The Rise and Fall of Business Firms A Stochastic Framework on Innovation, Creative Destruction and Growth
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 May 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Rise and Fall of Business FirmsA Stochastic Framework on Innovation, Creative Destruction and Growth, pp. 211 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Acemoglu, D. and Cao, D. (2015), “Innovation by entrants and incumbents,” Journal of Economic Theory 157, 255–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., and Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2012), “The network origins of aggregate fluctuations,” Econometrica 80, 1977–2016.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds.) (1998), Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992), “A model of growth through creative destruction,” Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akcigit, U. and Kerro, W. R. (2010), “Growth through heterogeneous innovations,” Working Paper 16443, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., et al. (1997), “Scaling behavior in economics: I. Empirical results for company growth,” Journal de Physique I 7(4), 635–650.Google Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Salinger, M. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1998), “Power law scaling for a system of interacting units with complex internal structure,” Physical Review Letters 80, 1385–1388.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. F. and Mallows, C. L. (1974), “Scale mixtures of normal distribution,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36, 99–102.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. and Hawkins, R. J. (2010), “Non-self-averaging and the statistical mechanics of endogenous macroeconomic fluctuations,” Economic Modelling 27(6), 1543–1546.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. and Yoshikawa, H. (2012), “Non-self-averaging in macroeconomic models: A criticism of modern micro-founded macroeconomics,” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991), “Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations,” Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297.Google Scholar
Argente, D., Lee, M., and Moreira, S. (2018), “How do firms grow? The life cycle of products matters,” Working Paper, University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkolakis, C. and Muendler, M. A. (2010), “The extensive margin of exporting products: A firm-level analysis,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkolakis, C. and Muendler, M. A. (2012), “Exporters and their products: A collection of empirical regularities,” CESifo Economic Studies p. ifs028.Google Scholar
Atalay, E. (2017), “How important are sectoral shocks?,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 9, 254–280.Google Scholar
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., and Reenen, J. V. (2017), “Concentrating on the fall of the labor share,” Working Paper 23108, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtell, R. L. (1999), The Emergence of Firm in a Population of Agents: Local Increasing Returns, Unstable Nash Equilibria, and Power Law Size Distributions, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, Brookings Institution Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Axtell, R. L. (2001), “Zipf distribution of U.S. firm sizes,” Science 293(5536), 1818–1820.Google Scholar
Axtell, R. L., Gallegati, M., and Palestrini, A. (2008), “Common components in firms’ growth and the sectors scaling puzzle,” Economics Bulletin 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
Axtell, R. L. and Guerrero, O. (2019), Dynamics of Firms from the Bottom Up: Data, Theories and Models, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. forthcoming.Google Scholar
Barabasi, A. L. and Albert, R. (1999), “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science 286, 509–512.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1991), “Economic growth in a cross section of countries,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1996), “Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study,” Working Paper 5698, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. and Jin, T. (2011), “On the size distribution of macroeconomic disasters,” Econometrica 79(5), 15767–1589.Google Scholar
Bee, M., Riccaboni, M., and Schiavo, S. (2011), “Pareto versus lognormal: A maximum entropy test,” Physical Review E 84, 026104.Google Scholar
Bee, M., Riccaboni, M., and Schiavo, S. (2013), “The size distribution of US cites: Not Pareto, even in the tail,” Economics Letters 120, 232–237.Google Scholar
Bee, M., Riccaboni, M., and Schiavo, S. (2017), “Where Gibrat meets Zipf: Scale and scope of French firms,” Physica A 481, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., Teugels, J., Waal, D. D., and Ferro, C. (2006), Statistics of Extremes: Theory and Applications, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., and Schott, P. K. (2010), “Multi-product firms and product switching,” The American Economic Review 100, 70–97.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, G., Coad, A., Jacoby, N., and Secchi, A. (2011), “Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: Evidence from French manufacturing,” Applied Economics 43(1), 103–116.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Lippi, M., Pammolli, F., and Riccaboni, M. (2001), “Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 19, 1161–1187.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, G. and Secchi, A. (2006), “Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates,” RAND Journal of Economics 37, 235–256.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C. (1973), Bayesian Inference Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Bremaud, P. (1981), Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics., Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, W. A. (1999), “Scaling in economics: A reader’s guide,” Industrial and Corporate change 8(3), 409–446.Google Scholar
