Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rethinking Liberty before Liberalism , pp. 267 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
A Declaration and Resolution of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament (1642). London.Google Scholar
A Sermon on the Present Situation of the Affairs of America and Great-Britain. Written by a Black, and Printed at the Request of Several Persons of Distinguished Characters (1782). Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Aptheker, H., ed. (1951). A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States. New York: Citadel.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1996). The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arminius, J. (1960). Verklaring van Jacobus Arminius afgelegd in de vergadering van de Staten van Holland op 30 Oktober 1608. Ed. Hoenderdaal, G. J.. Lochem: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar
Arminius, J. (1986). The Works of James Arminius: The London Edition, vol. ii. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.Google Scholar
Astell, M. (1996). Political Writings. Ed. Springborg, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1992). On Nature and Grace. In Mourant, John A. ed. and trans., St. Augustine: Four Anti-Pelagian Writings, vol. 86 of The Fathers of the Church. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 22–92.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1994). Novum Organum. Ed. and trans. Urbach, P. and Gibson, J.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Blanqui, A. (1834 [1993]). La richesse sociale doit appartenir à ceux qui l’ont créée. In Le Nuz, D. ed., Oeuvres I: Des Origines à la Révolution de 1848. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp. 283–90; (2018). Social Wealth Must Belong to Those Who Created It. In Le Goff, P., Hallward, P., and Abidor, M. eds. and trans., The Blanqui Reader: Political Writings, 1830–1880. London: Verso, pp. 48–55. (References in text are divided by a forward slash).Google Scholar
Brandt, C. (1727). Historie van het leven des heeren Huig de Groot. Completed by van Cattenburgh, A.. Dordrecht/Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brissot, J. P. de W. (1792). Nouveau Voyage dans les Etats Unis de l’Amérique Septentrionale, fait in 1788. Paris.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (2014). Revolutionary Writings. Ed. Hampsher-Monk, I.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calonne, C. de (1790). De l’état de la France: Tel qu’il peut et qu’il doit être. London.Google Scholar
Calonne, C. de (1791). Considerations on the Present and Future State of France. Translated from the French. London.Google Scholar
Calonne, C. de (1795). Tableau de l’Europe en novembre 1795, et pensées sur ce qu’on a fait & qu’on n’auroit pas dû faire (…). London.Google Scholar
Calonne, C. de (1796a). The political state of Europe at the beginning of 1796; or considerations on the most effectual means of procuring a solid and permanent peace. Translated from the French by D. St. Quentin, A.M. London.Google Scholar
Calonne, C. de (1796b). Tableau de l’Europe jusqu’au commencement de 1796; et pensées sur ce qui peut procurer promptement une paix solide. London.Google Scholar
Catéchisme révolutionnaire, ou L’histoire de la Révolution française, par demandes et par réponses: à l’usage de la jeunesse républicaine, et de tous les peuples qui veulent devenir libre (1793). Paris.Google Scholar
Cook, J. (1649). King Charls, his case, or, An appeal to all rational men concerning his tryal at the High Court of Justice. London.Google Scholar
Coornhert, D. V. (1630). Van de Predestinatie, Verkiesinge, ende Verwerpinge Godes. In Wercken, vol. iii. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dagverhaal der handelingen van de Nationaale vergadering (1796–98), 9 vols. The Hague.Google Scholar
De la Court, J. (1662). Consideratieen van Staat ofte Polityke Weeg-schaal, Waar in met veele redenen, omstandigheden, exempelen, en fabulen, werd overwoogen; welke forme der reegeringe, in speculatie geboud op de practyk, onder de menschen de beste zy, 3rd ed. Ysselmonde.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J. (1768). Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution Digital Edition, The (2009). Eds. Kaminski, J. P. et al. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. (1797). An Historical Survey of the French Colony in the Island of St. Domingo […]; A Narrative of the Calamities […] to the End of 1794. London.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England: Nach eigner Anschauung und autentischen Quellen, Marx Engels Werke (henceforth MEW), vol. 2, Berlin: Dietz Verlag. pp. 225–506; The Condition of the Working-Class in England: From Personal Observation and Authentic Sources, Marx Engels Collected Works (henceforth MECW), London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975–2005, vol. 4, pp. 295–583.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1847a [1970]). Entwurf des Kommunistischen Glaubensbekenntnisses. In Der Bund der Kommunisten: Dokumente und Materialien, Band 1: 1836–1849 (Berlin: Dietz Verlag), pp. 470–75; Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith, MECW, vol. 6 pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1847b). Grundsätze des Kommunismus, MEW, vol. 4. 1975–2005, pp. 361–80; Principles of Communism, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 341–56.Google Scholar
Equiano, O. (1789). The interesting narrative of the life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, 8th ed. Norwich.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D., ed. (1536). Origenis Adamantii eximii scripturarum interpretis Opera, quae quidem extant Omnia. Basel.Google Scholar
Feller, F. X. de, ed. (1773–94). Journal Historique et Litteraire. Luxembourg, Maastricht, and Liège.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1995 [1767]). An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. Oz-Salzberger, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ficino, M. (2005). Platonic Theology, Vol. IV, Books XV–XVI. Ed. Hankins, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frossard, B. (1789). La cause des esclaves nègres et des habitants de la Guinée, portée au tribunal de la justice, de la religion, de la politique; ou Histoire de la traite & de l’esclavage des nègres, preuves de leur illégitimité, moyens de les abolir sans nuire ni aux colonies ni aux colons, vol. i. Lyon.Google Scholar
Gomarus, F. (2010). Theological Disputation on Free Choice. In Van Asselt, W. J., Bac, J. M., and Te Velde, R. T. eds., Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 128–33.Google Scholar
Gouges, O. (1790/2014). Les Droits de la Femme. In Reid, M. ed, Femme réveille-toi! Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne et autres écrits. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1625). Of the Government and Rites of the Antient Church/Conciliation of Grace and Free Will. London.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1868). De Iure Praedae Commentarius. Ed. Hamaker, H. G.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1988). Meletius de iis quae inter Christianos conveniunt epistola. Ed. Posthumus Meyjes, H. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1993). De Iure Belli ac Pacis. Ed. de Kanter-Van Hettinga Tromp, J. A.. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1995). Ordinum Hollandiae ac Westfrisiae Pietas. Ed. Rabbie, E.. Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols. Ed. Tuck, R., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (2006a). De Iure Praedae Commentarius. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, vol. I. Eds. Williams, G. L. and Zeyde, W. H.. Oxford/London: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (2006b). Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty. Ed. van Ittersum, M.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. (1992). The Commonwealth of Oceana. In Pocock, J.G.A. ed., The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–266.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. (1997). The Political Works of James Harrington. Ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, L. (1801). The Nature and Importance of True Republicanism: With a few Suggestions Favorable to Independence. A Discourse Delivered at Rutland (Vermont), The Fourth of July – it being the 25th Anniversary of American Independencei. Rutland.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan: Or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Ed. Tuck, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1775). Taxation No Tyranny: An Answer to the Resolutions and Address of the American Congress. London.Google Scholar
Junius, F. (2010). Disputation XXII: Free Choice. In van Asselt, Willem J., Bac, J. M., and te Velde, R. T. eds., Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar
Justinian, (1985). The Digest of Justinian, 4 vols. Eds. Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P.. Ed. and trans. Watson, A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Justinian, (1902a). Institutiones. Ed. Krueger, Paul. In Kreuger, Paul and Mommsen, Theodore eds., Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. i. Berlin: Weidmannos, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Justinian, (1902b). Digesta. Ed. Mommsen, Theodore. In Kreuger, Paul and Mommsen, Theodore eds., Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. i. Berlin: Weidmannos, pp. 1–873 (2nd pagination).Google Scholar
Justinian, (1987). Justinian’s Institutes. Eds. Birks, P. and McLeod, G.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1900). Kants gesammelte Schriften. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Berlin: Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1922). Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft. Ed. Vorländer, K.. Leipzig: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1960). Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. Eds. and trans. Greeve, T. M. and Hudson, H. H., intro. Silber, J. R.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996a). Immanuel Kant: Religion and Rational Theology. Eds. and trans. Wood, A. and Di Giovanni, G.. Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996b). Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konijnenburg, J. (1790). Proeve eener verhandeling over den slaavenhandel en den aankleeve van dien. Bijdragen tot het menschelijk geluk, 4, pp. 86–87.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1864). Theodicy. In Jacques, M. A. ed., Oeuvres de Leibniz, 2ième Série. Paris.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (2009). Theodicy. Ed. Farrer, A. M., trans. Huggard, E. M.. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1954). Essays on the Law of Nature. Ed. and trans. von Leyden, W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1976–89). The Correspondence of John Locke, 8 vols. Ed. De Beer, E. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1983). A Letter Concerning Toleration. Ed. Tully, James, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatise of Government. Ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (2002). The Reasonableness of Christianity. In Nuovo, V. ed., John Locke: Writings on Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–225.Google Scholar
Macaulay, C. (1767). Loose Remarks on certain positions to be found in Mr Hobbes’s ‘Philosophical rudiments of government and society’, with a short sketch of a democratical form of government, In a letter to Signor Paoli. London.Google Scholar
Manetti, G. (2018). De Dignitate et Excellentia Hominis/On Human Worth and Excellence. Ed. and trans. Copenhaver, B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marat, J.-P. (1793). Les chaînes de l’esclavage: ouvrage destiné à développer les noirs attentats des princes contre les peuples, les ressorts secrets, les ruses, les menées, les artifices, les coups d’état qu’ils emploient pour détruire la liberté, et les scènes sanglantes qui accompagnent le despotisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Marat, J.-P. (1993). Œuvres politiques, 1789–1793, vol. vi. Eds. de Cock, J. and Goëtz, C.. Brussels: Pôle Nord.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844a). Zur Judenfrage, MEW, vol. 1, pp. 347–77; On the Jewish Question, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 146–74.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844b). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844, MEW, Ergänzungsband, vol. 1, pp. 465–588; Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 229–346.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844c). Auszüge aus James Mills Buch ‘Élemens d’economie politique’, MEW, Ergänzungsband, vol. 1, pp. 443–63; Comments on James Mill, ‘Élemens d’economie politique’, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 211–28.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1846). Marx an Pawel Wassiljewitsch Annenkow, 28. Dezember 1846, MEW, vol. 27, pp. 451–63; Marx to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenkov, 28 December 1846, MECW, vol. 38, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1847). Arbeitslohn, MEW, vol. 6, pp. 535–56; Wages, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 415–37.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1848). Rede über die Frage des Freihandels, MEW, vol. 4, pp. 444–58; Speech on the Question of Free Trade, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 450–65.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1849). Lohnarbeit und Kapital, MEW, vol. 6, pp. 397–423; Wage-Labour and Capital, MECW, vol. 9, pp. 197–228.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1857–58). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, MEW, vol. 42; Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy, MECW, vol. 28.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1858). Marx an Engels, 2 April 1858, MEW, vol. 29, pp. 311–18; Marx to Engels, 2 April 1858, MECW, vol. 40, pp. 296–304.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859). Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, MEW, vol. 13, pp. 3–160; Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, MECW, vol. 29, pp. 267–417.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1863–64). Sechstes Kapitel. Resultate des unmittelbaren Produktionsprozesses, Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe (henceforth MEGA②), Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1975–98; Akademie Verlag, 1998–, vol. II.4.1, pp. 24–135; Chapter Six. Results of the Direct Production Process, MECW, vol. 34, pp. 355–466.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1864a). Inauguraladresse der Internationalen Arbeiter-Assoziation, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 5–13; Inaugural Address of the Working Men’s International Association, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1864b). Marx an Engels, 4 November 1864, MEW, vol. 31, pp. 9–18; Marx to Engels, 4 November 1864, MECW, vol. 42, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1865). Lohn, Preis und Profit, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 101–52; Value, Price and Profit, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 101–49.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1866). Instruktionen für die Delegierten des Provisorischen Zentralrats zu den einzelnen Fragen, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 190–99; Instructions for the Delegates of the Provisional General Council. The different questions, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 185–94.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, erster Band, Buch 1: Der Produktionsprozeß des Kapitals, MEW, vol. 23; Capital: Critique of Political Economy, vol. i, book 1: The Process of Production of Capital, MECW, vol. 35.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1871a). Der Bürgerkrieg in Frankreich, MEW, vol. 17, pp. 313–65; The Civil War in France, MECW, vol. 22, pp. 307–55.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1871b). Erster Entwurf zum ‘Bürgerkrieg in Frankreich’, MEW, vol. 17, pp. 493–571; First Draft of ‘The Civil War in France’, MECW, vol. 22, pp. 437–514.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1848). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, MEW, vol. 4, pp. 459–93; Manifesto of the Communist Party, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 477–519.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1931–38). The Works of John Milton,18 vols. Ed. Patterson, F. A.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1953–82). Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols., with revised 2nd ed. of vol. 7. Ed. Wolfe, D. M.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1991a). John Milton: A Critical Edition of the Major Works. Eds. Orgel, S. and Goldberg, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1991b). Political Writings. Ed. Dzelzainis, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1999a). Areopagitica. In Alvis, J. ed., Areopagitica and Other Political Writings of John Milton. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 3–51.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1999b). The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates. In Alvis, J. ed., Areopagitica and Other Political Writings of John Milton. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 53–97.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de (1958). The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Trans. Frame, D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de (1991). On Experience. In Screech, M.A. trans., The Complete Essays. London: Penguin, pp. 1207–69.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de (2007). Les Essais. Ed. Balsamo, J., Magnien, M., and Magnien-Simonin, C.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1642). Observations upon some of his Majesties late Answers and Expresses. London.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1644). Jus Populi. Or, a Discourse wherein clear satisfaction is given, as well concerning the Right of Subiects, as the Right of Princes. London.Google Scholar
