and Antiochus’, in Astin, A. E., Walbank, F. W., Frederiksen, M. W. and Ogilvie, R.M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 8 2nd ed., Cambridge, 244–289.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J., 1983, ‘The consulares and praetorii in the Roman Senate at the Beginning of Sulla’s Dictatorship’, Athenaeum 71, 521–528.Google Scholar
Fadinger, V., 1969, Die Begründung des Prinzipats: Quellenkritische und staatsrechtliche Untersuchungen zu Cassius Dio und der Parallelüberlieferung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Feig Vishnia, R., 1996, State, Society and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome 241–167 bc, London.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L., Schiavone, A. and Stolfi, E., 2018, Quintus Mucius Scaevola Opera, Rome.Google Scholar
Ferriès, M.-C., 2007, Les partisans d’Antoine: des orphelins de César aux complices de Cléopâtre, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I., ‘Memory and Memoirs in Republican Rome’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, Ann Arbor, 27–41.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G., 1994, The Historian L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi and the Roman Annalistic Tradition, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
FRH = Cornell, T. J. (ed.), 2013, The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
García Riaza, E., 2002, Celtíberos y Lusitanos frente a Roma: diplomacia y derecho de guerra, Vitoria.Google Scholar
García Riaza, E., 2019, ‘Laureatae litterae. Announcing Victories and Public Opinion’, in Rosillo-López, C. (ed.), Communicating Public Opinion in the Roman Republic, Stuttgart, 85–106.Google Scholar
Gargola, D.J., 1995, Lands, Laws, and Gods: Magistrates and Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A., 1983, Consulare imperium, Basel.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M., 2001, ‘Imperia und provinciae des Pompeius 82 bis 48 v. Chr.’, Chiron 31, 153–209 = Rom auf dem Weg von der Republik zum Prinzipat, Bonn, 2007, 1–67.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J., 1972, Cicero and the State Religion, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goldbeck, F., 2010, Salutationes: die Morgenbegrüßungen in Rom in der Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit, Berlin.Google Scholar
Golden, G. K., 2013, Crisis Management during the Roman Republic: The Role of Political Institutions in Emergencies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. K., 2001, Cannae: Hannibal’s Greatest Victory, London.Google Scholar
González Estrada, L., 2018, ‘La mujer como exemplum. Subversión, desafío y resistencia’, Panta Rei 12, 73–91.Google Scholar
Götter, U., 2009, ‘Cato’s Origines: The Historian and His Enemies’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, New York, 108–122.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T., 1973, ‘The Tribune C. Cornelius’, Journal of Roman Studies 63, 196–213.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T., 2009, A Companion to Julius Caesar, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Gros, P., 1979, ‘Les statues de Syracuse et les “dieux” de Tarente’, Revue des Études Latines 57, 85–114.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1966, ‘Political Prosecutions in the 90’s bc’, Historia 15, 32–64.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1968, Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 b.c., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1974, The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1976, ‘Rome and the Seleucids in the Aftermath of Pydna’, Chiron 6, 73–95.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1984, The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., 1990, ‘The Advent of the Magna Mater’, in Gruen, E., Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy, Leiden, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérin, C., 2015, La voix de la vérité: Témoin et témoignage dans les tribunaux romains du 1er siècle avant J.-C., Paris.Google Scholar
Habicht, C., 1990, Cicero the Politician, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E., 1963, ‘Roman Nobility and the Three Major Priesthoods’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 94, 73–85.Google Scholar
Händl-Sagawe, U., 1995, Der Beginn des 2. punischen Krieges: ein historisch-kritischer Kommentar zu Livius Buch 21, Munich.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., 1990, ‘Cicero’s De temporibus suis: The Evidence Reconsidered’, Hermes 118, 455–463.Google Scholar
Hartfield, M. E., 1982, ‘The Roman Dictatorship: Its Character and Its Evolution’, PhD diss., Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. A., 1999, Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna, London.Google Scholar
Hermon, E., 2020, La colonie romaine: espace, territoire, paysage. Les Gromatici entre histoire et droit pour la gestion des ressources naturelles, Besançon.Google Scholar
Herrero Medina, M., 2020, Servio Sulpicio Rufo: un retrato final desde la perspectiva de Cicerón, Bologna.Google Scholar
Hiebel, D., 2009, Rôles institutionnel et politique de la contio sous la République romaine (287–49 av. J.-C.), Paris.Google Scholar
Hinard, F., 1985, Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine, Rome.Google Scholar