Brock, W. A. and Durlauf, S. N. (1999), “A formal model of theory choice in science,” Economic Theory 14, 113–130.Google Scholar
Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. (2009), Time Series: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.), Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., Amaral, L. A. N., Havlin, S., et al. (1997), “Scaling behavior in economics: II. Modeling of company growth,” Journal de Physique I 7(4), 635–650.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., Dokholyan, N. V., Erramilli, S., et al. (2003), “Hierarchy in social organization,” Physica A Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 330, 653–659.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., Pammolli, F., Riccaboni, M., et al. (2007), “A generalized preferential attachment model for business firms growth rates II. Mathematical treatment,” The European Physical Journal B 57, 131–138.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., Riccaboni, M., Growiec, J., Stanley, H. E., and Pammolli, F. (2007), “The growth of business firms: Facts and theory,” Journal of the European Economic Association 5(2/3), 574–584.Google Scholar
Cabral, L. M. B. and Mata, J. (2003), “On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory,” American Economic Review 93, 1075–1090.Google Scholar
Caldarelli, G. (2007), Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carsten, C. and Neary, J. P. (2010), “Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy,” The Review of Economic Studies 77(1), 188–217.Google Scholar
Carvalho, V. M. and Gabaix, X. (2013), “The great diversification and its undoing,” American Economic Review 103(5), 1697–1727.Google Scholar
Carvalho, V. M. and Grassi, B. (2015), “Large firm dynamics and the business cycle,” Economics Working Papers 1481, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Castaldi, C. and Dosi, G. (2009), “The patterns of output growth of firms and countries: Scale invariances and scale specificities,” Empirical Economics 37, 475–495.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. (1998), “Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms,” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1947–1982.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, I. M., Laha, R. G., and Roy, J. (1967), Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Champernowne, D. G. (1953), “A model of income distribution,” The Economic Journal 63(250), 318–351.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., and Newman, M. E. J. (2009), “Power-law distribution in empirical data,” SIAM Review 51, 661–703.Google Scholar
Coad, A. (2009), The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidencey, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Hinkley, D. V. (1979), Theoretical Statistics, Taylor & Francis, New York.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Miller, H. D. (1968), The Theory of Stochastic Processes, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Darwin, J. H. (1953), “Population differences between species growing according to simple birth and death processes,” Biometrika 40, 370–382.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. (2008), Asymptotic Theory of Statistics and Probability, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1992), “Knowledge, property, and the system dynamics of technological change,” The World Bank Economic Review 6(1), 215–248.Google Scholar
De Fabritiis, G., Pammolli, F., and Riccaboni, M. (2003), “On size and growth of business firms,” Physica A 324, 38–44.Google Scholar
De Vany, A. and Walls, W. (1996), “Boseeinstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry,” Economic Journal 439, 1493–1514.Google Scholar
De Wit, G. (2005), “Firm size distributions: An overview of steady-state distributions resulting from firm dynamics models,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 423–450.Google Scholar
Del Castillo, J. and Puig, P. (1999), “The best test of exponentiality against singly truncated normal alternatives,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 529–532.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, J., Levchenko, A. A., and Rancière, R. (2011), “Power laws in firm size and openness to trade: Measurement and implications,” Journal of International Economics 85, 42–52.Google Scholar
Dokholyan, N. V., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., and Stanley, H. E. (1997), “Distribution of base pair repeats in coding and noncoding dna sequences,” Physical Review Letters 79, 5182–5185.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. (1988), “Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation,” Journal of Economic Literature 26(3), 1120–1171.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Pereira, M. C., and Virgillito, M. E. (2016), “The footprint of evolutionary processes of learning and selection upon the statistical properties of industrial dynamics,” Industrial and Corporate Change 26(2), 187–210.Google Scholar