Philanthropos, [David Rice] (1792). Slavery Inconsistent with Justice and Good Policy proved by a Speech Delivered in the Convention held at Danville, Kentucky. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Plato, (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Eds. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Price, R. (1991). Political Writings. Ed. Thomas, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1993). Political Writings. Ed. Miller, P. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raynal, G. T. (1770). L’Histoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes, 4 vols. Amsterdam: s.n.Google Scholar
Raynal, (1780). Histoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes. Geneva.Google Scholar
Roland, M. J. (1827). Mémoires de Madame Roland, avec une notice sur sa vie, des notes et des éclaircissements historiques. Eds. Berville, J. and Barrière, A.. Paris: Baudoin Frère.Google Scholar
Roland, M. J. (1900). Lettres de Madame Roland (1780–1793). Ed. Perroud, C.. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1763). Projet de constitution pour la Corse. Digitized by Jean-Marie Tremblay for Les classiques des sciences sociales. Quebec: Bibliothèque Paul-Emile-Boulet.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1968). Politics and the Arts: Letter to D’Alembert on the Theatre. Trans. and intro. Allan, Bloom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997a). The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997b). New Heloise. Ed. Vache, J., trans. Steward, P.. Lebanon: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997c). Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997d). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rush, B. (1947). On Slave-Keeping. In The Selected Writings of Benjamin Rush. New York: Philosophical Library, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Sallust, (2013). The War with Catiline: The War with Jugurtha. Ed. Ramsey, J. T., trans. Rolfe, J. C.. Loeb Classical Library 116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1982). De Republica Anglorum. Ed. Dewar, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2002). Complete Works. Ed. Morgan, Michael, trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stanhope Smith, S. (1812). On the Relation between Master and Servant. In Lecture … on Subjects of Moral and Political Philosophy. Trenton, pp. 159–179.Google Scholar
Tucker, St. G. (1796). A Dissertation on Slavery: With a Proposal for the Gradual Abolition of It in the State of Virginia. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Veluanus, A. (1906). Kort bericht in alle principalen punten des christen geloves, mit klair ghetuichnis der hilligher schriffturen un guede kunstschafft der alden doctoren/ mit anwysung wanneer unde durch welcke personen die erroren opgestanden unde vermeert zijnen/ bereit vur den simpelen ongelerden christen, un is des halven genant der leken wechwyser, Strassburch. In Cramer, S. and Pijper, F. eds., Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica, vol. vi. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, pp. 123–376.Google Scholar
Vrymoedige gedachten van een (geweest zynde) Demerariaansch planter (1795). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
West, K. (2018). ‘Kanye West just said 400 years of slavery was a choice’. CNN, 4 May 2018.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/1992). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/2014). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Botting, E. H.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1992). The Wrongs of Woman: Or, Maria. Ed. Todd, J.. London: Penguin Classics, pp. 55–148.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1995a). A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In Tomaselli, S. ed., A Vindication of the Rights of Men with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1995b). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In Tomaselli, S. ed., A Vindication of the Rights of Men with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Achinstein, S. (1994). Milton and the Revolutionary Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, D., and Somanathan, R. (2020). Difference without Domination: Pursuing Justice in Diverse Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2017a). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2017b). Thomas Paine’s ‘Agrarian Justice’ and the Origins of Social Insurance. In Schliesser, E. ed., Ten Neglected Classics of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–83.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2010). ‘A Dwelling beyond Violence’: On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Contemporary Republicans. History of Political Thought, 31, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1961). What Is Freedom? In Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. London: Viking, pp. 143–71.Google Scholar
Armenteros, C., and Lebrun, R. A., eds. (2010). Joseph de Maistre and His European Readers: From Friedrich Gentz to Isaiah Berlin. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. (2004). John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government. Political Theory, 32(5), pp. 602–27.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. (2014). Foreword. In Palmer, R. R. ed., The Age of Democratic Revolution. A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, S. (2017). Capitalism, Class Conflict, and Domination. Socialism and Democracy, 31(1), 106–24.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, B. (1992). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, K. M. (1990). Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, K. M. (2001). Transformations of Classical Republicanism in Eighteenth-Century France. Journal of Modern History, 73, pp. 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2013). The Franchise Debate Revisited: The Levellers and the Army. In Taylor, S. and Tapsell, G. eds., The Nature of the English Revolution Revisited. Woodbridge: Boydell, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Barducci, M. (2017). Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613–1718: Transnational Reception in English Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, H. (1955). The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beik, P. H. (1956/1970). The French Revolution Seen from the Right: Social Theories in Motion, 1789–1799. In Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 46, part i. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Bejan, T. M. (2019). Since All the World Is Mad, Why Should Not I Be So? Mary Astell on Equality, Hierarchy, and Ambition. Political Theory, 47(6), 781–808.Google Scholar
Belissa, M. (2006). Repenser l‘ordre européen (1795–1802). In La société des rois au droits des nations. Paris: éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I., and Weinstein, W. L. (1971). Being Free to Act, and Being a Free Man. Mind, 80(318), pp. 194–211.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2015). Sophie de Grouchy on the Cost of Domination in the Letters on Sympathy and Two Anonymous Articles in Le Républicain. The Monist, 98, pp. 102–12.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2016a). A Republican Housewife: Marie-Jeanne Phlipon Roland on Women’s Political Role. Hypatia, 31, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2016b). Wet-Nursing and Political Participation: The Republican Approaches to Motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–17.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2018a). Lucretia and the Impossibility of Female Republicanism in Margaret Cavendish’s Sociable Letters. Hypatia, 33(4), pp. 663–80.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2018b). Olympe de Gouges vs Rousseau: Happiness, Primitive Societies and the Theatre. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(4), pp. 433–51.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (2002). Introduction [1969] and Two Concepts of Liberty [1958]. In Hardy, Henry ed., Liberty: Incorporating ‘Four Essays on Liberty’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–54 and 166–217.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R., and Mann, A. M. (2005). The Contradictions of Racism: Locke, Slavery, and the Two Treatises. In Valls, Andrew ed., Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
Bienenstock, M. (2002). Die ‘soziale Frage’ im französisch-deutschen Kulturaustausch: Gans, Marx und die deutsche Saint-Simon-Rezeption. In Blänkner, R., Göhler, G., and Waszek, N. eds., Eduard Gans (1797–1839): Politischer Professor zwischen Restauration und Vormärz. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, pp. 153–75.Google Scholar
Blanc, O. (2014). Olympe de Gouges, Des Droits de la Femme à la Guillotine. Paris, Tallandier.Google Scholar
Blockmans, W. (2020). Medezeggenschap: Politieke Participatie in Europa vóór 1800. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Blom, H. (2007). Spinoza on res publica, Republics and Monarchies. In Blom, H., Laursen, J. C., and Simonutti, L. eds., Monarchisms in the Age of Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Public Good. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Bogin, R. (1983). ‘Liberty Further Extended’: A 1776 Antislavery Manuscript by Lemuel Haynes. The William and Mary Quarterly, 40, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar
Botting, E. H. (2007). Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bouie, J. (2018). The Enlightenment’s Dark Side. The Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/taking-the-enlightenment-seriously-requires-talking-about-race.html.Google Scholar
Bourke, R. (2015). Empire & Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Pettit, P. (1990). Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brand, P. (2010). The Date and Authorship of Bracton: A Response. The Journal of Legal History, 31, pp. 217–44.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Lomasky, L. (2006). Against Reviving Republicanism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 5, pp. 221–52.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1932). A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bugg, J. (2006). The Other Interesting Narrative: Olaudah Equiano’s Public Book Tour. PMLA, 121(5), pp. 1424–42Google Scholar
Burrows, S. (2000). French Exile Journalism and European Politics, 1792–1814. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, G., Corns, T. N., Hale, J. K., and Tweedie, F. J. (2007). Milton and the Manuscript of De Doctrina Christiana. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, I. (2003). Liberty. In Bellamy, R. and Mason, A. eds., Political Concepts. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
Carter, I. (2008). How Are Power and Unfreedom Related? In Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 58–82.Google Scholar
Carter, I., Kramer, M., and Steiner, H., eds. (2007). Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castiglione, D. (2005). Republicanism and Its Legacy. European Journal of Political Theory, 4(4), pp. 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernaik, W. (2017). Milton and the Burden of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1979). The Labor Theory of Value and the Concept of Exploitation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(4), pp. 338–60.Google Scholar
Cicerchia, L. (1983). The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(1), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Cicerchia, L. (2019). Structural Domination in the Labor Market. European Journal of Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/1474885119851094.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. T. (2014). Doing Violence to the Roman Idea of Liberty?: Freedom as Bodily Integrity in Roman Political Thought. History of Political Thought, 35, pp. 211–33.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2014). Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life. Hypatia, 29(4), pp. 908–24.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2015). Two Spheres of Domination: Republican Theory, Social Norms and the Insufficiency of Negative Freedom. Contemporary Political Theory, 14, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2017). Catharine Macaulay’s Republican Conception of Social and Political Liberty. Political Studies, 65(4), pp. 844–59.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2018). Independence as Relational Freedom: A Republican Account Derived from Mary Wollstonecraft. In Bergès, S. and Siani, A. eds., Women Philosophers on Autonomy. London: Routledge, pp. 94–111.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (2009). Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes and the Neo-Republican Project. Modern Intellectual History, 6(2), pp. 343–67.Google Scholar
Corbett, R. J. (2006). The Extraconstitutionality of Lockean Prerogative. The Review of Politics, 68(3), pp. 428–48.Google Scholar
Corns, T. N. (1995). Milton and the Characteristics of a Free Commonwealth. In Armitage, D., Himy, A., and Skinner, Q. eds., Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Costa, M. V. (2009a). Neo-republicanism, Freedom as Non-domination, and Citizen Virtue. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 8, pp. 401–19.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2010). Milton, Marriage, and the Politics of Gender. In Hammond, P. and Worden, B. eds., John Milton: Life, Writing, Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, pp. 125–45.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. (2012). A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. (2015). Introduction. In Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, M. (1979). Chattel Slavery and Wage Slavery: The Anglo-American Context, 1830–1860. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Curran, A. S. (2011). The Anatomy of Blackness: Science and Slavery in an Age of Enlightenment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, D. B. (1975). The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolutions, 1770–1823. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, H. (2007). Locke, Language and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, H. (2018a). Fighting for My Mind: Feminist Logic at the Edge of Enlightenment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 118(3), pp. 275–306.Google Scholar
Dawson, H. (2018b). Shame in Early Modern Thought: From Sin to Sociability. History of European Ideas, 45(3), pp. 377–98.Google Scholar
Dawson, H. (2019). The Place of Democracy in Late Stuart England. In Cuttica, C. and Peltonen, M. eds., Democracy and Anti-Democracy in Early Modern England 1603–1689. Leiden: Brill, pp. 88–110.Google Scholar
De Bruin, B. (2009). Liberal and Republican Freedom. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, pp. 418–39.Google Scholar
Dembour, M. B. (2010). What Are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought. Human Rights Quarterly, 32, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Deseure, B. (2014). Onhoudbaar verleden. Geschiedenis als politiek instrument tijdens de Franse periode in België. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Dijn, A. de. (2008). French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dijn, A. de. (2020). Freedom: An Unruly History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Douglass, R. (2015). Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drescher, S. (2009). Abolition. In A History of Slavery and Anti-slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, L. (2004). A Colony of Citizens: Revolution & Slave Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787–1804. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Dun, J. A. (2016). Dangerous Neighbors: Making the Haitian Revolution in Early America. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dzelzainis, M. (1995). Milton’s Classical Republicanism. In Armitage, D., Himy, A., and Skinner, Q. eds., Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Egerton, D.R. (2009). Race and Slavery in the Era of Jefferson. In Shuffleton, F. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Jefferson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
Eijnatten, J. van, and Lok, M. M., eds. (2018). The Global Counter Enlightenment. Themed issue of the Journal for History. Culture and Modernity, 6(1).Google Scholar
Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, S. M. (1991). Milton among the Philosophers: Poetry and Materialism in Seventeenth-Century England. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fatovic, C. (2004). Constitutionalism and Contingency: Locke’s Theory of Prerogative. History of Political Thought, 25(2), pp. 276–97.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. C. (2013). Lockean Prerogative: Productive Tensions. In Fatovic, C. and Kleinerman, B. A. eds., Extra-Legal Power and Legitimacy: Perspectives on Prerogative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
Filling, J. (2015). Liberty. In Gibbons, Michael ed., Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fink, Z. (1945). The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelman, P. (2012). Slavery in the United States: Persons or Property? In Allain, J. ed., The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–34.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2017). Noumenal Alienation: Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the Dialectics of Self-Determination. Kantian Review, 22(4), pp. 523–51.Google Scholar
Foxley, R. (2013). The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Ed. Long, A. A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. (2003). Beyond Slavery and Freedom: Autonomy, Agency, and Resistance in Early American Political Discourse. The Journal of American History, 89(4), pp. 1295–1330.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. (2011). Atlantic Slavery, Atlantic Freedom: George Washington’s Library, Slavery, and Trans-Atlantic Abolitionist Networks. William and Mary Quarterly, 68, pp. 247–86.Google Scholar
Gädeke, D. (2017). Politik der Beherrschung: Eine kritische Theorie externer Demokratieförderung. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Gädeke, D. (2019). Does a Mugger Dominate? Episodic Power and the Structural Dimension of Domination. Journal of Political Philosophy. doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12202.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S. R. (2006). The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625–1660. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Garrigus, J. D. (2006). Before Haiti: Race and Citizenship in French Saint-Domingue. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Garsten, B. (2012). Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 73(1), 83–93.Google Scholar