Hoffman Lewis, M. W., 1955, The Official Priests of Rome under the Julio-Claudians, Rome.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J., 1995, ‘Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik’, in Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik des römischen Republik, Stuttgart, 11–49 = SENATVS POPVLVSQVE ROMANVS: Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen, Stuttgart, 2004, 219–256.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J., 2004, ‘Under Roman Roofs: Family, House, and Household’, in Flower, H. I. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, Cambridge, 101–126.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J., 2010, Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N., 1987, ‘The ‘Letter of Cornelia’: Yet More Problems’, Athenaeum 65, 231–234.Google Scholar
How, W. W., 1926, Cicero: Selected Letters II, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoyos, B. D., 1998, Unplanned Wars: The Origins of the First and Second Punic Wars, Berlin.Google Scholar
Humm, M., 2005, Appius Claudius Caecus: La république accomplie, Rome.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F., 2017, ‘La dualité du consulat à l’épreuve de la longue durée: À propos de la transgression et du contournement de la norme’, in Itgenshorst, T. and Doze, P. Le (eds.), La norme sous la Républiqe et le Haut-Empire romains: Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, Bordeaux, 283–299.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. (ed.), 2023, Honores et officia. Reconfiguration du cursus sénatorial aux époques triumvirale et augustéenne, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. and Pina Polo, F., 2023, ‘Le consulat (ordinaire, suffect, désigné) aux époques triumvirale et augustéenne: Les métamorphoses de la magistrature suprême’, in Hurlet, F. (ed.), Honores et officia. Reconfiguration du cursus sénatorial aux époques triumvirale et augustéenne, Zaragoza, 359–384.Google Scholar
Instinsky, H. U., 1971, ‘Zur Echtheitsfrage der Brieffragmente der Cornelia, Mutter der Gracchen’, Chiron 1, 177–189.Google Scholar
Ioannatou, M., 2006, Affaires d’argent dans la correspondance de Cicéron: L’aristocratie sénatoriale face à ses dettes, Paris.Google Scholar
Jahn, J., 1970, Interregnum und Wahldiktatur, Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Jahn, K., 2014, ‘Ritterliche quaestorii nach Sulla?’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 190, 239–242.Google Scholar
Jashemski, W. F., 1966, The Origins and History of the Proconsular and the Propraetorian Imperium to 27 b.c., Rome.Google Scholar
Jehne, M., 1987, Der Staat des Dictators Caesar, Cologne.Google Scholar
Jehne, M., 2006, ‘Who Attended Roman Assemblies? Some Remarks on Political Participation in the Roman Republic’, in Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, Barcelona, 221–234.Google Scholar
Jehne, M., 2011, ‘The Rise of the Consular as a Social Type in the Third and Second Centuries bc’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: High Office Holding in the Roman Republic, Cambridge, 211–231.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. D., 2008, The Military Consilium in Republican Rome, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
Jordan, B., 2024, The magister equitum in the Roman Republic, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A., 2006, Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A., 1982, Sulla: The Last Republican, London.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A., 1992, Lucullus: A Life, London.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. P., 2006, A History of Exile in the Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kienast, D., 1973, Cato der Zensor: seine Persönlichkeit und seine Zeit, Rome.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W., 1980, ‘Catos Origines und die Anfänge der römischen Geschichtsschreibung’, Chiron 10, 209–221.Google Scholar
Knapp, R. C., 1977, Aspects of the Roman Experience in Iberia 206–100 b.c., Valladolid.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, E., 2003, ‘Popular Power in Action: Tribunes of the Plebs in the Later Republic’, PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Krug, E., 1916, Die Senatsboten der römischen Republik, BreslauGoogle Scholar
Kübler, B., 1900, s.v. consularis, RE IV, 1138–1142.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R., 1995, Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik, Munich.Google Scholar
Kurczyk, S., 2006, Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit: autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten römischen Republik, Cologne.Google Scholar
Lafon, X., 2001, Villa maritima: Recherches sur les villas littorales de l’Italie romaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Lampela, A., 1998, Rome and the Ptolemies of Egypt: The Development of Their Political Relations 273–80 b.c., Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, T., 2015, Les tribuns de la plèbe et la formation de la République romaine, 494–287 avant J.-C., Rome.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, T., 2022, In nome del popolo romano? Storia del tribunato della plebe, Rome.Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. F., 1978, Hannibal’s War: A Military History of the Second Punic War, Warminster.Google Scholar