Douc, R., Moulines, E., and Stoffer, D. (2014), Nonlinear Time Series: Theory, Methods and Applications with R Examples, CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Dunne, T., Roberts, M., and Samuelson, L. (1989), “The growth and failure of us manufacturing plants,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 95, 657–674.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. (1975), “Kolmogorov-smirnov tests when parameters are estimated with applications to tests of exponentiality and tests on spacings,” Biometrika 62, 5–22.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. N. and Quah, D. T. (1999), Chapter 4: The new empirics of economic growth, in Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1, Elsevier, pp. 235–308.Google Scholar
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., and Kramarz, F. (2011), “An anatomy of international trade: Evidence from french firms,” Econometrica 79, 1453–1498.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T. (1997), Modelling Extremal Events: For Insurance and Finance, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. E. and Pakes, A. (1995), “Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work,” Review of Economic Studies 62, 53–82.Google Scholar
Evans, D. S. (1987a), “Tests of alternative theories of firm growth,” Journal of Political Economics 95, 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. S. (1987b), “The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries,” The Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567–581.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1968), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I, 3rd edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Fenton, L. (1960), “The sum of log-normal probability distributions in scatter transmission systems,” IRE Transactions on Communications Systems 8(1), 57–67.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (1982), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, The MIT Press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992), “Do old fallacies ever die?,” Journal of Economic Literature 30, 21–29.Google Scholar
Fu, D. F., Pammolli, F., Buldyrev, S. V., Riccaboni, M., Matia, K., Yamasaki, K., and Stanley, H. E. (2005), “The growth of business firms: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102, 18801–18806.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X. (1999), “Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 739–767.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X. (2009), “Power laws in economics and finance,” Annual Review of Economics 1, 255–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X. (2011), “The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations,” Econometrica 79, 733–772.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X. and Ibragimov, R. (2011), “Rank-1/2: A simple way to improve the ols estimation of tail exponents,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29, 24–39.Google Scholar
Gambardella, A. (1995), Science and Innovation: The US Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, U. and Scalas, E. (2010), Finitary Probabilistic Methods in Econophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garicano, L., LeLarge, L. C., and Van Reenen, J. (2013), “Firm size distortions and the productivity distribution: Evidence from France,” Working Paper 18841, NBER.Google Scholar
Gini, C. (1936), “On the measure of concentration with special reference to income and statistics,” Working Paper 208, Colorado College Publication, General Series.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. (2005), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition, Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 100–200.Google Scholar
Growiec, J., Pammolli, F., and Riccaboni, M. (2018), “Innovation and corporate dynamics: A theoretical framework, Eic working paper series,” IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca.Google Scholar
Growiec, J., Pammolli, F., Riccaboni, M., and Stanley, H. E. (2008), “On the size distribution of business firms,” Economics Letters 98, 207–212.Google Scholar
Gulisashvili, A. and Tankov, P. (2013), “Tail behavior of sums and differences of log-normal random variables,” Working Paper 1309.3057, arXiv.org.Google Scholar
Hall, B. H. (1987), “The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector,” Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4), 583–606.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1982), “On some simple estimates of an exponent of regular variation,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 44, 37–42.Google Scholar
Harris, T. E. (1989), The Theory of Branching Processes, Dover Publication Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Hart, P. E. and Oulton, N. (1996), “The growth and size of firms,” Economic Journal 106(3), 1242–1252.Google Scholar
Hawkes, A. G. (1971), “Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes,” Biometrika 58(1), 83–90.Google Scholar
Hellerstein, R. and Koren, M. (2019), “Are big firms born or grown? preliminary and incomplete.”Google Scholar
Henderson, R., Orsenigo, L., and Pisano, G. P. (1999), “The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Interactions among scientific, institutional, and organizational change,” in Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R., eds, Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–311.Google Scholar
Henly, S. E. and Sanchez, J. M. (2009), “The U.S. establishment-size distribution: Secular changes and sectoral decomposition,” Economic Quarterly 95, 419–454.Google Scholar
