Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:24:13.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Ethic of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Donald Earl Childress, III
Affiliation:
Pepperdine University School of Law
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A contemporary discussion of ethics in international law generally presumes a binary or dichotomous distinction between ethics and international law. Ethics would thus appear as environmental or human rights claims, for example, within an existing corpus of international law. These disparate ethical claims would be identifiable as alien, or at least distinct, intruders within the larger corpus. This binary distinction between ethics and law is difficult to avoid in the present Western world, without attempting neutral language or neologisms that fail to capture the nature of the discussion. It is possible, however, to blur the dichotomy to some measure (without escaping it entirely) by suggesting that ethical considerations do not somehow exist within international law, as a type of alien intruder, but both underlie and permeate international law itself. It would thus be appropriate to speak of the ethic, in the singular, of international law; this ethic, in the singular, would consist of the set of moral or normative principles that have controlled, and that continue to control, what we have known since Bentham as international law. The underlying ethic of international law is thus found primarily in the normative claim that justice, at the international level, is best defined in terms of the relations of states and not in terms of the relations of individual human beings. It is important, moreover, to recognize this as a normative or ethical claim, and not simply as a statement of the nature of international law. International law and its underlying ethic would thus exist in conflated form, and their ongoing success would depend on the normative grip of both. International law, accompanied by its underlying ethic, is therefore capable of engagement with novel or different normative claims. International law, even seen as positive law, would not constitute a bar or obstacle to the recognition of such claims as law, because its underlying ethic would provide a normative repository for engagement with them. International law would not exist as a normatively mute social fact.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Delacroix, S.Legal Norms and Normativity: An Essay in GenealogyOxfordHart 2006Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M.The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960CambridgeCambridge 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. P.Ethics and Authority in International LawCambridgeCambridge 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenger, F.Choice of Law and Multistate JusticeDordrechtMartinus Nijhoff 1993Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J.Levinson, D.Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public LawHarvard Law Review 122 2002 1791Google Scholar
Stolleis, M.Staat und Staatsräson in der frühen NeuzeitFrankfurtSuhrkamp 1990Google Scholar
Ullmann, W.Law and Jurisdiction in the Middle AgesGarnett, GeorgeLondonVariorum Reprints 1988Google Scholar
Friedrich, M.Geschichte der deutschen StaatsrechtswissenschaftBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1997Google Scholar
Stolleis, M.Public Law in Germany, 1800–1914New YorkBerhahn 2001Google Scholar
Onuma, Y.When Was the Law of International Society Born? – An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational PerspectiveJournal of the History of International Law 2 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, D.The Religious Roots of Modern International RelationsWorld Politics 52 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, H. P.Doin’ the Transystemic: Legal Systems and Legal TraditionsMcGill Law Journal 50 2005 863Google Scholar
Vrellis, S.Conflit ou coordination de valeurs en droit international privéLeidenMartinus Nijhoff 2007 175Google Scholar
Tribe, L.The Invisible ConstitutionNew YorkOxford 2008Google Scholar
Hart, H.The Concept of LawOxfordOxford 1994Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical EssaysCronin, C.CambridgePolity 2008Google Scholar
Shils, E.The Virtue of CivilityIndianapolisLiberty Fund 1997Google Scholar
Böckenforde, E.-W.Recht, Staat, FreiheitFrankfurtSuhrkamp 1991Google Scholar
Raz, J.The Concept of a Legal SystemOxfordOxford 1970Google Scholar
Nussbaum, A.A Concise History of the Law of NationsNew YorkMacMillan 1947Google Scholar
Gaurier, D.Histoire du droit internationalRennesPresses Universitaires de Rennes 2005Google Scholar
Sylvest, C.International Law in Nineteenth-Century BritainBritish Yearbook of International Law 75 2004Google Scholar
Bowden, B.The Colonial Origins of International Law. European Expansion and the Classical Standards of CivilizationJournal of the History of International Law 7 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anaya, S. J.Indigenous Peoples in International LawOxfordOxford 2004Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, 1856
Mattei, J.-M.Histoire du droit de la guerre (1700–1819)AixPresses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, H. PatrickCom-paringComparative Law: A HandbookOxfordHart 2007Google Scholar
Wink, A.Land and Sovereignty in India: Agrarian Society and Politics under the Eighteenth-Century Maratha SvarajyaCambridgeCambridge 1986Google Scholar
Menski, W.Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and ModernityNew DelhiOxford 2003Google Scholar
Rajagopal, B.International Law from Below: Developments, Social Movements, and Third World ResistanceCambridgeCambridge 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghani, A.Lockhart, C.Fixing Failed StatesOxfordOxford 2008Google Scholar
Collier, P.The Bottom BillionNew YorkOxford 2007Google Scholar
Beck, U.Lau, C.Entgrenzung und Entscheidung: Was is neu an der Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung?FrankfurtSuhrkamp 2004Google Scholar
Coleman, J.Beyond the Separability Thesis: Moral Semantics and the Methodology of JurisprudenceOxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auby, J. B.La globalisation, le droit et l’EtatParisMontchrestien 2003Google Scholar
Tuori, K.Critical Legal PositivismAldershotAshgate 2002Google Scholar
Preil, D.Evaluating Descriptive JurisprudenceAmerican Journal of Jurisprudence 52 2007Google Scholar
Rabkin, J.The Case for SovereigntyWashingtonAEI 2004Google Scholar
Rawls, J.The Law of PeoplesCambridge, MAHarvard 1999Google Scholar