Le Bohec, Y., 2019, Lucullus, général et grastronome, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaghan, J. O., 1969, A Commentary on Cicero’s Oration De haruspicum responso, The Hague.Google Scholar
Lesinski, J., 2002, ‘Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus: A Dictator in 217 bc?’, in Derda, T., Urbanik, J. and Wecowski, M. (eds.), Euergesias Charin: Studies Presented to Benedetto Bravo and Ewa Wipszycka by Their Disciples, Warsaw, 131–158.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S., 2010, Livy on the Hannibalic War, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G., 1991, ‘Sulla’s Autobiography: Scope and Economy’, Athenaeum 79, 509–519.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G., 2006, Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero, Oxford.Google Scholar
Linderski, J., 1996, ‘Q. Scipio Imperator’, in Linderski, J. (ed.), Imperium sine fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, Stuttgart, 130–174.Google Scholar
Linke, B., 2000, ‘Religio und res publica: Religiöser Glaube und gesellschaftliches Handeln im republikanischen Rom’, in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, Stuttgart, 269–298.Google Scholar
Lippold, A., 1963, Consules: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des römischen Konsulats von 264 bis 201 v.Chr., Bonn.Google Scholar
López Barja de Quiroga, P. and Cordeiro Macenlle, R., 2020, Julio César: muerte de una República, Madrid.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J., 1977, Livy: The Compositions of His History, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Lushkov, A. H., 2014, ‘Narrative and Notice in Livy’s Fourth Decade: The Case of Scipio Africanus’, Classical Antiquity 33, 102–129.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M., 1978, ‘The Neoteric Poets’, Classical Quarterly 28, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mairs, R., 2020, ‘Interpretes, Negotiatores and the Roman Army: Mobile Professionals and Their Languages’, in Clackson, J., James, P., McDonald, K., Tagliapietra, L. and Zair, N. (eds.), Migration, Mobility and Language Contact in and around the Ancient Mediterranean, Cambridge, 203–229.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G., 2021, Cicero, Post reditum Speeches, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A., 1976, Crassus: A Political Biography, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A., 1985, A Historical Commentary on Asconius, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A., 2011, ‘“Where Have All the Leaders Gone?” A Possible Reason for the Failure of the Sullan Senate’, Australasian Society for Classical Studies 32 (ascs.org.au/news/ascs32/Marshall.pdf).Google Scholar
Märtin, S., 2012, Die politische Führungsschicht der römischen Republik im 2. Jh. v.Chr. zwischen Konformitätsstreben und struktureller Differenzierung, Trier.Google Scholar
Marzano, A., 2007, Roman Villas in Central Italy: A Social and Economic History, Leiden.Google Scholar
Masi Doria, C., 2000, Spretum Imperium: Prassi costituzionale e momenti di crisi nei rapporti tra magistrati nella media e tarda repubblica, Naples.Google Scholar
Mayer, M., 2011, ‘Caesar and the Corpus Caesarianum’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, Leiden, 189–232.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. H., 1938, ‘Scipio Africanus and Roman Politics in the Second Century b.c.’, Journal of Roman Studies 28, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, A. H. and Walbank, F. W., 1937, ‘The Origins of the Second Macedonian War’, Journal of Roman Studies 27, 180–207.Google Scholar
McDougall, J., 1992, ‘Cassius Ravilla and the trial of the Vestals’, Ancient History Bulletin 6,1, 10–17.Google Scholar
Meier, C., 1984, ‘Die Ersten unter den Ersten des Senats: Beobachtungen zur Willensbildung im römischen Senat’, in Nörr, D. and Simon, D. (eds.), Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Kunkel, Frankfurt 185–204.Google Scholar
Meier, C., 1996 (11982), Caesar, London.Google Scholar
Méritens de Villeneuve, G. de (2023) Les fils de Pompée et l’opposition à César et au triumvirat (46–35 av. J.-C.), Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miączewska, A. B., 2014, ‘Quintus Fufius Calenus: A Forgotten Career’, Hermathena 196–197, 163–204.Google Scholar
Millar, F., 1973, ‘Triumvirate and Principate’, Journal of Roman Studies 63, 50–67.Google Scholar
Millar, F., 1998, The Crowd in Rome in the Late Roman Republic, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T., 1864, Römische Forschungen, vol. 1, Berlin.Google Scholar
Moore, L. C., 2013, ‘Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c. 319–50 bc’, PhD diss., University College London.Google Scholar
Mora, F., 2003, ‘La scelta del “Princeps senatus”’, Historia 52, 502–504.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., 1990, ‘The Perils of Schematism: Polybius, Antiochus Epiphanes and the “Day of Eleusis”’, Historia 39, 37–76.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., 1991, ‘Q. Metellus (cos. 206), dictatorii in the Pre-Sullan Senate and the End of the Dictatorship’, Athenaeum 79, 359–370.Google Scholar