Heyde, C. C. (1963), “On a property of the lognormal distribution,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 25, 392–393.Google Scholar
Hill, B. M. (1975), “A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution,” Annals of Statistics 3, 1163–1174.Google Scholar
Hymer, S. and Pashigian, P. (1962), “Firm size and rate of growth,” Journal of Political Economy 70, 556–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H. A. (1964), “Business firm growth and size,” The American Economic Review 54(2), pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H. A. (1975), “Some distributions associated with bose-einstein statistics,” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 72(2), 1654–1657.Google ScholarPubMed
Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H. A. (1977), Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Johansen, A. and Sornette, D. (2010), “Shocks, crashes and bubbles in financial markets,” Brussels Economic Review 53, 201–253.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, B. (1982), “Selection and the evolution of industry,” Econometrica 50, 649–70.Google Scholar
Kac, M., Kiefer, J., and Wolfowitz, J. (1955), “On tests of normality and other tests of goodness of fit based on distance methods,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26, 189–211.Google Scholar
Kadanoff, L. P. (1991), Scaling and Multiscaling: Fractals and Multifractals, nonlinear phenomena in fluids, solids and other complex systems edition, Elsevier Science Publisher: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Keith, H., Mayer, T., and Thoenig, M. (2014), “Welfare and trade without pareto,” The American Economic Review 104, 310–316.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1948), “On some modes of population growth leading to r. a. fisher’s logarithmic series distribution,” Biometrika 35, 6–15.Google Scholar
Kesten, H. (1973), “Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices,” Acta Mathematica 13, 207–248.Google Scholar
Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S. (2003), Statistical Size Distribution in Economics and Actuarial Sciences, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Klepper, S. (1996), “Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle,” The American Economic Review pp. 562–583.Google Scholar
Klepper, S. and Thompson, P. (2006), “Submarkets and the evolution of market structure,” RAND Journal of Economics 37, 861–886.Google Scholar
Klette, J. and Kortum, S. (2004), “Innovating firms and aggregate innovation,” Journal of Political Economy 112, 986–1018.Google Scholar
Koren, M. and Tenreyro, S. (2007), “Volatility and development,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics pp. 243–287.Google Scholar
Koren, M. and Tenreyro, S. (2013), “Technological diversification,” American Economic Review 103(1), 378–414.Google Scholar
Kotz, S., Kozubowski, T., and Podgorski, K. (2001), The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations: A Revisit with Applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering, and Finance, Birkhäuser Boston.Google Scholar
Kotz, S. and Nadarajah, S. (2000), Extreme Value Distributions: Theory and Applications, Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
Lando, D. (1998), “On cox processes and credit risky securities,” Review of Derivatives Research 2(2-3), 99–120.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Amaral, L. A. N., Canning, D., Martin, M., and Stanley, H. E. (1998), “Universal features in the growth dynamics of complex organizations,” Physical Review Letters 81, 3275–3278.Google Scholar
Lemeshko, B. Y., Lemeshko, S. B., and Postovalov, S. N. (2010), “Improvement of statistic distribution models of the nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests in testing composite hypotheses,” Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 39, 460–471.Google Scholar
Lentz, R. and Mortensen, D. T. (2008), “An empirical model of growth through product innovation,” Econometrica 76, 1317–1373.Google Scholar
Leonard, J. (1986), “On the size distribution of employment and establishments,” Working Paper 1951, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. A. W. and Shedler, G. S. (1979), “Simulation of nonhomogeneous poisson processes by thinning,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 26(3), 403–403.Google Scholar
Lilliefors, H. W. (1969), “On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the exponential distribution with mean unknown,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 387–389.Google Scholar
Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., and Vivarelli, M. (2009), “Defending Gibrat’s law as a long-run regularity,” Small Business Economics 32, 508–523.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1978), “On the size distribution of business firms,” Bell Journal of Economics 9, 508–523.Google Scholar