Geggus, D., ed. (2004), The Impact of the Haitian Revolution in the Atlantic World. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Geggus, D., (2014). The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ghachem, M. W. (2012). The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghosh, E. (2008). From Republican to Liberal Liberty. History of Political Thought, 29, pp. 132–67.Google Scholar
Godechot, J. (1972). The Counter-Revolution: Doctrine and Action 1789–1804. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldie, M. (1993). Introduction. In Two Treatises of Government. London: Tuttle, pp. xv–xliii.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. (2000). Republican Liberty Considered. History of Political Thought, 21, pp. 543–59.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (2003). Folie Républicaine. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., and Jackson, F. (2007). Freedom from Fear. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35, pp. 249–65.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, A. (2011). Labor and Republican Liberty. Constellations, 18(3), pp. 431–54.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, A. (2013). Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work. Political Theory, 41(4), pp. 591–617.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, A. (2015). From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, R. (1987). John Locke’s Liberalism: A Study of Political Thought in Its Intellectual Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, F. (2012). Montaigne and the Life of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, K. (2012). When Is a Contract Theorist Not a Contract Theorist? Mary Astell and Catharine Macaulay as Critics of Thomas Hobbes. In Hirschmann, N. J. and Wright, J. H. eds., Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press, pp. 169–89.Google Scholar
Grijzenhout, F. (1989). Feesten voor het vaderland. Patriotse en Bataafse feesten 1780–1806. Zwolle: Waanders.Google Scholar
Grofman, B., and Feld, S. (1988). Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective. American Political Science Review, 82, pp. 567–76.Google Scholar
Gruppelaar, J., and Verwey, G., eds. (2010). D.V. Coornhert (1522–1590): Polemist and Vredezoeker. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Grześkowiak-Krwawicz, A. (2012). Queen Liberty: The Concept of Freedom in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gutwirth, M. (2004). Suzanne Necker’s Legacy: Breastfeeding as Metonym in Germaine de Stael’s Delphine. Eighteenth-Century Life, 28(2), pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
Guyatt, N. (2016). Bind Us Apart: How Enlightened Americans Invented Racial Segregation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haan, I. de, and Lok, M. M., eds. (2019). The Politics of Moderation in Modern European History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2003). Locke and the Non-Arbitrary. European Journal of Political Theory, 2(3), pp. 261–279.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2007). The Primacy of Right. On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(1), pp. 75–99.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2015). Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2016). Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–82.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2018). Filosofiska teorier om mänskliga rättigheter: en kritisk analys. In Arvidsson, M., Halldenius, L., and Sturfelt, L. eds. Mänskliga rättigheter i samhället. Malmö: Bokbox Förlag, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
Hamel, C. (2013). The Republicanism of John Milton: Natural Rights, Civic Virtue, and the Dignity of Man. History of Political Thought, 34(1), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
Hammersley, R. (2005). Jean-Paul Marat’s The Chains of Slavery in Britain and France, 1774–1833. The Historical Journal, 48, pp. 641–60.Google Scholar
Hammersley, R. (2010). The English Republican Tradition and Eighteenth-Century France: Between the Ancients and the Moderns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hammersley, R. (2019). James Harrington: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. C., and Mason, M., eds. (2011). Contesting Slavery: The Politics of Bondage and Freedom in the New American Nation. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, I. (1998). Review of Liberty before Liberalism. The Historical Journal, 41(4), pp. 1183–87.Google Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, I. (2013). Liberty and Citizenship in Early Modern English Political Discourse. In Skinner, Q. and van Gelderen, M. eds., Freedom and the Construction of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol ii, pp. 105–27Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2010). Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-monarchical Republic. Political Theory, 38(4), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Harris, L. M. (2004). In the Shadow of Slavery: African Americans in New York City, 1626–1863. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, G. (2004). The Gender of Civic Virtue. In Martin, C. G. ed., Milton and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2011). Grace and Free Will according to Clement of Alexandria. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 19(1), pp. 21–48.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, N. (2002). The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, K., and Skinner, Q. (2018). The Liberties of the Ancients. History of European Ideas, 44, pp. 812–25.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoye, J. M., and , J. M. (2014). Surveillance, Freedom and the Republic. European Journal of Political Theory, 17, pp. 343–63.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ivison, D. (2010). Republican Human Rights? European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1), pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Jablonski, S. (1997). Ham’s Vicious Race: Slavery and John Milton. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 37(1), pp. 173–90.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. (2009). Let This Voice Be Heard: Anthony Benezet, Father of Atlantic Abolitionism. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobus, M. (1992). Incorruptible Milk: Breastfeeding and the French Revolution. In Melzer, S. and Rabine, L. eds., Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–75.Google Scholar
Jainchill, A. (2008 ). Reimagining Politics after Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
James, D. (2017). The Compatibility of Freedom and Necessity in Marx’s Idea of Communist Society. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(2), pp. 270–93.Google Scholar
James, S. (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2008). Democracy and the Good Life in Spinoza’s Philosophy. In Huenemann, Charlie ed., Interpreting Spinoza: Critical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–46.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, M. (2010), Revolutionary Exiles. The American Loyalist and the French Émigré Diasporas. In Armitage, D. and Subrahmanyam, S. eds., The Age of Revolution in a Global Context, ca. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
Jordan, W. (1968). White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550–1812. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Judge, J. (2016). ‘Qu’allons-nous devenir?’ Belgian National Identity in the Age of Revolution. In Jensen, L. ed., The Roots of Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600–1815. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 291–307.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, A., and Katznelson, I. (2008). Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kandiyali, J. (2014). Freedom and Necessity in Marx’s Account of Communism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(1), pp. 104–23.Google Scholar
Kandiyali, J. (2020). The Importance of Others: Marx on Unalienated Production. Ethics, 130(4), pp. 555–87.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. (2004). Skinner, Pettit and Livy: The Conflict of the Orders and the Ambiguity of Republican Liberty. History of Political Thought, 25, pp. 377–401.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (2010). The Propriety of Liberty: Persons, Passions, and Judgement in Modern Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppenberg, J. (1987). The Virtues of Liberalism: Christianity, Republicanism, and Ethics in Early American Political Discourse. The Journal of American History, 74, pp. 9–33.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, R. (2010). Eene waare en vrije Republiek. Jan Konijnenburg, De republikein en de uitvinding van de moderne republiek. De achttiende eeuw, 42, pp. 236–60.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, R. (2019a). The Citizenship Experiment: Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, R. (2019b). Envisioning the Dutch Imperial Nation-State in the Age of Revolutions. In Koekkoek, René, Weststeijn, Arthur, and Richard, Anne-Isabelle eds., The Dutch Empire between Ideas and Practice, 1600–2000. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N. (2019). Being under the Power of Others. In Elazar, Y. and Rousselière, G. eds., Republicanism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. H. (2008). Liberty and Domination. In Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Krause, S. R. (2013). Beyond Non-domination: Agency, Inequality and the Meaning of Freedom. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Laborde, C. (2010). Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1), pp. 48–69.Google Scholar