Morrell, K., 2017, Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R., 2004, Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R., 2021, Julius Caesar and the Roman People, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H., 1991, Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J., 1992, Cicero’s Return from Exile: The Orations Post Reditum, New York.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C., 1963, ‘À Rome pendant la seconde guerre Punique: techniques financières et manipulations monétaires’, Annales 18, 417–436.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (ed.), 1980, Insula sacra: la loi Gabinia-Calpurnia de Délos (58 av. J.-C.), Rome.Google Scholar
Niczyporuk, P., 2011, ‘Mensarii, Bankers Acting for Public and Private Benefit’, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 24 (37), 105–115.Google Scholar
Nörr, D., 1989, Aspekte des römischen Völkerrechts: Die Bronzetafel von Alcántara, Munich.Google Scholar
O’Brien Moore, A., 1935, s.v. Senatus consultum, RE Suppl. 6, Stuttgart, 800–812.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. M., 1997, Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic, Leiden.Google Scholar
Osgood, J., 2006, Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pailler, J.-M., 1988, Bacchanalia: La répression de 186 av. J.-C. à Rome et en Italie, Rome.Google Scholar
Parrish, E. J., 1972, ‘The Senate in January 1, 62 bc’, Classical World 65, 160–168.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. L., 1942, ‘Rome’s Choice of Magistrates during the Hannibalic War’, Transactions of the Americal Philological Association 73, 319–340.Google Scholar
Peretz, D., 2006, ‘The Roman Interpreter and His Diplomatic and Military Roles’, Historia 55, 451–470.Google Scholar
Pfeilschifter, R., 2005, Titus Quinctius Flamininus: Untersuchungen zur römischen Griechenlandpolitik, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1986, ‘El modelo agrícola catoniano’, in Estudios en homenaje al Dr. Antonio Beltrán Martínez, Zaragoza, 809–817.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1988, ‘La colonización romana en el siglo II a.C.’, in Pereira, G. (ed.), Actas del I Congreso Peninsular de Historia Antigua, Santiago de Compostela, 107–125.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1989, Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1995, ‘Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones’, Klio 77, 203–216.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1996, Contra arma verbis: Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 1997, ‘Las comisiones senatoriales para la reorganización de Hispania (App., Iber., 99–100)’, Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 23, 83–104.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2004, ‘Die nützliche Erinnerung: Geschichtsschreibung, mos maiorum und die römische Identität’, Historia 53, 147–172.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2005, Marco Tulio Cicerón, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2006, ‘The Tyrant Must Die: Preventive Tyrannicide in Roman Political Thought’, in Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, Barcelona, 71–101.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2011a, The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2011b, ‘Public Speaking at Rome: A Question of auctoritas’, in Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, Oxford, 286–303.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2012, ‘Veteres candidati: Losers in the Elections in Republican Rome’, in Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (eds.), Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, Barcelona, 63–82.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2013, ‘The Political Role of consules designati at Rome’, Historia 62, 420–452.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2016, ‘Cupiditas pecuniae: Wealth and Power in Cicero’, in Beck, H., Jehne, M. and Serrati, J. (eds.), Money and Power in the Roman Republic, Brussels, 165–177.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2017, ‘The “Tyranny” of the Gracchi and the concordia of the optimates: An Ideological Construct’, in Cristofoli, R., Galimberti, A. and Rohr Vio, F. (eds.), Costruire la memoria: Uso e abuso della storia fra tarda repubblica e primo principato, Rome, 5–33.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2018a, ‘Political Alliances and Rivalries in contiones in the Late Roman Republic’, in van der Blom, H., Gray, C. and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome, Cambridge, 105–122.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2018b, ‘Magistrates without Pedigree: The Consules Suffecti of the Triumviral Age’, Journal of Roman Studies 108, 99–114.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2018–2019, ‘Los colegios sacerdotales durante la época triunviral (43–31 a.C.) como instrumento para premiar lealtades’, in Alfayé Villa, S. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Dioses, sacerdotes y magos en el mundo antiguo: Homenaje a Francisco Marco Simón, Bandue 11, Madrid, 177–192.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2019, ‘Losers in the Civil War between Caesarians and Pompeians. Punishment and Survival’, in Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Beck, H. (eds.), Verlierer und Aussteiger in der ‘Konkurrenz unter Anwesenden’: Agonalität in der politischen Kultur des antiken Rom, Stuttgart, 147–166.