Lunardi, J. T., Miccichè, S., Lillo, F., Mantegna, R. N., and Gallegati, M. (2001), “Do firms share the same functional form of their growth rate distribution? a statistical test,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 299(1), 188–197.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. G. J. (2007), “Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 1103–1144.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. G. J. (2010), “Models of firm heterogeneity and growth,” Annual Review of Economics 3, 547–576.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. G. J. (2011), “On the mechanics of firm growth,” The Review of Economic Studies 78(3), 1042–1068.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. G. J. (2012), “Technology diffusion and growth,” Journal of Economic Theory 147(2), 602–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magazzini, L., Pammolli, F. and Riccaboni, M. (2004), “Dynamic competition in pharma-ceuticals,” The European Journal of Health Economics 5, 175–182.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L., and Winter, S. G. (2018), In Innovation and the Evolution of Industries: History-Friendly Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Malevergne, Y., Pisarenko, V., and Sornette, D. (2009), “Testing the pareto against the lognormal distributions with the uniformly most powerful unbiased test applied to the distribution of cities,” Physical Review E 83, 036111.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. (1962), “Gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms,” The American Economic Review 52(5), 1023–1051.Google Scholar
Mantegna, R. N. and Stanley, H. E. (1995), “Scaling behavior in the dynamics of an economic index,” Nature 376, 46–49.Google Scholar
Matraves, C. (1999), “Market structure, R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics 47, 169–194.Google Scholar
Mc Kelvey, M., Orsenigo, L., and Pammolli, F. (2004), Pharmaceuticals Analyzed thourgh the Lens of a Sectoral Innovation System, Sectoral system of innovation edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mitzenmacher, M. (2003), “A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions,” Internet Mathematics 1, 226–251.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2005), Long-Term Economic Growth and the History of Technology, number SUPPL. PART B in ”Handbook of Economic Growth,” suppl. part b edn, pp. 1113–1180.Google Scholar
Montroll, E. W. and Shlesinger, M. F. (1982), “On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79(10), 3380–3383.Google Scholar
Montroll, E. W. (1987), “On the dynamics and evolution of some sociotechnical systems,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 16, 1–46.Google Scholar
Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Riccaboni, M., and Tortolini, V. (2019), “The firms size-growth relation. an econometric approach,” Eic working paper series, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (1959), “The simple economics of basic scientific research,” Journal of Political Economy 67(3), 297–306.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2002), “Evolutionary theorizing in economics,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2), 23–46.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J. (2005), “Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law,” Contemporary Physics 46, 323–351.Google Scholar
Ogata, Y. and Vere-Jones, D. (1984), “Inference for earthquake models: a self-correcting model,” Stoch. Proc. Appl. 17, 337–347.Google Scholar
Orsenigo, L. (1989), The Emergence of Biotechnology: Institutions and Markets in Industrial Innovation, Pinter, New York.Google Scholar
Pammolli, F. (1996), Innovazione e Concorrenza nel Settore Farmaceutico, Guerini, Milano.Google Scholar
Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L. and Orsenigo, L. (2002), “The intensity of competition after patent expiry in pharmaceuticals. a cross-country analysis,” Revue d’Economie Industrielle 99, 107–131.Google Scholar
Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L., and Riccaboni, M. (2011), “The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10, 428–438.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000), Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O. (1972), “Tables for statisticians,” Biometrika 2, 117–123.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Perline, R. (2005), “Strong, weak and false inverse power laws,” Statistical Science 20, 68–88.Google Scholar
Perline, R., Axtell, R. L., and Teitelbaum, D. (2006), “Volatility and asymmetry of small firm growth rates over increasing time frames,” U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, The Office of Advocacy Small Business Working Papers.Google Scholar
Petroni, A. M. (1992), “Why have a heuristic of scientific discovery?,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6(1), 53–55.Google Scholar
Petroni, A. M. (1993), “Conventionalism, scientific discovery and the sociology of knowledge,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7(3), 225–240.Google Scholar
Prais, S. J. (1976), The Evolution of Giant Firms in Britain, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Quah, D. T. (1996), “Twin peaks: Growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics,” The Economic Journal 106(437), 1045–1055.Google Scholar
Radner, R. (1993), “The organization of decentralized information processing,” Econometrica 61, 1109–1146.Google Scholar
Reed, W. J. (2001), “The pareto, zipf and other power laws,” Economics Letters 74, 15–19.Google Scholar
Reed, W. J. and Hughes, B. D. (2002), “From gene families and genera to incomes and internet file sizes: Why power laws are so common in nature,” Physical Review E 66, 067103.Google Scholar
Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., Buldyrev, S. V., Ponta, L., and Stanley, H. E. (2008), “The size variance relationship of business firm growth rates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105, 19595–19600.Google Scholar
Rossi-Hansberg, E. and Wright, M. L. J. (2007 a), “Establishment size dynamics in the aggregate economy,” The American Economic Review 97, 1639–1666.Google Scholar