Rawls, J.A Theory of JusticeCambridge, MABelknap 1971Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W.An Egalitarian Law of PeoplesPhilosophy & Public Affairs 23 1994 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles RRawls's Law of PeoplesEthics 110 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, AllenRawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian WorldEthics 110 2000 697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.The Idea of JusticeCambridge, MABelknap 2009Google Scholar
Bull, H.The Anarchical SocietyLondonMacmillan 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H.On the Collapse of the Fact/Value DichotomyCambridge, MAHarvard 2002Google Scholar
Twining, W.Globalisation and Legal TheoryLondonButterworth 2000Google Scholar
Twining, W.General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global PerspectiveCambridgeCambridge 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, P. S.Global Legal PluralismSouthern California Law Review 80 2007 1155Google Scholar
Shapiro, I.Brilmayer, L.Global JusticeNew YorkNew York University Press 1999Google Scholar
Ost, F.Kerchove, M. van deDe la pyramide au réseauBruxellesPublications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis 2002Google Scholar
Scalia, A.Breyer, S.The Relevance of Foreign Legal Material in U.S. Constitutional Cases: A Conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen BreyerInternational Journal of Constitutional Law 3 2005 519Google Scholar
Hamann, A.Fabri, H. RuizTransnational Networks and ConstitutionalismInternational Journal of Constitutional Law 6 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, A. D.The Cultural DefenseNew YorkOxford 2003Google Scholar
Jessup, P.Transnational LawNew Haven, CTYale 1956Google Scholar
Michaels, R.Global Legal PluralismAnnual Review of Law and Social Science 5 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J.Foreign Law and the Modern Ius GentiumHarvard Law Review 119 2005Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L.Trachtman, J. P.Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global GovernanceCambridgeCambridge 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A.Transnational Constitutional Law: The Normative QuestionJournal of International Constitutional Law 2010 144Google Scholar
Ackerman, B.The Rise of World ConstitutionalismVirginia Law Review 83 1997 771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benyekhlef, K.Une possible histoire de la norme les normativités émergentes de la mondialisationMontrealThémis 2008 704Google Scholar
Peters, A.The Merits of Global ConstitutionalismIndiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, L.Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World StateLondonRoutledge 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, J.Global Civil SocietyCambridgeCambridge 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichsohn, E.World State, World CitizenshipNew York 2000Google Scholar
Kegel, G.Schurig, K.Internationales PrivatrechtMunichC. H. Beck 2000Google Scholar
Currie, B.Selected Essays on the Conflict of LawsDurham, NCDuke University Press 1963Google Scholar
Symeonides, S.Problems and Dilemmas in Codifying Choice of Law for Torts: The Louisiana Experience in Comparative PerspectiveAmerican Journal of Comparative Law 38 1990 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francescakis, Quelques précisions sur les ‘lois d'application immédiateRevue Critique de Droit International Privé 55 1966Google Scholar
Symeonides, S.Material Justice and Conflicts Justice in Choice of LawInternational Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. JuengerArdsley, NYTransnational 2001Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P.La capacité de la personne en droit international privé françaisParisDalloz 1975 110Google Scholar
Mehren, A. vonSpecial Substantive Rules for Multistate Problems: Their Role and Significance in Contemporary Choice of Law MethodologyHarvard Law Review 88 1974Google Scholar
Dalhuisen, J.Dalhuisen on International Commercial, Financial and Trade LawOxfordPortland 2000Google Scholar
Gaillard, E.Aspects philosophiques du droit de l'arbitrage internationalLeidenMartinus Nijhoff 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnham, R.Set in Stone: Will the ABA's Newly Revised Conflict of Interest Rules Prevail in EuropeThe European Lawyer 16 2001Google Scholar
Michaels, R.The Re-Statement of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal PluralismWayne Law Review 1209 2005Google Scholar
Berman, H.Is Conflict of Laws Becoming PasséBalancing of Interests: Liber Amicorum Peter Hay zum 70 GeburtstagFrankfurtVerlag Recht und Wirtschaft 2005 http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=870455Google Scholar
Singer, J.Normative Methods for LawyersU.C.L.A. Law Review 56 2009Google Scholar
Provost, R.Judging in Splendid IsolationAmerican Journal of Comparative Law 56 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J.Customary International Law and the Quest for Global JusticeThe Nature of Customary LawCambridgeCambridge 2007Google Scholar
McCorquodale, R.An Inclusive International Legal SystemLeiden Journal of International Law 17 2004 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, A.International Criminal LawOxfordOxford 2008Google Scholar
Roberts, P.Comparative Law for International Criminal JusticeComparative Law: A HandbookOxfordHart 2007Google Scholar
Ponte, C. delInvestigation and Prosecution of Large-Scale Crimes at the International Level: The Experience of the ICTYJournal of International Criminal Justice 4 2006 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digneffe, F.Fierens, J.L’expérience rwandaise et le génocideNamurPresses Universitaires de Namur 2003Google Scholar
Daly, E.Between Punitive and Reconstructive Justice: The Gacaca Courts in RwandaNew York University Journal of International Law and Politics 34 2002 355Google Scholar
Errico, S.The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Is Adopted: An OverviewHuman Rights Law Review 7 2007 756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xanthaki, A.Indigenous Rights and United Nations StandardsCambridgeCambridge 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, H. P.The Three Ironies of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous PeoplesReflections on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and International LawOxfordHart 2010 171Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H.Chinkin, C.Wright, S.Feminist Approaches to International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 85 1991 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008
Glenn, H. P.Legal Traditions of the WorldOxfordOxford 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, M.Global EthicsNew YorkRoutledge 2009Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×