Laborde, C. (2013). Republicanism. In Freeden, M. and Stears, M. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 513–35.Google Scholar
Laborde, C., and Maynor, J. (2008). Republicanism and Political Theory. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laborde, C., and Ronzoni, M. (2016). What Is a Free State? Republican Internationalism and Globalisation. Political Studies, 64, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
LaBreche, B. (2010). Espousing Liberty: The Gender of Liberalism and the Politics of Miltonic Divorce. ELH, 77(4), pp. 969–94.Google Scholar
Lacour-Gayet, R. (1963). Calonne: Financier, Reformateur, Contre-révolutionnaire (1734–1802). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larkin, H. (2014). The Making of Englishmen: Debates on National Identity 1550–1650. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. (2001). A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 11, pp. 229–43.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2011). Popular Liberty, Princely Government, and the Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’s De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 72(3), pp. 371–92.Google Scholar
Leipold, B. (2020). Marx’s Social Republic: Radical Republicanism and the Political Institutions of Socialism. In Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., and White, S. eds., Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 172–93.Google Scholar
Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., and White, S., eds. (2020). Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, D. (2007). The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, D. (2016). On Marxian Utopophobia. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(1), pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
List, C., and Valentini, L. (2016). Freedom as Independence. Ethics, 126(4), pp. 1043–74.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 2018. Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lok, M. M. (2019), ‘The Extremes Set the Tone’: Counter-Revolutionary Moderation in Continental Conservatism (ca. 1795–1835). In Haan, I. de and Lok, M. eds., The Politics of Moderation in Modern European History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
Lok, M. M., Pestel, F., and Reboul, J. (2021 ). Conservative Cosmopolitanism Countering Revolution in Transnational Networks, Ideas and Movements (c. 1700‒1930). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, F. (2018). Non-Domination. In Schmidtz, D. and Pavel, C. E. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 106–23.Google Scholar
Lovett, F., and Pettit, P. (2019). Preserving Republican Freedom: A Reply to Simpson. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 47, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Luis, J. P., and Artola Renedo, A., eds. (2016). Transfert Culturels et politiques entre révolution et contre-révolution en Europe (1789–1840), Siècles, 43.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. (1972). Negative and Positive Freedom. In Laslett, P., Runciman, W. G., and Skinner, Q. eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 174–93.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. (2016). Mary Wollstonecraft: An Early Relational Autonomy Theorist? In Berges, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar
Maddox, G. (2002). The Limits of Neo-Roman Liberty. History of Political Thought, 23, pp. 418–31.Google Scholar
Mali, J., Wokler, R., ed. (2003). Isaiah Berlin’s Counter-Enlightenment. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Martin, J. C. (1998 ). Contrerévolution, Révolution et Nation en France (1789–1799). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Martin, J. C. ed. (2001). La Contre-Révolution en Europe. XVIIIe-XIX siècles. Réalités politiques et sociales, résonances culturelles et idéologiques Rennes: Presses Universitaires Rennes.Google Scholar
Masseau, D. (2000). Les ennemis des Philosophes. L’Antiphilosophie au temps des Lumières. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Masseau, D. (2017). Dictionnaire des anti-lumières et antiphilosophes (France, 1715–1815). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McColley, D. (1994). Beneficent Hierarchies: Reading Milton Greenly. In Durham, C. W. and McColgan, K. P. eds., Spokesperson Milton: Voices in Contemporary Criticism. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (2003). Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge School’s ‘Guicciardinian Moments’. Political Theory, 31(5), pp. 615–43.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (2007). Rousseau’s Rome and the Repudiation of Populist Republicanism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP) 10, pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, D. M. (2001). Enemies of the Enlightenment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, P. (2016). Liberty or Death: The French Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mendle, M. (1995). Henry Parker and the English Civil War: The Political Thought of the Public’s ‘privado’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molhuysen, P. C., ed. (1928). Briefwisseling van Hugo Grotius. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Monnier, R. (2006). Républicanisme, Patriotisme et Révolution française. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. (2010). The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Muldoon, J. (2019). A Socialist Republican Theory of Freedom and Government. European Journal of Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/1474885119847606.Google Scholar
Myers, B. (2006). Milton’s Theology of Freedom. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving Autonomy. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar
Nellen, H. (2014). Hugo Grotius: A Lifelong Struggle for Peace in Church and State, 1583–1645. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2004). The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2007). ‘Talmudical Commonwealthsmen’ and the Rise of Republican Exclusivism. The Historical Journal, 50(4), pp. 809–35.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2019). The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. W. (2008). Rethinking Indivisibility: Towards a Theory of Supporting Relations between Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, pp. 984–1001.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. M (2011). Deliberation as Inquiry: Aristotle’s Alternative to the Presumption of Open Alternatives. The Philosophical Review, 120(3), pp. 383–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nyquist, M. (1987). The Genesis of Gendered Subjectivity in the Divorce Tracts and in Paradise Lost. In Nyquist, M. and Ferguson, M. W. eds., Remembering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions. New York and London: Methuen, pp. 99–127.Google Scholar
Nyquist, M. (2008). Slavery, Resistance, and Nation in Milton and Locke. In Loewenstein, D. and Stevens, P. eds., Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 356–97.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1980). ‘The Disorder of Women’: Women, Love and the Sense of Justice. Ethics, 91(1), pp. 20–34.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1992). Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship. In Block, G. and James, S. eds., Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity. London: Routledge, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Pattanaik, P., and Xu, Y. (2015). Freedom and Its Value. In Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas eds., The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 356–77.Google Scholar