Rossi-Hansberg, E. and Wright, M. L. J. (2007 b), “Establishment size dynamics in the aggregate economy,” The American Economic Review 97, 1639–1666.Google Scholar
Saichev, A., Malevergne, Y., and Sornette, D. (2009), Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R. and Willing, R. (1989), Interindustry Differences of Structure and Performance, handbook of industrial organization edition, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 951–1009.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), Theory of Economic Development, Harvard College, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955), “On a class of skew distribution functions,” Biometrika 42, 425–440.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1968), On judging the plausibility of theories, in Rootselaar, B. V. and Staal, J., eds., “Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III,” Vol. 52, Elsevier, pp. 439–459.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1991), “Organizations and markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(2), 25–44.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P. (1958), “The size distribution of business firms,” The American Economic Review 48, 607–617.Google Scholar
Singh, A. and Whittington, G. (1975), “The size and growth of firms,” Review of Economic Studies 42, 15–26.Google Scholar
Slanina, F. (2014), Essential of Econophisycs Modelling, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. and Golo, N. (2014), “Microeconomic structure determines macroeconomic dynamics. aoki defeats the representative agent,” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 10, 5–30.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. and Richmond, P. (2001), “Power laws of wealth, market order volumes and market returns,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 299(1), 188–197.Google Scholar
Sornette, D. and Cont, R. (1997), “Convergent multiplicative processes repelled from zero: Power laws and truncated power laws,” Journal de Physique I 7, 431–444.Google Scholar
Sornette, D. and Conty, R. (1997), “Convergent multiplicative processes repelled from zero: Power laws and truncated power laws,” Journal of Physics I France 7, 431–444.Google Scholar
Stanley, H. E. (1971), Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stanley, M. H. R., Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1996), “Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies,” Nature 379, 804–806.Google Scholar
Stanley, M. H. R., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Mantegna, R. N., Salinger, M. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1995), “Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms,” Economics Letters 49, 453–457.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. (1965), Random Processes and the Growth of Firms: A Study of the Pareto Law, London, Griffin.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. (1987), Pareto Distribution, The new Palgrave: a dictionary for economics edition, The Macmillan Press: London, pp. 810–813.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. A. (1955), “Use of the kolmogorov-smirnov, cramer-von mises and related statistics without extensive tables,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26, 189–211.Google Scholar
Subbotin, M. T. (1923), “On the law of frequency of errors,” Matematicheskii Sbornik 31, 296–301.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2002), “The variance of firm growth rates: The scaling puzzle,” Physica A 312, 577–590.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2007), Market Structure: Theory and Evidence, Vol. 3 of Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, chapter 35, pp. 2301–2368.Google Scholar
Takayasu, M., Watanabe, H., and Takayasu, H. (2014), “Generalised central limit theorems for growth rate distribution of complex systems,” Journal of Statistical Physics 155, 47–71.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1982), “Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3(1), 39–63.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., and Winter, S. G. (1994), “Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1977), Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Vianelli, S. (1963), “La misura della variabilità condizionata in uno schema generale delle curve normali di frequenza,” Statistica 23, 447–474.Google Scholar
West, G. (2017), Scale: the Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies Penguin Press, London.Google Scholar
West, M. (1987), “On scaled mixtures of normal distributions,” Biometrika 74, 646–648.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1984), “Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 5(3), 287–320.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press Cambridge, MA, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyart, M. and Bouchaud, J. P. (2003), “Statistical models for company growth,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 326(1), 241–255.Google Scholar
Yamasaki, K., Matia, K., Buldyrev, S. V., Fu, D. F., Pammolli, F., Riccaboni, M., and Stanley, H. E. (2006), “Preferential attachment and growth dynamics in complex systems,” Physical Review E 47, 35103–35106.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1925), “A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. willis, F.R.S.,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 213, 21–87.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949), Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least-Effort, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA.Google Scholar