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2020a, ‘El concepto auctoritas y el poder en la obra de Livio’, in David, J.-M. and Hurlet, F. (eds.), L’auctoritas à Rome: Une notion constitutive de la culture politique, Bordeaux, 155–169.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2020b, ‘The Functioning of the Republican Institutions under the Triumvirs’, in Polo, F. Pina (ed.), The Triumviral Period: Civil War, Political Crisis and Socioeconomic Transformations, Colección Libera Res Publica 2, Zaragoza, 49–70.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2020c, ‘The Consulship under the Triumvirs: A Phantom Office?’, in Balmaceda, C. (ed.), Libertas and res publica in the Roman Republic, Leiden, 138–152.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2021a, ‘El consulado sufecto durante la época triunviral’, in Beck, H., Gallego, J., García Mac Gaw, C. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Encuentros con las élites del Mediterráneo antiguo: Liderazgo, estilos de vida, legitimidad, Buenos Aires, 215–234.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2021b, ‘Frumentary Policy, Ideology, and the Welfare State in the Late Roman Republic’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Popularitas: Ricerca del consenso e ‘populismo’ in Roma antica, Rome, 127–162.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2022a, ‘The Drafting Committee of the SC de ludis saecularibus of 17 February 17 bce and the Principle of Seniority-Based Hierarchy in Official Documents’, Klio 104, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2022b, ‘Imperator and Politician: The Consul as the Highest Magistrate of the Republic’, in Arena, V. and Prag, J. R. W. (eds.), A Companion to the Political Culture of the Roman Republic, Chichester, 248–259.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2023, ‘Ocelli Italiae: Senatorial villae as Information Hubs’, in García Morcillo, M. and Rosillo-López, C. (eds.), The Real Estate Market in the Roman World, Oxford, 131–147.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., 2025a, ‘The cursus honorum of consulars in the 4th and 3rd centuries bce’, in Pina Polo, F. (ed.), Cursus honorum: Pathways to Rank and Power in the Roman Republic, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (ed.), 2025b, Cursus honorum: Pathways to Rank and Power in the Roman Republic, Colección Libera Res Publica 14, Zaragoza, 79–101.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. and Díaz Fernández, A., 2019, The Quaestorship in the Roman Republic, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pinna-Parpaglia, P., 1969, ‘Sulla rogatio Metilia de aequando magistri equitum et dictatoris iure’, Studi et Documenta Historiae et Iuris 35, 215–248.Google Scholar
Porte, D., 1989, Les donneurs de sacré: Le prêtre à Rome, Paris.Google Scholar
Radke, G., 1980, ‘Anmerkungen zu den kultischen Maßnahmen in Rom während des Zweiten Punischen Krieges’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft n.f. 6, 105–121.Google Scholar
Rafferty, D., 2011, ‘Princeps senatus’, Melbourne Historical Journal 39, 1–22.Google Scholar
Rafferty, D., 2019, Provincial Allocations in Rome, 123–52 bce, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Raimondi, M., 2023, Quinto Cecilio Metello Macedonico: Romanorum Laudatissimus, Milan.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., 1982a, ‘History, Historiography and Cicero’s Expositio Consiliorum Suorum’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 7, 121–124 = Roman Culture and Society, Oxford, 1991, 408–415.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., 1982b, ‘The Aftermath of the Ides’, in Boardman, J., Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. and Rawson, E. (eds.), Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9, Cambridge, 468–490.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., 1983, Cicero: A Portrait, London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., 1985, Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Rich, J., 1976, Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion, Brussels.Google Scholar
Rich, J., 1984, ‘Roman Aims in the First Macedonian War’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 210, 126–180.Google Scholar
Rich, J., 1996, ‘The Origins of the Second Punic War’, in Cornell, T., Rankov, B. and Sabin, P. (eds.), The Second Punic War: A Reappraisal, BICS Suppl. 67, London, 1–37.Google Scholar
Rich, J., 2014, ‘The Triumph in the Roman Republic: Frequency, Fluctuation and Policy’, in Lange, C. H. and Vervaet, F. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle, Rome, 197–258.Google Scholar
Richard, A. G., 2008, Scipio Africanus: Rome’s Greatest General, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S., 1986, Hispaniae: Spain and the Development of Roman Imperialism, 218–82 b.c., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T., 2014, ‘The Arch of Scipio Africanus’, Classical Philology 109, 11–25.Google Scholar
Rilinger, R., 1976, Der Einfluß des Wahlleiters bei den römischen Konsulwahlen von 366 bis 50 v.Chr., Munich.Google Scholar
Rilinger, R., 1978, ‘Die Ausbildung von Amtswechsel und Amtsfristen als Problem zwischen Machtbesitz und Machtmißbrauch in der Mittleren Republik (342 bis 217 v.Chr.)’, Chiron 8, 247–312.Google Scholar
Robert, J.-N., 2002, Caton ou le citoyen, Paris.Google Scholar
Rochette, B., 1997, Le latin dans le monde grec: Recherches sur la diffusion de la langue et des lettres latines dans les provinces hellénophones de l’Empire romain, Brussels.Google Scholar
Roddaz, J.-M., 1988, ‘Lucius Antonius’, Historia 37, 317–346.Google Scholar
Roddaz, J.-M., 1992, ‘Imperium: nature et competences à la fin de la République et au début de l’Empire’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 3, 189–211.Google Scholar
Rögler, G., 1962, ‘Die lex Villia Annalis’, Klio 40, 76–123.Google Scholar
Rohr Vio, F., 2009, Publio Ventidio Basso: fautor Caesaris tra storia e memoria, Rome.Google Scholar
Rohr Vio, F., 2022, Powerful Matrons: New Political Actors in the Late Roman Republic, Colección Libera Res Publica 6, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Roldán Hervás, J. M. and Wulff Alonso, F., 2001, Citerior y Ulterior: Las provincias romanas de Hispania en la era republicana, Madrid.Google Scholar
Roller, L. E., 1999, In Search of God the Mother:The Cult of Anatolian Cybele, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B., 2011, ‘The Consul(ar) as Exemplum: Fabius Cunctator’s Paradoxical Glory’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, Cambridge, 182–210.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., 1986, ‘Imperatores Victi: The Case of C. Hostilius Mancinus’, Classical Antiquity 5, 230–252.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., 1990, Imperatores victi: Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., 1993, ‘Competition and Crisis in Mid-Republican Rome’, Phoenix 47, 313–338.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., 1995, ‘Sorting Out the Lot in Republican Rome’, American Journal of Philology 116, 43–75.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., 2012, Rome and the Mediterranean 290 to 146 bc: The Imperial Republic, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C., 2013, ‘The Common (mediocris) Orator of the Late Republic: The Scribonii Curiones’, in Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, Oxford, 287–298.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C., 2017a, ‘The Role and Influence of the Audience (corona) in Trials in the Late Roman Republic’, Athenaeum 105, 106–119.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C., 2017b, Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C., 2021, ‘The Consilium as Advisory Board of the Magistrates at Rome during the Republic’, Historia 70, 396–436.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C., 2022, Political Conversations in Late Republican Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J., 2005, Fasti sacerdotum: Die Mitglieder der Priesterschaften und das sakrale Funktionspersonal römischer, griechischer, orientalischer und jüdisch-christlicher Kulte in der Stadt Rom von 300 v. Chr. bis 499 n. Chr., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J., 2008, Fasti sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 bc to ad 499, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X., 1994, ‘The Meaning of Consularis Auctoritas in Cicero’, Mnemosyne 47, 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, F. X., 1998, Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Salinas de Frías, M., 1995, El gobierno de las provincias hispanas durante la República romana (218–27 a.C.), Salamanca.Google Scholar
Salmon, E. T., 1969, Roman Colonization under the Republic, London.Google Scholar
Salomies, O., 1991, ‘Zu den Fasti Consulares von Tauromenium’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 86, 187–192.Google Scholar
Salomies, O., 2010, ‘Aedilicius, consularis, duumviralis and similar titles in Latin inscriptions’, Arctos 44, 205–229.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F., 2006, ‘Sulla and the Senate: A Reconsideration’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 17, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, F., 2018, ‘“Quaestorii” in the post-Sullan Senate’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 205, 247–249.Google Scholar
Saunders, C., 1923, ‘The Political Sympathies of Servius Sulpicius Rufus’, The Classical Review 37, 110–113.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., 2004, ‘Human Mobility in Roman Italy, I: The Free Population’, Journal of Roman Studies 94, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schettino, M. T., 2023, Marcus Licinius Crassus: Pratique et conception du pouvoir, Rome.Google Scholar
Schleussner, B., 1976, ‘Die Gesandtschaftsreise P. Scipio Nasicas im Jahr 133/32 v. Chr. und die Provinzialisierung des Königreichs Pergamon’, Chiron 6, 97–112.Google Scholar
Schleussner, B., 1978, Die Legaten der römischen Republik: Decem legati und ständige Hilfsgesandte, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitt, T., 2000, ‘Die Marci Pomponii Mathones: Eine quellen- und sachkritische Analyse der Überlieferung’, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 3, 84–110.Google Scholar
Schneider, H., 2017 (19771), Die Entstehung der römischen Militärdiktatur: Krise und Niedergang einer antiken Republik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Scholz, P., 2011, Den Vätern folgen: Sozialisation und Erziehung der republikanischen Senatsaristokratie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. and Walter, U., 2013, Fragmente römischer Memorien, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., 1997, Herrschaft und Regierung: Roms Regiment in den Provinzen in der Zeit der Republik, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H., 1951, Roman Politics, 220–150 b.c., Oxford.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H., 1970, Scipio Africanus: Soldier and Politician, London.Google Scholar
Seager, R., 2002, Pompey the Great: A Political Biography, Oxford.Google Scholar
Segenni, S. and Letta, C., 2023, L’amministrazione romana: Stato e città in età repubblicana e imperiale, Rome.Google Scholar
Sehlmeyer, M., 1999, Stadtrömische Ehrenstatuen der republikanischen Zeit: Historizität und Kontext von Symbolen nobilitären Standesbewußtseins, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Shatzman, I., 1975, Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics, Brussels.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R., 1960, ‘The Roman Nobility in the Second Civil War’, Classical Quarterly 10, 253–267.Google Scholar
Sherk, R. K., 1969, Roman Documents from the Greek East: Senatus consulta and epistulae to the Age of Augustus, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Smith, C., 2009, Development of Roman Autobiography, Swansea.Google Scholar
Steel, C., 2012, ‘The lex Pompeia de provinciis of 52 bc: A Reconsideration’, Historia 61, 83–93.Google Scholar
Steel, C., 2014, ‘Rethinking Sulla: The Case of the Roman Senate’, Classical Quarterly 64, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, C., 2022, ‘Consulars, Political Office, and Leadership in the Middle and Late Republic’, in Frolov, R. M. and Burden-Strevens, C. (eds.), Leadership and Initiative in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome, Leiden, 133–148.Google Scholar
Stein, C., 2021, ‘L’ascension du jeune Caton et la rénovation de l’aristocratie républicaine à la fin du IIIe siècle av. J.-C.’, in Bur, C. and Humm, M. (eds.), Caton l’Ancien et l’hellénisme: images, traditions et réception, Paris, 17–41.Google Scholar
Stepper, R., 2003, Augustus und sacerdos: Untersuchungen zum römischen Kaiser als Priester, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Stockton, D., 1979, The Gracchi, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stouder, G., 2015, ‘Négocier au nom de Rome’, in Grass, B. and Stouder, G. (eds.), La diplomatie romaine sous la République: réflexions sur une pratique, Besançon, 43–63.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V., 1970, ‘Proconsuls and Provinciae in Spain, 218/7–196/5 b.c.’, Arethusa 3, 85–102.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V., 1973, The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology, Toronto.Google Scholar
Suolahti, J., 1963, The Roman Censors: A Study on Social Structure, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Suolahti, J., 1972, ‘Princeps senatus’, Arctos 7, 207–218.Google Scholar
Syme, R., 1939, The Roman Revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R., 1986, The Augustan Aristocracy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J., 1972, The Priests of the Roman Republic: A Study of Interactions between Priesthoods and Magistracies, Brussels.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J., 1974, ‘The Dual Priests of the Republic’, Rheinisches Museum 117, 72–86.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J., 1986, ‘Priesthoods and Priestly Careers in Ancient Rome’, in ANRW 2.16.3, Berlin, 2314–2331.Google Scholar
Tansey, P., 2000, ‘The princeps senatus in the Last Decades of the Republic’, Chiron 30, 15–30.Google Scholar
Tarpin, M., 2021, ‘Vrbem condere / coloniam deducere: la procédure de “fondation” coloniale’, Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne suppl. 23, 13–94.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J., 2011, ‘The Late Republic: Autobiographies and Memoirs in the Age of the Civil Wars’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, Leiden, 161–188.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R., 1942, ‘Caesar’s Colleagues in the Pontifical College’, American Journal of Philology 63, 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R., 1949, Party Politics in the Age of Caesar, Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, J. H., 1954, A History of Roman Sea-Power before the Second Punic War, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Thommen, L., 1989, Das Volkstribunat der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. E., 1984, ‘To the Senate and to the People: Adaptation to the Senatorial and Popular Audiences in the Parallel Speeches of Cicero’, PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Tweedie, F.C., 2011, ‘The Case of the Missing Veterans: Roman Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in the Second Century b.c.’, Historia 60, 458–473.Google Scholar
Verrico, F., 2017, ‘Le commissioni di redazione dei senatoconsulti (qui scribundo adfuerunt): i segni della crisi e le riforme di Augusto’, Cahiers du Centre Glotz 28, 31–60.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2007, ‘The Scope and Historic Significance of the Lex Metilia de aequando M. Minuci magistri equitum et Q. Fabi dictatoris iure: (217 b.c.e.)’, Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris, 73, 197–232.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2009, ‘Pompeius’ Career from 79 to 70 bce: Constitutional, Political and Historical Considerations’, Klio 91, 406–434.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2012, ‘The Praetorian Proconsuls of the Roman Republic (211–52 bce): A Constitutional Survey’, Chiron 42, 45–96.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2014, The High Command in the Roman Republic. The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 bce, Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2020, ‘The Triumvirate Rei Publicae Constituendae: Political and Constitutional Aspects’, in Pina Polo, F. (ed.), The Triumviral Period: Civil War, Political Crisis and Socioeconomic Transformations, Colección Libera Res Publica 2, Zaragoza, 23–48.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J., 2023, Reform, Revolution, Reaction: A Short History of Rome from the Origins of the Social War to the Dictatorship of Sulla, Colección Libera Res Publica 10, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., 1957, 1967 and 1979, A Historical Commentary on Polybius, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wallmann, P., 1989, Triumviri Rei Publicae Constituendae: Untersuchungen zur Politischen Propaganda im Zweiten Triumvirat (43–30 v.Chr.), Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Walter, U., 2001, ‘Die Botschaft des Mediums: Überlegungen zum Sinnpotential von Historiographie im Kontext der römischen Geschichtskultur zur Zeit der Republik’, in Melville, G. (ed.), Institutionalität und Symbolisierung: Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, Cologne, 241–279.Google Scholar
Ward, A. M., 1977, Marcus Crassus and the Late Roman Republic, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Warrior, V. M., 1996, The Initiation of the Second Macedonian War: An Explication of Livy Book 31, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Webb, L., 2017, ‘Gendering the Roman imago’, EuGeStA 7, 140–183.Google Scholar
Weggen, K., 2011, Der lange Schatten von Carrhae: Studien zu M. Licinius Crassus, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Welbourn, M., 2017, ‘Censors and Society: The Roman Censorship, 443–21 bc’, PhD diss., University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Welch, K., 1995, ‘The Career of M. Aemilius Lepidus 49–44 b.c.’, Hermes 123, 443–454.Google Scholar
Welch, K., 2002, ‘Sextus Pompeius and the Res Publica in 42–39 bc’, in Powell, A. and Welch, K. (eds.), Sextus Pompeius, London, 31–63.Google Scholar
Welch, K., 2012, Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic, Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, S., 2005, ‘Cicero’s Viri Clarissimi’, in Welch, K. and Hillard, T. W. (eds.), Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, Swansea, 141–207.Google Scholar
Wikander, O., 1976, ‘Caius Hostilius Mancinus and the foedus Numantinum’, Opuscula Romana 11, 85–104.Google Scholar
Wildfang, R. L., 2006, Rome’s Vestal Virgins, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, P., 1883–1885, Le sénat de la République romaine, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. B., 2021, Dictator: The Evolution of the Roman Dictatorship, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Wiotte-Franz, C., 2001, Hermeneus und Interpres, zum Dolmetscherwesen in der Antike, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., 1969, ‘The census in the first century bc’, Journal of Roman Studies 59, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., 1971, New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 b.c.–a.d. 14, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., 2009, Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wistrand, E., 1978, Caesar and Contemporary Roman Society, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A., 1999, Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A., 2017, ‘Consuls, Consulars, Aristocratic Competition and the People’s Judgment’, in Haake, M. and Harders, A.-C. (eds.), Politische Kultur und soziale Struktur der Römischen Republik. Bilanzen und Perspektiven, Stuttgart, 497–516.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. M., 2012, ‘Decem Legati: A Flexible Institution, Rigidly Perceived’, in Smith, C. and Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius, Oxford, 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zecchini, G., 2014, ‘Pola e Cesare’, in Chiabà, M. (ed.), HOC QVOQVE LABORIS PRAEMIVM: Scritti in onore di Gino Bandelli, Trieste, 553–564.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Francisco Pina Polo, Universidad de Zaragoza
  • Book: The Role of Ex-Consuls in Republican Rome, 218–31 BCE
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597401.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Francisco Pina Polo, Universidad de Zaragoza
  • Book: The Role of Ex-Consuls in Republican Rome, 218–31 BCE
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597401.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Francisco Pina Polo, Universidad de Zaragoza
  • Book: The Role of Ex-Consuls in Republican Rome, 218–31 BCE
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597401.007
Available formats
×