Patten, A. (1996). The Republican Critique of Liberalism. British Journal of Political Science, 26, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Pestel, F. (2015). Kosmopoliten wider Willen: Die Monarchiens als Revolutionsemigranten. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1992). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2002). Keeping Republicanism Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner. Political Theory, 30(3), pp. 339–56.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007). Free Persons and Free Choices. History of Political Thought, 28, pp. 709–18.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008a). The Basic Liberties. In Kramer, Matthew and Grant, Claire eds., The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–24.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008b). Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, pp. 206–20.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008c). Republican Freedom: Three Axioms, Four Theorems. In Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 102–30.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2013). Two Republican Traditions. In Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp eds., Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2014). Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2015a). The Republican Law of Peoples: A Restatement. In Buckinx, B., Trejo-Mathys, J., and Waligore, T. eds., Domination and Global Political Justice. Abindgon: Routledge, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2015b). The Robust Demands of the Good: Ethics with Attachment, Virtue, and Respect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2000). Feminism and Republicanism: Is This a Plausible Alliance? Journal of Political Philosophy, 8, pp. 279–93.Google Scholar
Pickett, K., and Wilkinson, R. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1960). Burke and the Ancient Constitution – a Problem in the History of Ideas. The Historical Journal, 3(2), pp. 125–43.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). The Concept of a Language and the metier d’historien: Some Considerations on Practice. In Pagden, A. ed., The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (2006). Foundations and Moments. In Brett, Annabel and Tully, James eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (2016). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, with a new Foreword by Richard Whatmore. Princeton Classics Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1963). Factory Discipline in the Industrial Revolution. The Economic History Review, 16(2), pp. 254–71.Google Scholar
Popkin, J. (1989). Journals: The New Face of News. In Darnton, R. and Roche, D. eds., Revolution in Print: The Press in France, 1775–1800. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 141–64.Google Scholar
Popkin, J. (2010). You Are All Free: The Haitian Revolution and the Abolition of Slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prak, M. (2018). Citizens without Nations: Urban Citizenship in Europe and the World, c. 1000–1789. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putterman, E. (2010). Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2015). John Locke against Freedom. Jacobin. www.jacobinmag.com/2015/06/locke-treatise-slavery-private-property.Google Scholar
Rahman, K. S. (2017). Democracy against Domination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakove, J. N. (1998 ). Declaring Rights: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2001). John Rawls: Collected Papers. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2009). A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin & Faith. Ed. Nagel, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. (2010). Milton’s Angels: The Early-Modern Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riquet, M. (1989). Augustin de Barruel. Un jésuite face aux Jacobins francs-maçons 1741–1820. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Robbins, C. (1956). The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. C. (2017). Marx’s Inferno: The Political Theory of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. (2020). Race, Domination, and Republicanism. In Allen, D. and Somanathan, R. eds., Difference without Domination: Pursuing Justice in Diverse Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 59–92.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L. (forthcoming). The Darkened Light of Faith: Race, Democracy, and Freedom in African American Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roobol, M. (2005). Landszaken. De godsdienstgesprekken tussen gereformeerde predikanten en D.V. Coornhert onder leiding van de Staten van Holland (1577–1583), PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Rosdolsky, R. (1977). The Making of Marx’s ‘Capital’. Trans. Burgess, P.. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (1988–89). Kant’s Anti-Determinism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 89, pp. 125–41.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its Meaning and History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (forthcoming). The Shadow of God: History and Freedom in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. (1997). Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosendaal, J. (2003). Bataven! Nederlandse vluchtelingen in Frankrijk 1787–1795. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2008). Voting the General Will: Rousseau on Decision Rules. Political Theory, 36, pp. 403–23.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2005). Commonwealth Principles: Republican Writing of the English Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, M. M. (2012). Journey Back to God: Origin on the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sechler, M. J., and Greenberg, J. (2012). ‘There is Scarce a Pamphlet That Does Not Triumph in Bracton’: The Role of the De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae in Stuart Political Thought. History of Political Thought, 33, pp. 25–54.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), pp. 315–56.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1996). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), pp. 3–53.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1984a). The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. In Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q. eds., Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–221.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1984b). The Paradoxes of Political Liberty, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University, 24 and 25 October, pp. 227–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1986). The Paradoxes of Political Liberty. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. vii. Ed. McMurrin, S. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1990). The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty. In Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. eds., Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–41.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1992a). On Justice, the Common Good and the Priority of Liberty. In Mouffe, C. ed., Dimensions of Radical Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 211–24.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1992b). Les idées républicains de liberté et de citoyenneté. Rue Descartes, 3, pp. 125–44.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2000). John Milton and the Politics of Slavery. Prose Studies, 23(1), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002a). Classical Liberty, Renaissance Translation, and the English Civil War. In Renaissance Virtues, vol. ii of Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–43.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002b). The Idea of Negative Liberty: Machiavellian and Modern Perspectives. In Renaissance Virtues, vol. ii of Visions of Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–212.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002c). Interpretation and the Understanding of Speech Acts. In Regarding Method, vol. i of Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–27.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002d). A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 117, pp. 237–69.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2003). States and the Freedom of Citizens. In Skinner, Q. and Sträth, B. eds., States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2006a). Rethinking Political Liberty in the English Revolution. History Workshop Journal, 61, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2006b). Surveying the Foundations: A Retrospect and a Reassessment. In Brett, A. and Tully, J. with Hamilton-Bleakley, H. eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–61.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2008a). Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power. In Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2008b). Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2009a). Repenser la liberté politique. Raisons politiques, 36, pp. 109–30.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2009b). On Trusting the Judgement of Our Rulers. In Bourke, R. and Geuss, R. eds., Political Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2010). On the Slogans of Republican Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2012). On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My Critics. In Symposium: On Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 73, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2013). Liberty before Liberalism and All That. 3:AM Magazine, 18 February 2013. www.3ammagazine.com/3am/liberty-before-liberalism-all-that/.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2018). From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., and Gelderen, M. van (2002). Introduction. In Skinner, Q. and van Gelderen, M. eds. Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., and Gelderen, M. van eds. (2013). Freedom and the Construction of Europe, vol. II. Free Persons and Free States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerville, M. R. (1995). Sex and Subjection: Attitudes to Women in Early-Modern Society. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. (2009). Before the Deluge Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2017). Freedom and Will: Graeco-Roman Origins. In Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. eds., Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
Spector, H. (2010). Four Conceptions of Freedom. Political Theory, 38(6), pp. 780–808.Google Scholar
Sperber, J. (2013). Karl Marx: A Nineteenth-Century Life. New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Sprunck, A. (1947). François-Xavier de Feller, 1735–1802. In Mersch, J. ed., Biographie nationale du Pays de Luxembourg depuis ses origines jusqu’à nos jours. Luxembourg: Victor Buck, pp. 123–254.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. (2018). John Locke and the Fable of Liberalism. Historical Journal, 61(3), pp. 597–622.Google Scholar
Staumann, B. (2015). Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternhell, Z. (2009). The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, V. B. (2004). Machiavelli, Hobbes, and the Creation of a Liberal Republicanism in England. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. (2014). Impunity and Domination: A Puzzle for Republicanism. European Journal of Political Theory, 13, pp. 121–31.Google Scholar
Tarcov, N. (1984). Locke’s Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. (2012). Towards a Philosophy of Human Rights. Current Legal Problems, 65, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty? In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
Tempe, K., Griffith, M., and Levy, N., eds. (2017). The Routledge Companion to Free Will. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. J. (2013). Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 39(3), pp. 277–98.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. J. (2018). The Two Faces of Domination in Republican Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 17(1), pp. 44–64.Google Scholar
Thorburn Stern, R. (2017). Implementing Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Participation, Power and Attitudes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, C. (1995). In Our Image and Likeness: Humanitiy and Divinity in Italian Humanist Thought. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Trouille, M. S. (1997). Sexual Politics in the Enlightenment: Women Writers Read Rousseau. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tully, J. (1988). Governing Conduct. In Leites, Edmund ed., Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–71.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turnaoğlu, B. (2017). The Formation of Turkish Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted 10 December 1948). UNGA Res 217 A(III).Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2012). Competing for Liberty: The Republican Critique of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 106(3), pp. 607–21.Google Scholar
Uzgalis, W. (2017). John Locke, Racism, Slavery, and Indian Lands. In Zack, Naomi ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Valentini, L (2012). Human Rights, Freedom and Political Authority. Political Theory, 40(5), pp. 573–601.Google Scholar
van Deursen, A. Th. (2000). Maurits van Nassau (1567–1625). De winnaar die faalde. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. (1992). The Political Thought of The Dutch Revolt, 1555–1590. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. ed. (1993). The Dutch Revolt. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. (1996). De vrijheid van consciëntie: Het vrijheidsideaal van de Nederlandse Opstand, 1555–1610. Gouda: Stichting Fonds Goudse Glazen.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. (2006). Slot Loevestein. Hugo de Groot ontsnapt in een boekenkist. In Prak, M. ed., Plaatsen van herinnering. Nederland in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. (2011). Freedom Fighters: The Act of Abjuration, Hugo Grotius and Dutch Debates on Liberty. In Brood, P. and Kubben, R. eds., The Act of Abjuration: Inspired and Inspirational. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M. (2014). Hot Protestants: Predestination, the Freedom of Will and the Making of The Modern European Mind. In van den Brink, G. and Höpfl, H. eds., Calvinism and the European Mind. Leiden: Brill, pp. 131–54.Google Scholar
Van Veen, M. (2001). Verschooninghe van de roomsche afgoderye. De polemiek van Calvijn met Nicodemieten, in het bijzonder met Coornhert. ’t Goy–Houten: HES & De Graaf.Google Scholar
Vartija, D. (2018). The Colour of Equality: Racial Classification and Natural Equality in Enlightenment Encyclopaedias, PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Velema, W. (2007). Republicans: Essays on Eighteenth-Century Dutch Political Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vickery, A. (1993). Golden Age to Separate Spheres? A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women’s History. The Historical Journal, 36(2), pp. 383–414.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. Trans. Shugaar, A.. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. (2013). Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(2), pp. 131–57.Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. (2021). The Capitalist Cage: Structural Domination and Collective Agency in the Market. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38 (1), pp. 40–54.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1993). A Right to Do Wrong. In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–87.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2002). God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations of Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, L. H. (2002). When Girls Read Rousseau: The Case of Madame Roland. The Eighteenth Century, 43(2), pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
Walker, W. (2014). Antiformalist, Unrevolutionary, Illiberal Milton. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wall, S. (2001). Freedom, Interference and Domination. Political Studies, 49, pp. 216–30.Google Scholar
Welchman, J. (1995). Locke on Slavery and Inalienable Rights. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25(1), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Weststeijn, A. (2012). Commercial Republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age: The Political Thought of Johan & Pieter de la Court. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Whatmore, R. (2000). Republicanism and the French Revolution: An Intellectual History of Jean-Baptiste Say’s Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, A. (2010). Encountering Revolution: Haiti and the Making of the Early Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, A. N. (2012). The Divine Sense: The Intellect in Patristic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D. A. (2017 ). Milton’s Leveller God: Montreal & Kingston. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, R. (1983). Hercules at the Crossroads: Life, Work and Thought of Coluccio Salutati. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. (2020). Ethics and Public Policy: A Philosophical Inquiry. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, B. (2007). Slavery in Colonial Georgia, 1730–1775. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. (2018). Subjection without Servitude: The Imperial Protectorate in Renaissance Political Thought. Journal of the History of Ideas, 79, pp. 547–69.Google Scholar
Wootton, D. (2010). The Tamer Tamed, or None Shall Have Prizes: ‘Equality’ in Shakespeare’s England. In Wootton, D. and Holderness, G. eds., Gender and Power in Shrew-Taming Narratives, 1500–1700. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 206–25.Google Scholar
Worden, B. (1994). Marchamont Nedham and the Beginnings of English Republicanism, 1649–1656. In Wootton, D. ed., Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 1649–1776. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 45–81.Google Scholar
Worden, B. (1995). Milton and Marchamont Nedham. In Armitage, D., Himy, A., and Skinner, Q. eds., Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–80.Google Scholar
Worden, B. (1998). Factory of the Revolution. London Review of Books, 20(3), pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
Worden, B. (2007). Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yaffe, G. (2000). Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1995). Mothers, Citizens, and Independence: A Critique of Pure Family Values. Ethics 105(3), pp. 535–56.Google Scholar
Zielonka, J. (2018). Counter-Revolution: Liberal Europe in retreat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, M. (1994). Natural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, M. (2002). Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar